Microsoft to charge for FAT technology


Recommended Posts

from dp review, Dec 4, 2003

Microsoft will soon be charging manufacturers of flash memory card devices and those which use them $0.25 per unit or up to $250,000 to use the FAT filesystem. For those who are unaware the FAT file system was developed by Microsoft back in 1976 and has become the standard file system for all digital still cameras. Microsoft owns patents to the FAT File System but for many years hasn't even hinted that it may one day decide to charge for it. These new licenses appear to come into effect immediately and specifically make mention of 'compact flash memory cards' and 'portable digital still cameras'. What a great way for Microsoft to cash in on the most popular consumer products (as if they don't make enough money already).

I could understand M$ charging the camera manufacturers a fee, but charging the memory card manufacturers a fee is equivalent to charging floppy disk manufacturers the same kind of fee. The memory cards can be formatted in any format (I've formatted one HFS, and even NTFS before), but it is the CAMERA that is doing the formatting. If M$ chooses to do this, the simplest thing for card manufacturers to do is to simply ship the cards unformatted. Most cameras will offer to format them the first time they are inserted.

Here is a list of step Microsoft likes to use to make easy money....

1. Release something useful for the general public to use

2. Allow people to use this technology for free without any strings attached

3. Wait for this item to become an industry standard

4. Now attach some strings and make everybody pay money you for the use of this now industry standard technology

5. Watch the money roll in, or watch the industry standard switch

See how easy that is :D

i don't see the big deal.. first it is microsoft's technology to do with as they please... second, like stv said, it is only $0.25 per unit... *shrugs* then again, i do not own any of the affected pieces of equipment or the companies...

it's like GIF images before that expired

and in fact i don't think that MS have any claim on this 'FAT' technology because their 'FAT' technology was a filesystem that worked on hard drives, this is an implementation that resembles the same method of transfer as FAT, but because it's on flash memory, it physically is different

I own the following products that use the FAT file system technology:

- Lexar Media SD Card (64MB)

- SanDisk Cruzer Drive (128MB)

- SanDisk SD Card (256MB)

- FujiFilm FinePix A303 Camera (w/ 16MB xD-Picture Card)

I am not sure as to whether these products apply, but I would not mind paying the extra fee.

Please correct me if I am wrong, and also list any other products that might be affected.

Yeah, and the cap on this is $250,000 from what the post says. I don't really know that for sure, or if that is out of context, but usually there is a max cap so you don't have to pay like a billion dollars just because you mass produce products. $250,000 is nothing to these companies that manufacture the hardware.

it's like GIF images before that expired

and in fact i don't think that MS have any claim on this 'FAT' technology because their 'FAT' technology was a filesystem that worked on hard drives, this is an implementation that resembles the same method of transfer as FAT, but because it's on flash memory, it physically is different

a file system is a file system is a file system. It doesn't matter what media it is on, it's formatted the same way with FAT. That's why you can't read a disk or disc formatted for HFS in Windows. You can make your OS convert the information if you want, but that's a different story.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It is silly there is no simple way to check whether this profile has been activated. CFRs are normal, but trying to even hide the fact if it's on / off seems silly, especially for something so user-facing. Surely Microsoft is "proud" of their engineering efforts on this one and ought to display it somwhere in the GUI.
    • Many Linux distros are not known for excellent battery life, so I'm not sure that is the best example. A more apt example may be Apple, but Apple's CPUs are simply far more efficient than Intel & AMD at single-threaded tasks like these, so "boosting" is not as power-hungry and less heat-inducing. Not to mention Apple will hardly engage P-cores for basic UI tasks; they use a pretty complicated QoS scheme to only activate P-cores for more serious workloads like HTML / JS execution or decompression or application launch. Microsoft is (smartly) doing it for launch, but also for UI tasks, which is the more nonsensical part: why ... do Windows 11's UIs need modern CPUs to boost? It should load so quickly that there's not even time for the CPU to boost.
    • I've not seen any controlled testing and, judging by Microsoft's mentality, within a year, they'll have added so much more bloat, it'll undo any perceptible latency benefit and we'll have boosted the CPU clocks for nothing.
    • It depends: heat soak is a thing. Initially on cold boot-up, the heatsinks & heatpipes are at ambient temp. After heatsinks & heatpipes warm up (through normal usage), they don't immediately cool to ambient temp when the load goes away. So their baseline is higher and the trigger point for fans is much less stress. Add a few more CPU spikes → it's too hot to stay at the same fan RPM → fans get triggered to start up up much sooner / get triggered to ramp much more quickly.
    • Can LibreOffice just shut up and worry about themselves and stop comparing themselves? Do we see Microsoft complaining about euro office?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!