Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016)


Recommended Posts

The dead Robin is probably Jason Todd, his death being in the 'A Death in the Family' storyline. By then Dick Grayson is Nightwing. He's followed by Tim Drake and Stephanie Brown (rumored: Jena Malone)

Wasn't she going to be Carrie Kelly? Too bad Gordon might already be dead in this world though :/

Not really enough to matter.

I see enough of it to make it matter tbh. It looks very close to several versions of the comic-book.

It could go either way IMO. Depends on how close to DK Returns this is. It could also bring in Stephanie as Barbara's replacement as Batgirl.

Reports mentioned Carrie Kelly though, not Stephanie Brown. Besides, Stephanie never really was a real Robin.

  • 3 weeks later...

The image below popped up on Imgur this morning, and as you might imagine, it has already started creating a lot of buzz on social media websites. Chances are that it's a fake, like so many other supposedly "leaked" images we've seen in the past (people are bored and have too much time on their hands to make these things I guess). Let's for a minute assume that it is real though. Is it so hard to believe that Warner Bros. would split Batman v Superman into a two-part movie?

 

fwIjKvl.jpg

Don't know if it's real or not but if so that'd be cool, less waiting and by making it a two part movie means that the story as a whole isn't rushed.

  • Like 1

Part I sounds like Superman is about to sodomize Batman.

It just sounds like the first part could introduce batman into the new universe with part two showing WW and others.

It just sounds like the first part could introduce batman into the new universe with part two showing WW and others.

 

No, the name itself literally sounds like Supes is gonna bone Batman.

 

EDIT:

 

Jokes aside, not sure how I feel about this.

 

Splitting it this far into production really makes it seem like WB has no idea what they're doing, besides looking into milking this entire shared universe thing for all it's worth.

 

On the other hand, I'd be lying if I said I wouldn't like to see it earlier than 2016.

If the script is long and they'd rather not cut things out then i'd rather they split it and not rush it, plus we'd see it sooner so that's a bonus. They could also pull the old cliffhanger trick and have extra buildup for part 2 the following year.

Well what would they really do.... Batman still can't compare to Superman's power so why have them fighting as I've said before. I can see some heated exchanges between the two about a common foe but that's about it.

Well what would they really do.... Batman still can't compare to Superman's power so why have them fighting as I've said before. I can see some heated exchanges between the two about a common foe but that's about it.

 

Well, as was said before, in the comics, Batman hands Supes his own ass on al silver platter. The moral of the story is Brains before Brawn.

 

Don't believe it? Look it up.

 

 

Ed

I'd say there is no right answer for if Batman vs Superman would be better than Avengers Age of Ultron. Obviously both would have bias fans rooting for each side. Then again Age of Ultron has a stellar cast and a Hulk .. BUSTER. Yeah, I'm gonna go with Marvel on this one. Batman V Superman is probably going to turn out like The Matrix Revolutions fight at the end (The Neo vs Agent Smith fight) 

  • Like 1
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I've been on Deezer for over a decade, but glad that Tidal joined them in fighting AI slop. Can't stand such takes as Spotify's: "Spotify's CEO recently pushed back against listeners who call AI music "slop," urging people to stop using the term and instead embrace the creative potential of AI music."
    • “Could” … in the IS the healthcare is run by insurance companies that make indecent profits denying basic treatments to people that are paying money for nothing. Besides, where are all the Trump epigones who were stating that the tariffs were going to paid by foreign companies and not the US citizens? …
    • Microsoft Teams gets smarter at spotting sneaky meeting bots by Usama Jawad Microsoft Teams is set to receive a couple of new features soon, including a dedicated Recap app and a rather controversial location tracking functionality. The Redmond tech giant has also explained how it has made online communication and collaboration a lot more performant this year. Now, the company has detailed more secure bot admission mechanisms, as first reported by us in March 2026, and now available in Teams. As the use of AI has expanded across enterprise environments, Microsoft has begun allowing users to integrate bots into their meetings for various tasks, such as note-taking. While this has a tangible productivity benefit for users, Microsoft has highlighted how misconfiguration has allowed bots to join meetings that they shouldn't. This has created security and privacy risks, which Microsoft is now combating using a new Teams admin policy that allows organizers to control how external bots access meetings. Admins can leverage a policy called Manage external bots and their access to meetings. The default configuration is "When detected, require approval before joining", which places detected bots in a lobby before they are explicitly admitted into the meeting. The other option disables the experience. Microsoft has also requested admins to only allow organizers and co-organizers to manage access to a meeting, so that other people don't randomly allow bots into meetings. Teams will now be able to leverage infrastructure signals to intelligently detect and distinguish between bots and humans. Microsoft will soon also trial a registration experience for independent software vendors (ISVs) to build a system that registers a bot with Microsoft, so it is marked as a "known" bot. Teams will also categorize bots as trusted and suspected threats so that organizers can quickly identify which bots they want to allow into a meeting. Additional safeguards to block accidental admission of a bot into a meeting include: No one-click Admit option for identified bots Confirmation prompts when admitting participants that include bots Warnings when organizers choose Admit all, and bots are included Microsoft has begun rolling out this experience, and it will be retiring the current CAPTCHA verification implementation. In the future, the company plans to roll out new capabilities like allow-lists, organization-wide policies, admin reports, audit logs, and more granular controls.
    • With the current hardware prices Microsoft should lift the restriction. Then if you have the correct TPM then allow you to use X feature, if you don't have the correct TPM then don't but still actually let you run windows. 11. With a disclaimer during install that X features would be unavailable.
    • It's good for recycling of course. But commence inflation of a second hand RAM bubble and price gouging on DDR 4 inventory in 3... 2... 1...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      538
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!