Recommended Posts

we need to remember that id is basically a graphics engine company that licenses their tech, but occasionally makes a game that shows off the engine's capabilities. 1. graphics engines 2. games.

We need to remember that id WAS a graphics engine company that licensed their tech.  I'm pretty sure they made a game to show off every version of their engine and they pretty much all had great graphics (the point) and crappy stories (not important for a graphics engine demo).

 

That's not true anymore though.  When ZeniMax Media bought id they stopped licensing their engines externally (announced at QuakeCon 2010).  So they don't license their tech anymore.  When John Carmack left for Oculus VR they lost their main graphics engine developer so now they probably don't even develop graphics engines anymore, I doubt there will be an id Tech 7.  So what id is today is just a company that holds the licenses to id's prior franchises (Doom, Quake, etc.) and that's it.  As such they need to actually start making these things into compelling games in their own right or they may as well just shut down the company.

When John Carmack left for Oculus VR they lost their main graphics engine developer so now they probably don't even develop graphics engines anymore, I doubt there will be an id Tech 6.

 

Original post (did you possibly mean id tech 7?):

 

He also dropped the news that Doom will be running on id Tech 6, a much-needed update to the years-old technology that has run previous games from id (and struggled with texture pop-in and other technical problems)

 

Makes ya feel a bit older doesnt it? Shoot, i remember getting my hands on the leaked Doom 3 alpha code back in 2001/2002. Pretty amazing at the time. It ran on my shiny new Geforce 3 :D

I remember trying the alpha on my GeForce 3 Ti 200 (I was only 17-18 at the time so I had to go for the lower-end GeForce 3) and it was an absolute slideshow. I remember wishing I could see it running on a Ti 500.
  • Like 1

@xrobwx - Yeah, Doom 3 was pretty annoying. It tried to do a story but failed; it tried for tension but resorted to cheap tricks, like limiting flashlight use and monsters jumping out of closets; it tried to push graphics but everything ended up looking plasticy with over-the-top shadows, unlike Far Cry. It was thoroughly mediocre, which was disappointing for a company like id Software.

Lol what?

Doom 3 shadows were pretty ######ing good. Sure the game itself wasn't anything to write home about but the shadows were superbly well done.

Lol what?

Doom 3 shadows were pretty ######ing good. Sure the game itself wasn't anything to write home about but the shadows were superbly well done.

Shadows... yes.  Overall graphics?   Not so much.    They did look overly try hard, and not realistic.   As above post, they did look like shiny plastic effects you can create in photoshop, rather then true metal shine.  It was special effects galore! Even at release I did not like it too much...

 

But YES, shadows....

Shadows... yes.  Overall graphics?   Not so much.    They did look overly try hard, and not realistic.   As above post, they did look like shiny plastic effects you can create in photoshop, rather then true metal shine.  It was special effects galore! Even at release I did not like it too much...

 

But YES, shadows....

Oh yeah the graphics overall were just kindoff meh and not really realistic at all.

I actually never finished Doom 3 now that I think about it. Maybe I should go back and finish it just to see how bad it is. I have the special edition on Steam too, so as least there is that.

  • Like 1

Doom 3 shadows were pretty ######ing good. Sure the game itself wasn't anything to write home about but the shadows were superbly well done.

They were completely over-the-top - sharp edges, lacking transparency and overused (every scene had to be insanely dark). Certainly I would disagree that they were "superbly well done".

 

Speaking of shadows, bizarrely id Software removed them in the BFG update - one of the consequences of incorporating elements of the id Tech 5 engine.

  • Like 1

I actually never finished Doom 3 now that I think about it. Maybe I should go back and finish it just to see how bad it is. I have the special edition on Steam too, so as least there is that.

 

I was thinking about it, but then I decided I better play some new game instead :)

 

Though I heard BFG edition is pretty good.  

Holy crap, it's been 10 years since Doom 3 was released?

