only 3.19GB ram usable out of 4GB


Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Could someone tell me why the system properties is saying 4.00GB (3.19GB usable).  I am running windows 7 home premium 32 bit.  I would have thought if i have 4GB, the system would use 4GB.  

 

PS I don't know much about computers.

 

Thanks

 

Yas1320 

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1225925-only-319gb-ram-usable-out-of-4gb/
Share on other sites

You just explained why in your question.  A 32-bit operating system can not use a full 4GB of RAM.  Why did you install a 32-bit OS with that much memory?  I think your post is number 768 of the people that have asked this question.  

Sorry, I don't mean to beat you up.

thanks +devHead.  I had my pc made sometime ago and wasn't told it was pointless putting that much ram on a 32-bit OS system.  Thanks again for giving this info.  So, I am right in thinking the 32-bit OS system will only support no more than 3.19GB?

 

I think you can install the 64 bits version using the 32 bits license.

 

If i remember correctly i bought the 32 bits version of Vista and got the 64 bits cd later paying the cd only from ms web site. COuld be wrong that was a long time ago.

 

This.

 

Before you make a purchase that Hum suggested. Check your system to see if the hardware is 64bit with the checker at the following URL:

 

http://www.igorware.com/64bit-checker

 

If your system is not 64bit, then you can not install 64bit OS on it but the installer will install 32bit instead.

32-bits of address space is limited to exactly 4 GB.

The problem is that the RAM is not the only thing that uses the address space. x86 (16, 32, 64) only has ONE address space. The first part of the address space is reserved for certain legacy functions as well as new standards. Devices with DMA function are directly mapped onto the space as well, such as graphics cards.

There is no fixed amount of address space that is used by RAM. If you add more devices that get mapped to the address space that you have, less RAM can be mapped onto that address space.

The amount of bytes that can fit into the address space is (bits^2)+1.

Why anybody would even contemplate installing the 32-bit version of Windows on a machine fully capable of 64-bit is beyond me.  Who built your computer for you? If it's a computer store, I'd be seriously questioning their competence right about now.

 

I had my pc made sometime ago and wasn't told it was pointless putting that much ram on a 32-bit OS system.

 

It's the other way around really, it's pointless putting a 32-bit OS on a machine with 4 GB of RAM and above.

Why anybody would even contemplate installing the 32-bit version of Windows on a machine fully capable of 64-bit is beyond me.  Who built your computer for you? If it's a computer store, I'd be seriously questioning their competence right about now.

 

 

 

 

It's the other way around really, it's pointless putting a 32-bit OS on a machine with 4 GB of RAM and above.

Unfortunately it was a computer store.  They were recommended by someone.   Can't do anything about it now, its been about 4 year or so.

If you need the ISO this site has them.

 

2nd one down: Home Premium 64 bit.

 

IF THE KEY does not work call the Microsoft Activation # - Windows activation: (888) 571-2048

tell them it does not work with 64 bit they will give you a new one.

 

http://www.w7forums.com/threads/official-windows-7-sp1-iso-image-downloads.12325/

 

 

32-bits of address space is limited to exactly 4 GB.

The problem is that the RAM is not the only thing that uses the address space. x86 (16, 32, 64) only has ONE address space. The first part of the address space is reserved for certain legacy functions as well as new standards. Devices with DMA function are directly mapped onto the space as well, such as graphics cards.

There is no fixed amount of address space that is used by RAM. If you add more devices that get mapped to the address space that you have, less RAM can be mapped onto that address space.

The amount of bytes that can fit into the address space is (bits^2)+1.

 

Excellent explanation.

Actually, he should be able to crossgrade -  as long as the SKU (not the bitness) is identical, the key does not change.

Also, some PCs got hobbled due to BIOS quirks, despite being more than capable of swallowing 4+GB.

 

