Recommended Posts

yes you are, rafter109 :-P

rafter109 is the friend in question here.

and just for the record:

i do believe i read somewhere (although i am too lazy to go look) that a 64-bit app would be able to use the 64-bit cpu, regardless of the fact that panther is still 32-bit.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/122015-64bit-question/#findComment-1451067
Share on other sites

Panther and the version of Jaguar shipping on G5s have extentions that enable software to make use of the 64-bit processors (and some of the new 32-bit stuff on G5s too like the hardware sqrt() function). You are free to do 64-bit pointer addition, operation on registers holding 64-bit integers, etc.

Panther will address "lots" of gigs of ram, but any given process can only access 4gb of physical memory: you can have as many of these processes as you want (physical memory is the limitation here). This is the major limitation of panther.

Not an issue for most of us because we aren't specing G5s with >4gb of ram, but if you were building 8gb or 16gb G5s for high end photoshop or final cut work then you might run into this.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/122015-64bit-question/#findComment-1451285
Share on other sites

Just as the evn show says, in other words.

- Panther is primarily 32-bit, but has 64-bit extensions built into it.

- 32-bit programs can take full use of the CPU.

- 64-bit programs can take full use of the CPU.

- The CPU/OS is backwards compatible with both 32/64-bit applications.

I'm guessing that the next major update of Mac OS (10.4) will be natively 64-bit. But would that make a difference..? we don't use over 4Gb of RAM (the average user) so we won't be using the CPU(s)/OS to it's full potential. As long as we can run both 32/64-bit programs we'll be happy.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/122015-64bit-question/#findComment-1451988
Share on other sites

just a question, since the g5 is capable of running 32bit programs as well as 64bit programs, does it mean that it is not as powerful as a processor like the italium II which only does 64bit programs?

That's a good point. Although, just because it's 64-bit - doesn't mean it will be used to it's full capability.

For example,

1.) Say a program required 16-bits as a single stream of data. The 32 & 64-bit will calculate that stream at the same speed.

2.) Say a program required 32-bits as a single stream of data. The 32 & 64-bit will calculate that stream at the same speed.

3.) Say a program required 48-bits as a single stream of data. The 64-bit will calculate that stream at the same speed.

4.) Say a program required 64-bits as a single stream of data. The 64-bit will calculate that stream at the same speed.

x.) Say a program required 64-bits as a single stream of data (on a 32-bit CPU). The CPU would then take 2 passes (2x 32-bit streams), so it would take twice as long - in the millionth's of a second mind you ;) and the 64-bit would complete it in a single pass (1x 64-bit stream).

It's very difficult to explain, let's just say that the G5 can do both 32 & 64-bit and for the price it's a great deal. The Itanium II is extrememly expensive, and the downside of that chip is that it cannot handle the current 32-bit programs as easily as the G5 (if at all).

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/122015-64bit-question/#findComment-1452126
Share on other sites

Okay, but most CPU's to date have several parts in them that allready are 64-bit. Also, a program cannot be "fully optimized" for both 32 and 64, without incurring overhead. There must be some additional code, if it is included, it is bloat, if it is not included there are two versions.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/122015-64bit-question/#findComment-1452139
Share on other sites

you loose a bit of performance (a couple of million cycles per page request in virtual memory) but otherwise apps take full advantage of the CPU. i.e. 32 bit aps fully use 32bit portion, 64bit take full advantage of all 64bits. The slight (notice slight) performace hit comes from the fact that it has to keep track of 2 different page types, which store, it's probably the same page, but it has to spend time figuring out which one it is, and which portions to use and which are garbage. not to worry you typing of the keyboard wastes more CPU cycles than page read/writes.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/122015-64bit-question/#findComment-1454297
Share on other sites

Just as the evn show says, in other words.

- Panther is primarily 32-bit, but has 64-bit extensions built into it.

- 32-bit programs can take full use of the CPU.

- 64-bit programs can take full use of the CPU.

- The CPU/OS is backwards compatible with both 32/64-bit applications.

I'm guessing that the next major update of Mac OS (10.4) will be natively 64-bit. But would that make a difference..? we don't use over 4Gb of RAM (the average user) so we won't be using the CPU(s)/OS to it's full potential. As long as we can run both 32/64-bit programs we'll be happy.

