HDD fixed itself?

By riahc3
in Hardware Hangout

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

riahc3

Posted
Posted

I dont trust this drive much but just wanted to ask Neowin members....

A couple of days ago, my RAID5 controller said a drive had failed.

Here is the log:

B 0 E 04/13/14 16:06:45 An error occured on the disk at 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1.

B 0 E 04/13/14 16:06:51 An error occured on the disk at 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1.

B 0 E 04/13/14 16:06:59 An error occured on the disk at 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1.

B 0 I 04/13/14 16:07:07 Successfully repaired bad sector on disk 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1: LBA 0x4789a200 sectors 0x48 .

B 0 I 04/13/14 16:07:07 Successfully repaired bad sector on disk 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1: LBA 0x4789a248 sectors 0x38 .

B 0 I 04/13/14 16:07:07 Successfully repaired bad sector on disk 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1: LBA 0x4789a280 sectors 0x48 .

B 0 E 04/13/14 16:07:27 An error occured on the disk at 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1.

B 0 E 04/13/14 16:07:34 An error occured on the disk at 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1.

B 0 E 04/13/14 16:07:42 An error occured on the disk at 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1.

B 0 E 04/13/14 16:07:49 An error occured on the disk at 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1.

B 0 E 04/13/14 16:07:57 An error occured on the disk at 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1.

B 0 E 04/13/14 16:08:03 An error occured on the disk at 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1.

B 1 E 04/13/14 16:08:03 Disk 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1 failed.

B 1 I 04/16/14 18:50:55 Array 'RAID_5_0' rebuilding started.

B 1 I 04/16/14 20:25:10 Array 'RAID_5_0' rebuilding started.

B 0 E 04/16/14 22:15:13 An error occured on the disk at 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1.

B 0 I 04/16/14 22:15:13 Successfully repaired bad sector on disk 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1: LBA 0x187d80 sectors 0x80 .

B 0 E 04/16/14 22:15:13 An error occured on the disk at 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1.

B 0 I 04/16/14 22:15:13 Successfully repaired bad sector on disk 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1: LBA 0x188300 sectors 0x80 .

B 0 E 04/16/14 22:15:13 An error occured on the disk at 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1.

B 0 I 04/16/14 22:15:13 Successfully repaired bad sector on disk 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1: LBA 0x188848 sectors 0x38 .

B 0 E 04/16/14 22:15:13 An error occured on the disk at 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1.

B 0 I 04/16/14 22:15:13 Successfully repaired bad sector on disk 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1: LBA 0x188d80 sectors 0x80 .

B 0 E 04/16/14 22:15:13 An error occured on the disk at 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1.

B 0 I 04/16/14 22:15:13 Successfully repaired bad sector on disk 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1: LBA 0x189298 sectors 0x68 .

B 0 E 04/16/14 22:15:13 An error occured on the disk at 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1.

B 0 I 04/16/14 22:15:13 Successfully repaired bad sector on disk 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1: LBA 0x189800 sectors 0x80 .

B 0 E 04/16/14 22:15:13 An error occured on the disk at 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1.

B 0 I 04/16/14 22:15:13 Successfully repaired bad sector on disk 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1: LBA 0x189d00 sectors 0x80 .

B 1 E 04/16/14 22:15:13 An error occured on the disk at 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1.

B 0 I 04/17/14 11:12:04 Array 'RAID_5_0' rebuilding started.

B 0 I 04/17/14 22:46:40 Array 'RAID_5_0' rebuilding completed.

As you can see, it even says one of the disks straight up failed. I checked that my backup of nonreplaceable stuff was up to date then I did a backup of the entire array.

Im busy with a couple of other things but today I look up and I see those two last entries: The RAID5 rebuilt itself without any errors :huh:

I dont really trust that drive anymore but what could have happened here?

Thank you

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1209947-hdd-fixed-itself/
Share on other sites
Mentor

Starbuck84

Posted
Posted

From what I know, most hard drives have a build in mechanism to "report" / "block" bad sectors. It doesn't repair itself, it just "marks" those bad sectors and tries to move data from those bad sectors to good sectors. With your RAID5 set-up it's possible the RAID array "repaired" itself just fine. But I don't trust any disk which has bad sectors. I'd say: just replace the disk, as the ST3000DM001 isn't an expensive disk to replace anyway.

Grand Master

riahc3

Posted
  • Author
Posted

From what I know, most hard drives have a build in mechanism to "report" / "block" bad sectors. It doesn't repair itself, it just "marks" those bad sectors and tries to move data from those bad sectors to good sectors. With your RAID5 set-up it's possible the RAID array "repaired" itself just fine. But I don't trust any disk which has bad sectors. I'd say: just replace the disk, as the ST3000DM001 isn't an expensive disk to replace anyway.

Its already been replaced; Just surprised that it was able to "mark" a drive as a bad sector and then repair the array. And this RAID5 card sucks...
Grand Master

T3X4S

Posted
Posted

I wonder if it simply moved the data to the spare sector reserved on the drive... and your RAID controller just says "repaired sector" - hell I dunno really.  I'd like to know as well.

LOL I didnt know Starbuck just said the same thing.... so this post is kinda unnecessary.

Mentor

Starbuck84

Posted
Posted

From what I can gather, the ST3000DM001 is a simple desktop disk. It will move the data from the bad sector to another (spare) sector on the disk. Using RAID5 it was able to rebuild itself as the disk reports itself as healthy again.

Mentor

Starbuck84

Posted
Posted

Nice find, although the OP was getting "bad sector" messages. The article you link to states: "The array keeps failing drives. The controller error log shows continuous "aborted command" and/or "link failure" messages when using Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 drives (models: ST3000DM001, ST2500DM001, ST2000DM001, or ST1000DM003)."

