Recommended Posts

I created another topic and a few of the replies made me think, why does the TV brand matter? Here is a little back story:

 

A few months ago I was in the market for a TV, after looking over a dozen models I stumbled across an Insignia 55" TV on sale at Best Buy that was Roku Ready. I've wanted to cut my cable for a while because I barely watch it and Roku seemed to be the answer (it is!). I looked at my other options an settled on the Insignia for a few reasons, none of which really had to do with price all that much.

 

For starters, every other 55" TV was a smart TV with features and apps I don't and wont use. I had a 42" Vizio that had smart apps and I NEVER used it besides the first week I had it and the cool factor wore off quickly. The Insignia had a great picture and being Roku Ready it meant I would have a library of content without any extra wires or remotes, seemed like a match made in heaven. Why pay $400 more for a TV just to get smart features? Since then, I've bought 2 more Insignias for the rooms in my house and will probably buy 2 more that are all Roku ready.

 

My question is this, if the source is broadcasting 1080p, why does it matter the TV you buy if they also broadcast in 1080p? Are some 1080p rating better than others?.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1220089-why-does-the-tv-brand-matter/
Share on other sites

color quality and uniformity can vary quite a bit. Largely dependent on the type of panel I think. Not to mention viewing angles.

 

I've heard that a lot of Samsung panels have these issues. What brands are known for this? I ask because although my situation is past tense, some people will pay $1200 for a 55" Samsung when I paid $479 for a 55" Insignia with great viewing angles. It's just not a smart TV but my Roku Stick handles all of that.

Cheaper TVs will use cheaper panels, lights, speakers, processors, etc. There is a big difference between a cheap generic LCD panel and a high-end Samsung panel. Colour accuracy. Refresh rate. Ghosting. Backlight quality (even though this has got much better even on cheap panels with LED backlight there are still issues with very cheap backlight setups).

 

At the end of the day though it is what you are happy with. I know people who are more than happy with a super cheap TV they picked up in Asda/Walmart and I know others who are still not happy with their $5,000+ Sony and Samsung TVs.

 

I used to care a lot of my TV choice but as I got older (30 now, I am ancient haha) I realised I care less and less. I have a decent Sony which I use to play some games (Wii U and 360) on and it is great for that. I watch some HD movies via Netflix and the like which it does fine. For the price I paid I am extremely happy with it. I do miss the days of my Pioneer Kuro plasma and a surround system but I am just too lazy for it all now to be honest.

  • Like 2

Cheaper TVs will use cheaper panels, lights, speakers, processors, etc. There is a big difference between a cheap generic LCD panel and a high-end Samsung panel. Colour accuracy. Refresh rate. Ghosting. Backlight quality (even though this has got much better even on cheap panels with LED backlight there are still issues with very cheap backlight setups).

 

At the end of the day though it is what you are happy with. I know people who are more than happy with a super cheap TV they picked up in Asda/Walmart and I know others who are still not happy with their $5,000+ Sony and Samsung TVs.

 

I used to care a lot of my TV choice but as I got older (30 now, I am ancient haha) I realised I care less and less. I have a decent Sony which I use to play some games (Wii U and 360) on and it is great for that. I watch some HD movies via Netflix and the like which it does fine. For the price I paid I am extremely happy with it. I do miss the days of my Pioneer Kuro plasma and a surround system but I am just too lazy for it all now to be honest.

 

I think that's where I'm at. I stream a lot of movies and the DTS sound from my TV sounds great. The picture is great, viewing angles are great, no ghosting while playing games and the picture quality is awesome. All for under $500, can't beat that. I don't think I care anymore, I'm more concerned with where I'm going to vacation next. Oh and the answer is Puerto Rico, again this year.

I think that's where I'm at. I stream a lot of movies and the DTS sound from my TV sounds great. The picture is great, viewing angles are great, no ghosting while playing games and the picture quality is awesome. All for under $500, can't beat that. I don't think I care anymore, I'm more concerned with where I'm going to vacation next. Oh and the answer is Puerto Rico, again this year.