I don't think so. Cut off all your past customers when the G5 just only came out?And isn't even in all product lines yet?You might also think they could develop versions for 32-bit and 64-bit, but I just don't see them having two seperate versions. I say OS 11 before things are 64-bit only.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/122015-64bit-question/#findComment-1454789
Share on other sites

Not so fast isus. Wasn't your question

can a program take FULL advantage of the 64-bit cpu even though the os itself is only 32-bit?
? You couldnt possibly have won yet since no one has technically answered your question. No one has addressed a pure 32-bit OS in this topic at all and the only one that even comes close is the evn show who stated that panther was a 32-bit OS with extensions for programs to utilize 64-bit features. If it were not for those extensions in panther, would the programs still be able to run as 64-bit? That is the question that needs to be answered before anyone wins this debate.
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/122015-64bit-question/#findComment-1454972
Share on other sites

That's still not answering the question that you asked. Now if you were to have asked whether panther allowed software to utilize the 64-bit instructions on the G5, you would have won. Unfortunately, you didnt ask that question and instead asked whether a 32-bit os could allow programs to utilize 64-bit instructions on a cpu. And as far as I'm concerned you have lost due to a technicality in the wording of your question.

Next time just be sure to express yourself exactly as you mean to be taken and not leave any details out.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/122015-64bit-question/#findComment-1455025
Share on other sites

hmm, i lost, and you didn't win.

if you had a problem with the question, you should have stated it last night, when you first replied.

unfortunately, you stated no problem with the question, it was pointed out that panther has 64-bit extensions, and therefore, your whole argument about how apple is misleading consumer's by showing a 64-bit desktop which can't run 64-bit apps at full speed was shown to be your misinformation, not mine.

in that respect, i won.

i know how much you hate it when i win.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/122015-64bit-question/#findComment-1455037
Share on other sites

yes you did win in the respect that panther can run 64 bit apps. but as far as the question posted in this forum, you lost due to the fact that apparently 64 bit apps cannot run on a pure 32bit os and I was correct in that respect. The place where we were both wrong was in the fact that panther has extensions for 64-bit instructions. We were both under the assumption that it was a pure 32-bit os.

There, I think it is fairly settled and it has concluded in a draw. :happy:

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/122015-64bit-question/#findComment-1455054
Share on other sites

finally. damn.

yes, i used bad wording... yes, i understand that a pure 32-bit os cannot use 64-bit apps. however, you were the only one that said panther was 32-bit.

i never said it, but i remember reading on appleturns that it had 64-bit extensions to do this.

i was too busy writing my research paper to find the proof though.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/122015-64bit-question/#findComment-1455063
Share on other sites

For the 'common' program, no. There wouldn't be any point to it being 64 bit. All common programs today can get along just fine with 32 bit. However, if the program was 64 bit and compiled for a 64 bit processor (ie. itamiums & G5s), assuming the 64 bit instructions took the same time to execute as the 32 bit ones (as it should), the program should run at the same speed. Maybe even faster.

Why faster? I dunno, but on the pentium, a 32 but multiply is faster than a 16 or 8 bit one.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/122015-64bit-question/#findComment-1455101
Share on other sites

Both Windows XP Home and Mac OS X 10.2.1 are 32-bit operating systems (if that's what you want to call them) but both allow you to do operations on 64-bit instructions in hardware on '32-bit chips' Altivec is allows you to deal with 32,64, or 128 bit numbers in registers that are 128bits wide without any special hacks. The x86 alphabet soup SIMD systems have similar capabilities - though not as advanced as Apple/motorolla/ibm's VMX (IIRC SSE2 re-uses the standard x86 FPU registers to do it's dirty work rather than providing it's own) they still get the job done.

At what point do you call an application 64-bit instead of 32-bit? The first time put a 64bit number in V0? R0? maybe into the segment register? Where exactly do we draw the line?

FYI the RS6000 chips used in visualization systems are 64-bit and so is the OS that ships with those machines (solaris) but it has a 32bit userland because the overhead of using 64bits outweighs the performance benifits. An instruction that operates on 64bit number specifically should be faster than a cludge of 32bit instructions that do the same thing, however a 64bit add should be roughly the same speed as a 32bit add on an otherwise identical chip.

Itanium runs 64-bit code faster than 32bit because it does it through emulation

P-pro chips were also optimized to run 32bit code, the 16bit transistors were compromized in order to get these increases.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/122015-64bit-question/#findComment-1455608
Share on other sites

Both Windows XP Home and Mac OS X 10.2.1 are 32-bit operating systems (if that's what you want to call them) but both allow you to do operations on 64-bit instructions in hardware on '32-bit chips'

Yes, but the 64-bit instructions are done by using 2 or more 32-bit instructions to 'emulate' the 64-bit one. If you had a 64-bit OS, all it's 64-bit processing would be done using single 64-bit instructions rather than multiple 32 bit ones.

