Access HDD with NTFS Partition and TimeCapsule


Recommended Posts

Hello friends,

 

I'm having an issue trying to access my external HDD that I connected to my Time Capsule.

 

Basically, what I want is to have my extra external HDD of 1TB to be accessible via Finder, so I can manage the files manually.

 

This is my setup:

MacBook Pro, OS X Mavericks.

TimeCapsule 2TB currently used for Time Machine

Extra External HDD 1TB (the one I want to use to store manually my personal data)

 

Note: the HDD is NTSF format, I know Time Capsule supports FAT32 and other format of Mac. HOWEVER I have files that are around 8GB size or so on, that I need to backup and FAT32 does not support that file size sadly. I also have some Virtual Machines I want to manually backup, but FAT32 file size is a problem.

 

Any solution or ideas for this?

 

 

Thanks in advance

From the sounds of it the issue is that your mac isn't reading the NTFS drive? The odd thing is that it should support reading of an NTFS partition without an issue, normally writing is the problem. For that you can look for NTFS-3G which should resolve the problem.

I've just looked at my Time Capsule partition and it's formatted to HFS+? I don't think that has the same restrictions as FAT32...

Well, my external HDD is connected via USB to the Time Capsule. Not directly connected to the Mac. Basically I want to be able to access my HDD wireless.

 

Note: when I connect my HDD directly to the macbook pro, no issues at all, I can navigate into the folders and files without issues.

 

Probably this helps to clarify my issue.

Oh wait, are you talking about the Airport Time Capsule, rather than just using any HDD to save your Time Capsule data?

Hmm, I've not used the Airport Time Capsule before, although I do see that it mentions that you should be able to share a HDD through it. That doesn't explain why it can't read the drive though, seeing as - as I mentioned earlier - Mac should be able to read NTFS without an issue.

I'll have a look around and see if I can find something.

EDIT: Found it, although you're not going to like the answer, I'm afraid. According to this you can only browse an External HDD connect to your Time Capsule if it is formatted in Mac's Extended Journal file system.

Interesting that you mention that, as over the past few days I've been strugging with file systems. I own a Mac, I'm currently using Linux, and everyone I know normally uses Windows. Because of that I've been trying to find a file system that everything would recognise. The only real solution is either NTFS or UDF (and UDF is a pain for me to deal with at the second, but that's another matter.)

However, for your particular situation neither file system will work. You'll have to switch it to Mac Extended if you want to connect to it through Time Capsule.

  On 12/08/2014 at 19:10, Nick H. said:

Interesting that you mention that, as over the past few days I've been strugging with file systems. I own a Mac, I'm currently using Linux, and everyone I know normally uses Windows. Because of that I've been trying to find a file system that everything would recognise. The only real solution is either NTFS or UDF (and UDF is a pain for me to deal with at the second, but that's another matter.)

However, for your particular situation neither file system will work. You'll have to switch it to Mac Extended if you want to connect to it through Time Capsule.

 

Yeah. Seems like there is no other way sadly.

 

I'll try to research in the dark world so see if I can find a hint or something.

 

Thanks for the help.

  On 12/08/2014 at 18:56, Nick H. said:

Oh wait, are you talking about the Airport Time Capsule, rather than just using any HDD to save your Time Capsule data?

Hmm, I've not used the Airport Time Capsule before, although I do see that it mentions that you should be able to share a HDD through it. That doesn't explain why it can't read the drive though, seeing as - as I mentioned earlier - Mac should be able to read NTFS without an issue.

I'll have a look around and see if I can find something.

EDIT: Found it, although you're not going to like the answer, I'm afraid. According to this you can only browse an External HDD connect to your Time Capsule if it is formatted in Mac's Extended Journal file system.

Then that is a HARDWARE restriction of the Airport itself - I have a Netgear WNDR3700v4 with a USB port, and I can access any USB drive connected to it, as long as it is in a format that OS X recognizes, and yes, that includes NTFS.