 

His RAID array was working fine, but the disk itself reported bad sectors. Just a case of replacing the disk and "nothing to see here people" :)

Mentor

snaphat (Myles Landwehr) Member

Posted
  • Member
Posted

riahc3, the complete failure you seeing in the logs was probably just a intermittent fault. Those can and do happen with hardware. The other possibility is that the error log is incorrect and giving you inaccurate information (i.e. it wasn't actually a complete failure).

Grand Master

riahc3

Posted
  • Author
Posted

riahc3, the complete failure you seeing in the logs was probably just a intermittent [/size]fault. Those can and do happen with hardware. The other possibility is that the error log is incorrect and giving you inaccurate information (i.e. it wasn't actually a complete failure).

Problem is that Ive had these models before and Ive failed so.....yeah it could be inaccurate (still working as of this writing) but...

Anyways I bought already another (better) drive to replace it.

Grand Master

Praetor

Posted
Posted

Problem is that Ive had these models before and Ive failed so.....yeah it could be inaccurate (still working as of this writing) but...

Anyways I bought already another (better) drive to replace it.

 

that error could be a soft error, not a hard error; since the array rebuild itself (i assume your aren't using spare disks right?) then it still is OK to use that disk, since those faults do happen, although buying a new HDD in the upcoming weeks would be a good idea (since you already done that then it's OK).

 

In my clients i see like every month an HDD error, either a soft one that the arrays just fixes itself or a hard one that requires a new HDD.

 

HUM: you can RAID everything!

- USB RAID: http://analogbit.com/node/4

- SSD RAID:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Google Chrome is killing all uBlock Origin bypasses, Microsoft Edge, Opera to follow

      By Steven P. · Posted

      🥹
    • Universal USB Installer 2.0.3.6

      By Copernic · Posted

      Universal USB Installer 2.0.3.6 by Razvan Serea The Universal USB Installer (UUI) is a powerful bootable USB software tool for creating USB boot drives from ISO files, perfect for installing Linux or Windows, running live systems, or building diagnostic toolkits. This versatile ISO-to-USB software makes it easy to boot from USB and create Live USBs for Linux distributions, Windows setup installers, antivirus tools, and system diagnostic utilities. Whether you need a multisystem Windows Media Creation Tool, a Live USB Linux installer, or an all-in-one PC diagnostic toolkit, UUI offers a reliable and flexible Linux and Windows bootable USB creator. Effortlessly carry your favorite portable operating systems and essential troubleshooting and diagnostic tools on a single flash drive or USB boot stick. Take your preferred Live Linux distributions, Windows installers, recovery software, backup utilities, and diagnostic tools with you, all bootable from a single USB drive. No more juggling multiple USB sticks or complicated bootloaders, UUI consolidates everything into one flexible, multiboot solution. Using this open source USB boot maker software is easy as 123. To create a Linux or Windows bootable USB drive, you simply select your target flash drive, choose your distribution from the list, browse to the ISO file (or choose to download the ISO), and then click Create. Once finished, you should have a ready to run Live USB containing the Live operating system, Windows installation media, or system diagnostics utility, or advanced system cleaner tool you previously selected. Universal USB Installer 2.0.3.6 fixes: Fixed volume label never being set after disk preparation. Fixed selected disk not being restored when returning to the drive selection page after preparation. Download: Universal USB Installer 2.0.3.6 | 19.4 MB (Open Source) Link: Universal USB Installer Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Should Microsoft be forced to stop promoting Edge over other browsers?

      By FBSPL · Posted

      Browser vendors including Chrome, Firefox, Brave, and Vivaldi have jointly written an open letter to Microsoft saying enough is enough regarding Edge being pushed on Windows users without consent. Microsoft makes it difficult to change the default browser, promotes Edge throughout Windows 11, and has made the uninstall process unnecessarily complicated compared to other apps. Does anyone have more details on what exactly the open letter demands and whether any regulatory action is being considered? Also curious whether this could lead to antitrust investigations similar to what happened with Internet Explorer back in the day. Would love to hear from anyone following this closely.
    • Google Chrome is killing all uBlock Origin bypasses, Microsoft Edge, Opera to follow

      By Steven P. · Posted

      Amen, they are a shady company... they modify my site to remove inline ads and then cry about subscribing to their services, a few things they "bravely" did in recent years: In 2020, Brave was caught automatically appending its own affiliate referral codes to URLs when users typed the web addresses of crypto exchanges (like Binance and Coinbase) into the address bar. Following significant backlash, the CEO apologized and the feature was disabled. In 2023, the company faced criticism after users noticed a paid VPN service was installed on their computers without their explicit consent. TOR Privacy Leak: In 2021, Brave's private Tor tabs were found to be leaking DNS queries to internet service providers, a flaw that was subsequently patched. Passive Cryptocurrency Donations: In early versions of the browser, Brave automatically collected user contributions and held them in a pool to be distributed to creators. If a creator had not signed up to claim their funds within a certain time frame, the process sparked criticism about where the money went.
    • Microsoft AI boss no longer believes that AI will replace human workers

      By Snake Doc · Posted

      I think they still believe it but are realizing that those statements created massive backlash and impacted adoption. I personally think AI, if used regularly will give you back about 30% of your time if you are an “information” worker.

  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      johnjacobb40 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Primer1st earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Experienced
      JayZJay went up a rank
      Experienced
    • Reacting Well
      Sir_Timbit earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      rubentuben8 earned a badge
      Week One Done

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      229
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      144
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      86
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      82
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!