BTW, SSE2 could not use the fpu registers because they are only 80 bits wide. SEE/SSE2 requires 128-bit registers to work with. MMX however does use the fpu registers since those are only 64-bits wide (but they can't do 64-bit operations). This is very screwy since you can't use the fpu and MMX at the same time.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/122015-64bit-question/#findComment-1456477
Share on other sites

You might also think they could develop versions for 32-bit and 64-bit, but I just don't see them having two seperate versions.

I don't see why Apple wouldn't have two builds of OS X 10.4 (or whatever). It's not like it would be without precedent. Previous versions of the OS (such as 8.1) supported totally different chip architectures (68K & PPC), and the installation difference was transparent to the user. Why would it be any more difficult for the installation program to check for the CPU type (32 bit or 64 bit) and install the apropriate binaries? It's not like Apple is scared of using more than one CD for the OS (and if it was put on DVD, it would make this part even easier). Not all of the programs included would need to be re-compiled for 64 bit (I mean, what would Text Edit gain??). Since OS X is already BSD based, and there are already 64 bit versions of BSD for other processors, so just how hard do you think it would be for them to compile OS X as 64 bit?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/122015-64bit-question/#findComment-1456878
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Trailer park trash “sport “, fits the current White House
    • KataLib 5.3.0.0 by Razvan Serea KataLib is more than just a music player — it's a complete audio suite designed for music lovers and creators alike. It combines a powerful audio player, a flexible metadata editor, a capable audio converter, and a music library manager into one streamlined application. Core Features: Audio Player Enjoy seamless playback of virtually any audio format or even streaming video files. DJ Mode lets you mix tracks with manual or automatic crossfades. You can also load and save WinAmp-style playlists for quick access to your favorite sets. Audio Converter Convert between a wide range of audio formats effortlessly. Trim or normalize your output automatically, and even extract audio from streaming video sources. Ideal for preparing files for different devices or platforms. Metadata Editor View and edit ID3v2 tags and other metadata. Batch edit multiple files at once, and fetch missing information directly from the MusicBrainz database. You can also apply or update album art with ease. Music Library Manager Organize your entire audio collection, search across tracks instantly, and download cover images from the internet — or use your own custom artwork. KataLib makes it easy to keep your library tidy and enriched with useful info. Supported Formats: KataLib supports a wide range of both lossy and lossless audio formats: Input: OPUS, AAC, FLAC, M4A, MP3, MP4, MPC, APE, AIF, MKV, AVI, MOV, FLV, WEBM, Ogg Vorbis, WAV, WAVPack, WMA, AC3, OGA, MP2, MPGA, MPEG, DTS, M4B, DSD (DFS) Output: OPUS, FLAC, M4A, MP3, Ogg Vorbis, WAV Under the hood, KataLib uses the trusted FFmpeg engine for audio conversion and media playback, ensuring compatibility with virtually all mainstream media formats. KataLib 5.3.0.0 changelog: Added Option to select the Zoom level of the Oscilloscope visualizer. The taskbar button of the app now displays the progress of its processing tasks. The metadata text of the Visualization Video can now be aligned by the user. We can now reorder the order of the Visualizers and Metadata, in the Visualization Video Setup dialog, by removing any item and adding it again. It will be added at the end. Changed The font size of the Visualization Video can now be more than 30 points. Updated yt-dlp library to version 2026... Fixed Opening the Visualization Video Setup dialog could fail if the settings were wrong. Sometimes there were false duplicates in the Rename Tracks dialog. Tracks without metadata appeared without title in the Recent menu. Download: KataLib 5.3.0.0 | 90.0 MB (Open Source) Links: KataLib Home Page | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • EA Sports UFC 6 review: Brutal, satisfying, and surprisingly accessible to newcomers by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe EA’s UFC series of fighting games has been putting out games for over 10 years now, but it’s a series I have never spent any time with. As a PC guy, the series being console-exclusive is the primary reason for that. The latest entry to the series, EA Sports UFC 6, is still not coming to PC, but I have an Xbox now. When EA reached out to see if I could have a crack at the game and give my opinion about it, I finally got the chance to see what this franchise is about. I have spent about a week playing UFC 6 on the Xbox Series X. Despite my lackluster skill with fighting games, I still have fun with entries like Street Fighter and Tekken. I quickly came to realize this is a different kind of fighting game, not the arcade titles I am usually dabbling with. Most of the week that I spent playing UFC 6 was in the career mode, trying not to get knocked out while slowly improving my combos and reactions. The review below will be from the perspective of a newcomer to the series and an amateur fighting game fan, so please forgive any mistyped lingo or series-staple mechanics I am not comprehending. In the Ring Getting a solid hit in UFC 6 is satisfying. It’s probably the most satisfying impact reaction I have seen in a fighting game. The ripples in the muscles, the spray of sweat (and blood), the meaty sound, and the subsequent stumble all carry a lot of weight. If I miss a heavy swing like that, though, I already know that I'm in for a world of hurt from the incoming counters. The fighting is a real