• 0

Best free Email/Contacts/Calendar/Tasks syncing for multi-platform?


Question

Is there such a thing?  I'm currently on iOS, Mac, and Windows and I am using Gmail for my email, and iCloud for everything else.  I've had too many issues with syncing contacts with Google that I don't really want to mess with anymore.  Also, their web based contacts/calendar interface is hard on my eyes.  Out of the big 3, I'd say that Google has the worst looking interface with probably the best feature set.

 

I have flirted with Outlook.com, but the contact and calendar syncing for Mac is still a mess on that service.  Even Outlook 2011 for Mac only supports email with no way to setup calendar and contacts with Outlook.com.

 

Thought about using iCloud, but the space is really limiting.  I like the interface (and out of the 3, it has no ads).  But I have about 3.7GB of email on Gmail and if I decide to move that all to iCloud, that doesn't leave much from the 5GB of total free space.

 

Gosh, I wish Outlook.com just had proper CalDAV and CardDAV support.  If it did, it would be perfect.

 

Ultimately, I want to find a service that is preferably free and has great compatibility across all platforms. I'm willing to switch email addresses.  Although I've had my @gmail address since 2004, I think I'm OK with migrating to a new primary account and letting that one die.  But I haven't completely made up my mind yet, and will certainly try things out on any new platform before fully committing.

 

If I were to switch from iPhone, I'd likely switch to Windows Phone but may switch to Android.  I use to think that Google represented the best choice for folks who wanted good multi-platform support, and it seems that they are turning away from that.

 

Thanks for your input.

 

 

9 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

If you plan on moving to a windows phone then you will become heavily invested in outlook as that is the primary driver of that ecosystem.  I personally use outlook and the activesync that is offered for it to sync between all of my ios devices.  And then I don't use an actual desktop client but rather the OWA interface of outlook.  Personally, I find the web interface better than any desktop client.  And outlook owa does a great job at contact/calendar syncing between devices.

  • 0

Hi #Michael - Have you had any issues with photos assigned to contacts syncing?

 

I applied a picture of my wife on her Outlook.com contact info on my iPhone (sync'd via exchange activesync) and the picture never showed up in "People" on the web site.

 

The new version of Outlook for Mac will most likely have full support for Outlook.com... so a good desktop client for Mac is at least on the way...  If outlook.com supported CardDAV and CalDAV it would be perfect.  It is also kind of frustrating the Outlook.com does not support a contact export or import format that supports contact photos.  It only supports .CSV and not the far more advanced vCard format that Google and Apple support.  Isn't a big deal until switching services, but one more thing that if Outlook.com had it, "it would be perfect."  Why wouldn't MS want to add these few open standards to their platform?  The internet is riddled with folks complaining about the lack of support for these other-wise commonplace standards.

  • 0

Of course, Android integration is MUCH better with Google.

Do you mainly do mobile or you looking for desktop as well?

I don't keep up on mobile as much, as I am Android and stick with it.

For the desktop, you can use Thunderbird with an addon for Contacts, and Lightning addon with an addon for Calendars sync.

  • 0

Google apps do it all for me and family, too many issues with iwhatever, and Outlook is useless to all of us since wwe ado a lot on mobile and Android, works great even on the one iPhone

  • 0

Of course, Android integration is MUCH better with Google.

Do you mainly do mobile or you looking for desktop as well?

I don't keep up on mobile as much, as I am Android and stick with it.

For the desktop, you can use Thunderbird with an addon for Contacts, and Lightning addon with an addon for Calendars sync.

 

I'm on both, desktop and mobile.  I use the websites for Windows though (as my work computer sync's with my work's exchange server but I still want to access my stuff via a web page).  I would like to use a desktop client for my Mac, and my preference for Mac would be to use the Calendar, Address Book, and Mail apps.  I think all of those work with Google services just fine but not with Outlook.com.

Google apps do it all for me and family, too many issues with iwhatever, and Outlook is useless to all of us since wwe ado a lot on mobile and Android, works great even on the one iPhone

 

What were your issues with iWhatever?  Also, I thought Outlook.com worked fine on Android via Activesync.  Am I mistaken about that?

  • 0

Outlook.com is great for all platforms. I've been on Android for more than a year and I only use my Gmail account for the requirements of Play Store and Google apps. My contacts, calendar and mail are in my Microsoft account. Exchange Active Sync is supported from all OEMs.

The only thing I've seen from OEM's EAS and stock Android is that with the latter you can sync even your subscribed calendars. With the HTC Outlook.com support only your main calendar. In this case I subscribed with Google and I have my country's festivities and sports teams schedules.

Microsoft has the best support for multiplatform, specially since Google hasn't bothered to publish apps for Windows Phone or Windows.

  • 0

Funny there is no ongoing discussion on this subject: there seem to be surprisingly few people out there who want to remain truely independent from the three BigCorps Microsoft, Apple and Google.

I also keep on looking constantly for solutions that allow me to transit seamlessly between the MS, the Apple and the Android world.

Admittedly, the refusal of Microsoft to integrate calDAV / cardDAV support is one of the biggest pains in the derrière in this game.

The best solution I have found so far: set up your own owncloud server (to be independent at the core) and then use calDAV enabled clients on all sides. Android and iOS are easy (iOS out of the box, Anroid requiring the CalDAV-Sync and CardDav-Sync apps)....even if finding the right URL for the settings is not always easy, but it works.

Integration with the corporate outlook world (aka: my job PIM-information) worked (...against all prediction of the IT department :-) with the iCal4OL plugin into my job's outlook client.

Private Mac was no problem: owncloud-sync worked out of the box (...with the same cautionary note applying as above) for all elements, including tasks.

The private Windows laptop was really the toughest nut to crack:

Mozilla Thunderbird / Lightning looked like the best solution.....  just that it didn't work (seems to be some kind of issue with the SSL encryption of the communication with the owncloud server which is yet unresolved).

I finally ended up with the "em Client" - not really the most beautiful UI, but does all the  things I want it to do. In particular, there was no problem to sync the ownclound server not only  with calendars and contact info, but also with tasks.

If anyone know further Windows mail / PIM - clients worth trying out.... I'm all curious !

And for all those who do not wish to go thru the troubles of setting up & maintaining there own owncloud server: there are alternative services that allow you to maintain your own cloud information outside of the BigCorp infrastructre. The best experience I had (....before resorting to owncloud) was with a service called "fruux". Definetly worth a try to set up an account with them !

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!