Is It Worth Switching to Windows Phone 8.1?


Recommended Posts

Hi fellow neowin members,

 

 

 

So im wondering if switching to Windows Phone 8.1 is worth voiding a warranty?

 

 

Has anybody installed it - regardless of the consequences?

 

Do you enjoy it SO much more than WP8 that its worth not having protection in case of an accident etc./

 

 

Thanks for any responses,

 

 

 

Tobias

I upgraded it to the developer preview and is worth it. Great new features and very usable. If you are going to go for it, I recommend after the upgrade to do a hard reset to reinstall a clean WP 8.1, it will improve your experience and bugs free. It also does not affect the warranty because your phone will eventually upgrade to the final version or RTM in couple months.

Myself, on my non-activated pay as you go At&T 520, yes.

 

So far, worked perfectly. I even was able to revert to Windows 8.0 using the Nokia recovery tool (tried it just to see).

That being said, I can only speak for my specific Nokia model.

I had quite a major issue - no mobile data! (or, it would fail to reconnect mobile data after the first screen-off sleep).  I've an Ativ S, but I've read of other devices with the same issue.

 

Found (from a forum) the solution was to disallow all background tasks and re-enable them one by one.  All sweet now!

  • Like 1

I had quite a major issue - no mobile data! (or, it would fail to reconnect mobile data after the first screen-off sleep).  I've an Ativ S, but I've read of other devices with the same issue.

 

Found (from a forum) the solution was to disallow all background tasks and re-enable them one by one.  All sweet now!

I have heard the ATIV phones have had some pretty major problems with the update. 

 

http://www.wpcentral.com/psa-dont-install-windows-phone-81-samsung-ativ-se

Personally its worth it, as far as the warranty thing goes. They only warn of it because each carrier / manufacture is different. However, if you have a Lumia phone no matter the carrier it will not void your warranty.

I'm having problems with IE. So much so that I've considered rolling back to 8 now that the 8.1 excitement has worn off, because seriously a lot of stuff may be cool in 8.1, like Cortana or action center or swipe keyboard, they hardly carry any practical value for an average user. I was really looking forward to the improvements in IE, but so far my experience with it has been frustating to say the least. I spend most of my time on the browser on my phone, and the browser in 8 may have sucked and was just limited to 6 tabs, but at least it worked. In 8.1, there's no sense to the tab arrangement, they removed the number of tabs open from its button and if you switch to another tab and come back again, the whole page loads all over again. And not even the refreshed version, but the cached one. The worst thing however is the new video player. I stream a lot of stuff, or used to in 8 from the comfort of my bed late at nights, but I haven't been unable to stream a single video with this new player. "Decode error" every ******* time if you even so much as pause the video, forget about scrubbing. Speaking of which, I miss the old back forward buttons. I find the scrub bar horrible to use on a touch phone with fat fingers. So that's my opinion. If I somehow manage to roll back to 8, I'm sure there are some things from 8.1 I'll miss, but I won't regret it. Hope they fix the mess that is IE right now by time the final version rolls out with Cyan.

I'm having problems with IE. So much so that I've considered rolling back to 8 now that the 8.1 excitement has worn off, because seriously a lot of stuff may be cool in 8.1, like Cortana or action center or swipe keyboard, they hardly carry any practical value for an average user. I was really looking forward to the improvements in IE, but so far my experience with it has been frustating to say the least. I spend most of my time on the browser on my phone, and the browser in 8 may have sucked and was just limited to 6 tabs, but at least it worked. In 8.1, there's no sense to the tab arrangement, they removed the number of tabs open from its button and if you switch to another tab and come back again, the whole page loads all over again. And not even the refreshed version, but the cached one. The worst thing however is the new video player. I stream a lot of stuff, or used to in 8 from the comfort of my bed late at nights, but I haven't been unable to stream a single video with this new player. "Decode error" every ******* time if you even so much as pause the video, forget about scrubbing. Speaking of which, I miss the old back forward buttons. I find the scrub bar horrible to use on a touch phone with fat fingers. So that's my opinion. If I somehow manage to roll back to 8, I'm sure there are some things from 8.1 I'll miss, but I won't regret it. Hope they fix the mess that is IE right now by time the final version rolls out with Cyan.

That's odd.  I have had the polar opposite experience with the new IE.  I'll admit I don't use tabs that much but some of the high points for me are the swipe for back and forwards and the reading view.  There are still webpages that render a full sites and used to be very hard to read on 8.  The last high point is the streaming.  They have improved it considerably so it can play pretty much anything that iOS plays, like an embedded Vimeo video for example.  Never seen the decode error.

Hi everyone,

 

thanks for the really helpful responses (really!)

 

So i am tempted with the upgrade - however there are a few other factors to include (for me) 

 

Im running a HTC 8X - which i don't believe has any rollback features should i wish to revert back to Windows Phone 8.

My warranty does cover hardware - and they will not fix if its "voided".

 

I assume i would have to find an independent fixture,

 

 

 

Has anybody tried with HTC models?

 

thanks a lot,

 

 

Tobias

So im wondering if switching to Windows Phone 8.1 is worth voiding a warranty?

 

Has anybody installed it - regardless of the consequences?

 

Do you enjoy it SO much more than WP8 that its worth not having protection in case of an accident etc./

 

Overall Windows Phone 8.1 is a great update to the OS. I think most people are really going to enjoy a lot of the features.

I've installed it on a 520 and 920.

