Recommended Posts

nb7z1y.png

 

I was facing this issue a month ago, it rectified itself. But tonight, it has started again. There is nothing on download, no windows updates, browsers are also off. But for some reason, I am maxing out my connection (512kbps). What the hell is using my internet connection? I checked everything, my anti-virus update... nothing was using the internet. How do I find out the problem? I formatted my pc a month ago and it is virus free. This is highly annoying, please help. :)

Either the meter is broken or something is using your connection...

 

What does Resource Monitor show?

 

resourcemonitor-net-figa0729.jpg

 

http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/the-enterprise-cloud/use-resource-monitor-to-monitor-network-performance/4709/

239.255 is multicast address.

What I would do is sniff and look at the traffic.. http://www.wireshark.org/ is your friend.. Take a sniff - post up some details of the trace if you have questions on what it is.

Looks to be recv'd traffic not your machine sending anything. I don't see how that would be coming from outside your router to your box, it would be local so shouldn't really be slowing down your internet at such a small amount of traffic. 400 Bytes per second is nothing.

post-14624-0-21570000-1398459878.png

Give me a sec, and will fire up wireshark and show you example of this sort of traffic.

edit: So here is some example traffic on my home network.. This 192.168.1.99 is my popcorn hour A-110, this it announcing it UPnP services. The .97 and .98 are my DVRs - same thing. The 169.254 address are my Dvrs as well - they give themselves APIPA address for their local link stuff so multiple devices are sure to be able to talk to each other, etc.

This is typical noise on any network. If you do a sniff and we look into the packets we can see what it is sending, just from the mac address you can look up what device it is.

post-14624-0-01364500-1398460266.png

so see the mac there 00:06:DC Syabas Technology (Amquest), Sybas is hardware in the popcorn hour

Its not a problem - pretty much every single network is going to have multicast traffic on it.. I find it unlikely it could of of such a level that it would hinder your machines use of the internet. Guess on a really slow wireless network maybe typical multicast could take a bite out of performance.

Here is sniff from my work machine.. Look you got all other users machines here sending out SSDP discover multicast traffic

post-14624-0-24471700-1398461139.png

From the MAC we can see it is a

5C:26:0A Dell Inc.

Here is info about SSDP

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simple_Service_Discovery_Protocol

If you want to disable this on your machines running windows, we can go over that. If you have a smart switch you could turn on IGMP snooping to block it, etc. But it typical noise your going to see pretty much on any network that has user type devices on it.

Without any technical jargon - this traffic is going to be seen on ANY network - no it has nothing to do with you being on wireless or wired..  It is your devices looking for other devices.

Sure grab a sniff and we can look to identify what it is - I can promise you the traffic is there now as well.  If there is any other windows computers or media players, dvrs, etc.. you will have multicast traffic.  Multicast just means a special type of address that goes to every device on the network, not just 1 IP address.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Of course the sales are bad. Who even asked for a thinner phone with way less battery? Lightness? It's still a giant brick, it's just a thinner giant brick. It makes no sense at all. Making folding phones thinner, now that does make sense. Because when folded, the thinner it is unfolded, the more usable and pocketable it is when folded. You already expect worse battery at expense of actually being more pocketable. Galaxy Flip, when folded is half the size of S Ultra models and about as thick. That does make a big difference when fitting it in a pocket. But the phone that's as big as Ultra, making it thinner, you don't really solve anything, it's still a giant slab that barely fits into a pocket. All the "Mini" phones made way more sense than this thin crap. Especially now that it's literally impossible to find a phone smaller than 6.5". My dad only needs phone for calls and SMS and he doesn't want to go with smartphone because they are all so massive. Especially cheaper ones. Like, he'd be fine with Galaxy A06 for all he cares in terms of hardware, but it only comes in giant 6.7" format. It's useless. Or is he suppose to find a 800€ old gen iPhone Mini or Zenfone? He doesn't even need those stupid specs and such stupid price. And then you see old people fumbling around with giant smartphones and they don't even need 3/4 of features on them.
    • its funny now instead of robots built for a specific task which is more efficient we are focused on humanoid robots that are built for do anything but might not do it as well because of restrictions similar to how human body works and they were molded after...
    • 3,900 mAh. When compared to the S25 Ultra (5,000), the S25+ (4,900) and the S25 (4,000), it has the worst battery of them all, all because of that slim size. Everything comes with sacrifices.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      emptyother earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Crunchy6 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      KynanSEIT earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      gowtham07 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Collaborator
      lethalman went up a rank
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      669
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      271
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      218
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      163
    5. 5
      +FloatingFatMan
      162
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!