HDD fixed itself?

By riahc3
in Hardware Hangout

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

riahc3

Posted
Posted

I dont trust this drive much but just wanted to ask Neowin members....

A couple of days ago, my RAID5 controller said a drive had failed.

Here is the log:

B 0 E 04/13/14 16:06:45 An error occured on the disk at 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1.

B 0 E 04/13/14 16:06:51 An error occured on the disk at 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1.

B 0 E 04/13/14 16:06:59 An error occured on the disk at 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1.

B 0 I 04/13/14 16:07:07 Successfully repaired bad sector on disk 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1: LBA 0x4789a200 sectors 0x48 .

B 0 I 04/13/14 16:07:07 Successfully repaired bad sector on disk 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1: LBA 0x4789a248 sectors 0x38 .

B 0 I 04/13/14 16:07:07 Successfully repaired bad sector on disk 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1: LBA 0x4789a280 sectors 0x48 .

B 0 E 04/13/14 16:07:27 An error occured on the disk at 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1.

B 0 E 04/13/14 16:07:34 An error occured on the disk at 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1.

B 0 E 04/13/14 16:07:42 An error occured on the disk at 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1.

B 0 E 04/13/14 16:07:49 An error occured on the disk at 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1.

B 0 E 04/13/14 16:07:57 An error occured on the disk at 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1.

B 0 E 04/13/14 16:08:03 An error occured on the disk at 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1.

B 1 E 04/13/14 16:08:03 Disk 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1 failed.

B 1 I 04/16/14 18:50:55 Array 'RAID_5_0' rebuilding started.

B 1 I 04/16/14 20:25:10 Array 'RAID_5_0' rebuilding started.

B 0 E 04/16/14 22:15:13 An error occured on the disk at 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1.

B 0 I 04/16/14 22:15:13 Successfully repaired bad sector on disk 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1: LBA 0x187d80 sectors 0x80 .

B 0 E 04/16/14 22:15:13 An error occured on the disk at 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1.

B 0 I 04/16/14 22:15:13 Successfully repaired bad sector on disk 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1: LBA 0x188300 sectors 0x80 .

B 0 E 04/16/14 22:15:13 An error occured on the disk at 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1.

B 0 I 04/16/14 22:15:13 Successfully repaired bad sector on disk 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1: LBA 0x188848 sectors 0x38 .

B 0 E 04/16/14 22:15:13 An error occured on the disk at 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1.

B 0 I 04/16/14 22:15:13 Successfully repaired bad sector on disk 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1: LBA 0x188d80 sectors 0x80 .

B 0 E 04/16/14 22:15:13 An error occured on the disk at 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1.

B 0 I 04/16/14 22:15:13 Successfully repaired bad sector on disk 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1: LBA 0x189298 sectors 0x68 .

B 0 E 04/16/14 22:15:13 An error occured on the disk at 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1.

B 0 I 04/16/14 22:15:13 Successfully repaired bad sector on disk 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1: LBA 0x189800 sectors 0x80 .

B 0 E 04/16/14 22:15:13 An error occured on the disk at 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1.

B 0 I 04/16/14 22:15:13 Successfully repaired bad sector on disk 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1: LBA 0x189d00 sectors 0x80 .

B 1 E 04/16/14 22:15:13 An error occured on the disk at 'ST3000DM001' at Controller1-Channel1.

B 0 I 04/17/14 11:12:04 Array 'RAID_5_0' rebuilding started.

B 0 I 04/17/14 22:46:40 Array 'RAID_5_0' rebuilding completed.

As you can see, it even says one of the disks straight up failed. I checked that my backup of nonreplaceable stuff was up to date then I did a backup of the entire array.

Im busy with a couple of other things but today I look up and I see those two last entries: The RAID5 rebuilt itself without any errors :huh:

I dont really trust that drive anymore but what could have happened here?

Thank you

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1209947-hdd-fixed-itself/
Share on other sites
Mentor

Starbuck84

Posted
Posted

From what I know, most hard drives have a build in mechanism to "report" / "block" bad sectors. It doesn't repair itself, it just "marks" those bad sectors and tries to move data from those bad sectors to good sectors. With your RAID5 set-up it's possible the RAID array "repaired" itself just fine. But I don't trust any disk which has bad sectors. I'd say: just replace the disk, as the ST3000DM001 isn't an expensive disk to replace anyway.

Grand Master

riahc3

Posted
  • Author
Posted

From what I know, most hard drives have a build in mechanism to "report" / "block" bad sectors. It doesn't repair itself, it just "marks" those bad sectors and tries to move data from those bad sectors to good sectors. With your RAID5 set-up it's possible the RAID array "repaired" itself just fine. But I don't trust any disk which has bad sectors. I'd say: just replace the disk, as the ST3000DM001 isn't an expensive disk to replace anyway.

Its already been replaced; Just surprised that it was able to "mark" a drive as a bad sector and then repair the array. And this RAID5 card sucks...
Grand Master

T3X4S

Posted
Posted

I wonder if it simply moved the data to the spare sector reserved on the drive... and your RAID controller just says "repaired sector" - hell I dunno really.  I'd like to know as well.

LOL I didnt know Starbuck just said the same thing.... so this post is kinda unnecessary.