 

While I can't WRITE to an NTFS partition without a third-party utility (such as Paragon NTFS), that's fine - that means I can download files in Windows, and use them on OS X - without having to worry about cross-OS file corruption.

 

I'm more concerned about another issue that could cause conniptions - using a MyBook as a backup destination for both OSes, with a single drive split into two partitions - one NTFS for Windows and one HFS+ for OS X.

 

Since the MyBook won't be a boot drive, can this work?

  On 12/08/2014 at 19:10, Nick H. said:

Interesting that you mention that, as over the past few days I've been strugging with file systems. I own a Mac, I'm currently using Linux, and everyone I know normally uses Windows. Because of that I've been trying to find a file system that everything would recognise. The only real solution is either NTFS or UDF (and UDF is a pain for me to deal with at the second, but that's another matter.)

However, for your particular situation neither file system will work. You'll have to switch it to Mac Extended if you want to connect to it through Time Capsule.

 

The best solution is exFat.  Windows, Mac, and Linux all can write and right to that file format.

  On 12/08/2014 at 20:07, PGHammer said:

I'm more concerned about another issue that could cause conniptions - using a MyBook as a backup destination for both OSes, with a single drive split into two partitions - one NTFS for Windows and one HFS+ for OS X.

 

Since the MyBook won't be a boot drive, can this work?

I can only comment on what I have tried in the past. I had a 3TB External HDD split in to two partitions: One is HFS+ (for Time Capsule) and the other was in ExFat. Time Capsule had no problem backing up to the HFS+ partition, and Mac had no problem reading ExFat.

So yes, you should be able to do that without a problem. (Y)

 

 

  On 12/08/2014 at 20:08, #Michael said:

The best solution is exFat.  Windows, Mac, and Linux all can write and right to that file format.

I agree, and as I mentioned in my reply to PGHammer I had an External HDD formatted in ExFat which worked between Windows and Mac without an issue. Once I started using Linux though, something went screwy with the permissions and Linux no longer allowed me to write to the ExFat partition. A few guys on Neowin and myself tried various things for a majority of the day before I gave up.

I've now formatted the ExFat patition to NTFS, that seems to have the least problems across all the systems. But again, that is my problem that I'm facing, not the problem of this discussion. ;)

  On 12/08/2014 at 20:50, acido00 said:

exFat supports larger file sizes? and if you say that it is supported in windows and Mac and Linux, then that is perfect.

 

Can I format it then using Disk Utility?

Well hang on, read what I wrote again. Yes, all three OS's are supposed to be able to read and write ExFat (using FUSE, I think) but I did have problems when it came to Linux. We still aren't sure exactly what caused it, but it may have been to do with disconnecting the drive without properly ejecting it. Who knows, It's not my problem anymore. :p

ExFat supports larger file sizes, yes. But again, in your situation you'll be better off sticking with NTFS (at least, in my opinion.) It won't fix your problem with the Airport Time Capsule, but neither will changing the filesystem to ExFat.

Airport Time Capsule will only read the Mac Extended Journaled file system. There doesn't seem to be two ways about it, I'm afraid.

  On 12/08/2014 at 20:54, Nick H. said:

Well hang on, read what I wrote again. Yes, all three OS's are supposed to be able to read and write ExFat (using FUSE, I think) but I did have problems when it came to Linux. We still aren't sure exactly what caused it, but it may have been to do with disconnecting the drive without properly ejecting it. Who knows, It's not my problem anymore. :p

ExFat supports larger file sizes, yes. But again, in your situation you'll be better off sticking with NTFS (at least, in my opinion.) It won't fix your problem with the Airport Time Capsule, but neither will changing the filesystem to ExFat.

Airport Time Capsule will only read the Mac Extended Journaled file system. There doesn't seem to be two ways about it, I'm afraid.

 

oh! I misunderstood then. OK, I'll follow your suggestion then.

