Too much RAM used up in Windows 8.1


Recommended Posts

I bought a new laptop with Windows 8 (updated to 8.1) 64 bits with 8 GB of RAM. The problem is large RAM is always used up, around 4 GBs when I'm running nothing.
Task manager is showing no weird behavior, all the running tasks aren't using that much individually.
I could see that many people had this problem, but there have been different causes for it, so I thought the best thing I would do is ask for help.
I don't really know about RAM stuff but it seems that I have too high non-paged pool usage


http://i.imgur.com/wTtxNsy.png
http://i.imgur.com/uzwWSeZ.png
http://i.imgur.com/kKvau0u.png
http://i.imgur.com/VxDp2TZ.png

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1210965-too-much-ram-used-up-in-windows-81/
Share on other sites

I don't think that is superfetch, that ram is legitimately in use by something. Unfortunately its hard to tell what it is from those screenshots. My understanding of the non-paged pool memory (which as you indicated is really high...my system with 16GB ram only has a non-paged pool size of 167 MB) is often used by drivers. Perhaps install updated drivers and that will fix it?

What people often don't know is that overwriting memory is as fast as writing to empty memory.

 

that means superfecth reserves available free memory for stuff you are likely to start up or use the memory for so it's already there. then there's absolutely zero lag until the program has started since it's already in memory.

 

Now all the memory superfecth reserves, isn't really reserved, it's still available for anything else, so if you start another app that needs the memory pluperfect is using, superfecth merely releases it and the app will overwrite what's there. just as fast as if the memory had been empty. memory isn't an etchasketch that needs to be wiped before you can write something else. 

Try running a very demanding app that uses a lot of RAM or more than one app at once and see if after that, the RAM usage is lower. If so, this shows that it was mostly cache being used by Windows in the beginning

My system with 8GB in it is currently idling at 3.1GB and all I have open is a browser with 3 tabs, it looks as if the OP has a lot more services running than I do, so it's to be expected.

What people often don't know is that overwriting memory is as fast as writing to empty memory.

 

that means superfecth reserves available free memory for stuff you are likely to start up or use the memory for so it's already there. then there's absolutely zero lag until the program has started since it's already in memory.

 

Now all the memory superfecth reserves, isn't really reserved, it's still available for anything else, so if you start another app that needs the memory pluperfect is using, superfecth merely releases it and the app will overwrite what's there. just as fast as if the memory had been empty. memory isn't an etchasketch that needs to be wiped before you can write something else. 

superfetch doesn't show up in Non-paged pool memory though, it shows up as 'standby', his screenshots *do* show somewhat unusual NPP mem usage guys...

 

High NPP memory usage can indicate a driver memory leak and things like that.

 

The screenshots don't look too concerning overall though, because there is still plenty of 'standby' and 'free' memory available. However if OP notices NPP mem just keeps rising higher and higher over time that could indicate a driver causing a memory leak (I've seen several drivers cause this in windows 8, older versions of realtek ethernet drivers in particular)

Wow that was a fast reaction from the forum.

I don't think it's something related to Superfetch guys.

First, when I run a simple game with a browser on (not much tabs) it starts giving me "low on memory" warnings (which I think wouldn't happen if it was superfetch?). It also heats up, because of the RAM I would suppose, since the processor has low percentage of usage at that time, and since both my processor and video card would run that game very easily.

Second, I have another VAIO laptop with the same amount of RAM, and Windows 8.1 Pro, and the memory used is much lower than here. If it was superfetch, wouldn't it be the same as my current laptop?

 

And no, when I run more a more demanding app(s) the RAM used up doesn't decrease, it actually increases to 80% and gives warnings like I said.

 

 

Got any Virtual Machines running?

 

Not yet.. I was planning to, but this RAM problem is blocking my way.

 

 

 

will check it out and post any news. Thanks.

 

Edit:

Forgot to say, my drivers are all updated (according to VAIO update), and I'm not having any special softwares installed that could be running in the background

Wow that was a fast reaction from the forum.

I don't think it's something related to Superfetch guys.