treat. The actions aren’t as snappy as arcade titles, so a miss feels like a much bigger mistake here. This slowness did take some getting used to, but I felt the improvement in my abilities even after a few drills with basic punch and kick combos. If I’m not deliberate with my actions in the ring, whether it be a hasty retreat or a flying punch, the possibility of getting instantly knocked out is always there. The head, chest, and legs all come with their own health bars, so guarding just one area is just asking for trouble. A few hits to the head, and it's game over. Meanwhile, you won’t even be able to stay on your feet if they get damaged enough, drastically lowering the total amount of stamina available for the rest of the match. I was also encountering a large range of fighting styles to customize my own fighter with. There are a huge number of real-life superstars here from multiple eras. It’s not as exaggerated as Street Fighter or Tekken, but the way they move, evade, throw punches, or even take steps is based on their real-life counterparts. I can see this being a big draw for any mixed martial arts fan. One feature I was surprised to see here was the 'Flow State' ability. As rounds progress, a power-up meter can give a temporary boost to the unique fighting style of the selected fighter, essentially boosting what they are good at. There is an entire visual effect that kicks in when activating this, too. The surprising part was seeing something like this in a game that feels like it’s aiming to be more of a simulator than an arcade fighter. My skill level is too low to use this exactly how the game wants me to, so I ended up triggering it whenever the opponent did it as well. Streamlined vs Authentic When I first started it up, UFC 6 asked me about my experience with the series. Being genuinely new, I took its advice and opted for a lowered difficulty level and 'Streamlined' controls. Quickly, I realized that this wasn’t for me. My chosen fighters were throwing random attacks, no matter what combination the game was trying to teach me. Win streaks were happening, and I was already getting bored out of my mind just a few matches in. Turning off this mode and switching to 'Authentic' controls fixed everything right up. I was now able to control my fighter with more precision than I expected. I could control each arm and leg, which body part my attacks would aim at, and the fully customizable controls for setting up unorthodox moves were a cherry on top. None of these made me an expert at the game, but at least I was being beaten up fairly. This is not a point against UFC 6, though. Giving the option for anyone to enjoy the game is always a good thing in my eyes. There is a lot of customizability in the difficulty, with everything from slow-motion reactions to specific assists being offered as toggles. If I had a friend coming over and wanted to try a quick 1v1, the streamlined controls option is one I’d consider to make it a light and fun fight. The one part of the fighting that did not click with me was the grappling. Being taken to the ground brings in an entirely new control mechanism involving mounts and submissions that feel more like quick-time events than the heavy, tactical fighting I had seen so far while standing. The game wants me to hold sticks in certain directions to change the position or pull off submissions, trying to do the opposite actions of the opponent. Even though I tried to get used to this gameplay, it just felt like a momentum killer, and I eventually just wanted to get back on my feet to get back into the action. Legacy and Career It was UFC 6’s career mode that I wanted to play the most when I started it up. I grew up with EA Sports games, and taking my team from the ground to the top has always been my favorite task. UFC 6 has that same option but also offers a more cinematic entrance to the career experience than I expected with ‘The Legacy’ mode. This mini-campaign follows an up-and-coming fighter, Chris Carter, who is attempting to reach the heights his father had reached in the sport. Starting with a small-time gym and coach, the story follows both his growth in the space as well as the growing rivalry with a friend and fighter, Danny Lopez. The fights in this mode are very good at introducing a newcomer like me to the sport and its varying techniques. Cinematics land between the major fights, showing the growing tension between the two fighters as the years go by, feeling the pressure to not miss out on the hard-earned chances. The dialogue can be a little corny at times, especially when the bar fights kick off, but I largely enjoyed the storyline. At the end of it, I was pretty much familiar with all the mechanics of the career mode, unlocking new skills and moves, and how I needed to approach fights, both outside and inside the ring. This story mode isn’t a very lengthy one, so don’t expect an hour-long campaign. Once the conclusion is reached, Carter’s journey continues as if it’s a normal career playthrough, though I decided to start over from scratch now that I have some know-how about the basics. The career mode is very streamlined, which is to be expected considering there isn’t a team to manage like in other EA Sports games. It’s the journey of one fighter. When a fight comes up in the calendar, I could choose how many weeks I dedicate to preparing for it at the gym. A longer prep time gives the opportunity to get my fighter’s fitness up (giving a bonus during fights), earn more money and points for unlocking new skills, and gain more fans to fast-track the rise to stardom. While that sounds like a lot of things to manage, it’s more like a few clicks. There is a social media menu that sometimes pops up with canned replies I can send to fans, and the sponsors are once again a single click away from being assigned as finished. It’s the training aspect that adds a gameplay