 

Thanks.

exFAT is totally stable between OS X, Win and Linux. I use many drives for cross platform talk. For time machine you will need to use HFS+ but for everything else you can use exFAT. OS X writes natively to exFAT and the stupid 4GB File limit is gone and it can handle up to 16T file sizes now.

  On 12/08/2014 at 21:08, Sikh said:

exFAT is totally stable between OS X, Win and Linux. I use many drives for cross platform talk. For time machine you will need to use HFS+ but for everything else you can use exFAT. OS X writes natively to exFAT and the stupid 4GB File limit is gone and it can handle up to 16T file sizes now.

Again, I would have agreed before I moved to Linux. However, Linux will need a third party driver to read-write ExFat. OS X was the same until 10.6.5. (source)

And again, ExFat was working fine for me on Linux until...well, until it didn't. It didn't have a problem reading the drive, just writing to it. But again, that could have been something that I did wrong, and isn't the topic of the conversation. ;)

Maybe I'll start a discussion about file systems. There are lots of variations out there, each with their own pros and cons. For this thread though, acido00 is best of leaving his drive with the NTFS file system as far as I can see.

  On 12/08/2014 at 21:24, Nick H. said:

Again, I would have agreed before I moved to Linux. However, Linux will need a third party driver to read-write ExFat. OS X was the same until 10.6.5. (source)

And again, ExFat was working fine for me on Linux until...well, until it didn't. It didn't have a problem reading the drive, just writing to it. But again, that could have been something that I did wrong, and isn't the topic of the conversation. ;)

Maybe I'll start a discussion about file systems. There are lots of variations out there, each with their own pros and cons. For this thread though, acido00 is best of leaving his drive with the NTFS file system as far as I can see.

 

You should definitely start a conversation on file systems. All the linux builds ive used based off debian or arch and read exFat fine. We have ubuntu and centOS servers at work and they all read and wrtie to exFAT drives fine. I dont know many Snow Leopard which is why its not a thought in my mind when I mention exFAT is supported.

 

im looking for to this file system dicussion thread!

I think, I have an idea. Is it possible to create a partition probably of 1GB using (exFat or Fat32) and then the rest using the MAC OSX Format (HFS+)? this way when I connect it to my Airport Time Capsule it can be detected and I can write on it wireless

 

Any tutorial or guide?

 

I think if I can make it that way, I can put on the 1GB partition software like "MacDrive" or any other free that will allow me to read on Windows the HFS+ format, so basically I can install it on windows when needed and I can access the information.

 

What do you think?

Ok maybe I am missing something - why are you using ntfs, you don't list any windows machines - did I miss that?

Why don't you just format the disk in your mac book pro with apple filesystem, quite sure that supports large file sizes. Even really old 10.0 to 10.1 supports 2TB, etc.

  On 14/08/2014 at 14:41, BudMan said:

Ok maybe I am missing something - why are you using ntfs, you don't list any windows machines - did I miss that?

Why don't you just format the disk in your mac book pro with apple filesystem, quite sure that supports large file sizes. Even really old 10.0 to 10.1 supports 2TB, etc.

 

yes, it should wrok on windows machines.

  On 14/08/2014 at 12:47, acido00 said:

I think, I have an idea. Is it possible to create a partition probably of 1GB using (exFat or Fat32) and then the rest using the MAC OSX Format (HFS+)? this way when I connect it to my Airport Time Capsule it can be detected and I can write on it wireless

 

Any tutorial or guide?

 

I think if I can make it that way, I can put on the 1GB partition software like "MacDrive" or any other free that will allow me to read on Windows the HFS+ format, so basically I can install it on windows when needed and I can access the information.

 

What do you think?

So your Fat32 drive would have the installion file for Macdrive which you could then use on any machine to make the machine read an HFS+ partition, while the rest of the drive would be formatted in HFS+, allowing you to access those files through Time Capsule?

I can't see a problem with it in theory, although if you choose to do that you will have to have administrator rights on any machine that you wanted to connect your HDD to, in order to install the software.

