Too much RAM used up in Windows 8.1


Recommended Posts

I bought a new laptop with Windows 8 (updated to 8.1) 64 bits with 8 GB of RAM. The problem is large RAM is always used up, around 4 GBs when I'm running nothing.
Task manager is showing no weird behavior, all the running tasks aren't using that much individually.
I could see that many people had this problem, but there have been different causes for it, so I thought the best thing I would do is ask for help.
I don't really know about RAM stuff but it seems that I have too high non-paged pool usage


http://i.imgur.com/wTtxNsy.png
http://i.imgur.com/uzwWSeZ.png
http://i.imgur.com/kKvau0u.png
http://i.imgur.com/VxDp2TZ.png

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1210965-too-much-ram-used-up-in-windows-81/
Share on other sites

I don't think that is superfetch, that ram is legitimately in use by something. Unfortunately its hard to tell what it is from those screenshots. My understanding of the non-paged pool memory (which as you indicated is really high...my system with 16GB ram only has a non-paged pool size of 167 MB) is often used by drivers. Perhaps install updated drivers and that will fix it?

What people often don't know is that overwriting memory is as fast as writing to empty memory.

 

that means superfecth reserves available free memory for stuff you are likely to start up or use the memory for so it's already there. then there's absolutely zero lag until the program has started since it's already in memory.

 

Now all the memory superfecth reserves, isn't really reserved, it's still available for anything else, so if you start another app that needs the memory pluperfect is using, superfecth merely releases it and the app will overwrite what's there. just as fast as if the memory had been empty. memory isn't an etchasketch that needs to be wiped before you can write something else. 

Try running a very demanding app that uses a lot of RAM or more than one app at once and see if after that, the RAM usage is lower. If so, this shows that it was mostly cache being used by Windows in the beginning

My system with 8GB in it is currently idling at 3.1GB and all I have open is a browser with 3 tabs, it looks as if the OP has a lot more services running than I do, so it's to be expected.

What people often don't know is that overwriting memory is as fast as writing to empty memory.

 

that means superfecth reserves available free memory for stuff you are likely to start up or use the memory for so it's already there. then there's absolutely zero lag until the program has started since it's already in memory.

 

Now all the memory superfecth reserves, isn't really reserved, it's still available for anything else, so if you start another app that needs the memory pluperfect is using, superfecth merely releases it and the app will overwrite what's there. just as fast as if the memory had been empty. memory isn't an etchasketch that needs to be wiped before you can write something else. 

superfetch doesn't show up in Non-paged pool memory though, it shows up as 'standby', his screenshots *do* show somewhat unusual NPP mem usage guys...

 

High NPP memory usage can indicate a driver memory leak and things like that.

 

The screenshots don't look too concerning overall though, because there is still plenty of 'standby' and 'free' memory available. However if OP notices NPP mem just keeps rising higher and higher over time that could indicate a driver causing a memory leak (I've seen several drivers cause this in windows 8, older versions of realtek ethernet drivers in particular)

Wow that was a fast reaction from the forum.

I don't think it's something related to Superfetch guys.

First, when I run a simple game with a browser on (not much tabs) it starts giving me "low on memory" warnings (which I think wouldn't happen if it was superfetch?). It also heats up, because of the RAM I would suppose, since the processor has low percentage of usage at that time, and since both my processor and video card would run that game very easily.

Second, I have another VAIO laptop with the same amount of RAM, and Windows 8.1 Pro, and the memory used is much lower than here. If it was superfetch, wouldn't it be the same as my current laptop?

 

And no, when I run more a more demanding app(s) the RAM used up doesn't decrease, it actually increases to 80% and gives warnings like I said.

 

 

Got any Virtual Machines running?

 

Not yet.. I was planning to, but this RAM problem is blocking my way.

 

 

 

will check it out and post any news. Thanks.

 

Edit:

Forgot to say, my drivers are all updated (according to VAIO update), and I'm not having any special softwares installed that could be running in the background

Wow that was a fast reaction from the forum.

I don't think it's something related to Superfetch guys.

