Recommended Posts

thank you windowsX, you did not RIP anything. the version like that isn't even out yet so yeah... anyways, heres my verdict.

andy, ur a homo. u ripped his work, plain to the eye. try to make ur OWN theme newb, copying ppls exact things isn't very sportsman like, although this isn't a COMPETITION for christ sake ppl!!!

windowsX has all the right in the world to make the theme, andy can copy his theme to make his OWN mockup as long as he doesn't release it to the public saying that he is to credit.

windowsX, the credit goes to you. END OF STORY!

Shud i call this my own theme ?

Shud i release it ?

It is more different than WindowsX's Theme as compared to AndyLogo's

:blink:

Come On guyz...God gave u a brain..Use it

You hit the head till nails :D

Didn't I tell you guys I'll leave this stupid thing? Go for it you the brainless ppl who never read my reply.

This is the theme i based this Aero theme off of( i made this over six months ago)

http://screenshots.haque.net/screenshots/v...enshot-3465.jpg

Let me tell you how he work.

1) Extract my resources with StyleBuilder

2) Open my themes

3) Copy some of my resources to his theme

4) check theme property to suite it with his theme (like turn off word in keynote and and start button contentmargins in slate for example)

5) Modify his own theme after he has ripped some of my work like his rendition toolbar based on my idea and start button

6) Test it with my shellstyle

7) Make a screenshot and post it here

Correct? :shifty:

I'm really leaving now.

decided by whom? nobody cept himself can actually proves it's a rip.

personally i think arguing over this---without any proof---is very sad. remember windows x used to compite with alan whatever. that's just sad. i am not against to windows x but really, it's just sad. i feel sorry for him

Let me tell you how he work.

1) Extract my resources with StyleBuilder

2) Open my themes

3) Copy some of my resources to his theme

4) check theme property to suite it with his theme (like turn off word in keynote and and start button contentmargins in slate for example)

5) Modify his own theme after he has ripped some of my work like his rendition toolbar based on my idea and start button

6) Test it with my shellstyle

7) Make a screenshot and post it here

Correct? :shifty:

I'm really leaving now.

buddy, you need to stop. it's ridiculous. you can't even prove it. :no:

i'd stop using your theme just because of this post

Didn't I tell you I'll stop this? I know that this can't prove anything even he really ripped or not but I feel so bad with this so I want to say something for this. And I believe that every themer wouldn't feel OK for his work was ripped or something like that without permission. So I want to clear my mind up from this situation. I'm sorry for my post as I told you before that there's no one who wanna see this kind of reply. I won't care of this anymore. Really!

For Alan, it's his misunderstanding that he think I stole his idea. Now it was cleared with my witness thread to prove him that I planned it since March.

What a sad thread. There's valid arguments to support both sides of the argument (basically, rip or no rip) - but certaintly no proof that Andy's ripped Windows X's work, so why are some assuming the worst in him? Guilty until proven innocent?

And I believe that every themer wouldn't feel OK for his work was ripped or something like that without permission.

I hear ya, I really do (I've had my work ripped before). But there's no proof, and it's a strong possibility that he HASN'T ripped your work. So until there's evidence or a solid argument to the contrary, your posts are nothing more than unfounded attacks.

That's my opinion, anyway. I'm not trying to take sides, btw.

Whats happened to you guys,really??

I do not like intervening in people affairs, however I will in the odd chance that this might change your attitudes.

Myself, y_notm, and another member of this board, all made .net/longhorn/blackcomb themes for WindowsXP around 2 years ago

1. When themes first because possible

2. When the first mock up shots of Longhorn were posted over the net.

Now there were 3 of us, making themes off the same mock up pics, and the exact same resources.

We didnt run around spamming the boards about whos copying who, hell we near released them at the same times, we made out own additions to it, and we kept updating and improving our theme to outdo the others. It was friendly fun, competition that resulted in a golden age of themeing. Back then those were the 3 most downloaded themes for quite some months.

Even uptil the first proper alpha shots of Longhorn, there were dozens upon dozens of themes based off Longhorn, and the EXACT resources we used to create our themes, and still did you see us running around detracting from threads about it. No.

