• 0

Going to C# from heavy Python experience


Question

Hey there! I'm a noob and I need help.

 

 

I've been given certain liberties on my companies next GUI adventures and after enough research I've decided I'm going with Visual C#. The ease of Visual Studio with the friendliness of C# seems like an excellent combination. The only problem is.... I don't really know C#. I get the basic Syntax, it's pretty straight forward as I have quite a bit of experience with PHP (and less so with C) but I know I need to drastically improve. Partial Classes, for example, scare me. Although so does this odd thing known as compiling and strong typing.

 

 

Answer Guide:

Keep in mind I'm a visual person and have never been very good with books. Sure I can read and comprehend but I have a much easier time with watching by example and taking apart other peoples code on github or something. This doesn't mean I don't want books, just that they are second fiddle.

 

Question:

As a heavy Python3/Qt4/MySQL programmer where is the best place to start learning C#?

 

Are there any projects you know of written in C# that would be easy for me to dissect?

 

Do you have any experience with both Python and C# and know a thing or two about important differences / "gotchas"?

 

 

Thanks a ton!

14 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

If you've done a lot of any object-oriented language then the syntax of C# should not be a huge issue. Stackoverflow has an awesome C# community, if you ask a question there it usually gets answered in 5 minutes. I'm an expert on C# and .NET so I can probably answer most of your questions as well.

 

I think the bigger change from Python is getting to know .NET, the underlying platform: how code is compiled into assemblies, how assemblies can reference each other, how garbage collection works in regards to reference and value types, all the basic types in the root System namespace (Object, String, Type, etc.) that sort of thing. .NET is a wonderful development environment with excellent documentation, comprehensive, high quality libraries, and this is reflected in many independent open-source projects that build on the platform. Personally, I'm totally spoiled and wouldn't use anything else these days. C# was consistently designed as a "pit of success": usually the most obvious thing to do is the best thing to do (unlike in some other *cough languages).

 

If you're going to do GUI programming, WPF can be a pretty tough pill to swallow. Try to focus on one thing at a time.

 

Coming from Python you're likely used to exploratory programming inside the REPL. Visual Studio doesn't provide a C# REPL, but LINQPad is a great alternative.

 

I'm not convinced of the value of learning by reading other code; perhaps you can understand it but it'll be hard for you to figure out why it was coded this way. A really good book for experienced programmers is C# in a Nutshell. For an in-depth treatment of the .NET platform (once you have some experience with it), read CLR via C#.

  • 0
  On 03/06/2014 at 01:02, Andre S. said:

. . .

 

I'm glad you're an expert. For the most part I'm fairly self-sufficient but I may ask direct C# questions from time to time (so long as I haven't found something on S.O. yet).

 

I agree on C#, it looks like a wonderful language so far and I'm a bit disappointed I overlooked it the first time around. I believe there were some issues with Linux compatibility at the time that immediately removed it from my "check it out" list. Now that's no longer of concern.

 

I've been working out the Windows Form Application but haven't touched WPF; I'll stay away for now. WFA however is very straight forward and simple.

 

I don't really touch the REPL much these days but I agree it was a big help in the beginning, I'll take a look a LINQPad. Thanks.

 

I read other peoples code not to understand the syntax but the reasoning. I don't generally get into that until I have a firm grasp of the language, but the one thing I don't want to happen is code Python in C#. There is a C# way of doing things and in general other peoples code are a good indicator of those methods. I've never been formally taught so I have to learn formalities and methodologies the hard way, unfortunately.

 

Thanks for the help. I'll check those books out.

  • 0
  On 03/06/2014 at 01:31, astropheed said:

I've been working out the Windows Form Application but haven't touched WPF; I'll stay away for now. WFA however is very straight forward and simple.

It's usually referred to as WinForms. ;)

  • 0
  On 03/06/2014 at 01:02, Andre S. said:

.NET is a wonderful development environment with excellent documentation, comprehensive, high quality libraries, and this is reflected in many independent open-source projects that build on the platform. Personally, I'm totally spoiled and wouldn't use anything else these days. C# was consistently designed as a "pit of success": usually the most obvious thing to do is the best thing to do (unlike in some other *cough languages).

 

I'm having a really good time with it so far. I wish I got into this much sooner.

 

Update:

I enjoy the type system. I didn't think I'd like strongly typed languages (I didn't like it in C) but I actually find it gives a certain peace of mind after a while. I'm not a fan of using the 'new' keyword to instantiate a new object reference (and arrays), but, I guess I'll just have to deal (I'm not a big fan of the explicit 'self' parameter in Python methods either, so...win some, lose some).

 

I've got the basics down, including Structs, Enums, Classes, Arrays and anything easier than those. Having a heck of a time. I haven't touched generics or threads, but I don't think they'll be too difficult. Time will tell.

  • 0
  On 05/06/2014 at 01:48, astropheed said:

I'm having a really good time with it so far. I wish I got into this much sooner.

 

Update:

I enjoy the type system. I didn't think I'd like strongly typed languages (I didn't like it in C) but I actually find it gives a certain peace of mind after a while.