First, when I run a simple game with a browser on (not much tabs) it starts giving me "low on memory" warnings (which I think wouldn't happen if it was superfetch?). It also heats up, because of the RAM I would suppose, since the processor has low percentage of usage at that time, and since both my processor and video card would run that game very easily.

Second, I have another VAIO laptop with the same amount of RAM, and Windows 8.1 Pro, and the memory used is much lower than here. If it was superfetch, wouldn't it be the same as my current laptop?

 

And no, when I run more a more demanding app(s) the RAM used up doesn't decrease, it actually increases to 80% and gives warnings like I said.

 

 

 

Not yet.. I was planning to, but this RAM problem is blocking my way.

 

 

 

will check it out and post any news. Thanks.

 

Edit:

Forgot to say, my drivers are all updated (according to VAIO update), and I'm not having any special softwares installed that could be running in the background

High NPP memory usage like that does typically indicate a misbehaving driver, if I had to hazard a guess that'd be it.

First, when I run a simple game with a browser on (not much tabs) it starts giving me "low on memory" warnings (which I think wouldn't happen if it was superfetch?). It also heats up, because of the RAM I would suppose, since the processor has low percentage of usage at that time, and since both my processor and video card would run that game very easily.

Definitely doesn't sound like SuperFetch. Regarding driver updates, I have misgivings about OEM-supplied update utilities. I'd recommend identifying your hardware components and looking for the latest first party drivers, e.g. Intel wireless card > check Intel's website for the latest version.

Normal, no VMs. Many regular Modern UI apps running (mail, calendar, Lync, Alarms, RDP, WSOP, AlphaJax, IE, OneDrive, OneDrive business. 1GB Ramdisk, One Note, The Maxifier, Excel 2013 is always open. This is my idle baseline, I find Windows 8.1U1 x64 to be very memory efficient. I run with no page, all my disks except for an 2TB USB 3.0 external are SSDs, and I just choose not to put an unneeded page file on them.

post-59115-0-82069700-1398543257.png

 

Okay I tried Poolmon and it showed no abnormal memory values, http://i.imgur.com/PmwQzgk.png Nothing is above 8 digits (eg. 12000000 bytes which counts as around 10 mbs)

I'm pretty lost on what to do.

 

Definitely doesn't sound like SuperFetch. Regarding driver updates, I have misgivings about OEM-supplied update utilities. I'd recommend identifying your hardware components and looking for the latest first party drivers, e.g. Intel wireless card > check Intel's website for the latest version.

 

Do you still recommend that after Poolmon showed no errors? It would be quite hard to uninstall each driver and download it from the manufacturer's website.

So you have a viao ... with an ati video card.  VIAO says your drivers are up to date?  Sure they are.... check the driver date in device manager just to be sure.  You don't have hybrid graphics do you?

 

Intel and ati  graphics drivers?

 

Do you still recommend that after Poolmon showed no errors? It would be quite hard to uninstall each driver and download it from the manufacturer's website.

 

Well, alright.... but that link did say that a certain driver of a certain date was causing an issue. 

 

I'm only bringing up hybrid graphics because if you have hybrid(switchable) graphics then you're in the same boat as me.....

This is not normal usage.  It is likely a driver as others have said.  Try this, uninstall drivers one at a time and see what happens.  It's not a service or running process taking the memory.  Just for reference, I have a bukkit server running with only 2.9G used.  Generally windows will not be using more than 2GB at boot.  Drivers can affect this but not usually to a great effect.  The "In Use" is not cache. It's actually reserved for use, whether it's being used or not it is not available and being assigned to something.

Westren Digital Backup Drive you have? WDBoost.exe process seems to indicate it, I once read it having issue detailed under following blog by one Valve employee.

 

http://randomascii.wordpress.com/2012/09/04/windows-slowdown-investigated-and-identified/

 

Worth checking his fixup solution...

 

From same author on different blog post he mentioned this:

 

 

I just heard back from Western Digital yesterday and apparently a fixed driver is now available. Version 1.1.3.1 was released over the weekend, so if you have this drive be sure to get the update.

