Is anyone else annoyed by the Microsoft's Account two-factor authentication?


Recommended Posts

Is anyone else annoyed by the Microsoft's Account two-factor authentication?

 

14786142970_872e7b0656_b.jpg

 

 

 

14972473422_41a38f403f_o.jpg

 

I've had numerous customer almost get locked out of their account already. I understand that Two-authentication is great everything but the following is the issue I have with the way Microsoft is doing it.

 

One day I got a call about a woman who all of the sudden started getting this message (the 1st photo). They wouldn't let her enter her account until she would validate she was the owner of her own account and enter the code they would send her. The issue was she was at the lakes for the summer and the recovery email she had on the account was from her home ISP which was currently disconnected while gone.

 

So the best we could do is create her a new gmail address which she could use (on photo 2) just to authenticate her account and to change her security information. They say that it takes 30 days for this to take in effect.

 

But what about this

 

Hacker, hacks an account which isn't used a lot. They tell Microsoft, I cant authenticate with the email on file, use this one. So he enters his email address and they send the hacker a link which he clicks and resets the security information. Now normally it takes 30 days for this to take in effect but the person who's account he logged into doesn't use it once every 60 days.

 

It's just something about how the implicated their two factor authentication which just annoys me.

I've run into this recently where the second account I had tied to it hadn't been used in years and being that it was also a hotmail account meant it got auto deleted long ago. No way for me to get full access to edit my account unless I jump through the 30 day hoop. -_-

Not sure what the problem is here. You're the one who 1. switched on two-factor authentication and 2. elected to use e-mail addresses for authentication. It's your job to make sure you keep those e-mail accounts alive. If you can't, don't use e-mail addresses and use another option (mobile, app, etc.).

  • Like 8

For me, I do the two-factor authentication by having it send me a text message. For me, I get logged out of my account a lot. Especially Skype. Skype likes to randomly log me out about every 3rd time I start it up on either my computer or my phone. So every single time I log in, even when I check the "Don't ask for codes while using this device" box, they still require me to go through the hoops and have it send me a text message.

 

It'd be more fine if after I log in, the webpage says "Okay, sent a text message to your phone (***)-***-**56" or something like that. But instead, they have to ask me how I'd like to verify my account (fortunately, the text message option is the default), and then they ask me to put in the last four digits of my phone number before sending the text messge, which is just an annoying extra step.

 

On paper, it seems like a good idea, but... if someone else were to steal my phone, it'd be as simple as four taps from the home screen to get to my full phone number. Simply asking for the last four digits doesn't really seem to be a way to stop anybody. If they wanted me to verify some personal information, why not choose something that's not so easily accessible from my physical device?

Had a guy call me today using all sorts of profanity towards this. It started a month ago and he just got around to calling. It started saying unless you validate we aren't letting you in, well the recovery address was his last name at hotmail.com but he claims he doesn't have that address so maybe he mistyped it.

 

So now he entered his friends email address to send the email to and to change his security into ...blah blah.. the whole thing could be done better.

There is an option to remember the device and add it to the trusted devices, but there is also the option to remove all trusted devices on the account. If a hacker gains access, they can simply revoke all of your devices before changing the details.

You can always use a two factor authenticator program for Android, Windows Phone, iOS, Blackberry, Windows, Linux or OSX, and you're good.

yes I have had it not trust me for the 30 day waiting period which affected my Surface Pro, Windows Phone, Xbox 360 along with services Onedrive & Hotmail after getting a new Windows Phone & #  when my old was the main verification.

 

You can always use a two factor authenticator program for Android, Windows Phone, iOS, Blackberry, Windows, Linux or OSX, and you're good.

 

 

The exploit warwagon mentions would circumvent the 2-factor app, as you enter the code at the same point as you would enter the email security code.

This is actually pretty worrying for those who do not access their account often, or never keep it up to date with their newest email address or mobile number.

Not sure what the problem is here. You're the one who 1. switched on two-factor authentication and 2. elected to use e-mail addresses for authentication. It's your job to make sure you keep those e-mail accounts alive. If you can't, don't use e-mail addresses and use another option (mobile, app, etc.).

Pretty much this.

For me, I do the two-factor authentication by having it send me a text message. For me, I get logged out of my account a lot. Especially Skype. Skype likes to randomly log me out about every 3rd time I start it up on either my computer or my phone. So every single time I log in, even when I check the "Don't ask for codes while using this device" box, they still require me to go through the hoops and have it send me a text message.

