Recommended Posts

Is there such a thing as an indie publisher? :laugh:

Indie groups are the hot thing to support now and they get treated much better than larger groups.

 

I wonder if the kickstarter program is big enough now that a big developer/publisher would see it as a chance to market a new project to gamers. What if they didn't even ask for money (they could ask for whatever the minimum is required for kickstarter). Maybe there is value in the connection they can make with gamers. Kickstarter projects do get a good amount of attention in the gaming media.

 

 

I think there are publishers that focus on indie games, although a large chunk of games are self published.

Indies do get cut a lot of slack indeed, but the amount of crap that makes its way on Steam is huge. Greenlight is considered a failure and will supposedly disappear at some point.

 

What would be the point of putting something on Kickstarter if they're not looking for funding. The kickstarter would be cancelled, that is, if it even meets the requirements and gets published in the first place. Make a community site or something.

 

Developer Digital are becoming a bit of a super power when it comes to indie publishing.

 

Plenty of others are doing the same.

What would be the point of putting something on Kickstarter if they're not looking for funding. The kickstarter would be cancelled, that is, if it even meets the requirements and gets published in the first place. Make a community site or something.

I was just wondering if Kickstarter is a good place to get attention from the gaming media and gaming community vs say a community site. If there was enough value there, then it might be used just to stir up interest in a game, more than the actually fund raising.

 

 

Developer Digital are becoming a bit of a super power when it comes to indie publishing.

 

Plenty of others are doing the same.

Ah ok, thanks for sharing that. So there are indie publishers that might tap into something like Kickstarter.

Used to be though. MS and Sony are still considered evil for recent transgressions. By recent, I mean in the last say, 10 years.

 

Well it's hard to be an offender when you don't have the power to compete.

 

I'm sure Nintendo would do exactly as Microsoft if it was in the same situation.

 

I don't think the point here is to say Microsoft is worse than Sony or Nintendo cause Microsoft is not. I think people just have enough with all this timed/dlc exclusive from both side and Tomb Raider just happens to be the last straw since it is a relatively popular multiplatform game.

 

People don't have problem with first party exclusive (dev/ip owned by Sony or MS) or seconde party exclusive (games almost totally funded by Sony or Microsoft but not owned by them) but 3rd party exclusive specially from big publishers has never ever be popular and never will be.

People don't have problem with first party exclusive (dev/ip owned by Sony or MS) or seconde party exclusive (games almost totally funded by Sony or Microsoft but not owned by them) but 3rd party exclusive specially from big publishers has never ever be popular and never will be.

That is not true. This thread and others here contradict your statement. People have a problem any exclusive. Most are willing to put up with first party exclusives. Many are willing to put up with 2nd party exclusives. Few put up with 3rd party solutions.

I agree with you that this game was nearly the tipping point in a long building reaction to exclusives. I just hope every single person remembers that when the next exclusive comes around.

Used to be though. MS and Sony are still considered evil for recent transgressions. By recent, I mean in the last say, 10 years.

 

I don't really know of any recent transgressions from Microsoft. Mistakes, maybe. But evil acts? Sony was a train wreck last generation with false promises and product downgrades. Microsoft did what? Release Windows 7 and 8.1? Listen to their community? And they're constantly stapled to the wall as the evil ones.

 

 

Well it's hard to be an offender when you don't have the power to compete.

 

I'm sure Nintendo would do exactly as Microsoft if it was in the same situation.

 

I don't think the point here is to say Microsoft is worse than Sony or Nintendo cause Microsoft is not. I think people just have enough with all this timed/dlc exclusive from both side and Tomb Raider just happens to be the last straw since it is a relatively popular multiplatform game.

 

People don't have problem with first party exclusive (dev/ip owned by Sony or MS) or seconde party exclusive (games almost totally funded by Sony or Microsoft but not owned by them) but 3rd party exclusive specially from big publishers has never ever be popular and never will be.

 

 Nintendo can't compete? What?

 

People seem to have a problem when their decisions aren't rewarded and throw a fit when they don't get what they want. So they demonize the perceived cause and as usual are quick to react. Exclusives aren't inherently bad, and I really don't understand why people are so upset with them. It is what it is, imo.

 

What bugs me more is that it takes so long for them to release what the game is for. If the game had been announced as a time exclusive I doubt as many people would be up in arms over things. The real issue here is the game company's/publishers need to be more transparent and the gaming community needs to learn patience and stop jumping to conclusions before anyone can issue a response.

 

Leave the gaming community to their own devices for a few days and an entire movement will spring up.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Plans. Christ at least editorialise this tripe for what it is or put your own journalistic take on it.
    • If you have a TV in your living room, chances are you can probably just use the Steam Link app and play your huge PC in big picture mode, effectively giving you the Steam Machine experience to see if you'd actually like it. The good news is the Steam Machine can have it's drives upgraded. It has a USB-C 10Gbs port as well, so the 512GB drive could be quickly moved to an external enclosure and repurposed.
    • This machine could very well be a second gaming PC for their living room as a console experience. So we would have to assume their main PC exists as well; With that said, I have 10gb home network with a 2.5gigabit internet connection here so we tend to have more than enough speed to download games. However, we can't make use of the 10gb LAN using Steam's built in transfer tool because it always compresses transfers and that slows the transfer down to well below a standard gigabit port speeds, sometimes as slow as 200-300Mb/s transfers. While that's probably still faster than most internet connections anyway, if they'd fix the LAN transfer issue it'd be upto x5 faster even on a gigabit LAN, than simply dropping a 2.5gbe port on there with hopes of a few people having fast internet connections. There are solutions, work arounds, like using LANCache if you run a NAS... or simply copying the files over manually using a network share.
    • Samsung announces ultra-fast UFS 5.0 storage to supercharge mobile AI by Paul Hill Local AI models tend to run a lot more slowly than cloud services like Claude and Gemini; however, Samsung has just announced that it has developed its UFS 5.0 solution, which increases data transfer to speeds of 10.8GB/s, enabling faster storage and processing in mobile memory that has the potential to provide more optimal local AI experiences. Commenting on this development, Jangseok Choi, head of Memory Product Planning at Samsung Electronics, said: If you’ve tried local AI, you’ll know it can be quite slow, especially if using the larger parameter models. By developing this new solution, Samsung says that storage is evolving from just storing data to a core piece of infrastructure that supports AI computation, too. The Korean company said that UFS 5.0 integrates the latest embedded memory interface standard from JEDEC and achieves up to 10.8 gigabytes per second (GB/s) transfer speeds. Regarding write speeds, Samsung UFS 5.0 can reach 9.5 GB/s. Both the read and write speeds are twice as fast as those of the previous UFS 4.1 standard. Aside from being ideal for local AI, Samsung’s UFS 5.0 is more power efficient by 40% compared to UFS 4.1. Samsung achieved this by implementing innovations such as clock gating and multi-voltage technologies. UFS 5.0 is also ultra-compact at just 7.5mm x 13mm x 0.9mm; that is 16.7% smaller than UFS 4.1. The company said it will be bringing it to multiple devices in the future, including mobile, wearable, and extended reality.
    • A bit like the steamdeck, this probably isn't for you.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      496
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      209
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      99
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      86
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!