 

This is very wild guess and I can be completely wrong, on the hand try this below article for vsserv.exe process:

http://www.bitdefender.com/support/what-is-the-vsserv-exe-process-1116.html

This is definitely not normal and it's not superfetch as some people are saying. Superfetch used RAM shows up as "standby" RAM in the task manager, not as "In Use". Just start killing things one by one in the task manager.

 

And how will he kill a river in task manager ;)   also if it's a proper bad memory leak killing might not work. granted windows will generally clean up any bad remains nowadays but...

That Bitdefender needs to go. Any security software runs on top of the OS. Windows defender is embedded. Also what is in your startup Tab in Task Manager? I noticed you have allot of unnecessary processes.


This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Glad these prices are starting to come down, but that is still crazy. I bought the 2TB 9100 Pro (slightly more expensive version with PCIe 5.0) last year for $240.
    • The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months by Sayan Sen Yesterday, we covered a really good deal wherein you can get a 4TB TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 NVMe PCIe Gen4 SSD for a low price of just $400 with a special discount coupon. That's just $100 per TB, making it a very good offer during these hard times. The deal is still live, so you can check it out in its dedicated article here if you do not want to miss out. Meanwhile, if you don't have that kind of budget but still wish to buy an SSD for a good price, the 2TB variant of the TeamGroup SSD at $280 its lowest price in over three months. Meanwhile, those seeking 2TB but faster performance can check out Samsung's 990 PRO, which has hit the lowest price also in the last quarter or so, as it's on sale for $370 (purchase links under the specs table down below). Thus, you want a faster drive, get the 990 Pro, or you want more capacity, grab the TeamGroup 4TB linked in the first para. The 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $500. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The tech specs are given below: Specification TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 2TB Samsung 990 PRO 2TB Interface PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe 1.4 PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 Form Factor M.2 2280 M.2 2280 Controller InnoGrit Controller Samsung In-house Controller NAND Flash 3D TLC 3D TLC DRAM Cache None (HMB supported) 2GB LPDDR4 Sequential Read (Max) 5,000 MB/s 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write (Max) 4,500 MB/s 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4K) Up to 600,000 IOPS Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4K) Up to 700,000 IOPS Up to 1,550,000 IOPS TBW (Endurance) 1,300 TBW 1,200 TBW MTBF 3,000,000 hours 1,500,000 hours Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C 0°C to 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C to 85°C -40°C to 85°C Shock Resistance 1,500G / 0.5ms 1,500G / 0.5ms Heatsink Patented Graphene Heat Spreader No Get them at the links below: Samsung 990 PRO SSD 2TB (MZ-V9P2T0B/AM): $369.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 2TB SSD (TM8FFE002T0C129): $279.99 (Sold by TeamGroup, Shipped by Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • If you can't spell a simple word that 2nd graders learn, your entire argument is suspect.
    • And here goes the "Won't someone think of the children" brigade. Get stuffed mate. This has NOTHING to do with making the internet safe. It's about tracking adults, spying on your online activity, and sending the boys around when they don't like something you post. Also, again, parliament have voted TWICE against this, and Starmer is going ahead anyway. THAT is anti-democratic bullsh**. They will use this law to track you, they will use this law to control you, and they will use this law to punish you if they don't like what you do, even if it's legal. And your data? Say bye bye to that. It'll be on the darkweb in weeks. I'm not some rando online. I've been an IT professional for 40 years, many of it in security. I know exactly what this means and what will happen to your data. I do not consent and I will not comply.
    • "...but it may not be Microsoft's fault" seems like a reasonable way to tease what is going on without leaving the user with a false impression that an update is the problem. A title isn't a summery, it is meant to entice the user to read the article. It should not contain a misleading premise; which this title does not. You could maybe complain that the first paragraph should have included that detail. The writing style popularized over 100 years ago in newspapers will cover the most important information as soon as possible with details and nuance added later; the idea being that with each new paragraph you have less of the reader's focus.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      520
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!