First, when I run a simple game with a browser on (not much tabs) it starts giving me "low on memory" warnings (which I think wouldn't happen if it was superfetch?). It also heats up, because of the RAM I would suppose, since the processor has low percentage of usage at that time, and since both my processor and video card would run that game very easily.

Second, I have another VAIO laptop with the same amount of RAM, and Windows 8.1 Pro, and the memory used is much lower than here. If it was superfetch, wouldn't it be the same as my current laptop?

 

And no, when I run more a more demanding app(s) the RAM used up doesn't decrease, it actually increases to 80% and gives warnings like I said.

 

 

 

Not yet.. I was planning to, but this RAM problem is blocking my way.

 

 

 

will check it out and post any news. Thanks.

 

Edit:

Forgot to say, my drivers are all updated (according to VAIO update), and I'm not having any special softwares installed that could be running in the background

High NPP memory usage like that does typically indicate a misbehaving driver, if I had to hazard a guess that'd be it.

First, when I run a simple game with a browser on (not much tabs) it starts giving me "low on memory" warnings (which I think wouldn't happen if it was superfetch?). It also heats up, because of the RAM I would suppose, since the processor has low percentage of usage at that time, and since both my processor and video card would run that game very easily.

Definitely doesn't sound like SuperFetch. Regarding driver updates, I have misgivings about OEM-supplied update utilities. I'd recommend identifying your hardware components and looking for the latest first party drivers, e.g. Intel wireless card > check Intel's website for the latest version.

Normal, no VMs. Many regular Modern UI apps running (mail, calendar, Lync, Alarms, RDP, WSOP, AlphaJax, IE, OneDrive, OneDrive business. 1GB Ramdisk, One Note, The Maxifier, Excel 2013 is always open. This is my idle baseline, I find Windows 8.1U1 x64 to be very memory efficient. I run with no page, all my disks except for an 2TB USB 3.0 external are SSDs, and I just choose not to put an unneeded page file on them.

post-59115-0-82069700-1398543257.png

 

Okay I tried Poolmon and it showed no abnormal memory values, http://i.imgur.com/PmwQzgk.png Nothing is above 8 digits (eg. 12000000 bytes which counts as around 10 mbs)

I'm pretty lost on what to do.

 

Definitely doesn't sound like SuperFetch. Regarding driver updates, I have misgivings about OEM-supplied update utilities. I'd recommend identifying your hardware components and looking for the latest first party drivers, e.g. Intel wireless card > check Intel's website for the latest version.

 

Do you still recommend that after Poolmon showed no errors? It would be quite hard to uninstall each driver and download it from the manufacturer's website.

So you have a viao ... with an ati video card.  VIAO says your drivers are up to date?  Sure they are.... check the driver date in device manager just to be sure.  You don't have hybrid graphics do you?

 

Intel and ati  graphics drivers?

 

Do you still recommend that after Poolmon showed no errors? It would be quite hard to uninstall each driver and download it from the manufacturer's website.

 

Well, alright.... but that link did say that a certain driver of a certain date was causing an issue. 

 

I'm only bringing up hybrid graphics because if you have hybrid(switchable) graphics then you're in the same boat as me.....

This is not normal usage.  It is likely a driver as others have said.  Try this, uninstall drivers one at a time and see what happens.  It's not a service or running process taking the memory.  Just for reference, I have a bukkit server running with only 2.9G used.  Generally windows will not be using more than 2GB at boot.  Drivers can affect this but not usually to a great effect.  The "In Use" is not cache. It's actually reserved for use, whether it's being used or not it is not available and being assigned to something.

Westren Digital Backup Drive you have? WDBoost.exe process seems to indicate it, I once read it having issue detailed under following blog by one Valve employee.

 

http://randomascii.wordpress.com/2012/09/04/windows-slowdown-investigated-and-identified/

 

Worth checking his fixup solution...

 

From same author on different blog post he mentioned this:

 

 

I just heard back from Western Digital yesterday and apparently a fixed driver is now available. Version 1.1.3.1 was released over the weekend, so if you have this drive be sure to get the update.

 

This is very wild guess and I can be completely wrong, on the hand try this below article for vsserv.exe process:

http://www.bitdefender.com/support/what-is-the-vsserv-exe-process-1116.html

This is definitely not normal and it's not superfetch as some people are saying. Superfetch used RAM shows up as "standby" RAM in the task manager, not as "In Use". Just start killing things one by one in the task manager.