The fact is with this whole Longhorn theme, some authors seem hell bent on having the definitive Aero or PDC or Keynote theme, that will be like the definitve Watercolour theme by Binary. We that will never happen again. Binaries theme is the definitive watercolour theme because at the time, there were not enough authors around to have several authors working on the one same theme.

I mean WindowsX you were almost on the right path, go! go and update your themes, out do the other guy, without being nasty about it, theres always more thaty can be done to improve a theme or TFP, Binaries watercolour wasnt complete and a close as possible replication on the first or second releases. It took him well over a year to refine it to the level he did.

My point is, this happens, hell I created a HTML version of MCE, and the Whistler 2250 Active desktop. Then Xero came along and with the help of some russian guy, made it in Flash etc, but at the end of the day I created the first HTML, and I wasnt happy that he stole my thunder, but the fact is both versions had their good and bad points, and quite frankly his release pushed me on to update my HTML releases time and time again.

Again, as people have pointed out, no one owns this theme, its out in the wind, so just do your different versions, and push yourselves on to better them.

Because quite frankly both WindowsX and ANDYs again have good and bad points, and they each have their own followings. So lets keep these threads what they are about.

@ WindowsX

I don't know what the big deal is, they don't look even similar. Maybe its just me but the colour is completely different, caption buttons are different, startbutton is different, my caption bars have a slate/plex gradient effect not flat like yours, my startpanel has a screwy black line around the user pic(yours doesn't), taskband program highlights are completely different, and my captions and taskbar are way thinner.

@ GOJI_GKing2000

Thanks for the suggestions

Cheers

yes its different, but thats a moded rip

same think as i would rip neowin site then add some gradient effects, change color and everyone will think ive chaged the world !!

dude if i was you i would admit that i used some ideas then ask windows x for permission and im sure he would be happy to give it to you, he is a great guy. :rolleyes:

I like how it looks.

Windows X : I really like you transformation pack and I am using it currently. I love your work.

ANDYLOGO : I really like what you have done. The black line you have around the display picture I find actually looks better. It gives it sort of a 'shadowed' look which what I like.

Back At Windows X : I feel bad if he stole your work cause I really enjoy your stuff.

I'm not going to take sides on this whole 'stolen, not stolen' cause really I like them both.

I hate to weigh in on this argument but im afraid im going to have to agree with the whole ask for permission thing.

I still ask for permission even when the images are barely recognizable anymore just as a matter of courtesy.

I happen to know first hand that WindowsX and myself put a lot of creative thought and effort into our keynote style startmenus.

I am also more than happy to give permission to people who want to mod or use my work and I am quite sure WindowsX would be too,

The important thing is that you actually ask before you make a public spectacle of it ..

ANDYLOGO you have great skills but in the future get your permissions taken care of before you post these [WIP] topics and we will all have an easier time getting along :)

thats my long winded two cents :

:p

ANDYLOGO: im friends with windows=x but i tried to not take sides because i liked your version of it, hell i would like to help you beta it but oh well

my only advice to you is maybe talk to windowx aobut this and maybe you two could end up making a(n) Uber-Theme by both of you...i would LOVE to see that

anyway just try to settle the difference and understand the main reason he gets mad....hes still in school and this is probably his favorite thing to do, meaning he loves it....i dunno that really didnt make sense..... anyway post some more screen shots damnit and lets see how ur theme is doing now

AND CAN YOU ANSWER MY QUESTION???: are you using Glass2k? :)

Windows X ... you said you were leaving, GO!

This is a good theme, it's not a rip. Of course they will look similar, they are trying to copy the same thing!

The Shell is the same, but ANDYLOGO already said it wasn't going to be included.

