Are OEM's Giving AMD a bad name?


Recommended Posts

I have an acer w500 tablet an it has an AMD c-50 CPU.. It's not that bad.. For a x86 tablet anyway.but also has a ssd.. For an actual computer it would probably suck.

Err it's a c-50 so it's before E... So it must be slower right?

It's made for win7 but i bought it to test Windows 8 rc on. Looking back on it I was going to try Android x86 on it again last week but it's sooooooooo thick.. I looked at and thought Meh

I'm running a Llano upstairs, a Llano in my brothers laptop, and an A10-7850K in this box.  As long as you know what you're getting AMD is good, the C, Z, and E stuff can be skipped for sure.

 

AM1 stuff as a baseline and current A* stuff should be good.

 

And yes, at least with laptops the OEMs are definitely not helping.

Before I made this thread I had a gateway computer in my office it had a

 

E1-1500 CPU

8GB of ram

Windows 8.1

hardly any crapware

500GB 7200RPM drive.

 

Ran like complete dog ####.

 

I work at a small computer shop much like the one you own i believe.

our basic system comes with:

AMD A4-5300 3.2Ghz Dual Core

4GB DDR3 RAM

500GB Hard Drive

going any lowing with the CPU side normally leaves the customer unhappy

people forget how much they spend a lot quicker than how slow their computer is. i feel its best to try and get them spending a bit more and that way they are more likely to buy their next computer from you because they were happy with their last one.

Hello,

 

this is quite interesting, in another post a few weeks ago i mentioned a similar situation: my mother-in-law bought a new Asus notebook and asked me in install all the software she needs; the laptop was brand new but it was incredible unusual: it was so slow that it was unbearable to do anything at all. I immediately find that weird and started to troubleshoot: high CPU usage, high disk usage, memory wasn't filled to the max but something didn't add up. So after seeing the process that was leaving this brand new notebook in such a state that it was impossible to do anything at all (to put in perspective: the last time i saw such a slow machine it was my good ol' Pentium MMX @ 200 mhz), i figured it out that the the power options was capping the CPU; when i activated the Performance option the CPU high usage stopped, but still the notebook was slow. Then i saw the specs: 5400 RPM HDD, lots of memory - that's good i thought, but then again it was very slow memory - and some Asus software that was running in the background and was consuming CPU and lots of disk access. Also i saw a very big design fault: not a single exhaust vent was underneath the notebook, leaving it incredible hot after a few minutes, just a exhaust for the CPU but clearly it wasn't enough.

 

So i did a last thing: installed a clean Windows 8 version to compare: this time the notebook was more functional but still the same Asus software was the leaving the notebook more slow then it should be. I asked my mother in law to exchange that crap notebook for other one and pay the difference, it's was worthy because one can't have a problematic and slow tool for work, like that notebook was being.

 

Conclusion: I contacted Asus and told them because of their stupidity they lost a costumer: my mother in law because so dissatisfied with this incident that she didn't bought another Asus equipment. So they lost a costumer and gained negativity for their brand, bravo!

 

Now i'm not bashing Asus; it just the low end and cheap notebooks / laptops from ALL the OEMs are severely capped, bad QC and poorly designed, resulting in incidents like this one. And it's the OEM that suffers with this, so i don't get their stupidity: it's better to receive the clients money and give him a poor experience? Contrastingly, the high end Asus stuff is great: I'm posting on a Asus Vivobook, all aluminum and incredible fast and stable, but it wasn't cheap.

going any lowing with the CPU side normally leaves the customer unhappy

people forget how much they spend a lot quicker than how slow their computer is. i feel its best to try and get them spending a bit more and that way they are more likely to buy their next computer from you because they were happy with their last one.

 

 

It's a simple rule of business but i found incredible that many OEMs are so greedy and have such a poor vision that forget the experience the end user is going to get: a poor, enervating and problematic one.

What about the hardware? This could easily be a failing drive that can make a system super slow. I have never had a bad experience with AMD. Not saying I am a fan boy but generally its something else. If the processors defective that could be an issue too.

 

I don't think so, because theres an incredible amount of complaining users; sure not all the HDD are dieing...

it's just poor hardware choces from the OEM: getting a low end CPU tied with crap HDD, RAM and more and the result is crap.

