Recommended Posts

we need to remember that id is basically a graphics engine company that licenses their tech, but occasionally makes a game that shows off the engine's capabilities. 1. graphics engines 2. games.

We need to remember that id WAS a graphics engine company that licensed their tech.  I'm pretty sure they made a game to show off every version of their engine and they pretty much all had great graphics (the point) and crappy stories (not important for a graphics engine demo).

 

That's not true anymore though.  When ZeniMax Media bought id they stopped licensing their engines externally (announced at QuakeCon 2010).  So they don't license their tech anymore.  When John Carmack left for Oculus VR they lost their main graphics engine developer so now they probably don't even develop graphics engines anymore, I doubt there will be an id Tech 7.  So what id is today is just a company that holds the licenses to id's prior franchises (Doom, Quake, etc.) and that's it.  As such they need to actually start making these things into compelling games in their own right or they may as well just shut down the company.

When John Carmack left for Oculus VR they lost their main graphics engine developer so now they probably don't even develop graphics engines anymore, I doubt there will be an id Tech 6.

 

Original post (did you possibly mean id tech 7?):

 

He also dropped the news that Doom will be running on id Tech 6, a much-needed update to the years-old technology that has run previous games from id (and struggled with texture pop-in and other technical problems)

 

Makes ya feel a bit older doesnt it? Shoot, i remember getting my hands on the leaked Doom 3 alpha code back in 2001/2002. Pretty amazing at the time. It ran on my shiny new Geforce 3 :D

I remember trying the alpha on my GeForce 3 Ti 200 (I was only 17-18 at the time so I had to go for the lower-end GeForce 3) and it was an absolute slideshow. I remember wishing I could see it running on a Ti 500.
  • Like 1

@xrobwx - Yeah, Doom 3 was pretty annoying. It tried to do a story but failed; it tried for tension but resorted to cheap tricks, like limiting flashlight use and monsters jumping out of closets; it tried to push graphics but everything ended up looking plasticy with over-the-top shadows, unlike Far Cry. It was thoroughly mediocre, which was disappointing for a company like id Software.

Lol what?

Doom 3 shadows were pretty ######ing good. Sure the game itself wasn't anything to write home about but the shadows were superbly well done.

Lol what?

Doom 3 shadows were pretty ######ing good. Sure the game itself wasn't anything to write home about but the shadows were superbly well done.

Shadows... yes.  Overall graphics?   Not so much.    They did look overly try hard, and not realistic.   As above post, they did look like shiny plastic effects you can create in photoshop, rather then true metal shine.  It was special effects galore! Even at release I did not like it too much...

 

But YES, shadows....

Shadows... yes.  Overall graphics?   Not so much.    They did look overly try hard, and not realistic.   As above post, they did look like shiny plastic effects you can create in photoshop, rather then true metal shine.  It was special effects galore! Even at release I did not like it too much...

 

But YES, shadows....

Oh yeah the graphics overall were just kindoff meh and not really realistic at all.

I actually never finished Doom 3 now that I think about it. Maybe I should go back and finish it just to see how bad it is. I have the special edition on Steam too, so as least there is that.

  • Like 1

Doom 3 shadows were pretty ######ing good. Sure the game itself wasn't anything to write home about but the shadows were superbly well done.

They were completely over-the-top - sharp edges, lacking transparency and overused (every scene had to be insanely dark). Certainly I would disagree that they were "superbly well done".

 

Speaking of shadows, bizarrely id Software removed them in the BFG update - one of the consequences of incorporating elements of the id Tech 5 engine.

  • Like 1

I actually never finished Doom 3 now that I think about it. Maybe I should go back and finish it just to see how bad it is. I have the special edition on Steam too, so as least there is that.

 

I was thinking about it, but then I decided I better play some new game instead :)

 

Though I heard BFG edition is pretty good.  

Holy crap, it's been 10 years since Doom 3 was released?

