• 0

How do you Embed Webkit in a Python GUI/WxPython (cross platform) and Qt5/PySide License Conflicts


Question

Hi,

I am the lead developer for the project PHP Nightrain. Currently, it is coded in Python and using WxPython to create the GUI, etc? For the most part it does what it was designed to do.

But it is not quite where I would like it to be. Currently, it is using the WebView control from WxPython. So, on Windows the software uses IE, on OS X it uses Safari and on Linux it needs the libwebkit-dev to work. The WebKitCtrl is only for OS X :(

I want to accomplish the following:

1. Remove WxWebview or make it optional.
2. Embed WebKit in my Python application. So, on Windows, Linux and Mac it will use webkit by default.
3. Everything has to be packaged in a single executable. I don?t want my users to manually install libwebkit-dev, etc? Not really sure how to accomplish that with pyinstaller.

Can you give me a top level idea on what I will need to do to make it possible? I guess the main question I am asking is?. how do I take webkit source and bind it in my Python application? I am assuming I will have to learn C/C++? but I?m not sure where to go after learning C/C++?

Qt5 bindings for Python was excellent. But their confusing licensing terms is making me skeptical to use their solution.

PHP Nightrain is licensed under MIT and PySide is licensed under LGPL but the actual Qt5 libraries are licensed under GPL, LGPL and Commercial. Can my project use PySide without any restriction? I want my users to download PHP Nightrain binaries and use it for whatever they want (open source, commercial, whatever). So, I am not sure whether PySide LGPL license and Qt5 Licenses will make an issue out of it :/?

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

https://code.google.com/p/cefpython/

 

Author of PHP Desktop made a project for embedding chromium into a python project ;)

 

This project supports embedding in PyGTK, PyQt and PySide.

  • 0

As far as I've come to understand you're free to distribute PySide apps so long as they stay open source. I also found it very confusing. With that in mind packaging it into a single executable may break that license. I've yet to see a reliable method of packaging Python 3 into a single file. Python 2 can do it though I hear.

  • 0
  On 25/09/2014 at 13:45, simplezz said:

I don't know if this is what you're looking for, but there's Python bindings for GTK's Webkit port. GTK works across most platforms.

 

i did use this on my linux distros but there's no precompiled "WebKitGtk" on the Windows platform. And WebKitGtk does not provide any instructions for compiling it to Windows either. It's something along the line where you have to compile Webkit on windows first and then the WebKitGtk bindings... and then you can use PyWebkitGTK. There is a .NET Webkit control though... so, I might have to do something with IronPython -_-

  • 0
  On 25/09/2014 at 19:12, roosevelt said:

i did use this on my linux distros but there's no precompiled "WebKitGtk" on the Windows platform. And WebKitGtk does not provide any instructions for compiling it to Windows either. It's something along the line where you have to compile Webkit on windows first and then the WebKitGtk bindings... and then you can use PyWebkitGTK. There is a .NET Webkit control though... so, I might have to do something with IronPython -_-