As for a guide, what are you looking for? Any partition tool (GParted, for example) should be able to partition the drive for you and format each partition without an issue. Remember that it will format the drive though, so backup your data first!

  On 14/08/2014 at 16:56, Nick H. said:

So your Fat32 drive would have the installion file for Macdrive which you could then use on any machine to make the machine read an HFS+ partition, while the rest of the drive would be formatted in HFS+, allowing you to access those files through Time Capsule?

I can't see a problem with it in theory, although if you choose to do that you will have to have administrator rights on any machine that you wanted to connect your HDD to, in order to install the software.

As for a guide, what are you looking for? Any partition tool (GParted, for example) should be able to partition the drive for you and format each partition without an issue. Remember that it will format the drive though, so backup your data first!

 

Exactly what you just said is my idea. For admin permissions that is not a problem, wherever I will use my personal external HDD I will have the right permissions.

 

GParted sounds cool. I was also about to give it a try using Disk Utility to perform the partition following this guide: http://hints.macworld.com/article.php?story=20110422113851848

 

It should works as I think.

 

I'm backup up my external HDD, to give it a try and if it works, I'll let you know here on this post.

 

Thanks

If you just want read-only HFS+ access in Windows you can install the HFS+ drivers from Apple's BootCamp package. I use them here to have read-only access to my hackintosh partition.

 

There's an installer here. Basically it just copies the two driver files and sets up the registry. Reboot and your HFS drives should be visible.

Why should it work on windows - you didn't list any windows machines?

doesn't hfs explorer work? http://www.catacombae.org/hfsx.html

There are for sure ways to read and write hfs in windows machines. Why do you just buy another external if you need one for windows - and copy your files over the network to this disk be it ntfs or exfat, etc.

If this devices is going to be connect to your timecap -- then why would you use it for anything else?

  On 14/08/2014 at 19:56, BudMan said:

Why should it work on windows - you didn't list any windows machines?

Because he might want to unplug it, take it somewhere and plug it in to a Windows machine? The same reason I was looking in to UDF a while back.

  Quote

If this devices is going to be connect to your timecap -- then why would you use it for anything else?

