My Ideal Lumia 1030 would be...


Recommended Posts

If Microsoft makes a Lumia 1030 it would be nice to see:

 

1. The Camera do a come back with minor updates (not needed in my opinion).

2. Micro SD slot for up to 128GB support.

3. Water proofing the Phone Maybe.

4. Higher Native Resolution (1080+).

5. Better front facing Camera (5MP)

6. The last and most Important thing, Make it Available in all Carriers. (no exclusive to one Carrier.)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1229713-my-ideal-lumia-1030-would-be/
Share on other sites

I just did a quick google search and apparently it's on the drawing board.

 

I hope it will have the same design as I find rounded edges, not just on iPhones but on all phones, to be hideously ugly. I don't care if the camera will still protrude out but I would love to have 4k video recording capability (and especially being able to snap a picture of that 4k recording). So it will have to be able to have at least 128 gb microsd support; and yepp water proofing would be fantastic.

 

Other requests of mine have to do with the operating system, so in a nutshell I should keep quiet about that ...buuuttt, I would love to be able to control the color of the tiles and being able to have a gapless playback on the default music app (as I understand it, it doesn't have gapless playback!) and being able to play the songs of boxsets in correct order!

 

 

 

My wishlist for Windows phone:
Faster camera

 

Supposedly that's coming with the Nokia Lumia Denim upgrade (granted, though only on Lumia devices; and no idea about the shutter lag - didn't even know Windows phones suffered from that). But I've been reading a little about the Lumia 930 and I would really love it if that device would have natural colors when taking photos; preferably as close to what the eye sees. That's one of the biggest downsizes with the Lumia and thus still keeping me pretty much away from buying it

I too am waiting for an updated version of the Lumia 1020.

 

Windows Phone 8.1 Update 2 just got confirmed for Oct and is rumored to add support for 2k screens and Snapdragon 805 SoC. The 805 would make a lot of sense for a 1030 as it officially supports camera sensors up to 55MP (vs 800/801 only support up to 21MP, likely why the 930/Icon/1520 all have a 20MP sensor...). They made the 41MP sensor from the 1020 work with the older Snapdragon S4 Plus SoC but as most people know there's some delay there. The 805 paired with a 41MP sensor or similar should run smoothly. Hopefully a bit after the 8.1 Update 2 release we see something from the Lumia line.

 

What I'd like to see:

4.5"~5.2" screen (I'd like 1080p but hearing some rumors of 2560x1440)

Glance screen (missing on the 930)

Snapdragon 805 SoC

41MP or similar rear camera

5MP front facing camera (from the 730/735)

2GB of RAM

Qi Wireless charging

Multiple internal storage sizes (32/64GB), or MicroSD support.

The camera will be faster on any future Lumia 1030 simply because they'll be using the faster and newer quadcore Snapdragon 8xx SoC.  The thing to remember with the 1020 is that it uses the older Snapdragon S4, 1.5Ghz Dual Core.   That SoC also didn't support the higher megapixels the PureView camera uses so, and this is why there's such a big bump, Nokia had to add in a second processor to support it.  This all adds to the camera lag you get but with that the new Snapdragon 805 you have a Quad core CPU up to 2.7Ghz and it supports cameras up to 55 megapixels on it's own, so they wouldn't have to put in a second image processor like with the 1020.

 

All of that will help with making the camera faster on the hardware side, and then all the software and firmware improvements you see with the 830 etc will add to it.  

 

The only devices that use the Snapdragon 805 are from Samsung, the s5 and the new Note 4 etc, I think MS should do something better and go with the 808, why not go for the first Lumia 8 core phone off the bat and make a splash?  Just think, 8 core, 3GB ram, 1440p screen, 41mpix or maybe more, camera?   Between 5" and 5.5" tops as well, and you'd have a monster of a Lumia on your hands, I'd rush out to buy it personally and I hardly take pictures.

I too am waiting for an updated version of the Lumia 1020.

 

Windows Phone 8.1 Update 2 just got confirmed for Oct and is rumored to add support for 2k screens and Snapdragon 805 SoC. The 805 would make a lot of sense for a 1030 as it officially supports camera sensors up to 55MP (vs 800/801 only support up to 21MP, likely why the 930/Icon/1520 all have a 20MP sensor...). They made the 41MP sensor from the 1020 work with the older Snapdragon S4 Plus SoC but as most people know there's some delay there. The 805 paired with a 41MP sensor or similar should run smoothly. Hopefully a bit after the 8.1 Update 2 release we see something from the Lumia line.

 

What I'd like to see:

4.5"~5.2" screen (I'd like 1080p but hearing some rumors of 2560x1440)

Glance screen (missing on the 930)

Snapdragon 805 SoC

41MP or similar rear camera

5MP front facing camera (from the 730/735)

2GB of RAM

Qi Wireless charging

Multiple internal storage sizes (32/64GB), or MicroSD support.