angle. Using the money from winnings and sponsorships, I was hiring different types of trainers and learning fancier moves to use in the ring. One small thing I appreciated was that it was possible to injure each other during these training sessions. If a trainer goes down in a bad way while sparring, they won’t be available for the remainder of training. If my fighter is injured, it takes valuable time and resources to heal and recuperate. Just like in real life, it makes sense not to go so hard during training sessions and save that energy for the main event. Every training or sponsorship activity I took part in used up the days and weeks I had before the next fight, bringing a balancing element to the whole ordeal. There were times I simulated most of these to just get to the next fight, but the grind for gaining even the slightest bit of advantage while trying not to overdo it is an enjoyable one. Outside of quick fights and career modes, UFC 6 also introduces an almost museum-like mode to explore a trio of fighters considered to be legends of the sport: Max Holloway, Alex Pereira, and Zhang Weili. The aptly named Hall of Legends mode is unlike everything else seen in the game. Each of these fighters has entire levels dedicated to them that I could walk around in and explore their journey into the UFC. This includes footage from real-life fights and interviews about their original inspirations and training methods. Each of these spaces is almost like an interactive documentary. Once the highlights are done, the mode offers the opportunity to take over a deciding fight from the superstars. It’s an impressive transition. Going from the real-life televised event with crowds and commentary to immediately taking over in the game has some real hype behind it. Performance and visuals It’s clear to see that UFC 6 is going for a photo-realism look with its visuals compared to any other fighting game. The fighters don’t look great in selection screens. But inside the arenas, under the flood lights, surrounded by crowds, and facing an opponent, the visuals are more than impressive. As ghastly as it is to witness, things like blood spraying into the mat and muscles reddening as they get pummeled keep improving the immersion. The fluid animations help sell the illusion even further. A missed kick carries the momentum to require a corrective step. Hard punches that glance off blocks give off the air of a hit that still took some wind off the opponent’s guard. The special moves with flips and spins look mega awkward when missing, just as they do in real life. Suffice to say, the Frostbite Engine powering this game is one of the biggest strengths of EA development studios. Playing on the Xbox Series X, the 60 FPS gameplay did not miss the mark or cause any slowdowns that I could detect. I still wish this series were on PC to see just how far the developer can push the engine. One area I continue to have issues with, surprisingly enough, is the menus. The game has fast loading screens, but almost every menu I click through has a large amount of noticeable lag before it registers. This is immensely painful in the career mode, since I have to go through multiple menus between fights to train and do sponsorships, and having a 3-second pause when selecting a simple move between pages is the only time that made me quit the game. Thanks to Xbox’s quick resume, though, I was able to instantly jump back in the next day to the same point (and wade through more laggy menus). Conclusion My primary mission going into this EA Sports UFC 6 review as a newcomer to the series was to find out if this is a good jumping-in point for someone like me. Suffice it to say, the game passed that test with flying colors. Despite the high skill ceiling, the legacy mode introduction campaign, multiple types of accessible controls, and streamlined career had me picking up the basics and fighting styles much faster than I expected. I wish I had gotten to try out competitive multiplayer during my time with the game, too, but the lack of players in the pre-release version prevented this. The impressive visuals and animations, coupled with the impact physics that let me feel every punch and kick easily, made this the most immersive fighting game I have played. The only part that gave me pause was the grappling gameplay, which killed the momentum in most fights. The Flow State amplifying system didn’t hamper the experience, but I also felt like it made more sense for an arcade fighter, not this. Easily the most annoying thing about UFC 6 was its laggy menus, which I hope get some sort of fix later. Returning series veterans might have a completely different experience from me. But for a new fan like me looking to climb ranks and see fighters get floored in spectacular ways, UFC 6 doesn’t miss a step. EA Sports UFC 6 is releasing on June 19 across Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. Ultimate Edition owners can already jump in via advanced access. This review was conducted on the Xbox Series X version of the game provided by EA.
    • No, Microsoft is obviously just spending money on maintaining a product with 0 users.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      ssd21345 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Contributor
      MarkHughes4096 went up a rank
      Contributor
    • Dedicated
      jordanspringer earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Rookie
      Rimplesnort went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Markus94287 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      486
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      173
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      138
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      94
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      79
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!