Recommended Posts

Doom "Mod" Makes The Game Look Very 21st Century
 
komjlnofrfztcogjdzxl.gif
 
It might be stretching the definition a little, but this Doom II mod is one of the most technically impressive things I've seen in a long time.
 
For reference, this is what Doom II looked like upon release.



While this is what the upcoming Total Chaos - Overgrowth looks like.

 
Yeah. Wow.
 
Some of the more contemporary additions being made include 16x motion blur and bloom lighting, while smart use of a filter glosses over some of the areas the engine can't be dragged kicking and screaming into the modern era.
 
Note that this isn't a straight mod, though. The code from a 1994 PC game simply couldn't handle all that extra, new stuff. Instead, it's an all-new game being that'll run on GZDoom and Zandronum, two projects that take the original Doom source code and bolt on stuff like the ability to add things such as lighting effects.
 
Total Chaos - Overgrowth is intended as a no-guns game set in a post-apocalyptic future. Inspired by STALKER the idea is to explore a wasteland and "use their wit and the hazards they find in the environment to defend themselves".
 
Total Chaos - Overgrowth [site]

 

Source: Kotaku

Watched video.

This has nothing to do with Doom.

EDIT: Ah the engine, they used modified Doom engine. Still not impressive.

You really don't know the limits of these 'modified' DOOM engines, do you? I guess not, since you don't find this impressive. Do you think Kirby on the NES is 'not impressive,' either?

 

This mod is pretty amazing considering the limits of the DOOM engines used, especially Zandronum.

You really don't know the limits of these 'modified' DOOM engines, do you? I guess not, since you don't find this impressive. Do you think Kirby on the NES is 'not impressive,' either?

 

This mod is pretty amazing considering the limits of the DOOM engines used, especially Zandronum.

Key question is why?

There are plenty of engines out there without silly limitations of old school shooters.

Heck even starting with the Quake engine makes you less limited (Forest ?LordHavoc? Hale Dark Places Engine and Classic Nexuiz).

Key question is why?

There are plenty of engines out there without silly limitations of old school shooters.

Heck even starting with the Quake engine makes you less limited (Forest ?LordHavoc? Hale Dark Places Engine and Classic Nexuiz).

 

Why not? Some times the easy way isn't the best way. Perhaps they wanted a challenge?

It looks ok, but I kind of agree with Alexander on this.  I'm sure there is a mechanic that could outfit a '67 Volkswagen Beetle with a modern hybrid engine, which would be impressive.  But the question is, why?  Sure, it would be a challenge, but what is the benefit. 

 

Their game concept and art style seems cool, but in a modern engine that idea could turn from "wow, that's neat that they were able to do that" into "that is revolutionary".  Seems like they are limiting themselves quite a bit.

It looks ok, but I kind of agree with Alexander on this.  I'm sure there is a mechanic that could outfit a '67 Volkswagen Beetle with a modern hybrid engine, which would be impressive.  But the question is, why?  Sure, it would be a challenge, but what is the benefit. 

 

Their game concept and art style seems cool, but in a modern engine that idea could turn from "wow, that's neat that they were able to do that" into "that is revolutionary".  Seems like they are limiting themselves quite a bit.

 

Nahhh... better to drop a Chevy V8 in it!

 

th?id=HN.608022646049279131&pid=1.7

Key question is why?

There are plenty of engines out there without silly limitations of old school shooters.

Heck even starting with the Quake engine makes you less limited (Forest ?LordHavoc? Hale Dark Places Engine and Classic Nexuiz).

Someone in the demoscene took an FPGA, created his own CPU, APU and blitter engine for it, JUST to make a (very awesome) intro on it.

Why? Because he could, because it's fun and something extraordinary that people enjoy working on and really sticks out.

Where's the fun in just getting the most modern free engine and having to do nothing, you'd have the whole project completed in a matter of hours and you wouldn't have a clue how any of the underlying parts work.

Just as an aside, do you guys deliberately embed these videos without the fullscreen control, or is yet another thing Youtube does to irritate me?

 

-Forjo

Weird, I have the fullscreen control on my end.  I must say that I've been noticing lately more and more embedded videos that are missing it.  That and also when I click on "Watch later" I get the exclamation point instead of the check mark.  When I click YouTube and do it from there it works fine.

Weird, I have the fullscreen control on my end.  I must say that I've been noticing lately more and more embedded videos that are missing it.  That and also when I click on "Watch later" I get the exclamation point instead of the check mark.  When I click YouTube and do it from there it works fine.

 

Full screen control is visible for me too, but I often have the 'watch later' bug as well.

 

Maybe a browser issue? Using FF29 here

Weird, I have the fullscreen control on my end.  I must say that I've been noticing lately more and more embedded videos that are missing it.  That and also when I click on "Watch later" I get the exclamation point instead of the check mark.  When I click YouTube and do it from there it works fine.

Probably just Google ####ing on IE again like they did on Windows Phone. If I changed my browser string it would probably work.

 

Call me paranoid, but it's happened before.

 

-Forjo

  • 2 months later...

Watched video.

This has nothing to do with Doom.

EDIT: Ah the engine, they used modified Doom engine. Still not impressive.

Yeah, I was expecting it to be a 21st century Doom II. 

  • Like 1

Yeah I think Doom mod is the wrong phrase. It's like saying Half-Life is a Quake mod. It just uses a heavily modified game engine.

 

Which is very impressive as a technical achievement.. but I don't see any real world use for it. Nonetheless.. a great job!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • As someone who isn't in the EU what is all this gatekeeper stuff about anyways?
    • The data center gold rush has tossed all forms of sensibility and reasoning right out of the window. The craziest part being that AI infrastructure isn't driven by consumer demand. It's being driven by manufacturers to force AI onto the market, consumers be damned.
    • Apple has not said whether the new prices are temporary ..... LOL.... These are the new prices peeps, because they will still sell them. Everybody will get used to the price hike = more Profit!
    • EU says AWS and Microsoft Azure should be treated as DMA gatekeepers by Pradeep Viswanathan Under the European Commission's Digital Markets Act (DMA), a company is presumed to be a gatekeeper if it meets certain quantitative thresholds. However, the Commission can still investigate and designate a company even if it does not meet the numeric thresholds, provided the service has a major market impact. The European Commission launched its investigations into AWS and Azure on November 18, 2025, to address unfair or anti-competitive practices in the cloud sector. Today, the European Commission has informed Amazon and Microsoft of its preliminary view that their cloud computing services, AWS and Azure, should be designated as gatekeepers under the DMA. The EC highlighted that Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft Azure are the largest and second-largest cloud computing services in the European Union. Both of these platforms act as important gateways between businesses and their customers in the EU. The EC further mentioned that AWS and Azure have reached significant turnover, built large and entrenched user bases, and benefit from high switching costs and customer lock-in. Furthermore, their operational capacity and investments appear to have outpaced those of competitors. Teresa Ribera, Executive Vice-President for Clean, Just and Competitive Transition, said the following: It is important to note that the findings are preliminary and do not decide the final outcome. Amazon and Microsoft can now review the findings and respond to the Commission. However, if the Commission confirms its preliminary findings, it will formally designate Amazon and Microsoft as gatekeepers for AWS and Azure. Once designated, Microsoft and Amazon will have six months to bring their cloud services into full compliance with the DMA’s rules and regulations.
    • will EU users be getting the extra 1yr update for free again?
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      431
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      168
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      133
    4. 4
      Xenon
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!