Recommended Posts

Doom "Mod" Makes The Game Look Very 21st Century
 
komjlnofrfztcogjdzxl.gif
 
It might be stretching the definition a little, but this Doom II mod is one of the most technically impressive things I've seen in a long time.
 
For reference, this is what Doom II looked like upon release.



While this is what the upcoming Total Chaos - Overgrowth looks like.

 
Yeah. Wow.
 
Some of the more contemporary additions being made include 16x motion blur and bloom lighting, while smart use of a filter glosses over some of the areas the engine can't be dragged kicking and screaming into the modern era.
 
Note that this isn't a straight mod, though. The code from a 1994 PC game simply couldn't handle all that extra, new stuff. Instead, it's an all-new game being that'll run on GZDoom and Zandronum, two projects that take the original Doom source code and bolt on stuff like the ability to add things such as lighting effects.
 
Total Chaos - Overgrowth is intended as a no-guns game set in a post-apocalyptic future. Inspired by STALKER the idea is to explore a wasteland and "use their wit and the hazards they find in the environment to defend themselves".
 
Total Chaos - Overgrowth [site]

 

Source: Kotaku

Watched video.

This has nothing to do with Doom.

EDIT: Ah the engine, they used modified Doom engine. Still not impressive.

You really don't know the limits of these 'modified' DOOM engines, do you? I guess not, since you don't find this impressive. Do you think Kirby on the NES is 'not impressive,' either?

 

This mod is pretty amazing considering the limits of the DOOM engines used, especially Zandronum.

  • Like 4

You really don't know the limits of these 'modified' DOOM engines, do you? I guess not, since you don't find this impressive. Do you think Kirby on the NES is 'not impressive,' either?

 

This mod is pretty amazing considering the limits of the DOOM engines used, especially Zandronum.

Key question is why?

There are plenty of engines out there without silly limitations of old school shooters.

Heck even starting with the Quake engine makes you less limited (Forest ?LordHavoc? Hale Dark Places Engine and Classic Nexuiz).

Key question is why?

There are plenty of engines out there without silly limitations of old school shooters.

Heck even starting with the Quake engine makes you less limited (Forest ?LordHavoc? Hale Dark Places Engine and Classic Nexuiz).

 

Why not? Some times the easy way isn't the best way. Perhaps they wanted a challenge?

It looks ok, but I kind of agree with Alexander on this.  I'm sure there is a mechanic that could outfit a '67 Volkswagen Beetle with a modern hybrid engine, which would be impressive.  But the question is, why?  Sure, it would be a challenge, but what is the benefit. 

 

Their game concept and art style seems cool, but in a modern engine that idea could turn from "wow, that's neat that they were able to do that" into "that is revolutionary".  Seems like they are limiting themselves quite a bit.

It looks ok, but I kind of agree with Alexander on this.  I'm sure there is a mechanic that could outfit a '67 Volkswagen Beetle with a modern hybrid engine, which would be impressive.  But the question is, why?  Sure, it would be a challenge, but what is the benefit. 

 

Their game concept and art style seems cool, but in a modern engine that idea could turn from "wow, that's neat that they were able to do that" into "that is revolutionary".  Seems like they are limiting themselves quite a bit.

 

Nahhh... better to drop a Chevy V8 in it!

 

th?id=HN.608022646049279131&pid=1.7

Key question is why?

There are plenty of engines out there without silly limitations of old school shooters.

Heck even starting with the Quake engine makes you less limited (Forest ?LordHavoc? Hale Dark Places Engine and Classic Nexuiz).

Someone in the demoscene took an FPGA, created his own CPU, APU and blitter engine for it, JUST to make a (very awesome) intro on it.

Why? Because he could, because it's fun and something extraordinary that people enjoy working on and really sticks out.

Where's the fun in just getting the most modern free engine and having to do nothing, you'd have the whole project completed in a matter of hours and you wouldn't have a clue how any of the underlying parts work.

Just as an aside, do you guys deliberately embed these videos without the fullscreen control, or is yet another thing Youtube does to irritate me?

 

-Forjo

Weird, I have the fullscreen control on my end.  I must say that I've been noticing lately more and more embedded videos that are missing it.  That and also when I click on "Watch later" I get the exclamation point instead of the check mark.  When I click YouTube and do it from there it works fine.

Weird, I have the fullscreen control on my end.  I must say that I've been noticing lately more and more embedded videos that are missing it.  That and also when I click on "Watch later" I get the exclamation point instead of the check mark.  When I click YouTube and do it from there it works fine.

 

Full screen control is visible for me too, but I often have the 'watch later' bug as well.

 

Maybe a browser issue? Using FF29 here

Weird, I have the fullscreen control on my end.  I must say that I've been noticing lately more and more embedded videos that are missing it.  That and also when I click on "Watch later" I get the exclamation point instead of the check mark.  When I click YouTube and do it from there it works fine.

Probably just Google ####ing on IE again like they did on Windows Phone. If I changed my browser string it would probably work.

 

Call me paranoid, but it's happened before.

 

-Forjo

  • 2 months later...

Watched video.

This has nothing to do with Doom.

EDIT: Ah the engine, they used modified Doom engine. Still not impressive.

Yeah, I was expecting it to be a 21st century Doom II. 

  • Like 1

Yeah I think Doom mod is the wrong phrase. It's like saying Half-Life is a Quake mod. It just uses a heavily modified game engine.

 

Which is very impressive as a technical achievement.. but I don't see any real world use for it. Nonetheless.. a great job!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I have a Motorola, one of the lower end ones, it works fine. It is possible to get rid of the Gemini app and also to disable googles assistant , but A.i is still apps. I try to avoid all LLM A.I, is i can, I use no Ai duck duck go.
    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      189
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!