Budget machines cut corners through more parts than the CPU. Expect a slower hard drive, slower RAM, a worse chassis, worse display, crappy battery, slow charger, and more bloatware. These things are everything you'd expect from a netbook, cleverly disguised as a normal laptop. The entire package is designed to be as cheap as possible, resulting in poor performance.

AMD is more competitive/cost-effective in the lower end of performance, and so OEMs typically source hardware configs around these budget processors, resulting in everything being tarred and feathered with the same brush.

  • Like 3

Personally I always figured if people don't know what they're buying before they get it, they should probably not get it.

 

that's what retail clerks exist for! problem is: most of them know jack and sell the biggest POS to count as a sale. :/

I haven't really seen or used any AMD chips in while.  I have a 5400+ BE for several years, but they just can't compete with Intel anymore.  In most cases at least.  Unless you need better integrated graphics, then I'd go AMD.  The new 3740 Atoms run GREAT. 

 

Computers get lower-powered and are technically faster per clock, but they end up being not much faster to the user.  Plus, SSDs just aren't in mainstream laptops, so there just isn't decent performance.  Not to mention all the crap software, malware, greayware, or whatever else is installed.

Computers get lower-powered and are technically faster per clock, but they end up being not much faster to the user.  Plus, SSDs just aren't in mainstream laptops, so there just isn't decent performance.  Not to mention all the crap software, malware, greayware, or whatever else is installed.

An SSD really does give a speed boost. I once reinstalled Windows on a Laptop onto a spare SSD while I was waiting for her new hard drive to arrive from HP. She had to leave for the weekend so I let her take the laptop with the SSD. When she came back, she said, I don't want the HP replacement, Order me one of these solid state drives LOL

AMD's E1 processors really are not meant to be used for anything more than very basic use, same target audience as Atom processors (and they're pretty pants as well)

For all of you complaining about slow OEM computers with bloatware - have you never heard of PC Decrapifier ?

 

People have been saying these OEM's with the AMD E CPU's are slow as crap even on a clean install.

  • Like 3

I personally prefer intel and there is no specific reason to it. I have a laptop with AMD cpu and I don not have any issue with it. I recently purchased a $400 ASUS laptop with pentium 2117U processor and it works fine. I think some of the bottlenecks specially in laptops are coming from 5400 RPM hard drive. No matter how fast your CPU is, if you have slow hard drive then it's going to pull whole system down. It is misconception among the people that if their system is slow, it is because of their CPU. I replaced my laptop with a SSD and now system runs like a horse. Not bad performance for under $400 laptop. 

 

I remember when I purchased my first laptop in year 2004. It was HP with intel pentium 4 processor on it and it cost me around $1800. Then two year later my friend purchased a Toshiba laptop for $1,200 which I though was excellent deal and now I even think $500 laptop is expensive. I guess, I am getting too spoiled by price of laptop coming down. 

  • 1 month later...

Moments ago I was remotely connected to a PC cleaning it up. I'm like.. MAN this computer is running like ball sack (even after I cleaned it up). Checked the CPU ... E2-1800

 

Between GotoAssist, Avast and CCleaner we are using around 89% CPU

 

CCleaner is using 14 - 20%

post-4927-0-28374800-1401291215.jpg

Moments ago I was remotely connected to a PC cleaning it up. I'm like.. MAN this computer is running like ball sack (even after I cleaned it up). Checked the CPU ... E2-1800