 

It doesn't feel 10 years ago when me and my friend Richard built a rig together to play it on high graphics settings! We were awed by the graphics quality, on surround sound the game really spooked you :)

I was thinking about it, but then I decided I better play some new game instead :)

Metro: Last Light is a nice alternative, as it has a lot of atmosphere and depth while having solid shooter mechanics. And Homefront: The Revolution looks pretty decent as well, if it ever gets released. Sure they're lacking demons but that's not necessarily a bad thing.

  • Like 1

Metro: Last Light is a nice alternative, as it has a lot of atmosphere and depth while having solid shooter mechanics. And Homefront: The Revolution looks pretty decent as well, if it ever gets released. Sure they're lacking demons but that's not necessarily a bad thing.

Last Light is one of my favorite game of this generation.   Really liked it, also because I got to play in original Russian language, not some crappy translation that the English language was.

Seriously, I speak english for 20 years.    The level of translation was ok, but not exceptional (or professional) by any means. It really took the immersion out of the game.

With original language you can relate to everything that is going on much better!   

I really wished they hired not just a translator, but a translator lived in an english speaking country for a long time, who delivers the meaning and the feeling, not just the literal translation!

  • Like 1

They were completely over-the-top - sharp edges, lacking transparency and overused (every scene had to be insanely dark). Certainly I would disagree that they were "superbly well done".

But the every scene had to be insanely dark wasn't an issue with the shadow engine, it was because the game itself was designed that way. The shadows also didn't require as heavy resources as they would have if they used traditional rendering techniques.

You're also forgetting when this game came out which was in 2004. Far Cry didn't have anywhere near the quality of shadows that doom did. We didn't start seeing games with soft transparent shadows until later in the decade.

As for the BFG update, most people hated that anyways because the graphics were worse and you couldn't use some of the excellent mods that Doom 3 got

Last Light is one of my favorite game of this generation.   Really liked it, also because I got to play in original Russian language, not some crappy translation that the English language was.

Seriously, I speak english for 20 years.    The level of translation was ok, but not exceptional (or professional) by any means. It really took the immersion out of the game.

With original language you can relate to everything that is going on much better!   

I really wished they hired not just a translator, but a translator lived in an english speaking country for a long time, who delivers the meaning and the feeling, not just the literal translation!

 

Well you can play Metro in russian with english subtitles. I have yet to play Last Light but if i remember corectly i played Metro 2033 in russian with english subs.

Well you can play Metro in russian with english subtitles. I have yet to play Last Light but if i remember corectly i played Metro 2033 in russian with english subs.

 

Yeah, that does not make the translation any better, but it least you can feel the mood of the thing better.

I wish someone makes a fan translation, by someone who knows what they are doing.  It will make the game for english speaking people a lot better.

I don't know, Mars has been done two times now. I would of like to seen a return to the city as in Doom 2.

 

And I kind of liked the flashlight techinque in Doom 3, Made the whole thing tense and tactical; you don't even get to use it much in the later parts of the game where it becomes run and gun.

Holy crap, it's been 10 years since Doom 3 was released?

 

This sounds awful. Particularly the bold part. That does NOT belong in a Doom game in my opinion.

 

I particularly liked the melee moves in Killzone 3, but they did not require the player to be weakened, and weakened players didn't flash and get highlighted, you just sneak up on them and stick a knife in their throat or shove your thumbs into their eyesockets and move on.  The whole flashing part sounds a bit "arcade"-esque for Doom, but maybe it'll work out and look cool.

I particularly liked the melee moves in Killzone 3, but they did not require the player to be weakened, and weakened players didn't flash and get highlighted, you just sneak up on them and stick a knife in their throat or shove your thumbs into their eyesockets and move on.  The whole flashing part sounds a bit "arcade"-esque for Doom, but maybe it'll work out and look cool.