Because the HDD isn't being used by Time Capsule as a backup. It's being used to hold files and folders that he would like to access wirelessly. The drive isn't a wireless drive, but he can connect it up to Time Capsule which would make it wireless.
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It gave OEMs all kinds of stuff to put effort into that did nothing about bad drivers that crashed the system.
    • Yes, because Google's ad platform dominates the internet and most sites use Google's ad platform. Microsoft cares about their own ad platform. And they whitelist their ads. Edge is still on mv2 on desktop but they have officially announced they will stop supporting it. They haven't announced the date, but it is on their roadmap. Microsoft HAS the resources to keep it, but they have announced they will remove it unlike other chromium based browsers like Brave and Opera which have announced they will try to keep it. They postponing it in an attempt maybe to gain some market share from Chrome, but their end goal is the same, the deprecation of mv2. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-edge/extensions-chromium/developer-guide/manifest-v3#manifest-timeline-for-microsoft-edge-and-partner-center
    • I'll say this again:  This hasn't changed since Windows 10.  This customization issue is not unique to Windows 11.   Windows 10 was released about 10 years ago.  I didn't look at changing default fonts in Windows 8 or 7.  Most (sane) people would look for supportability -- you might have the desired customization in those OSs but not able to play games, apps, that one typically gets the OS for.  No one is going to trade off getting an ancient OS just so they can have larger fonts but not be able to play games or run apps.   There are many options that are not exposed in the default UI because they have a lot more potential harm than benefit.  Doesn't mean they don't exist.  Hence, registry changes. "What's the harm by leaving it in Settings?"  Imagine if you changed the default font to something unreadable.  How would you change it back if you can't read anything?  The settings UI allows one to change size and style, but not font, so you'd still be able to read it.  Changing the font itself to Wingdings might render an OS unusable. Now YOU might be savvy enough to make that change and/or undo it, but that's why it's not exposed in simplistic UI and instead is moved to registry changes. Your 3rd party app is most likely causing conflict with the registry as it wants to make its own changes.  It's not voodoo magic here, that's typically what these apps do.  I'd bet you a beer if I spin up a new VM for Windows 11 and try my links above with no Winaero Tweaker it'd work just fine.  Introduction of 3rd party apps is always suspect -- who knows what else it's doing.  
    • Yes, and the reason is the defaults is has. The masses have no interest to change settings etc. It feels cluttered by default. The default home/NTP feels cluttered with so much stuff from MSN. The sidebar has too many buttons with Microsoft services. The default search engine is Bing. Just compare Edge defaults with Chrome defaults. The masses open Edge or are "forced" to open it, they don't like what they see and close it and go back to Chrome.
    • PrivaZer 4.0.106 by Razvan Serea PrivaZer is a PC cleaner that helps you master your security and freedom at home and at work. PrivaZer permanently and irretrievably erases unwanted traces of your past activity on your computer and on your storage devices (USB keys, external drive, and so on) which prevents others from retrieving what you have done, watched, streamed, visited on internet, freeing up valuable hard disk space, and keeping your PC running secure. PrivaZer key features: Deep Cleaning: PrivaZer thoroughly cleans your PC by removing unnecessary files, traces of activity, and potential privacy risks. Advanced Scan Modes: With multiple scan modes, including Quick and Deep scans, PrivaZer ensures comprehensive cleaning tailored to your needs. Customizable Cleaning: PrivaZer allows you to customize cleaning settings, so you can choose exactly what to clean and what to keep. Privacy Protection: PrivaZer safeguards your privacy by securely erasing traces of your online and offline activities, including browsing history and temporary files. Secure File Deletion: PrivaZer securely deletes sensitive files beyond recovery, ensuring your confidential data remains private. Startup Manager: PrivaZer helps you control which programs launch at startup, improving boot times and overall system performance. Automatic Updates: PrivaZer regularly updates its cleaning algorithms to adapt to new threats and ensure effective protection. Scheduled Cleanups: PrivaZer offers the convenience of scheduling automated cleanups, so your PC stays optimized without manual intervention. Portable Version: PrivaZer offers a portable version, allowing you to carry it on a USB drive and clean any PC without installation. Detailed Reports: PrivaZer provides detailed reports after each cleanup, giving you insights into the space reclaimed and the areas cleaned. File Shredder: PrivaZer includes a file shredder feature to securely delete files, making data recovery impossible even with specialized tools. Context Menu Integration: PrivaZer integrates with the context menu, enabling quick and easy access to cleaning functions from any file or folder. Multi-Language Support: PrivaZer supports multiple languages, making it accessible to users worldwide. Automatic Traces Detection: PrivaZer automatically detects traces of activity on your PC, ensuring thorough cleaning without manual intervention. System Restore Point Creation: PrivaZer creates system restore points before cleaning, allowing you to revert changes if needed. Disk Health Analysis: PrivaZer analyzes disk health and alerts you to potential issues, helping you prevent data loss and maintain system stability. Browser Extensions Cleanup: PrivaZer cleans up browser extensions and add-ons, improving browser performance and security. File Association Management: PrivaZer helps you manage file associations, ensuring files open with the correct programs for optimal usability. Intuitive User Interface: PrivaZer features an intuitive user interface, making it easy for both novice and advanced users to optimize their PCs for better performance and privacy. PrivaZer 4.0.106 changelog: New cleanup : BAM (Background Activity Monitor) Improved cleanup : Clipboard Improved UI Download: PrivaZer 4.0.106 | Portable PrivaZer ~30.0 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: PrivaZer Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Epaminombas earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Veteran
      Yonah went up a rank
      Veteran
    • First Post
      viraltui earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      viraltui earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      LunaFerret earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      481
    2. 2
      +FloatingFatMan
      264
    3. 3
      snowy owl
      232
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      231
    5. 5
      Edouard
      172
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!