Mentor

Starbuck84

Posted
Posted

From what I can gather, the ST3000DM001 is a simple desktop disk. It will move the data from the bad sector to another (spare) sector on the disk. Using RAID5 it was able to rebuild itself as the disk reports itself as healthy again.

Mentor

Starbuck84

Posted
Posted

Nice find, although the OP was getting "bad sector" messages. The article you link to states: "The array keeps failing drives. The controller error log shows continuous "aborted command" and/or "link failure" messages when using Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 drives (models: ST3000DM001, ST2500DM001, ST2000DM001, or ST1000DM003)."

 

His RAID array was working fine, but the disk itself reported bad sectors. Just a case of replacing the disk and "nothing to see here people" :)

Mentor

snaphat (Myles Landwehr) Member

Posted
  • Member
Posted

riahc3, the complete failure you seeing in the logs was probably just a intermittent fault. Those can and do happen with hardware. The other possibility is that the error log is incorrect and giving you inaccurate information (i.e. it wasn't actually a complete failure).

Grand Master

riahc3

Posted
  • Author
Posted

riahc3, the complete failure you seeing in the logs was probably just a intermittent [/size]fault. Those can and do happen with hardware. The other possibility is that the error log is incorrect and giving you inaccurate information (i.e. it wasn't actually a complete failure).

Problem is that Ive had these models before and Ive failed so.....yeah it could be inaccurate (still working as of this writing) but...

Anyways I bought already another (better) drive to replace it.

Grand Master

Praetor

Posted
Posted

Problem is that Ive had these models before and Ive failed so.....yeah it could be inaccurate (still working as of this writing) but...

Anyways I bought already another (better) drive to replace it.

 

that error could be a soft error, not a hard error; since the array rebuild itself (i assume your aren't using spare disks right?) then it still is OK to use that disk, since those faults do happen, although buying a new HDD in the upcoming weeks would be a good idea (since you already done that then it's OK).

 

In my clients i see like every month an HDD error, either a soft one that the arrays just fixes itself or a hard one that requires a new HDD.

 

HUM: you can RAID everything!

- USB RAID: http://analogbit.com/node/4

- SSD RAID:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Should Microsoft be forced to stop promoting Edge over other browsers?

      By cleverclogs · Posted

      I haven't paid for windows since windows 8. So I guess I would be happy to pay for a new version if it meant seeing fewer adverts (none) or product pushes. But that applies to _any_ service or OS.
    • Microsoft wants to end printer driver headaches with Windows Ready Print

      By cork1958 · Posted

      Edit: Oops! Wrong topic! :(
    • Save 35% on Sony's SS-CS5M2 3-way high-res bookshelf speakers

      By TarasBuria · Posted

      Save 35% on Sony's SS-CS5M2 3-way high-res bookshelf speakers by Taras Buria Sony is currently offering a big discount on its SS-CS5M2 bookshelf speaker, saving you 35% on a set of high-quality audio equipment. The SS-CS5M2 is a passive 3-way bookshelf speaker with a 5.12-inch woofer, a 25 mm soft-dome tweeter, and a 19 mm super tweeter. This design allows different drivers to handle different parts of the sound spectrum for a clearer, more detailed audio when watching movies or listening to music. The compact cabinet size allows you to place these speakers on shelves, desks, or stands, making them a practical choice for apartments, bedrooms, and small living rooms. Despite its compact size, the SS-CS5M2 delivers up to 100 W of power. Note that since the speakers are passive, you will need an amplifier to drive them. However, if you do, you can use them for high-resolution music, thanks to a claimed frequency response of 53 Hz - 50 kHz. It is able to extend so far high in the spectrum as a result of those super tweeters. While they will work with most amplifiers and AV receivers, Sony says this pair is a perfect match for its AV receivers, such as STRDH190, 590, 790, or 1000. Sony CS Bookshelf Speakers SS-CS5M2 3-Way 3-Driver Hi-res - $178 | 36% off on Amazon US This Amazon deal is US-specific and not available in other regions unless specified. This is a first-party seller link (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you also purchase from a first-party seller link only. If you don't like it or want to look at more options, check out the previous deals that we have covered, OR you can also visit Amazon US deals page. Get Prime (SNAP), Prime Video, Audible Plus or Kindle / Music Unlimited. Free for 30 days. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • EU Commission explains why Siri AI isn't launching in the EU, and Apple is to blame

      By AltecXP · Posted

      So they somehow expect Apple to easily make it so that if I install say DeepSeek that DS can then handle all the tasks that Siri would be doing while integrated in the OS? That sounds like just rediculous.
    • AMD 9070XT

      By Mockingbird · Posted

      For ray-tracing, the Radeon RX 9070 XT is better than the GeForce RTX 5070, but worse than the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti The Radeon RX 9070 XT is similar to the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti in rasterization Both AMD and NVIDIA have had serious issues with drivers in the past, so I can't say that one is better or worse than the other. Yes. AMD has better support Linux than does NVIDIA. Use Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) to uninstall NVIDIA's drivers before installing AMD's drivers. That's up to you. Supplies of memory is unpredictable because AI using up a lot of memory. As a result, there is a lot of volatility in video card prices.

  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      pinnclepd earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      X-No-file earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      johnjacobb40 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Primer1st earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Experienced
      JayZJay went up a rank
      Experienced

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      215
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      145
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      83
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!