Recommended Posts

 

Sony Computer Entertainment America has been hit with a lawsuit alleging "deceptive marketing" of Killzone: Shadow Fall because the PlayStation 4 game's multiplayer mode does not run at the resolution advertised.

 

The suit, filed by California resident Douglas Ladore in Northern District California court, alleges that Sony advertised Killzone: Shadow Fall would run at native 1080p resolution but "used a technological shortcut that was supposed to provide 'subjectively similar' results."

 

In March, Eurogamer's Digital Foundry analyzed Shadow Fall's graphics and reported that the PS4 game's multiplayer component runs at 960 by 1080 resolution ? as opposed to 1920 by 1080, or 1080p resolution ? with a "high-quality temporal upscale."

 

The lawsuit alleges that Sony advertised ? through videos, its official website, social media and Killzone's retail packaging ? would offer 1080p graphics. "Unfortunately, Sony's marketing and on-box representations turned out to be nothing more than fiction," the lawsuit says.

 

 

 

 

 

The lawsuit alleges that "'temporal reprojection' is not the 'native 1080p' that Sony promised" and that Sony has not updated its packaging and marketing to reflect the game's actual resolution. Class allegations in the suit include negligent misrepresentation, false advertisement, unfair competition and fraud in the inducement. The amount sought in the suit exceeds $5,000,000.

 

 

 

http://www.polygon.com/2014/8/6/5975983/sony-sued-killzone-shadow-fall-1080p

lol 5 million, and people think there's nutters in the Neowin frame rate and resolution topic (I really hope no one tries to argue this is a good use of court time or tax payers money....).

on one hand yeah it is false advertising. on the other though, who the hell even cares? it's not that great of a game anyway (then again most "realistic" style shooters are stale anymore)

on one hand yeah it is false advertising. on the other though, who the hell even cares? it's not that great of a game anyway (then again most "realistic" style shooters are stale anymore)

 

The issue is false advertising, when companies can get away with it on a regular basis, it's a bad thing. 

 

I wish we had something similar to United Kingdom's ASA in the United States.  

  • Like 1

The whole suit is listed on Kotaku http://kotaku.com/someones-suing-sony-because-a-ps4-game-isnt-1080p-1617200896

I love blurry to the point of distraction, and the in depth report of going into best buy.

The box is going to have 1080p on it at least because of SP. Jeez Xbox 360 boxes had 1080p on them as the device had a hardware upscaler.

Sure Sony should have explained the tech to the geeks sooner, but lawsuits and false advertising is a waste of time. Aliens Colonial Marines was false advertising, did that even get a lawsuit?

  • Like 1

on one hand yeah it is false advertising. on the other though, who the hell even cares? it's not that great of a game anyway (then again most "realistic" style shooters are stale anymore)

 

I do want the person filing the lawsuit to win. I've had it with literal lies that publishers make and polish up videos prior to sales, then they limit reviews until after release of the game so you will go and buy it based on deceptive and false advertising and of course the hook is that retailers won't take back the game after it's been open.

 

We should all sue them for selling us a supposed "full" product but we end up being beta tests at $60 a pop. 

 

It's really getting out of hand these days.

  • Like 1

The whole suit is listed on Kotaku http://kotaku.com/someones-suing-sony-because-a-ps4-game-isnt-1080p-1617200896

I love blurry to the point of distraction, and the in depth report of going into best buy.

The box is going to have 1080p on it at least because of SP. Jeez Xbox 360 boxes had 1080p on them as the device had a hardware upscaler.

Sure Sony should have explained the tech to the geeks sooner, but lawsuits and false advertising is a waste of time. Aliens Colonial Marines was false advertising, did that even get a lawsuit?

 

Exactly.    1080p on box means it is outputting actual 1080p to the TV.      It is not a guarantee that it is not unscaled inside the console!   

All it means that the signal is 1080p to TV

 

This is pretty idiotic to think he will get his $5M.

Single player is true 1080p too.

 

And the description about him buying the game made me LOL

welcome to pretty much every PR promo, IMC for MS and Sony prior to the launch of their consoles. This generation was overrun by lame marketing phrases such as "nextgen" and they blatantly said sure " 1080, no problem". What a load of bull.

This case should be thrown out but Sony should get a slap on the wrist for playing with the numbers a bit. Still, no one got hurt and no one deserves $5 million in compensation for something like this.

 

Otherwise, I'm going to sue Nintendo, because they promised me that the N64 would have dinosaurs like the ones in Jurassic Park.

I always thought this argument was silly before but now it's hit an absurd level.. it's called marketing. You want hard data do your homework, should never take a commercial at face value.

Otherwise, I'm going to sue Nintendo, because they promised me that the N64 would have dinosaurs like the ones in Jurassic Park.

