Recommended Posts

 

Sony Computer Entertainment America has been hit with a lawsuit alleging "deceptive marketing" of Killzone: Shadow Fall because the PlayStation 4 game's multiplayer mode does not run at the resolution advertised.

 

The suit, filed by California resident Douglas Ladore in Northern District California court, alleges that Sony advertised Killzone: Shadow Fall would run at native 1080p resolution but "used a technological shortcut that was supposed to provide 'subjectively similar' results."

 

In March, Eurogamer's Digital Foundry analyzed Shadow Fall's graphics and reported that the PS4 game's multiplayer component runs at 960 by 1080 resolution ? as opposed to 1920 by 1080, or 1080p resolution ? with a "high-quality temporal upscale."

 

The lawsuit alleges that Sony advertised ? through videos, its official website, social media and Killzone's retail packaging ? would offer 1080p graphics. "Unfortunately, Sony's marketing and on-box representations turned out to be nothing more than fiction," the lawsuit says.

 

 

 

 

 

The lawsuit alleges that "'temporal reprojection' is not the 'native 1080p' that Sony promised" and that Sony has not updated its packaging and marketing to reflect the game's actual resolution. Class allegations in the suit include negligent misrepresentation, false advertisement, unfair competition and fraud in the inducement. The amount sought in the suit exceeds $5,000,000.

 

 

 

http://www.polygon.com/2014/8/6/5975983/sony-sued-killzone-shadow-fall-1080p

lol 5 million, and people think there's nutters in the Neowin frame rate and resolution topic (I really hope no one tries to argue this is a good use of court time or tax payers money....).

on one hand yeah it is false advertising. on the other though, who the hell even cares? it's not that great of a game anyway (then again most "realistic" style shooters are stale anymore)

on one hand yeah it is false advertising. on the other though, who the hell even cares? it's not that great of a game anyway (then again most "realistic" style shooters are stale anymore)

 

The issue is false advertising, when companies can get away with it on a regular basis, it's a bad thing. 

 

I wish we had something similar to United Kingdom's ASA in the United States.  

  • Like 1

The whole suit is listed on Kotaku http://kotaku.com/someones-suing-sony-because-a-ps4-game-isnt-1080p-1617200896

I love blurry to the point of distraction, and the in depth report of going into best buy.

The box is going to have 1080p on it at least because of SP. Jeez Xbox 360 boxes had 1080p on them as the device had a hardware upscaler.

Sure Sony should have explained the tech to the geeks sooner, but lawsuits and false advertising is a waste of time. Aliens Colonial Marines was false advertising, did that even get a lawsuit?

  • Like 1

on one hand yeah it is false advertising. on the other though, who the hell even cares? it's not that great of a game anyway (then again most "realistic" style shooters are stale anymore)

 

I do want the person filing the lawsuit to win. I've had it with literal lies that publishers make and polish up videos prior to sales, then they limit reviews until after release of the game so you will go and buy it based on deceptive and false advertising and of course the hook is that retailers won't take back the game after it's been open.

 

We should all sue them for selling us a supposed "full" product but we end up being beta tests at $60 a pop. 

 

It's really getting out of hand these days.

  • Like 1

The whole suit is listed on Kotaku http://kotaku.com/someones-suing-sony-because-a-ps4-game-isnt-1080p-1617200896

I love blurry to the point of distraction, and the in depth report of going into best buy.

The box is going to have 1080p on it at least because of SP. Jeez Xbox 360 boxes had 1080p on them as the device had a hardware upscaler.

Sure Sony should have explained the tech to the geeks sooner, but lawsuits and false advertising is a waste of time. Aliens Colonial Marines was false advertising, did that even get a lawsuit?

 

Exactly.    1080p on box means it is outputting actual 1080p to the TV.      It is not a guarantee that it is not unscaled inside the console!   

All it means that the signal is 1080p to TV

 

This is pretty idiotic to think he will get his $5M.

Single player is true 1080p too.

 

And the description about him buying the game made me LOL

welcome to pretty much every PR promo, IMC for MS and Sony prior to the launch of their consoles. This generation was overrun by lame marketing phrases such as "nextgen" and they blatantly said sure " 1080, no problem". What a load of bull.

This case should be thrown out but Sony should get a slap on the wrist for playing with the numbers a bit. Still, no one got hurt and no one deserves $5 million in compensation for something like this.

 

Otherwise, I'm going to sue Nintendo, because they promised me that the N64 would have dinosaurs like the ones in Jurassic Park.