I dunno man,  4k on a cellphone, the LG3 has pretty bad reviews as it seems technology wise, we aren't quite there for use in mobile devices at least.

I dunno man,  4k on a cellphone, the LG3 has pretty bad reviews as it seems technology wise, we aren't quite there for use in mobile devices at least.

 

There's middle grounds you can go with, doesn't have to be either 1080p or 1440p, why not, say, 1200p or whatever the next res after 1080p fits the same aspect ratio?   This is what Apple does, as long as you're using the same ratio then it doesn't mess with apps.

  • Like 1

I dunno man,  4k on a cellphone, the LG3 has pretty bad reviews as it seems technology wise, we aren't quite there for use in mobile devices at least.

 

That's why I said I hope 1080p. Still very high pixel density but still get some smoothness and save a bit on battery life.

 

But also the G3 has a SD801 SoC, the 805 has a fair bit more powerful GPU, but I'd still like to see 1080p, It's a nice balance.

  • Like 1

Why cant they use Core-m for a phone? Sure its terrible for a PC, but its at least 3x faster than the S805.

It could be gamechanging if they could do it and do it right

 

Because of size maybe? and I don't think the Core-M has all the needed built in 3G/4G/LTE radio stuff and other things the Snapdragon SoCs have.  So MS would have to take those, then use other parts to fill in the gaps, maybe.

That's why I said I hope 1080p. Still very high pixel density but still get some smoothness and save a bit on battery life.

 

But also the G3 has a SD801 SoC, the 805 has a fair bit more powerful GPU, but I'd still like to see 1080p, It's a nice balance.

 

It depends on where they want to win on the specs, the 1030 should win hands down on the pureview camera but going with the better 805 or heck, going for broke with the 808 would also be a boost, then you can leave the screen res at 1080p because you're countering other phones in other key areas.

Because of size maybe? and I don't think the Core-M has all the needed built in 3G/4G/LTE radio stuff and other things the Snapdragon SoCs have.  So MS would have to take those, then use other parts to fill in the gaps, maybe.

Ok. Imagine the possibilities Core-M could bring to a windows phone if it was possible. I think it is a SoC, but idk.

The camera will be faster on any future Lumia 1030 simply because they'll be using the faster and newer quadcore Snapdragon 8xx SoC.  The thing to remember with the 1020 is that it uses the older Snapdragon S4, 1.5Ghz Dual Core.   That SoC also didn't support the higher megapixels the PureView camera uses so, and this is why there's such a big bump, Nokia had to add in a second processor to support it.  This all adds to the camera lag you get but with that the new Snapdragon 805 you have a Quad core CPU up to 2.7Ghz and it supports cameras up to 55 megapixels on it's own, so they wouldn't have to put in a second image processor like with the 1020.

 

All of that will help with making the camera faster on the hardware side, and then all the software and firmware improvements you see with the 830 etc will add to it.  

 

The only devices that use the Snapdragon 805 are from Samsung, the s5 and the new Note 4 etc, I think MS should do something better and go with the 808, why not go for the first Lumia 8 core phone off the bat and make a splash?  Just think, 8 core, 3GB ram, 1440p screen, 41mpix or maybe more, camera?   Between 5" and 5.5" tops as well, and you'd have a monster of a Lumia on your hands, I'd rush out to buy it personally and I hardly take pictures.

The 1020 doesn't use a secondary image processor, the Nokia 808 (their first device with a 41MP sensor) did but the reworked the image stack on the Snapdragon S4 Plus to work with the 41MP sensor. The hump on the 1020 is purely from the size of the sensor.

 

Nokia collaborated with Qualcomm to do a complete rewrite of the chipset's imaging stack in order to make everything work properly

 

Also the Snapdragon 808 isn't 8 cores, its 6 in a 2+4 (big.LITTLE configuration). Either the 2 Cortex-A57 cores are in use for high power applications, or the 4 Cortex-A53 cores are use during low power scenarios. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qualcomm_Snapdragon

 

Regardless the SD805/808/810 should be used for the next irritation of the 1020 as they all officially support sensors up to 55MP.

yea that is in the works in the next updated called denim.  Check out the IFA Event in 3 Parts here : 

I said for Windows Phone not just Lumias

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I grew up a Star Trek fan and never watched Star Wars movies. To this days I've not watched most Star Wras movies. As a result I rarely get these references, I have no idea what this post means. Given the popular reactions these get I have to accept I missed out.  
    • Spotify really have turned in to a butthole of a company. Assuming this isn't a bug then this is a low act for Premium users. Honestly, YT Premium which includes YT Music is a genuine alternative. In any event, the internet enshitification continues unabated...next up, the banning of VPN's.
    • This is why science is the only path to truth. It isn't rigid in its beliefs, rather it changes its views based on scientific discoveries.
    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      92
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!