Are OEM's Giving AMD a bad name?


Recommended Posts

I have an acer w500 tablet an it has an AMD c-50 CPU.. It's not that bad.. For a x86 tablet anyway.but also has a ssd.. For an actual computer it would probably suck.

Err it's a c-50 so it's before E... So it must be slower right?

It's made for win7 but i bought it to test Windows 8 rc on. Looking back on it I was going to try Android x86 on it again last week but it's sooooooooo thick.. I looked at and thought Meh

I'm running a Llano upstairs, a Llano in my brothers laptop, and an A10-7850K in this box.  As long as you know what you're getting AMD is good, the C, Z, and E stuff can be skipped for sure.

 

AM1 stuff as a baseline and current A* stuff should be good.

 

And yes, at least with laptops the OEMs are definitely not helping.

Before I made this thread I had a gateway computer in my office it had a

 

E1-1500 CPU

8GB of ram

Windows 8.1

hardly any crapware

500GB 7200RPM drive.

 

Ran like complete dog ####.

 

I work at a small computer shop much like the one you own i believe.

our basic system comes with:

AMD A4-5300 3.2Ghz Dual Core

4GB DDR3 RAM

500GB Hard Drive

going any lowing with the CPU side normally leaves the customer unhappy

people forget how much they spend a lot quicker than how slow their computer is. i feel its best to try and get them spending a bit more and that way they are more likely to buy their next computer from you because they were happy with their last one.

Hello,

 

this is quite interesting, in another post a few weeks ago i mentioned a similar situation: my mother-in-law bought a new Asus notebook and asked me in install all the software she needs; the laptop was brand new but it was incredible unusual: it was so slow that it was unbearable to do anything at all. I immediately find that weird and started to troubleshoot: high CPU usage, high disk usage, memory wasn't filled to the max but something didn't add up. So after seeing the process that was leaving this brand new notebook in such a state that it was impossible to do anything at all (to put in perspective: the last time i saw such a slow machine it was my good ol' Pentium MMX @ 200 mhz), i figured it out that the the power options was capping the CPU; when i activated the Performance option the CPU high usage stopped, but still the notebook was slow. Then i saw the specs: 5400 RPM HDD, lots of memory - that's good i thought, but then again it was very slow memory - and some Asus software that was running in the background and was consuming CPU and lots of disk access. Also i saw a very big design fault: not a single exhaust vent was underneath the notebook, leaving it incredible hot after a few minutes, just a exhaust for the CPU but clearly it wasn't enough.

 

So i did a last thing: installed a clean Windows 8 version to compare: this time the notebook was more functional but still the same Asus software was the leaving the notebook more slow then it should be. I asked my mother in law to exchange that crap notebook for other one and pay the difference, it's was worthy because one can't have a problematic and slow tool for work, like that notebook was being.

 

Conclusion: I contacted Asus and told them because of their stupidity they lost a costumer: my mother in law because so dissatisfied with this incident that she didn't bought another Asus equipment. So they lost a costumer and gained negativity for their brand, bravo!

 

Now i'm not bashing Asus; it just the low end and cheap notebooks / laptops from ALL the OEMs are severely capped, bad QC and poorly designed, resulting in incidents like this one. And it's the OEM that suffers with this, so i don't get their stupidity: it's better to receive the clients money and give him a poor experience? Contrastingly, the high end Asus stuff is great: I'm posting on a Asus Vivobook, all aluminum and incredible fast and stable, but it wasn't cheap.

going any lowing with the CPU side normally leaves the customer unhappy

people forget how much they spend a lot quicker than how slow their computer is. i feel its best to try and get them spending a bit more and that way they are more likely to buy their next computer from you because they were happy with their last one.

 

 

It's a simple rule of business but i found incredible that many OEMs are so greedy and have such a poor vision that forget the experience the end user is going to get: a poor, enervating and problematic one.