I always thought this argument was silly before but now it's hit an absurd level.. it's called marketing. You want hard data do your homework, should never take a commercial at face value.

Otherwise, I'm going to sue Nintendo, because they promised me that the N64 would have dinosaurs like the ones in Jurassic Park.

I always wanted to sue them too because of Duck Hunt on the NES. Cost me a few TV's, damaged from thrown light guns at that f'ing dog.

I honestly hope sony loses this one.

remember when sony falsely advertised that watchdogs would run at 1080p 60fps on the ps4?? 

I don't care much for these things, but sony should not blatantly lie about these things. 

Are you really going to hold Sony responsible for Ubisoft's screw up? Seriously?

 

Ubisoft screwed up so badly, it's not even funny. Hell, I think they're on a few lists for worst game debuts ever...

Are you really going to hold Sony responsible for Ubisoft's screw up? Seriously?

 

Ubisoft screwed up so badly, it's not even funny. Hell, I think they're on a few lists for worst game debuts ever...

 

It's because Sony listed the game on their website as being 1080p/60....   for about a day.  Spread across the internet like wildfire, Sony took it down, Ubi then confirmed 900p/30.  All before release.

It's because Sony listed the game on their website as being 1080p/60....   for about a day.  Spread across the internet like wildfire, Sony took it down, Ubi then confirmed 900p/30.  All before release.

lmao, really? A day is what someone's shizstorming about? That just made my day, thanks. :laugh:

How stupid. There wasn't any false advertising.

There was false advertising from Sony and even after the whole thing somewhat blew up they continued saying it's 1080p. This lawsuit is still stupid though.
Seriously if you are going to try to take this stance like it is a crusade or some kind of cause, be consistent and do it across the board and at the very least pick a better game. 

 

Or you could always join the adults who realize marketing is in fact just that, marketing. Anyone who is capable of looking at things objectively know that companies are always going to do whatever they can to make their products look better than they actually are. I mean seriously, do you watch the trailers for the upcoming Assassin's Creed game and think that is what it is going to look like on either the PS4 or XBox One? Or do you have enough sense to know they are showing it on a development kit with everything maxed out to look as good as it possibly can look?

 

This is literally no different than seeing an advertisement for a Big Mac, or hell even the picture on the menu as you are standing in line, and wanting to sue McDonalds as the real life Big Mac looks nothing like the one in the commercials.

 

Nevermind the fact that the SP portion of Killzone is actually 1080p, so it really was the dumbest game they could have chosen for this supposed "lawsuit."

 

GIve me a break.

 

This whole lawsuit is an absolute joke. Let's pretend for a second it actually does somehow win. What exactly does that gain the consumer? Trailers and screenshots that are an actual representation of the final product? Some text on the box that claims it is actually running at 900p but is upscaled to 1080p instead? Like none of that information is widely available as soon as the game is released, if not weeks before it is released?

 

Every single industry does false advertising, every single one. If you are somehow gullible enough to fall for it, who exactly is to blame again? The company that is doing the same as every other company out there? Or the people that somehow think any marketing they see is going to be an actual representation of the final product.

  • Like 3

What I find funny is that this is totally what I expect to happen after the over exposure to the whole resolution arguments.

 

You reap what you sow. The internet community made resolution and frame rate a really, really big deal. So big shocker, someone is suing a company that doesn't 'measure up'

 

I think the lawsuit is silly, but then I also think the obsessing over resolutions and frame rates got out of hand too. That has led to people taking it far too seriously and then suing companies over it.

 

Luckily, I think the tide is turning online and we might be near the end of that kind of over blown emphasis. Unfortunately, the damage is done, trickling down to the masses and it will take a while for it to pass from there.

I think I'm going to sue Sony because the game graphics for my old PS1 games don't look as good as the pre-rendered CG cut-scenes they put on the game cases...(sarcasm)

  • Like 2

Soooo..... this lawsuit is stupid but the resolution thread is 75 pages long? Huh...

touch?

What I find funny is that this is totally what I expect to happen after the over exposure to the whole resolution arguments.

 

You reap what you sow. The internet community made resolution and frame rate a really, really big deal. So big shocker, someone is suing a company that doesn't 'measure up'

 

I think the lawsuit is silly, but then I also think the obsessing over resolutions and frame rates got out of hand too. That has led to people taking it far too seriously and then suing companies over it.

 

Luckily, I think the tide is turning online and we might be near the end of that kind of over blown emphasis. Unfortunately, the damage is done, trickling down to the masses and it will take a while for it to pass from there.

not only community - Sony has contributed to the whole "resolutiongate" with tweets and interviews and offhand comments. It was good marketing so can't really blame them.