It's possible to build the source for Windows (cross compilation or Mingw/Cygwin), but you'd need Mingw and associated tools. Failing that, there are some precompiled binaries around. I can't attest to how well they work or how up to date they are, but it's an option. Ideally, you'd want to build it yourself to get the latest and greatest, as well as compiler optimisations (-march=) suitable for the target machine(s). I understand that not everyone is versed in those disciplines though.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • They already are small. Have you seen the size of Linux icons?
    • I thought I could download the ringtone.
    • Foxconn to make iPhone casings in India as Apple shifts more production from China by Sagar Naresh Bhavsar It was recently reported that Donald Trump was unhappy with Tim Cook and threatened Apple with a 25% tariff if iPhones weren't produced in America. While the exact reason is unclear, some speculated that Trump's anger had to do with Cook skipping the Middle East trip with him, which was attended by other major company CEOs. Many believed that Apple came under the radar because of its plans for a $1.5 billion iPhone production plant in India. True or not, Apple is facing a tough situation as Trump has already imposed hefty tariffs on China, where the majority of iPhones are made. In a move to reduce dependence on China, Apple planned to shift its production from China to India, where tariffs are relatively lower. In line with this, a fresh report by The Economic Times suggests that Apple's iPhone assembler, Foxconn, has decided to start producing iPhone casings in India. Sources claim that a new unit is being planned at the ESR Industrial Park in Oragadam, Tamil Nadu. The area is close to the upcoming display module manufacturing plant. Until now, Tata Electronics was the one producing iPhone casings in India. However, Foxconn, which was assembling iPhones in the country at its plant in Sriperumbudur, will start making iPhone casings as well. This move suggests that Foxconn is helping Apple move more production out of China to India. Prabhu Ram, vice president, industry research group, CyberMedia Research, said, Foxconn has already ramped up its India push. The company recently started production of Apple AirPods in Hyderabad for exports and is also setting up an iPhone production plant in Bengaluru. Casings only make up about 2-3% of the total iPhone cost, making them locally helps Apple reduce costs, and also helps avoid hefty tariffs.
    • I loved the initial compact Start Menu present in Windows 10. It was tiny, awesome and super fast without any Store apps clutter.
    • BBC threatens Perplexity with legal action over content scraping by Paul Hill Image via Depositphotos.com The UK’s public broadcaster, BBC, has written a letter to Perplexity, the AI search startup, asking it to stop scraping articles from its websites, delete existing copies of content, and propose some sort of financial compensation if it would like to carry on scraping data. If the demands are not met, BBC may seek an injunction against the startup citing alleged misuse of its intellectual property. BBC is probably responding in this way because it has seen other news organizations cement deals with firms like OpenAI and Mistral. The income stream allows news organizations to raise more funds and also cover the costs of the extra load on their servers caused by AI scraping. For anybody not familiar with Perplexity, it’s a bit like ChatGPT but has a much stronger emphasis on searching the web to find information. You can ask it anything you want to know about and it very quickly searches online and constructs a specific response to your question based on what it has found. The company offers many of its features for free, but does have Perplexity Pro, which costs money. Essentially, Perplexity is making money from publishers by using their content to improve its own product, but not paying them all. Perplexity's defense and existing publisher programs In a statement to the Financial Times, Perplexity labeled the BBC’s claims as "manipulative and opportunistic". The startup accused the broadcaster of having “a fundamental misunderstanding of technology, the internet and intellectual property law.” This is not the first time Perplexity has had a run-in with the media. Forbes and Wired accused it of plagiarizing content from their websites and The New York Times sent the company a cease and desist notice to stop using its content for AI purposes. To assuage publishers, Perplexity has set up a revenue sharing program, which includes TIME, Fortune, Der Spiegel, and others. According to Digiday, the revenue share was up to 25%. It’s not clear if BBC has tried engaging through this avenue or if it wants to try to squeeze the startup for a bigger slice. The escalating battle over AI and intellectual property Even if you only keep up with AI developments in passing, you’ll likely have seen that AI models need to be trained on vast amounts of data, much of which is copyrighted. There is an ongoing debate about whether these companies should be allowed to train on this data, or first seek out permission from the copyright holders. The move from the BBC could spur other publishers on to try and get themselves a better deal from Perplexity. Alternatively, Perplexity could remove BBC content from its platform and stop pulling information from there. It could probably find most of the information elsewhere, but if Perplexity tried to pull this too much it would eventually end up pretty useless with not a lot of content. Overall, this is just one of many ongoing legal issues surrounding AI, but once a conclusion has been reached, it could set a precedent about how AI companies should go about getting content from publishers. Source: FT via Reuters
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      KynanSEIT earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      gowtham07 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Collaborator
      lethalman went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Wayne Robinson earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Karan Khanna earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      678
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      274
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      220
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      171
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      160
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!