To be precise, C# is statically typed whereas Python is dynamically typed, i.e., every identifier has a fixed type which can be figured out just by looking at the code, whereas in Python types are assigned and can change at run time. The terms "weak" and "strong" typing don't have well-defined meanings.

 

Glad to know you're having fun with it!

  • 0

I always recommend csharp-station to people looking to learn C#. The tutorials are well written, short enough not to feel overwhelming, but long enough to give you all of the basics that you need. And as Andre suggested, Stack Overflow is an invaluable tool. Definitely consult that site when you run into a problem.

  • 0
  On 05/06/2014 at 01:59, spacer said:

I always recommend csharp-station to people looking to learn C#. The tutorials are well written, short enough not to feel overwhelming, but long enough to give you all of the basics that you need. And as Andre suggested, Stack Overflow is an invaluable tool. Definitely consult that site when you run into a problem.

 

Right now I'm reading "C# Yellow Book" by Rob Miles. I like the way he breaks things down with some light humor thrown in. After which I will read "C# in a nutshell" which I've ordered online and just waiting to arrive. If by the end of that 1000 page "nutshell" I need a bit more I'll take a look at your suggestion. I'm also reading "Code The Hidden Language" and "The C Programming Language" in the meantime as suggested by Joel Spolsky from Stack Exchange. 

 

I just can't take on anymore books right now lol. I will however look into it.

 

 
  On 05/06/2014 at 01:59, Andre S. said:

C# is statically typed whereas Python is dynamically typed

 

Sorry, still not very good at terminology. I'm a decent to pretty good programmer, but as I was all self taught the terminology sometimes escapes me; if I even know it at all.

  • 0
  On 05/06/2014 at 01:48, astropheed said:

Update:

I enjoy the type system.

 

Small note about that. The types in C# are aliases for the actual types in .NET. In that fashion, int is an alias to Int32, long to Int64, and so on. You might find it sometimes to be more appropriate to use the .NET types, particularly if you share code with non-C# .NET developers (VB.NET, F#...). They would know exactly what the types are, instead of going through C# documentation to read on what "long" means.

 

It is something so simple, and it really depends on your usage, but it is something to give a thought or two about. Personally, I've started to use the .NET types, thus I'm getting a clear distinction between types and other C# keywords (they're not with the same colour). Not that it matters that much, but still, I like my cake this way! :laugh:

  • 0

I personally go by what the language specification recommends:

 

  Quote
Each of the predefined types is shorthand for a system-provided type. For example, the keyword int refers to the struct System.Int32. As a matter of style, use of the keyword is favored over use of the complete system type name. http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/files/ECMA-ST/Ecma-334.pdf (page 18)
  • 0
  On 05/06/2014 at 02:30, elenarie said:

Personally, I've started to use the .NET types, thus I'm getting a clear distinction between types and other C# keywords (they're not with the same colour). Not that it matters that much, but still, I like my cake this way! :laugh:

 

  On 05/06/2014 at 04:08, Andre S. said:

I personally go by what the language specification recommends

 

 

I have to take one of your sides, and Andre is Green. If Ruby Rod taught me anything it was that it must be green. Thanks guys though, I'm glad I know it's an alias.

  • 0

It seems like you are well on your way with C# and the .NET framework. My story was different... I started with C# etc... but switched to Python because of its no brainer syntax. However, my days with C# is far from over and I still sometimes go back to it when I am building a web based enterprise application. .NET has some awesome libraries that makes things much faster.

 

Anyhow, I would feel really bad if you found the following tools later than now. I don't want you to spend your wheels and waste too much time because the following tools and resources made my applications look super awesome even though I was still a complete noob ;)... don't tell that to my employers now!

 

DevExpress

https://www.devexpress.com/

 

Excellent .NET controls for ASP.NET and C# desktop applications.

 

Total Training for .NET/C#

http://totaltraining.com/store/asp-net-2-0-building-web-applications-bundle/

http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL25CE22D4AA564934 ;)

 

Probably the best video tutorial series I came across for .NET stuff. The basic C# was well enough but the ASP.NET part also made me very comfortable toward the web.

  • 0
  On 09/06/2014 at 16:02, roosevelt said:
<snip>

 

DevExpress

https://www.devexpress.com/

 

Excellent .NET controls for ASP.NET and C# desktop applications.

 

<snip>

 

Personally, I'd stay away from those if at all possible, far too much bloat ;)

  • 0
  On 09/06/2014 at 16:02, roosevelt said:

It seems like you are well on your way with C# and the .NET framework. My story was different... I started with C# etc... but switched to Python because of its no brainer syntax. However, my days with C# is far from over and I still sometimes go back to it when I am building a web based enterprise application. .NET has some awesome libraries that makes things much faster.

 

Anyhow, I would feel really bad if you found the following tools later than now. I don't want you to spend your wheels and waste too much time because the following tools and resources made my applications look super awesome even though I was still a complete noob ;)... don't tell that to my employers now!

 

DevExpress

https://www.devexpress.com/

 

Excellent .NET controls for ASP.NET and C# desktop applications.