 

Last gen Sony camp was obsessed with the "Power of the Cell" and this gen it is 1080p/60fps. Life goes on as usual. :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • So size is the ONLY selling point????? People have been plugging in PC's to TV's in living rooms for 20+ years. I would take a bigger box for more peformance. Also lot and lots of SFF/Mini ITX build guides out there.
    • My point is, if you buying this instead of a console for TV purposes, that you need to understand that you will not be able to play the most popular MP games with Steam OS. Now if you are not into those games, and into some of the perputual alpha/beta games on Steam then this is an option. I would argue a gaming PC would be the better route, more expensive but take the 1k -1.4k you are about to spend on this thing and build a better one. Because it is running Linux you can overide its 1080p settings. However The Verge complained about its 1080p cap and how you would have to get around it at the CLI, so someone buying this instead of a PS5 or Xbox might have a challege on their hands.
    • A review of Synology's BeeCamera software for the BeeStation Plus by Christopher White Synology is leaning into the BeeStation and the BeeStation Plus, and it's easy to understand why. While power users will want something more customizable, the BeeStation and its more powerful sibling, the BeeStation Plus, are great for those who want a device they can simply plug in, click a few buttons, and have it work as their own personal cloud. Until recently, the device was mostly used for the storage of files, photos, and videos, and with the Plus model, you could install and stream media through Plex. Synology recently released a new free application for the BeeStation Plus called BeeCamera, which is basically a stripped-down version of Surveillance Station. First, let's get the confusing naming out of the way. While you might initially think that BeeCamera is a physical device, perhaps a camera that Synology created specifically for the BeeStation Plus, that would be incorrect. BeeCamera is simply the name for the application that runs on the NAS and on your mobile device. I think the marketing team missed the mark here, but it does fit the other naming on the device, like BeePhotos and BeeFiles, I guess. Camera Support As of right now, only Synology-branded cameras are supported, which many will see as a callback to the drive locking the company implemented and then backtracked on. That said, while I 100% disagree on drive locking, I agree that camera locking for a device made to simply plug and play is the right decision. The whole point of the BeeStation line is simplicity. There are currently three camera model lines available, a wireless device for indoor use, and two PoE models for external use. CC400W (Wi-Fi): Plug it into power using the included power adapter, and connect it to your wireless network. This camera is rated only for indoor use and is the one I was provided to review the BeeCamera. $198.36, in line with the Unifi G6 Compact. BC510 (PoE): A bullet-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. TC510 (PoE): A dome-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. Although this isn't a review of the actual Synology camera, I did want to note that a positive for the Synology CC400W is that it uses a magnetic base. This means you can mount it on any magnetic surface, which is pretty handy. However, a downside to the camera is that it's powered by a built-in USB cable that's about six and a half feet (two meters) long. This means that the cable will probably be either too long or too short, but more importantly, if the cable is damaged at all, you'll likely need to buy an entirely new camera because there doesn't appear to be a way to replace it, unlike many competitors, like the Unifi G6 Instant. Hopefully, this is something Synology addresses in a future revision of the hardware. The BeeStation Plus supports up to four cameras. Setup The setup of BeeCamera is, like everything in the BeeStation family, very straightforward. Simply make sure you're on at least version 1.5 of the BeeStation OS, and BeeCamera is automatically installed on the device. BeeCamera Setup Screenshots Setting up the CC400W was just as easy. Plug it in, open up the BeeCamera app, and follow the on-screen steps to add the camera. During this process, you'll configure the camera name and how many days of retention you want to keep. The system will also automatically update the firmware for you. The whole thing took only a couple of minutes, excluding the time it took for the camera to update the firmware. Once the camera is connected to the BeeStation Plus, you can manage the various camera settings within the app, although there aren't many to choose from. You're able to configure whether the microphone will record audio (some privacy laws may preclude you from recording it), select what codec to use (H.264 or H.265), configure the color and exposure of the camera, and determine what data you want to overlay onto the video. Finally, you can set up AI detections so that BeeCamera will alert you if it sees certain things. These are all of the common detections you would expect in a camera system, such as people, pets, and vehicles. Under people and vehicles, you can also add extra monitoring for lingering and congestion detection, although pets are currently in "Lab" and therefore have no extra features yet. Recording in 4K using H.265 for 30 days will take roughly 300 GB of storage, which is very reasonable for most regular households, as the BeeStation Plus has 8TB of native storage. If you want to set up detection zones, you can. These are areas that BeeCamera will look at for the various detections, and are helpful if, for example, there's a tree in your frame and you don't want to be notified each time the wind makes the branches move around in the frame. Finally, you can also schedule when the camera should