 

It doesn't feel 10 years ago when me and my friend Richard built a rig together to play it on high graphics settings! We were awed by the graphics quality, on surround sound the game really spooked you :)

I was thinking about it, but then I decided I better play some new game instead :)

Metro: Last Light is a nice alternative, as it has a lot of atmosphere and depth while having solid shooter mechanics. And Homefront: The Revolution looks pretty decent as well, if it ever gets released. Sure they're lacking demons but that's not necessarily a bad thing.

  • Like 1

Metro: Last Light is a nice alternative, as it has a lot of atmosphere and depth while having solid shooter mechanics. And Homefront: The Revolution looks pretty decent as well, if it ever gets released. Sure they're lacking demons but that's not necessarily a bad thing.

Last Light is one of my favorite game of this generation.   Really liked it, also because I got to play in original Russian language, not some crappy translation that the English language was.

Seriously, I speak english for 20 years.    The level of translation was ok, but not exceptional (or professional) by any means. It really took the immersion out of the game.

With original language you can relate to everything that is going on much better!   

I really wished they hired not just a translator, but a translator lived in an english speaking country for a long time, who delivers the meaning and the feeling, not just the literal translation!

  • Like 1

They were completely over-the-top - sharp edges, lacking transparency and overused (every scene had to be insanely dark). Certainly I would disagree that they were "superbly well done".

But the every scene had to be insanely dark wasn't an issue with the shadow engine, it was because the game itself was designed that way. The shadows also didn't require as heavy resources as they would have if they used traditional rendering techniques.

You're also forgetting when this game came out which was in 2004. Far Cry didn't have anywhere near the quality of shadows that doom did. We didn't start seeing games with soft transparent shadows until later in the decade.

As for the BFG update, most people hated that anyways because the graphics were worse and you couldn't use some of the excellent mods that Doom 3 got

Last Light is one of my favorite game of this generation.   Really liked it, also because I got to play in original Russian language, not some crappy translation that the English language was.

Seriously, I speak english for 20 years.    The level of translation was ok, but not exceptional (or professional) by any means. It really took the immersion out of the game.

With original language you can relate to everything that is going on much better!   

I really wished they hired not just a translator, but a translator lived in an english speaking country for a long time, who delivers the meaning and the feeling, not just the literal translation!

 

Well you can play Metro in russian with english subtitles. I have yet to play Last Light but if i remember corectly i played Metro 2033 in russian with english subs.

Well you can play Metro in russian with english subtitles. I have yet to play Last Light but if i remember corectly i played Metro 2033 in russian with english subs.

 

Yeah, that does not make the translation any better, but it least you can feel the mood of the thing better.

I wish someone makes a fan translation, by someone who knows what they are doing.  It will make the game for english speaking people a lot better.

I don't know, Mars has been done two times now. I would of like to seen a return to the city as in Doom 2.

 

And I kind of liked the flashlight techinque in Doom 3, Made the whole thing tense and tactical; you don't even get to use it much in the later parts of the game where it becomes run and gun.

Holy crap, it's been 10 years since Doom 3 was released?

 

This sounds awful. Particularly the bold part. That does NOT belong in a Doom game in my opinion.

 

I particularly liked the melee moves in Killzone 3, but they did not require the player to be weakened, and weakened players didn't flash and get highlighted, you just sneak up on them and stick a knife in their throat or shove your thumbs into their eyesockets and move on.  The whole flashing part sounds a bit "arcade"-esque for Doom, but maybe it'll work out and look cool.

I particularly liked the melee moves in Killzone 3, but they did not require the player to be weakened, and weakened players didn't flash and get highlighted, you just sneak up on them and stick a knife in their throat or shove your thumbs into their eyesockets and move on.  The whole flashing part sounds a bit "arcade"-esque for Doom, but maybe it'll work out and look cool.

Definitely. I really liked how it was done in Killzone. I remember Guerrilla saying, way back in the day before KZ1 was released, that melee kills were specifically designed to be insta-kills because they wanted them to be like a kind of "reward" for being able to get within arms distance of an enemy without dying. I think it works really well in the context.