 

Total Training for .NET/C#

http://totaltraining.com/store/asp-net-2-0-building-web-applications-bundle/

http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL25CE22D4AA564934 ;)

 

Probably the best video tutorial series I came across for .NET stuff. The basic C# was well enough but the ASP.NET part also made me very comfortable toward the web.

 

Ah, thanks for that. I may at some point actually use devexpress, very pretty.

 

As for the video series, thanks but I have little interest in using ASP.NET.

  • 0

Not sure if someone has already posted this or you have already looked at but check out http://code.msdn.microsoft.com/

 

You can pretty much get any code sample by filtering it from the left.

 

For 3rd party WinForms controls, I can vouch for DevExpress controls. Been using them since 2003. Great controls and excellent support and cuts down a lot of development time.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Meta (Facebook) tends to make horribly designed apps, which not sure if its deliberate or just plain poor design, maybe due to incompetence. For a huge internationally and well known company, this is baffling, they are getting bad PR but I guess they are tok big and super popular and seemingly can get away from any gov thus they are getting away with these blunders. Example their Facebook Stories, when mobile OS uses gestures for years to go back to previous menu, it just tends to swipe to previous or next stories instead of exiting the UI. I have to make sure I swipe from the very edge. This really bad UX but Facebook doesnt car about the bad UI practices. Is this deliberate, malice? Idk, maybe for force engagement, or just somebody never tested their products well about the issue, maybe they think user should know better and just arrogant to thing we are using it wrong?
    • This is insane for a tech focused site tbh. I cant understand anyone who would want this let alone anyone interested in tech or pc's. I understand the want to push stack deals but this is a terrible deal. I have bought a few deals through neowins stack before, they were good deals but this....
    • Its really apparent that these features and how they treat new Outlook now to be only web based to call these features "Offline mode". Like before we just gain features without them being called offline mode feature, but now here it is. It feels like if these codes bugged, we might left with app that is just useless liece kf codes when PC isnt connected to internet, especially laptops and tablets/convertibles.
    • Amazon Deal: Sony 65 inch 4K Bravia 5 2025 Mini LED TV with Dolby Vision/Atmos is $200 off by Sayan Sen Recently, we covered soundbar home theatre deals from Samsung and JBL for under $1000. Those are still selling for their best prices and you can check them out in their respective articles linked above. Obviously, for a home theatre, you also need a display, and depending on the kind of setup and room you have, you could choose a fairly premium projector like Valerion's StreamMaster Plus2 4K that is currently $300 off on Amazon US, or you could look for a TV. If you are looking for something for under $1500 then Sony has a great deal at the moment. The company's Bravia 5 mini LED 65-inch TV is on sale for $1298 thanks to a $200 discount (purchase link under the specs list below). Mini LEDs, unlike LEDs, promise much better precision in terms of backlighting which should lead to better contrasts with deeper blacks and brighter whites without being overblown either way. The full specs of the Bravia 5 are given below: Display Resolution: 3840 x 2160 (4K UHD) Panel Type: LCD with Mini LED backlight Backlight Dimming: XR Backlight Master Drive with local dimming for enhanced contrast Panel Refresh Rate: 120 Hz HDR Compatibility: Supports HDR10, HLG, and Dolby Vision Color & Image Processing: XR Triluminos Pro™ with Live Color™ technology, XR Clear Image, and XR Motion Clarity™ Connectivity & Ports: HDMI Inputs: 4 side-mounted (supports HDMI 2.1 features including 4K at 120Hz, eARC, VRR, ALLM, and SBTM) HDCP: Version 2.3 on all HDMI ports USB Ports: 2 side ports (supports FAT16, FAT32, exFAT, and NTFS formats) Other Ports: RS-232C Input: 1 (side) Digital Audio Output: 1 (side) RF (Terrestrial/Cable) Input: 1 (side) LAN Input: 1 (side) Wireless & Smart Features: Wi‑Fi: Dual‑band (2.4 GHz/5 GHz) with support for Wi‑Fi Certified 802.11 and Wi‑Fi 6 Bluetooth: Version 5.3 (compatible with A2DP, HID, HOGP, SPP, and AVRCP) Built‑in Chromecast: Yes Operating Platform: Google TV Smart Connectivity: Features BRAVIA Sync (with HDMI‑CEC), Apple HomeKit, and Apple AirPlay Get it at the link below: Sony BRAVIA 5 65 Inch TV, Mini LED, 4K120hz Television with Dolby Vision/Atmos, Exclusive Features for PlayStation®5, K-65XR50, 2025 Model: $1298.00 (Shipped and Sold by Amazon US) This Amazon deal is US-specific and not available in other regions unless specified. If you don't like it or want to look at more options, check out the Amazon US deals page here. Get Prime (SNAP), Prime Video, Audible Plus or Kindle / Music Unlimited. Free for 30 days. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Explorer
      Case_f went up a rank
      Explorer
    • Conversation Starter
      Jamie Smith earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      NeoToad777 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      JoeV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      VAT Services in UAE earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      523
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      231
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      150
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      142
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      109
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!