and should not be recording, which is a very useful feature. For example, you may want to record only at night when you're sleeping, but not during the day when you're up and about the house, so you can easily shut the camera off between 8 am and 10 pm. Each hour of each day can be configured to record continuously, only upon a detection event, or disabled completely. You can't fine-tune to record at a specific time, though, only hourly blocks on the hour. Daily Use The best part of BeeCamera is that it's easy and just works. If you only care about being notified when things happen, the mobile app sends those notifications and lets you click the button to bring up the video and see what's going on. For example, when I went out of town and had the camera pointed at the cat tower in our hallway, it was nice to be able to drop in and check that my furry friends were doing okay without me. Initiating the remote connection to the BeeStation Plus through the app is very responsive, but this will heavily depend on your ISP. In my case, using Xfinity, I'm able to go from starting the app to seeing live video in roughly three seconds, which is about the same amount of time it takes to connect to my Unifi UNVR system that costs much more. If you want to see footage from a specific day and time, you can do so using the calendar icon. You can also scroll through the timeline, looking for detections that are labeled in blue (vs. the normal gray when there's nothing of interest). There are buttons that let you go to the last/next detection on the timeline, which is helpful if you missed the notification on your mobile device. That's where the ease of use stops, though. While you can download clips that are flagged by detection, there's apparently no way to select generic time frames you're interested in, and the only place to download is to your phone. In addition, sharing a video shares the actual video, not just a link back to your BeeStation Plus. While that's good from a security and privacy perspective, it's a little awkward for sharing large videos. Limitations While the ease of implementation is great, there are some things that are lacking from BeeCamera. The most obvious is that there is no way to view the footage on the desktop. You can log in to the BeeStation Plus to see how much storage BeeCamera is using, but unlike BeePhotos and BeeFiles, there is no BeeCamera on the web console to manage or view footage. This means you'll be viewing all of your security footage on your mobile device, which is pretty limiting. In addition, there's no way to download the video to your PC without first using your phone as the intermediary. The one exception to this is that you can use BeeFiles to see the raw MP4 files. They're saved in 5-minute increments, and it's just raw data with no detection information or any other way to identify what any of them are. The lack of a way to interact with BeeCamera on the desktop also makes configuration of the cameras more difficult. For example, trying to set up detection zones using a tiny screen and your finger to draw boxes is more cumbersome than it needs to be. This reinforces the idea that BeeCamera is not made for power users. It's also missing some of the more advanced functionality of Surveillance Station. For example, I couldn't find a way to say, "Alert me if the thing in this zone is no longer there." Another major deficiency with BeeCamera, and a feature I suspect may come out in the future, is that while it can detect generic people, there is no specific facial recognition yet. This is an interesting omission, given the fact that other Synology tools can detect specific individuals, and competitors such as Unifi Protect also do it. This is probably a software limitation, so we will have to wait and see if this feature is added in the future. Conclusion If you need a security guard to monitor surveillance cameras to make sure your property is secure, then BeeCamera is not the solution for you. That said, you probably wouldn't be using a BeeStation Plus as the brains behind the system either. BeeCamera (and BeeStation in general) is clearly aimed at households that want to avoid sending personal data to Google and Amazon, and now want to add some cameras to keep an eye on their home and their pets while they're away. BeeCamera excels at doing this. The target market isn't interested in creating cases, tying multiple views together in a single pane of glass, or the like, and for the intended use case, the system works great. Where it starts to fall apart a bit is with more advanced features. Not being able to use a desktop app is a major compromise in my opinion, and having to do all of the configuration on a mobile device is annoying, but not impossible. If you don't want to have a full-fledged NAS device in your home, but still want control over your data (or maybe want an easy way to backup your data for World Backup Day), and want to add a couple of cameras to keep an eye on your house and your pets, this is a great, cheap, and easy way to go, and I suspect more functionality will come over time. If Synology releases a desktop app or at least a way to configure cameras and view footage on a desktop browser, this would be a near-perfect solution for a general home user. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I forgot to add on my comment that when robots will take physical jobs, it's when they become more cheaper to manufacture and sell. That will be the starting point of the end to lanscaping, trash pickup, factory jobs, etc.
    • How many people can actually use a 2.5gig ethernet port? Most people do not have more than a 1gig internet connection, heck most have less than that. Most people at home do not have a switch that has multiple 2.5gig ports either.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      477
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      neufuse
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!