I never get asked that and I have two factor turned on and I login to skype like once a month. I hate the program and try to avoid using it as much as humanely possible. The only time I've ever seen the "please enter the code to login" was when I logged into it using another computer.

Not sure why it asks you so often.

On paper, it seems like a good idea, but... if someone else were to steal my phone, it'd be as simple as four taps from the home screen to get to my full phone number. Simply asking for the last four digits doesn't really seem to be a way to stop anybody. If they wanted me to verify some personal information, why not choose something that's not so easily accessible from my physical device?

If someone had your phone then the entire thing is worthless anyways since they'll get the text message and be able to login. The 4 digits thing is to verify that it's actually you and not someone else.

There is an option to remember the device and add it to the trusted devices, but there is also the option to remove all trusted devices on the account. If a hacker gains access, they can simply revoke all of your devices before changing the details.

And? That's the way it is with every two-factor authentication. If someone gets access to your device and knows your password well nothing can really protect you anymore.

It's like if someone got access your computer then apart from like encryption, nothing is going to protect you.

  • Like 2

 

 
 

 

The exploit warwagon mentions would circumvent the 2-factor app, as you enter the code at the same point as you would enter the email security code.

This is actually pretty worrying for those who do not access their account often, or never keep it up to date with their newest email address or mobile number.

 

 

Yep. This is why most implementations of 2FA only allow you to use either a recovery code, or a code from the mobile authenticator app. Most will also add text based codes as a backup. The idea is to require access to another device which only the true user should have access to. When implemented like this, if you lose access to recovery codes, your phone number, and the mobile authenticator app, you lose access to your account.

 

The images in the original post aren't from a 2FA enabled account though. This is just something that Microsoft pops up on devices it doesn't recognize for accounts without 2FA enabled.

No. Because it's the user who is at fault here. I have it turned on and use code generator for it. If that fails, I can always recover using a secondary email or phone/text.

These things work if you pay attention to what you are doing.

In general i think its a good thing, the customers complaining are the ones that likely need protection from themselves.

 

The only problem i have with Microsoft's two factor authentication are devices / services that don't support codes generated by an authentication app, and require a one time use password.

It's a right pain having to log in to account.live.com, create a one time use password then entering it on a friends Xbox 360 for example. It would be nice if Microsoft updated all their products and services to support codes generated by authentication apps.

 

Google Authenticator works fine for any Microsoft services that support authentication apps on Android and iOS.

It really isn't two factor authentication per se. It's a way to have a current medium like phone or secondary email address so they can contact you in the event you lose access (forgotten password most likely) to the Microsoft account.

 

When you have your security info updated and verified, you can still log in using only your Microsoft ID and password. There is a separate option to enable true two-factor authentication.

 

InsaneNutter above is right. This is aimed towards people that will not have any means to recover an account once their password is lost or forgotten.

 

This security authentication is required is when you sign in from a previously unknown (to Microsoft) device. On Windows 8-8.1 you don't need this when using IE but the first time you try log in from another browser, you will get prompted for a code. Once this is done, it's not required anymore.

 

I've had many clients in the past that couldn't remember the password and they couldn't get a reset because of outdated/missing secondary email address or a phone number on the account.

 

The only downside of adding security info is the 30 day waiting period but it works on the user favor if they didn't trigger the request to change info or change password.

And? That's the way it is with every two-factor authentication. If someone gets access to your device and knows your password well nothing can really protect you anymore.

It's like if someone got access your computer then apart from like encryption, nothing is going to protect you.

 

However, you do not need access to any of their devices, you only need their password. Try it out for yourself. You'll see resetting the security info on a MS live account is a lot easier (but more time consuming) than other 2-factor authentications. At least with Google, and various MMO 2-factor authentications, you need to answer the security questions you would have been forced to enter when setting up the account.
 

 

The images in the original post aren't from a 2FA enabled account though. This is just something that Microsoft pops up on devices it doesn't recognize for accounts without 2FA enabled.

 

Even with the 2-factor authentication app, you only have to click the "get a code in a different way" link to either try the email/text code or enter the recovery code. Once you say no to both, the security info can be replaced and after 30 days you can login using those details. Granted, this is not an issue for anyone who regularly uses their account or have set up email/text security alerts, but for those who don't this could be a problem.