Definitely. I really liked how it was done in Killzone. I remember Guerrilla saying, way back in the day before KZ1 was released, that melee kills were specifically designed to be insta-kills because they wanted them to be like a kind of "reward" for being able to get within arms distance of an enemy without dying. I think it works really well in the context.

 

But putting something similar in Doom, where you're supposed to be battling super-human demons (who can most likely best a human in a hand-to-hand fight) seems out of place. And it definitely seems like an awful design move if they're going to be highlighting enemies on top of it.

Lol what?

Doom 3 shadows were pretty ######ing good. Sure the game itself wasn't anything to write home about but the shadows were superbly well done.

 

Yeah bearing in mind I was 13, Doom 3 scared the hell out of me playing it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I hate the term, "future-proof." We saw it back in the 90's / 2000's, if not before. You cannot future-proof anything, since there is no definition of how far into the future you plan on prepping for. Best idea is to tell us what you currently have and what its use is at the moment, and we can then offer ideas about some areas that might need an upgrade and other areas that can be left alone.
    • I can agree that it is being used in a small capacity. I worked for a company where their engineers still used XP, and when asked why it was because their sensor software wasn't compatible with newer operating systems and the software was discontinued so they couldn't upgrade the software. Given that the sensors were still in use by companies, they had to continue using XP to support the sensor, otherwise the price to the company would have gone into the millions or billions. Our response was simple: Ok, you can keep the XP machine. But we're removing it from the network. "But then it can't access the Internet or folder shares!" Yup, kinda the point. If someone wants to continue using an unsecure OS they can do, I have no problem with that. But it should be isolated. Simple. I had a fight with a guy in the engineering department for weeks before he finally relented. But we digress.   What do I plan on doing to commemorate the anniversary? Nothing. I have fond memories of the OS, but at the end of the day it's just an OS. If I had some time I might see if I could install it on my Raspberry Pi for a laugh. But my reflex memory with today's OS ideas would probably get me frustrated and I'd uninstall it after 5 mins.
    • Shutter Encoder 20.2 by Razvan Serea Shutter Encoder is one of the best video converter software and image, audio available today. It has been designed by video editors in order to be as accessible and efficient as possible. It is one of the few free professional tools. Based on FFmpeg, it has the largest codec library available. You can thus convert your files into many different formats. Complete settings for the most advanced Shutter Encoder has a panel containing a large number of settings, in order to define your own choices based on your files and perfect your video or audio output. Well-thought-out settings, with parameters predefined to create files quickly and easily. List of functions Without conversion: Cut without re-encoding, Replace audio, Rewrap, Conform, Merge, Extract, Subtitling, Video inserts Sound conversions: WAV, AIFF, FLAC, MP3, AAC, AC3, OPUS, OGG Editing codecs: DNxHD, DNxHR, Apple ProRes, QT Animation, GoPro CineForm, Uncompressed YUV Output codecs: H.264, H.265, VP9, AV1, OGV Broadcast codecs XDCAM HD422, AVC-Intra 100, XAVC, HAP....and much more. Shutter Encoder 20.2 changelog: Added "Intel Quick Sync" hardware acceleration for Linux Added 'Identify speakers' option for "Audio transcription" function Improved installer package Improved video player performance Improved timecode display with drop-frame videos Improved naming convention for surround audio files Fixed splash screen freeze Fixed bug with file hanging Fixed bugs with presets loading Fixed bugs with video player's buffer Fixed bug with 'Total length of file' option Fixed bugs with 'Record screen/device' option Fixed bug with "XAVC" & "XAVC Long GOP" functions Rollback to XPDF tool for PDF conversion Removed unused binary architecture for Mac Various corrections Various improvements Download: Shutter Encoder 20.2 | 166.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Shutter Encoder Portable | 185.0 MB Links: Shutter Encoder Home Page | FAQ / Tips | macOS | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • did you give it permission to do so? its probably on the ToS. After that South Park episode I'm paying attention to them lol
    • Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha   No
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      534
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      265
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!