 

Issues I've had is just some lag when tapping things to open them. Kind of takes away from the ultra smooth feel Windows Phone had for me, but I can understand if it's just from the preview builds we're using (debug etc).

If you're outside North America at the moment you're going to have to play around with regional settings to get Cortana working.

Also, if you were a fan Facebook, twitter etc integration into the messaging and people hubs, that's gone now. Messaging hub is just for text messages. People hub needs to have the Facebook app installed to work properly with your contacts... and the Facebook app and Facebook messaging apps are very poorly done, more so when it used to be a slick smooth experience from the hubs.

 

The lack of Facebook is the only reason I'd go back to WP8.0 now, it certainly feels more like a generic smart phone with 'an app for that' experience now.

 

I have heard the ATIV phones have had some pretty major problems with the update. 

 

http://www.wpcentral.com/psa-dont-install-windows-phone-81-samsung-ativ-se

those are issues with the new Verizon ativ se, not the ativ s. ive had no such issues with the ativ s. the only major major annoyance I have is that usually,when I pressed the windows button, if my finger was resting on the touchscreen, the windows button would take priority and I would be brought back to the start screen. now, I have to hit the windows button precisely without my finger touching the touchscreen,or else the windows button doesn't respond. im sure this will get fixed with a firmware update,and isn't actually a wp8.1 problem.

I have had it installed since it was released and think it is very good! The notification centre is excellent, extra tiles and background images are all excellent features.

 

In addition, performance wise my phone is smoother and more fluid, Other storage has been reduced to pretty much nothing.

 

Overall I think it was a worthwhile upgrade, and any bugs that are found will be ironed out in RTM.

 

Also, you can revert back to wp8 if you want :D

Hi everyone,

 

thanks for the really helpful responses (really!)

 

So i am tempted with the upgrade - however there are a few other factors to include (for me) 

 

Im running a HTC 8X - which i don't believe has any rollback features should i wish to revert back to Windows Phone 8.

My warranty does cover hardware - and they will not fix if its "voided".

 

I assume i would have to find an independent fixture,

 

 

 

Has anybody tried with HTC models?

 

thanks a lot,

 

 

Tobias

 

 

I believe George P has an 8X that he has upgraded to WP8.1 and I don't think he has reported any major problems.

 

Personally, I would definitely upgrade.  WP8.1 offers so many little improvements that I feel quite constrained when using a phone running WP8.  In particular, I'm currently loving the improvements to the Mail app that make it more like the Windows 8 Mail app.  Photos appear as thumbnails, you have an option to download all at once and you can scroll through photos once you've opened one rather than having to go back and forth between the pictures and the email. 

I do not like it.  I like some things about it, but the castrated messenging app is driving me nuts.  I hate the Skype app, Microsoft's service is my main chat protocol, and now I'm being forced to use a crappy app to chat with people when it used to be integrated into the OS.  There are lots of pros but this one con is seriously making me consider reflashing 8.0 amber.

Honestly, WinRT and the Flow keyboard are probably the two things that I really care about, everything else went down the I-don't-care path after the first few days of excitement / hype. Not even Cortana since I am in Sweden right now and I rather not restart the phone multiple times per day for some silly feature (silly at the moment, will most likely improve in the future).

Honestly, WinRT and the Flow keyboard are probably the two things that I really care about, everything else went down the I-don't-care path after the first few days of excitement / hype. Not even Cortana since I am in Sweden right now and I rather not restart the phone multiple times per day for some silly feature (silly at the moment, will most likely improve in the future).

flow keyboard is great!

 

For cortana, I am in the UK and have it as I set my region to US. I kept the keyboard and regional settings as UK so currencies, date and time all stay as UK format.

 

I like Cortana so far, it really is going to be a powerful tool once it is out of beta and is obviously region specific. For example:

 

Places and wifi control - you can save favourite places and then set your wifi to turn on when you reach that place, doesn't work for leaving but it has been confirmed this will be in final build.

Reminders that appear when someone calls or texts, for example " Remind me to tell John when he calls that he needs to do x,y,z" John calls, reminder pops up,

 

Im not a fan of talking to my phone....lol but I think some of the non voice features of Cortana are pretty awesome.

Hehe.  I had one of those "Wow" moments with Cortana last week.  I had a trip to New Jersey coming up which the details were emailed to me.  Cortana picked up on it and asked me if I wanted her to track it so I said yes.  The day I was traveling I had lunch and checked Cortana. She told me that my flight was on time, how long it would take me to drive to the airport from my current location and what the temperature was in New Jersey.  That was pretty cool.

 

Another feature I'm enjoying is the "Hey, you better leave now" when I have appointments throughout the day.  I just have to make sure the location is correct and she'll give me enough of a heads up to leave where I am.

Hehe.  I had one of those "Wow" moments with Cortana last week.  I had a trip to New Jersey coming up which the details were emailed to me.  Cortana picked up on it and asked me if I wanted her to track it so I said yes.  The day I was traveling I had lunch and checked Cortana. She told me that my flight was on time, how long it would take me to drive to the airport from my current location and what the temperature was in New Jersey.  That was pretty cool.

 

Another feature I'm enjoying is the "Hey, you better leave now" when I have appointments throughout the day.  I just have to make sure the location is correct and she'll give me enough of a heads up to leave where I am.

 

Cortana tracked my flights last week too. It's pretty handy.

 

I am loving the "Time to leave - You need to leave now to reach work by 10:20am" alert every morning. :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!