That image isn't really relevant considering.  An E2 would be comparable pricewise to older Atoms, not an i3.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I will keep my current devices for several years... no planning in upgrading until these devices stop working. Too pricey.
    • Apple raises MacBook and iPad prices as memory costs surge by Karthik Mudaliar Apple has raised the U.S. prices of several MacBook and iPad models, including the MacBook Neo, which it launched for $599 less than four months ago. The company’s cheapest laptop now starts at $699, while some MacBook Pro configurations have increased by $300. The changes affect the MacBook Neo, MacBook Air, MacBook Pro, iPad Air, and iPad Pro. Apple has not changed the hardware or storage included with these models, so customers are simply paying more for the same configurations. Here is how the new US pricing compares with the previous starting prices: Product Previous price New price Increase MacBook Neo $599 $699 $100 13-inch MacBook Air, 512GB $1,099 $1,299 $200 14-inch MacBook Pro, 1TB $1,699 $1,999 $300 16-inch MacBook Pro $2,699 $2,999 $300 11-inch iPad Air, 128GB $599 $749 $150 13-inch iPad Air, 128GB $799 $949 $150 11-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $999 $1,199 $200 13-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $1,299 $1,499 $200 The updated prices are already appearing on Apple’s U.S. online store. The MacBook Neo increase will probably attract the most attention. Apple introduced the laptop in March for $599, pitching it as a more affordable Mac for students and buyers considering Windows laptops or Chromebooks. It uses an A18 Pro processor and originally undercut Dell’s new $699 XPS 13 by $100. Following the increase, the two laptops now have the same starting price. The M5 MacBook Air has also lost the price Apple promoted when it launched in March. The 13-inch model arrived with 512GB of storage for $1,099, while Apple’s store now lists the MacBook Air range as starting at $1,299. The 14-inch MacBook Pro with an M5 chip and 1TB of storage has gone from $1,699 to $1,999. Apple has made similar changes to its iPads. The recently released M4 iPad Air, which launched at the same $599 starting price as its predecessor, now starts at $749 for the 11-inch version. The 13-inch version has risen from $799 to $949. The iPad Pro increases are larger in dollar terms. Apple’s 11-inch M5 iPad Pro now starts at $1,199, up from $999, while the 13-inch version has moved from $1,299 to $1,499. Both base models still include 256GB of storage. Apple blamed the increases on the rapidly rising cost of DRAM and NAND flash, which provide system memory and device storage. The company told Reuters that it had tried to shield customers from the increases but could no longer absorb them. “We have never seen a component price increase this much, this quickly,” Apple said. Tim Cook had already warned that price increases were coming. Cook said Apple’s existing component inventory had softened the immediate impact, but that higher memory costs would increasingly affect the company after the June quarter. Much of the pressure comes from the construction of AI data centers. Memory manufacturers are directing more production toward high-margin server products, leaving PC, tablet, and smartphone makers competing for the remaining supply. Apple has not said whether the new prices are temporary or whether further increases are planned. For now, the changes show that even Apple’s purchasing power has not been enough to keep the AI-driven memory shortage away from consumer devices.
    • Ventoy 1.1.16 is out.
    • This is a none story - these low volume Chinese models will always get new experimental features first because Apple and Samsung can't produce them in huge volume to meet demand.
    • Nvidia GeForce NOW gains support for Dark Scrolls, Empulse, and more by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The final update of June for Nvidia's cloud gaming service GeForce NOW is now available, and it is touting support for six more games. The company is also drawing subscriber attention towards the summer sales kicking off across stores, so they can stock up on more cloud-supported titles. Of course, the Steam Summer Sale is the biggest promotion, which is kicking off later today. "Supported Steam games can be streamed across devices with GeForce NOW, making it easy to buy a game once, keep progress synced and pick up where the gameplay left off on PCs, Macs, handheld devices, phones, TVs and more," says the company. "In other words, the Steam Summer Sale brings the deals; GeForce NOW adds the flexibility." Don't forget that the GeForce NOW summer sale is still active as well. This limited-time offer drops the 12-month Performance membership from $99.99 to $64.99, saving members $35. At the same time, the 12-month Ultimate membership is currently going for $129.99, dropping the price by $70 from the original $199.99. Here are the games joining GeForce NOW's supported list this week: Dark Scrolls (New release on Steam, available June 22) SAND: Raiders of Sophie (New release on Steam, available June 22) Deer & Boy (New release on Steam, available June 23) EMPULSE (New release on Steam, available June 24) The Adventures of Elliot: The Millennium Tales (Steam) FATAL FURY: City of the Wolves (Steam) With the June expansions coming to an end, Nvidia should be announcing its July GeForce NOW plans next week. Keep in mind that, unlike subscription services like Game Pass or EA Play, a copy of a game must be owned by the GeForce NOW member (or at least have a license via PC Game Pass) to start playing via Nvidia's cloud servers. There is also a limit to how many hours subscribers can use the service per month.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      462
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      135
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      77
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!