True story - my Mom's HP DC7600 (refurbished) came with 2 GB (eight DDR2 RAM slots) but has 5 GB onboard today.  The issues were twofold - when she bought it, four of the eight DIMM slots were populated with 512MB sticks (cheap), AND there was a BIOS bug which resulted in an address "hole" - which is why it came with XP32.  After updating the BIOS, I reinstalled Windows 7 x32 (which Mom's old PC was running), then crossgraded to 7 x64 (same key), and used the USMT to migrate her settings.  The crossgrade worked because she was also going to a larger HDD than her old one - a crossgrade requires an HDD the same size or larger.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Simple answer is yes, you will still get the Windows updates and as long as browser is up to date, you will be good. Only thing secure boot does is protect you against boot level threats and make it harder to install other OS's. I've been looking into this pretty thoroughly lately myself as wifes computer has secure boot disabled plus my other, older computers that run Linux, don't have secure boot enabled. Have seen all kinds of questions about this on the Linux Mint and MX Linux forums. Just don't suddenly enable secure boot now.
    • How many other companies will follow Ford's lead? Or, have they already gotten lazy and become enslaved to AI--and now can't figure out how to get out of that mess.
    • Why would any self-respecting intelligent person follow any recommendation by Donald's GOP administration? With almost two years of fabrications, deceit, and blatantly illegal behavior, why believe them now? They had best be gone after the November 2026 election, so we'll wait and see.
    • AltSendme 0.4.1 by Razvan Serea AltSendme is a minimal, cross-platform application designed for fast, secure, and private peer-to-peer file transfers. It allows users to send files or entire directories directly between devices without relying on cloud servers, accounts, or any personal information. Everything is encrypted end-to-end using modern protocols like QUIC and TLS 1.3, ensuring both strong security and low-latency performance. Transfers are verified with BLAKE3 for data integrity, and interrupted downloads automatically resume, making the experience reliable even on unstable connections. You can transfer anything—images, videos, documents, and more. Integrity checks are performed on both ends, so your files are automatically verified for correctness during both sending and receiving. AltSendme works seamlessly across local networks or long-distance links, capable of saturating multi-gigabit connections for extremely fast delivery. With built-in NAT traversal and encrypted relay fallback, it connects devices almost anywhere. The app integrates with the Sendme CLI and will soon support mobile and web platforms. Fully free and open-source, AltSendme offers a lightweight, privacy-first alternative to traditional cloud-based services, removing size limits, upload costs, and unnecessary data exposure. AltSendme 0.4.1 changelog: Release Highlights Self-hosted relays: Run your own iroh relay so transfers don't rely on public infrastructure. Includes a full deployment template in deploy/relay/ with Docker Compose for a VPS and configuration examples for production use. Fly.io support: One-click deploy template for Fly.io, including a quick-start config (fly.dev.toml) for testing without a custom domain, plus production setup with Let's Encrypt and your own hostname. Relay settings UI: New Settings → Network panel to choose how AltSendme connects: automatic public relays, custom self-hosted URLs (with optional auth token), or disabled. Test connections, verify latency, and see live relay status in the footer. Disable relays: Turn off relay servers entirely when you only need same-network transfers (e.g. LAN). Direct connections only. No relay hop required when devices can reach each other. Android graduates from beta: Android is now part of the regular release cycle alongside desktop. APKs ship with each version (universal, arm64, and armv7). Other improvements Private relay access control via shared auth token Relay fallback notifications when a custom relay is unreachable Broadcast mode toggle in sharing settings Android release build fixes (split-per-ABI APKs, universal APK preservation) UI polish: mobile safe-area insets, dropzone layout, transfer progress animation Bug fixes for minification-related serialization issues and system tray icon loading What's Changed feat(relay): add relay status functionality and settings UI (a120cdf) feat(relay): implement custom relay server configuration and verification (51276c7) feat(relay): add configuration for private relay access and enhance observability features (48fbabf) feat(relay): enhance relay URL validation, display connection status (d4fffa0) feat(relay): add RelayChangeGuard component and enhance relay-related translations (16ba514) feat(broadcast): add toggle setting for broadcast mode in sharing UI (ca6d977) fix(relay): correct QUIC discovery port, pin image, templatize fly.dev (52a2ba5) fix: More broken serialization due to minification (67491a9) fix(android): preserve true universal APK across per-ABI builds (e9f256f) fix(ui): conditional safe-area insets padding on mobile (1182f0e) refactor(transfer): CircularRing component animation fix (944572b) chore(android): drop x86 and x86_64 release APKs, keep universal+arm64+armv7 (34ada0b) Download: AltSendme 0.4.1 | ARM64 | ~9.0 MB (Open Source) Download: AltSendme for MacOS | Android Links: AltSendme Home Page | GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • You are mostly right about the ephemeral nature of it. As I mention in the article, if you dont add a second device or take a backup of your account before uninstalling it, then yes you will lose access to your account. That said, in terms of actual user experience when you sync multiple devices your message history carries across and there's also a Saved Messages chat like there is on Telegram to send messages and attachments between your installs. But yh, what you point out are correct and its not trying to emulate Messenger or Telegram.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      149
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!