This is a bunch of crap, a perfectly good thread ruined.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A coalition of publishers sued OpenAI and Microsoft over scraping content without consent by Hamid Ganji Image via Depositphotos.com AI companies often rely on readily available internet content to train their chatbots and provide users with instant answers. This method of AI training is fast and relatively inexpensive, but using a website’s content without permission or compensation is not something publishers like to see, and this is exactly why Microsoft and OpenAI are now being sued. As reported by Bloomberg, a group of publishers that collectively own nearly 400 newspapers has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft. The coalition argues that the two companies scraped their content to build AI chatbots like ChatGPT and Copilot without paying any compensation. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, argues that while AI products have generated billions of dollars in market value using publishers’ work, none of that value has been shared with the publishers. The plaintiffs are seeking statutory damages and injunctive relief for alleged copyright infringement and violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. “Defendants systematically and secretly crawled the Publishers’ websites—including content behind paywalls and other access restrictions—and copied the Publishers’ articles, stories, and other original works onto their own servers without authorization,” the complaint states. The publishers also described the AI boom as a “death knell for local journalism” if AI companies that scrape content for free are not held accountable. Former New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin and his law firm, Platkin LLP, are representing the publishers. “Our models empower innovation, are trained on publicly available data, and are grounded in fair use,” OpenAI spokesperson Drew Pusateri told Bloomberg. This is not the first lawsuit involving the unauthorized use of publishers’ content by AI firms, but it is one of the largest coalitions ever formed against the free use of content by AI chatbots. In 2024, OpenAI and Microsoft also faced a similar lawsuit from eight newspapers that claimed AI products were benefiting from their content without permission.
    • Rufus alternative Ventoy now supports Windows 11's mandatory update, fixes major boot bug by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has its own official Media Creation Tool used for making bootable USB media, there are some popular third-party utilities as well which offer additional options like bypassing system requirements, Microsoft Account creation, and more. One of these is Ventoy, and the software has received its latest update today. In fact, the app actually got a slew of updates over the last couple of days, three version releases in total, to be specific. The first release, version 1.1.13, was pulled as there was some unspecified error in the update, and as such, the corrected version 1.1.14 was pushed out. Following that on very short notice, 1.1.15 was published as well. For those unfamiliar, Ventoy is an open-source utility that lets users create a bootable USB drive once and then simply copy ISO, WIM, IMG, VHD, or EFI files onto it without repeatedly formatting the drive. It supports both legacy BIOS and UEFI boot modes, Secure Boot, and a wide range of operating systems, making it one of the most versatile tools in the category. The biggest change in version 1.1.14 is an updated Secure Boot shim file aimed at resolving the UEFI CA 2023 issue, which is basically a compatibility problem that has affected Secure Boot environments on some systems. If you recall, we reported about severe boot issues on HP devices following the release of updated Secure Boot 2023 keys. For anyone who may not be aware, back in early 2024, Microsoft announced that it was updating Secure Boot keys as they were going to become 15 years old in 2026, which is also when they are set to expire. As such, the new 2023 certificates have been rolling out with the newest Windows 11 updates. Updated boot manager and Secure Boot certificates are crucial for protection against malware like bootkits. These are mandatory updates. Alongside that, the VentoyPlugson graphical plugin configurator was updated in sync with the release. The update also introduces a new VTOY_SECURE_BOOT_POLICY option within the Global Control plugin, giving users more flexibility in managing Secure Boot behavior. Ventoy has also received a fix for a startup issue when Secure Boot was disabled. Microsoft does officially allow users to boot systems without Secure Boot as long as the PC is Secure Boot capable. The full changelog is given below: Update secure boot shim file to solve the UEFI CA 2023 issue. The new release use a new CA, so you need to enroll the new key for the first boot time. VentoyPlugson update synchronously. Global control plugin add a VTOY_SECURE_BOOT_POLICY option. Fix the boot issue when Secure Boot is disabled in the UEFI firmware. You can download the latest version of the app here on Ventoy's official GitHub repo or from Neowin software stories.
    • Windows 11 is fine, no issues on any of the machines I've run it on since release. The stricter security requirements are a good thing, sometimes the baseline needs to change and people will winge, but it is what it is. Happened with the move from 9x to NT - broke compatability Happened with XP SP2 when security started to become a serious consideration Certainly happend with Vista that brought in UAC, the concept of not running as admin (something that has been the norm in Linux/Unix from pretty much the start) and a completely new driver stack. Windows 11 will probably get looked back at as the point where even consumer and SMB IT was dragged kicking and screaming into a somewhat secure by default configuration.
    • Bluestacks has been emulating Android on Windows for fifteen years. It's janky and riddled with ads though, so WSA looked like it was going to be a huge improvement over the emulator experience. Too bad Microsoft dropped the ball on that.
    • Classic. China would be nothing without Western, Japanese, and South Korean technology.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      441
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!