 

But putting something similar in Doom, where you're supposed to be battling super-human demons (who can most likely best a human in a hand-to-hand fight) seems out of place. And it definitely seems like an awful design move if they're going to be highlighting enemies on top of it.

Lol what?

Doom 3 shadows were pretty ######ing good. Sure the game itself wasn't anything to write home about but the shadows were superbly well done.

 

Yeah bearing in mind I was 13, Doom 3 scared the hell out of me playing it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I like Tidal, but it still does not control devices from the mobile/app and still no surround support. And yeah re: above comment I still get a lot of network errors and I am on a 4/4 Gbit Fiber connection.
    • Aren`t "security features" and "AI model that can see your screen" a tad diametric!
    • Samsung, Amazon extend 990 PRO 2TB NVMe SSD deal beyond Prime Day 2026 by Sayan Sen Recently, we had Amazon's Prime Day 2026 sales wherein there were several great deals including on SSDs. One of those discounted components was the Samsung 990 PRO SSD as the 2TB variant of it was selling for $370, a very good price after a long time. Although that deal was supposed to expire today, Amazon has now extended that sale further (purchase link under the specs table down below). The 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $400. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The technical specs of the Samsung 990 PRO 2TB are given in the table below: Specification Value Form Factor M.2 2280 Interface PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 NAND Flash Samsung V-NAND TLC Controller Samsung In-house Controller Cache Memory Samsung 2GB Low Power DDR4 SDRAM Sequential Read Speed Up to 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write Speed Up to 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4KB, QD32) Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4KB, QD32) Up to 1,550,000 IOPS Random Read (4KB, QD1) Up to 22,000 IOPS Random Write (4KB, QD1) Up to 80,000 IOPS Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C Reliability (MTBF) 1.5 Million Hours Endurance 1,200 TBW (Total Bytes Written) Get it at the link below: Samsung 990 PRO SSD 2TB NVMe SSD (MZ-V9P2T0B/AM): $369.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases
    • Glad im on the right boat. Tidal has lots of issues in terms of app and music mix, its worst than spot but its honest. Spot algo is very tendentious and they pess less to artists, so im comfortable with the tidal errors, for now.
    • Tidal won't monetize AI slop music, company says by David Uzondu Image via Tidal Tidal has announced an AI policy aimed at protecting artists and their crafts, as AI music generation tools continue to improve both in speed and quality. According to the music streaming platform, AI-generated music will be accepted, but these tracks will be held to a "higher standard" of content integrity. Next month, the company plans to auto-identify and tag these uploads. Listeners will spot a special icon next to content that algorithms flag as 100% AI-generated starting mid-July, and the platform hopes to expand this tag to partially generated songs as detection tech improves. Any AI music that exploits an artist's voice or likeness will be taken down, and Tidal will immediately block tracks associated with fraudulent activity, which includes artificial streaming and deceptive content that interferes with real creators. And finally, music that's 100% AI-generated will not be monetized. Tidal said there is "ongoing debate" about whether certain licensed synthetic models deserve payouts, so it's possible that this part will change in the future. Streaming platforms are absolutely getting flooded with AI-generated music because of how easy it is to pump out endless tracks every minute. To give you an idea of how "bad" it is, Deezer alone reported that synthetic uploads now make up about 44% of its daily intake, which translates to roughly 75,000 automated tracks hitting its servers every single day. Interestingly, Deezer found most people cannot tell the difference between human and machine creations, with an Ipsos study revealing that 97% of listeners failed to spot the AI-generated tracks. Spotify's CEO recently pushed back against listeners who call AI music "slop," urging people to stop using the term and instead embrace the creative potential of AI music. The Swedish platform partnered with Universal Music Group to test "legal and controlled" generative AI tools that let subscribers remix songs with AI.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      541
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      270
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!