 

And how will he kill a river in task manager ;)   also if it's a proper bad memory leak killing might not work. granted windows will generally clean up any bad remains nowadays but...

That Bitdefender needs to go. Any security software runs on top of the OS. Windows defender is embedded. Also what is in your startup Tab in Task Manager? I noticed you have allot of unnecessary processes.


This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This sounds like underneath the nice marketing spin, either someone at Adobe got tired of their lazy devs and asked Microsoft to help them sort at least some of Adobe's ancestral spaghetti code to make it go faster, or Microsoft wanted Adobe's crap to run better on Windows to make it look better when compared to Apple, so they offered to intervene. Either way, GOOD.
    • My favorite file manager for Windows 11 finally gets a long-requested feature by Taras Buria Files is among the best File Explorer alternatives for Windows 10 and 11. This free app is packed with all sorts of features and conveniences, but there is one crucial feature that is still missing—Tree View. Fortunately, the latest update in the Preview channel finally delivers it. With version 4.1.4, which is now available for download in the Preview channel, developers implemented Tree View, a new mode that displays folders in an expandable hierarchy. Windows 11's stock File Explorer always had this feature, but it was nowhere to be found in Files until now. Starting with the latest preview update, you can expand each drive and its nested folders without leaving the current location and then open the folder you need in the main view. To try Tree View in Files, update the app to the latest preview version, then click the small arrow next to a drive to expand its content. The developers say they are rolling out Tree View in Preview first to gather feedback from users and improve the feature before bringing it to all in the stable channel. In addition to Tree View, Files 4.1.14 improves the Windows Fonts folder. You can now preview each font directly in Files with no need to open the built-in font viewer. For now, these two features are only available in the Preview channel. For those using the stable release, developers recently released version 4.1.3, with improvements for the built-in tag system, on-demand folder size calculation, and plenty of various fixes. You can check out the full release notes here. You can download Files from the Microsoft Store (paid version) or its official website (free).
    • Who is paying for this 30x scale-up? Its sounds expensive.
    • Millions of users to benefit from Windows 11's new performance boost on Adobe Photoshop by Sayan Sen Despite the advent of AI-generated imagery, Adobe's Photoshop remains one of the most popular tools on this planet. Adobe does not have a publicly reported total user count but it's probably not wrong to assume there are millions. As of 2025, Adobe Creative Cloud has had approximately 41 million paid subscribers, many of whom likely use Photoshop. In addition, more than 166,000 companies worldwide are apparently also using the app. These figures are according to a very recent report by SQ Magazine. Out of them, it is fair to assume that many are probably running Windows. As such, there is good news for these users as Microsoft has announced Photoshop is getting a big 20% performance boost on x86-64 (AMD64) systems and a 13% bump-up on Arm devices. This is definitely great news for them as many have complained about the slow performance and general sluggishness of Photoshop on Windows 11 ever since the advent of the latter back in 2021. If you are wondering how Microsoft managed to do this, the answer lies in a combination of compiler-level optimizations and a technology called Sample Profile Guided Optimization (SPGO). According to Microsoft, Adobe worked closely with the company’s Visual C++ team and adopted the latest MSVC toolchain enhancements together with SPGO to squeeze more performance out of Photoshop’s CPU-bound workloads. Unlike traditional Profile Guided Optimization (PGO), which requires developers to create special instrumented builds and run lengthy training workloads, SPGO gathers performance data directly from optimized release binaries. This means Adobe could collect real-world usage information which gives a major advantage to this technique, as companies could leverage data collected from actual customer workloads rather than only relying on synthetic benchmark runs. In theory, this should allow optimizations to better reflect how users interact with software in the real world. Thanks to this, there are improvements to code layout, function inlining, hot-and-cold code separation, and other low-level tweaks that help processors execute instructions more efficiently. Essentially the compiler is better able to identify “hot” code paths, those which are most frequently executed, and optimize them accordingly.
    • "The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months¨ I'd prefer to see the lowest price in over a year
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      521
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!