I always wanted to sue them too because of Duck Hunt on the NES. Cost me a few TV's, damaged from thrown light guns at that f'ing dog.

I honestly hope sony loses this one.

remember when sony falsely advertised that watchdogs would run at 1080p 60fps on the ps4?? 

I don't care much for these things, but sony should not blatantly lie about these things. 

Are you really going to hold Sony responsible for Ubisoft's screw up? Seriously?

 

Ubisoft screwed up so badly, it's not even funny. Hell, I think they're on a few lists for worst game debuts ever...

Are you really going to hold Sony responsible for Ubisoft's screw up? Seriously?

 

Ubisoft screwed up so badly, it's not even funny. Hell, I think they're on a few lists for worst game debuts ever...

 

It's because Sony listed the game on their website as being 1080p/60....   for about a day.  Spread across the internet like wildfire, Sony took it down, Ubi then confirmed 900p/30.  All before release.

It's because Sony listed the game on their website as being 1080p/60....   for about a day.  Spread across the internet like wildfire, Sony took it down, Ubi then confirmed 900p/30.  All before release.

lmao, really? A day is what someone's shizstorming about? That just made my day, thanks. :laugh:

How stupid. There wasn't any false advertising.

There was false advertising from Sony and even after the whole thing somewhat blew up they continued saying it's 1080p. This lawsuit is still stupid though.
Seriously if you are going to try to take this stance like it is a crusade or some kind of cause, be consistent and do it across the board and at the very least pick a better game. 

 

Or you could always join the adults who realize marketing is in fact just that, marketing. Anyone who is capable of looking at things objectively know that companies are always going to do whatever they can to make their products look better than they actually are. I mean seriously, do you watch the trailers for the upcoming Assassin's Creed game and think that is what it is going to look like on either the PS4 or XBox One? Or do you have enough sense to know they are showing it on a development kit with everything maxed out to look as good as it possibly can look?

 

This is literally no different than seeing an advertisement for a Big Mac, or hell even the picture on the menu as you are standing in line, and wanting to sue McDonalds as the real life Big Mac looks nothing like the one in the commercials.

 

Nevermind the fact that the SP portion of Killzone is actually 1080p, so it really was the dumbest game they could have chosen for this supposed "lawsuit."

 

GIve me a break.

 

This whole lawsuit is an absolute joke. Let's pretend for a second it actually does somehow win. What exactly does that gain the consumer? Trailers and screenshots that are an actual representation of the final product? Some text on the box that claims it is actually running at 900p but is upscaled to 1080p instead? Like none of that information is widely available as soon as the game is released, if not weeks before it is released?

 

Every single industry does false advertising, every single one. If you are somehow gullible enough to fall for it, who exactly is to blame again? The company that is doing the same as every other company out there? Or the people that somehow think any marketing they see is going to be an actual representation of the final product.

  • Like 3

What I find funny is that this is totally what I expect to happen after the over exposure to the whole resolution arguments.

 

You reap what you sow. The internet community made resolution and frame rate a really, really big deal. So big shocker, someone is suing a company that doesn't 'measure up'

 

I think the lawsuit is silly, but then I also think the obsessing over resolutions and frame rates got out of hand too. That has led to people taking it far too seriously and then suing companies over it.

 

Luckily, I think the tide is turning online and we might be near the end of that kind of over blown emphasis. Unfortunately, the damage is done, trickling down to the masses and it will take a while for it to pass from there.

I think I'm going to sue Sony because the game graphics for my old PS1 games don't look as good as the pre-rendered CG cut-scenes they put on the game cases...(sarcasm)

  • Like 2

Soooo..... this lawsuit is stupid but the resolution thread is 75 pages long? Huh...

touch?

What I find funny is that this is totally what I expect to happen after the over exposure to the whole resolution arguments.

 

You reap what you sow. The internet community made resolution and frame rate a really, really big deal. So big shocker, someone is suing a company that doesn't 'measure up'

 

I think the lawsuit is silly, but then I also think the obsessing over resolutions and frame rates got out of hand too. That has led to people taking it far too seriously and then suing companies over it.

 

Luckily, I think the tide is turning online and we might be near the end of that kind of over blown emphasis. Unfortunately, the damage is done, trickling down to the masses and it will take a while for it to pass from there.

not only community - Sony has contributed to the whole "resolutiongate" with tweets and interviews and offhand comments. It was good marketing so can't really blame them.

 

Last gen Sony camp was obsessed with the "Power of the Cell" and this gen it is 1080p/60fps. Life goes on as usual. :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
    • Usually the bigger ones with many fixes/changes take a few, theyre an exception to the rule most likely
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      452
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!