 

Yeah I rather spend the money on other things too. I have a nice digital camera, nice computer, nice TV, etc. they are not top of the line but they are still good. I used to have a DSLR, really high spec computer that was way over powered for my actual needs, crazy expensive TV but these days I am more interested in putting money into my pension haha. I sound like such an old man but it is great seeing my savings go up and up :yes:

  • Like 1

Yeah I rather spend the money on other things too. I have a nice digital camera, nice computer, nice TV, etc. they are not top of the line but they are still good. I used to have a DSLR, really high spec computer that was way over powered for my actual needs, crazy expensive TV but these days I am more interested in putting money into my pension haha. I sound like such an old man but it is great seeing my savings go up and up :yes:

 

It's so funny how you answered my question by "straying" off topic. I love it and thanks man. I'm 28 and we sound exactly alike.

When in doubt always look for user reviews online... When you buy samsung, sony, lg... you are also paying brand price, that's not to say cheaper brands aren't equally as  good or better, however, there are far more rotten apples in the cheap basket, than they are good ones, so you really have to look around is all.

Cheaper TVs will use cheaper panels, lights, speakers, processors, etc. There is a big difference between a cheap generic LCD panel and a high-end Samsung panel. Colour accuracy. Refresh rate. Ghosting. Backlight quality (even though this has got much better even on cheap panels with LED backlight there are still issues with very cheap backlight setups).

 

At the end of the day though it is what you are happy with. I know people who are more than happy with a super cheap TV they picked up in Asda/Walmart and I know others who are still not happy with their $5,000+ Sony and Samsung TVs.

 

I used to care a lot of my TV choice but as I got older (30 now, I am ancient haha) I realised I care less and less. I have a decent Sony which I use to play some games (Wii U and 360) on and it is great for that. I watch some HD movies via Netflix and the like which it does fine. For the price I paid I am extremely happy with it. I do miss the days of my Pioneer Kuro plasma and a surround system but I am just too lazy for it all now to be honest.

There are quality differences within a brand - not even all Sony CRT TVs used the same quality of CRT.  (The same is, naturally, true of Samsung's LCD/LED TVs - we have three (32"/40"/55"), and their panels differ from each other, and not alone in size.  The largest two are both "smart TVs" and differ from each other.)

 

The two flat-panels in the basement are my 40" Sony and the 55" Samsung in the media room.  Both are LED-backlit, and both are 1080p-ready/HD-ready - even more important, both are connected to HD STBs.  Where the limitation is the source material - and both are connected to the same source material - such as HD over cable-TV - unless it's a movie, the two TVs are identical when it comes to picture quality.  (That says a great deal, to be honest, as my Sony is from the BX (basic) series - with a quite average Toshiba-sourced panel.)  Movies, on the other hand, display better on the Samsung's higher-quality panel.  (It's NOT the source - remember, I specified identical source material - specifically HD over cable.  While the Samsung ALSO is connected to BD, because the Sony in my bedroom is not, I did not compare the two TVs in that way.)

 

That is why brand - and even position within the brand - can still matter.

There are quality differences within a brand - not even all Sony CRT TVs used the same quality of CRT.  (The same is, naturally, true of Samsung's LCD/LED TVs - we have three (32"/40"/55"), and their panels differ from each other, and not alone in size.  The largest two are both "smart TVs" and differ from each other.)

 

Even within the same brand, in a lot of cases, different sizes are made by different manufacturers altogether.  Keep in mind that Sony, in particular, has exited the panel manufacturing business altogether and no longer makes its own nowadays.

 

This is one of the few run-downs I've found on who makes who's panels:

 

https://ca.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100528202127AA5hSbn

The panel quality is the biggest difference. Then there's design, internal hardware (such as CPU, etc), software, among other things.