I've had it working perfectly with Microsoft, Google, Dropbox, and other services. I think it's just your approach to 2FA. 

 

I use Authy to sync/get my 2FA codes.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Anthropic pulls Fable 5 and Mythos 5 after US export control order by Pradeep Viswanathan In April this year, Anthropic launched the Claude Mythos Preview frontier model with state-of-the-art cyber and coding capabilities for a select set of companies around the world. After preparing appropriate guardrails, early this week, Anthropic launched Claude Fable 5 and Mythos 5, its most capable AI models. Claude Fable 5 is for general users and comes with strict safeguards, while Mythos 5 is designed with fewer safeguards for cybersecurity and biology use cases. Today, Anthropic abruptly suspended access to its Fable 5 and Mythos 5 AI models for all customers after receiving an export control directive from the US government. The company received the directive from the government today at 5:21 p.m. ET, and the received letter did not provide any details regarding the national security concern. Anthropic understands that the government became aware of a method to bypass, or “jailbreak,” Fable 5, which might be the reason behind the directive. The order was issued under national security authorities and requires the company to suspend all access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5 by any foreign national, whether they are inside or outside the United States. The restriction also applies to foreign national employees working at Anthropic. As a result, the company has disabled both models for all customers to ensure compliance. Access to previous Anthropic models like Opus and Sonnet is not affected by this government order. The company highlighted that it had developed strong safeguards to reduce the possibility that Fable is misused for tasks related to cybersecurity. In fact, many developers are complaining that the safeguards are going overboard. Additionally, the company worked with the US government, the UK AISI, multiple private third-party organizations, and internal teams to red-team Fable’s safeguards for thousands of hours. Finally, Anthropic noted that no testers have yet been able to find a universal jailbreak on Fable 5. As expected, Anthropic disagrees that a narrow potential jailbreak should lead to the recall of a commercial model used by hundreds of millions of people. It warned that applying this standard across the AI industry could effectively halt new frontier model deployments. Anthropic concluded by mentioning that it is working to restore access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5 as soon as possible and plans to share more details within the next 24 hours.
    • Brave Browser 1.91.172 is out.
    • Any Video Converter Free 9.2.3 by Razvan Serea Any Video Converter is an All-in-One video converting tool with an easy-to-use graphical interface, fast converting speed and excellent video quality. Any Video Converter supports all popular video formats and converts your videos to different video formats including MP4, MOV, MKV, M2TS, M4V, MPEG, AVI, WMV, ASF, OGV, WEBM, and more. It supports converting videos to customized percent (50%, 100%, 200%, and more) or resolution (480p, 720p, 1080p, 4K, and more); It supports encoding videos into x264, x265, h263p, xvid, mpeg, wmv, and more. Any Video Converter Free key features: Compatible with Windows 11/10/8.1/8/7 (32-64bit) User interface are available in 14 languages Convert all kinds of video formats including high-definition videos Extract audio from any videos and save as MP3/WMA for your mp3 player Take snapshot from any videos and build your own picture collection Support high-definition for both input and output Batch add videos from hard drive and batch convert Customize output parameters completely as you like Manage your output videos files by group or output profile Merge several video files into a single and long one Clip a video into segments Free Audio Filter: Adjust audio volume and add audio effects Crop frame size to remove black bars and retain what you want only Adjust the brightness, contrast, saturation Rotate or flip or add noise/sharpen effects Produce output video with subtitles of your own dialogue and much, much more... Any Video Converter Free 9.2.3 changelog: Fixed video download engine auto-update failures. Added custom speed control support in the speed change tool. Added support for downloading YouTube AI-generated subtitles. Added support for preserving original audio stream in the format convert tool (e.g., Dolby Atmos, DTS:X). Fixed other bugs and improved overall performance. Download: Any Video Converter Free 9.2.3 | 7.6 MB (Freeware) View: Any Video Converter Free Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Not sure what country you’re in but in many countries you can absolutely jail the sellers behind businesses… in fact I’d say in most countries you can do that
    • I guess we are done since you refuse to read my comment you replied to or my other comment in another thread you were also a part of here.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      jordanspringer earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Rookie
      Rimplesnort went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Markus94287 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Markus94287 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Markus94287 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      505
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      175
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      155
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      90
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      79
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!