What about the hardware? This could easily be a failing drive that can make a system super slow. I have never had a bad experience with AMD. Not saying I am a fan boy but generally its something else. If the processors defective that could be an issue too.

 

I don't think so, because theres an incredible amount of complaining users; sure not all the HDD are dieing...

it's just poor hardware choces from the OEM: getting a low end CPU tied with crap HDD, RAM and more and the result is crap.

Budget machines cut corners through more parts than the CPU. Expect a slower hard drive, slower RAM, a worse chassis, worse display, crappy battery, slow charger, and more bloatware. These things are everything you'd expect from a netbook, cleverly disguised as a normal laptop. The entire package is designed to be as cheap as possible, resulting in poor performance.

AMD is more competitive/cost-effective in the lower end of performance, and so OEMs typically source hardware configs around these budget processors, resulting in everything being tarred and feathered with the same brush.

  • Like 3

Personally I always figured if people don't know what they're buying before they get it, they should probably not get it.

 

that's what retail clerks exist for! problem is: most of them know jack and sell the biggest POS to count as a sale. :/

I haven't really seen or used any AMD chips in while.  I have a 5400+ BE for several years, but they just can't compete with Intel anymore.  In most cases at least.  Unless you need better integrated graphics, then I'd go AMD.  The new 3740 Atoms run GREAT. 

 

Computers get lower-powered and are technically faster per clock, but they end up being not much faster to the user.  Plus, SSDs just aren't in mainstream laptops, so there just isn't decent performance.  Not to mention all the crap software, malware, greayware, or whatever else is installed.

Computers get lower-powered and are technically faster per clock, but they end up being not much faster to the user.  Plus, SSDs just aren't in mainstream laptops, so there just isn't decent performance.  Not to mention all the crap software, malware, greayware, or whatever else is installed.

An SSD really does give a speed boost. I once reinstalled Windows on a Laptop onto a spare SSD while I was waiting for her new hard drive to arrive from HP. She had to leave for the weekend so I let her take the laptop with the SSD. When she came back, she said, I don't want the HP replacement, Order me one of these solid state drives LOL

AMD's E1 processors really are not meant to be used for anything more than very basic use, same target audience as Atom processors (and they're pretty pants as well)

For all of you complaining about slow OEM computers with bloatware - have you never heard of PC Decrapifier ?

 

People have been saying these OEM's with the AMD E CPU's are slow as crap even on a clean install.

  • Like 3

I personally prefer intel and there is no specific reason to it. I have a laptop with AMD cpu and I don not have any issue with it. I recently purchased a $400 ASUS laptop with pentium 2117U processor and it works fine. I think some of the bottlenecks specially in laptops are coming from 5400 RPM hard drive. No matter how fast your CPU is, if you have slow hard drive then it's going to pull whole system down. It is misconception among the people that if their system is slow, it is because of their CPU. I replaced my laptop with a SSD and now system runs like a horse. Not bad performance for under $400 laptop. 

 

I remember when I purchased my first laptop in year 2004. It was HP with intel pentium 4 processor on it and it cost me around $1800. Then two year later my friend purchased a Toshiba laptop for $1,200 which I though was excellent deal and now I even think $500 laptop is expensive. I guess, I am getting too spoiled by price of laptop coming down. 

  • 1 month later...

Moments ago I was remotely connected to a PC cleaning it up. I'm like.. MAN this computer is running like ball sack (even after I cleaned it up). Checked the CPU ... E2-1800

 

Between GotoAssist, Avast and CCleaner we are using around 89% CPU

 

CCleaner is using 14 - 20%

post-4927-0-28374800-1401291215.jpg

Moments ago I was remotely connected to a PC cleaning it up. I'm like.. MAN this computer is running like ball sack (even after I cleaned it up). Checked the CPU ... E2-1800

That image isn't really relevant considering.  An E2 would be comparable pricewise to older Atoms, not an i3.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!