 

You could probably buy 4 or 5 46" TVs for the price of one 46" F8000, but I'd still take the F8000. It's the best screen I've ever seen on a TV, by a long margin.

With a brand think of it as you are buying a better package. Lets not get confused with Packaging. So as someone said better internals. Panel etc. More care has been taken over assembling the right components other than say a Generic TV where they might have taken whatever was left OR most likely what was cheaper. So build quality for example better housing. Better software (Firmware and Interface) might be updated updated more often with the right brand.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My favorite file manager for Windows 11 finally gets a long-requested feature by Taras Buria Files is among the best File Explorer alternatives for Windows 10 and 11. This free app is packed with all sorts of features and conveniences, but there is one crucial feature that is still missing—Tree View. Fortunately, the latest update in the Preview channel finally delivers it. With version 4.1.4, which is now available for download in the Preview channel, developers implemented Tree View, a new mode that displays folders in an expandable hierarchy. Windows 11's stock File Explorer always had this feature, but it was nowhere to be found in Files until now. Starting with the latest preview update, you can expand each drive and its nested folders without leaving the current location and then open the folder you need in the main view. To try Tree View in Files, update the app to the latest preview version, then click the small arrow next to a drive to expand its content. The developers say they are rolling out Tree View in Preview first to gather feedback from users and improve the feature before bringing it to all in the stable channel. In addition to Tree View, Files 4.1.14 improves the Windows Fonts folder. You can now preview each font directly in Files with no need to open the built-in font viewer. For now, these two features are only available in the Preview channel. For those using the stable release, developers recently released version 4.1.3, with improvements for the built-in tag system, on-demand folder size calculation, and plenty of various fixes. You can check out the full release notes here. You can download Files from the Microsoft Store (paid version) or its official website (free).
    • Who is paying for this 30x scale-up? Its sounds expensive.
    • Millions of users to benefit from Windows 11's new performance boost on Adobe Photoshop by Sayan Sen Despite the advent of AI-generated imagery, Adobe's Photoshop remains one of the most popular tools on this planet. Adobe does not have a publicly reported total user count but it's probably not wrong to assume there are millions. As of 2025, Adobe Creative Cloud has had approximately 41 million paid subscribers, many of whom likely use Photoshop. In addition, more than 166,000 companies worldwide are apparently also using the app. These figures are according to a very recent report by SQ Magazine. Out of them, it is fair to assume that many are probably running Windows. As such, there is good news for these users as Microsoft has announced Photoshop is getting a big 20% performance boost on x86-64 (AMD64) systems and a 13% bump-up on Arm devices. This is definitely great news for them as many have complained about the slow performance and general sluggishness of Photoshop on Windows 11 ever since the advent of the latter back in 2021. If you are wondering how Microsoft managed to do this, the answer lies in a combination of compiler-level optimizations and a technology called Sample Profile Guided Optimization (SPGO). According to Microsoft, Adobe worked closely with the company’s Visual C++ team and adopted the latest MSVC toolchain enhancements together with SPGO to squeeze more performance out of Photoshop’s CPU-bound workloads. Unlike traditional Profile Guided Optimization (PGO), which requires developers to create special instrumented builds and run lengthy training workloads, SPGO gathers performance data directly from optimized release binaries. This means Adobe could collect real-world usage information which gives a major advantage to this technique, as companies could leverage data collected from actual customer workloads rather than only relying on synthetic benchmark runs. In theory, this should allow optimizations to better reflect how users interact with software in the real world. Thanks to this, there are improvements to code layout, function inlining, hot-and-cold code separation, and other low-level tweaks that help processors execute instructions more efficiently. Essentially the compiler is better able to identify “hot” code paths, those which are most frequently executed, and optimize them accordingly.
    • "The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months¨ I'd prefer to see the lowest price in over a year
    • Glad these prices are starting to come down, but that is still crazy. I bought the 2TB 9100 Pro (slightly more expensive version with PCIe 5.0) last year for $240.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      521
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!