My Ideal Lumia 1030 would be...


Recommended Posts

If Microsoft makes a Lumia 1030 it would be nice to see:

 

1. The Camera do a come back with minor updates (not needed in my opinion).

2. Micro SD slot for up to 128GB support.

3. Water proofing the Phone Maybe.

4. Higher Native Resolution (1080+).

5. Better front facing Camera (5MP)

6. The last and most Important thing, Make it Available in all Carriers. (no exclusive to one Carrier.)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1229713-my-ideal-lumia-1030-would-be/
Share on other sites

I just did a quick google search and apparently it's on the drawing board.

 

I hope it will have the same design as I find rounded edges, not just on iPhones but on all phones, to be hideously ugly. I don't care if the camera will still protrude out but I would love to have 4k video recording capability (and especially being able to snap a picture of that 4k recording). So it will have to be able to have at least 128 gb microsd support; and yepp water proofing would be fantastic.

 

Other requests of mine have to do with the operating system, so in a nutshell I should keep quiet about that ...buuuttt, I would love to be able to control the color of the tiles and being able to have a gapless playback on the default music app (as I understand it, it doesn't have gapless playback!) and being able to play the songs of boxsets in correct order!

 

 

 

My wishlist for Windows phone:
Faster camera

 

Supposedly that's coming with the Nokia Lumia Denim upgrade (granted, though only on Lumia devices; and no idea about the shutter lag - didn't even know Windows phones suffered from that). But I've been reading a little about the Lumia 930 and I would really love it if that device would have natural colors when taking photos; preferably as close to what the eye sees. That's one of the biggest downsizes with the Lumia and thus still keeping me pretty much away from buying it

I too am waiting for an updated version of the Lumia 1020.

 

Windows Phone 8.1 Update 2 just got confirmed for Oct and is rumored to add support for 2k screens and Snapdragon 805 SoC. The 805 would make a lot of sense for a 1030 as it officially supports camera sensors up to 55MP (vs 800/801 only support up to 21MP, likely why the 930/Icon/1520 all have a 20MP sensor...). They made the 41MP sensor from the 1020 work with the older Snapdragon S4 Plus SoC but as most people know there's some delay there. The 805 paired with a 41MP sensor or similar should run smoothly. Hopefully a bit after the 8.1 Update 2 release we see something from the Lumia line.

 

What I'd like to see:

4.5"~5.2" screen (I'd like 1080p but hearing some rumors of 2560x1440)

Glance screen (missing on the 930)

Snapdragon 805 SoC

41MP or similar rear camera

5MP front facing camera (from the 730/735)

2GB of RAM

Qi Wireless charging

Multiple internal storage sizes (32/64GB), or MicroSD support.

The camera will be faster on any future Lumia 1030 simply because they'll be using the faster and newer quadcore Snapdragon 8xx SoC.  The thing to remember with the 1020 is that it uses the older Snapdragon S4, 1.5Ghz Dual Core.   That SoC also didn't support the higher megapixels the PureView camera uses so, and this is why there's such a big bump, Nokia had to add in a second processor to support it.  This all adds to the camera lag you get but with that the new Snapdragon 805 you have a Quad core CPU up to 2.7Ghz and it supports cameras up to 55 megapixels on it's own, so they wouldn't have to put in a second image processor like with the 1020.

 

All of that will help with making the camera faster on the hardware side, and then all the software and firmware improvements you see with the 830 etc will add to it.  

 

The only devices that use the Snapdragon 805 are from Samsung, the s5 and the new Note 4 etc, I think MS should do something better and go with the 808, why not go for the first Lumia 8 core phone off the bat and make a splash?  Just think, 8 core, 3GB ram, 1440p screen, 41mpix or maybe more, camera?   Between 5" and 5.5" tops as well, and you'd have a monster of a Lumia on your hands, I'd rush out to buy it personally and I hardly take pictures.

I too am waiting for an updated version of the Lumia 1020.

 

Windows Phone 8.1 Update 2 just got confirmed for Oct and is rumored to add support for 2k screens and Snapdragon 805 SoC. The 805 would make a lot of sense for a 1030 as it officially supports camera sensors up to 55MP (vs 800/801 only support up to 21MP, likely why the 930/Icon/1520 all have a 20MP sensor...). They made the 41MP sensor from the 1020 work with the older Snapdragon S4 Plus SoC but as most people know there's some delay there. The 805 paired with a 41MP sensor or similar should run smoothly. Hopefully a bit after the 8.1 Update 2 release we see something from the Lumia line.

 

What I'd like to see:

4.5"~5.2" screen (I'd like 1080p but hearing some rumors of 2560x1440)

Glance screen (missing on the 930)

Snapdragon 805 SoC

41MP or similar rear camera

5MP front facing camera (from the 730/735)

2GB of RAM

Qi Wireless charging

Multiple internal storage sizes (32/64GB), or MicroSD support.

I dunno man,  4k on a cellphone, the LG3 has pretty bad reviews as it seems technology wise, we aren't quite there for use in mobile devices at least.

I dunno man,  4k on a cellphone, the LG3 has pretty bad reviews as it seems technology wise, we aren't quite there for use in mobile devices at least.

 

There's middle grounds you can go with, doesn't have to be either 1080p or 1440p, why not, say, 1200p or whatever the next res after 1080p fits the same aspect ratio?   This is what Apple does, as long as you're using the same ratio then it doesn't mess with apps.

  • Like 1

I dunno man,  4k on a cellphone, the LG3 has pretty bad reviews as it seems technology wise, we aren't quite there for use in mobile devices at least.

 

That's why I said I hope 1080p. Still very high pixel density but still get some smoothness and save a bit on battery life.

 

But also the G3 has a SD801 SoC, the 805 has a fair bit more powerful GPU, but I'd still like to see 1080p, It's a nice balance.

  • Like 1

Why cant they use Core-m for a phone? Sure its terrible for a PC, but its at least 3x faster than the S805.

It could be gamechanging if they could do it and do it right

 

Because of size maybe? and I don't think the Core-M has all the needed built in 3G/4G/LTE radio stuff and other things the Snapdragon SoCs have.  So MS would have to take those, then use other parts to fill in the gaps, maybe.

That's why I said I hope 1080p. Still very high pixel density but still get some smoothness and save a bit on battery life.

 

But also the G3 has a SD801 SoC, the 805 has a fair bit more powerful GPU, but I'd still like to see 1080p, It's a nice balance.

 

It depends on where they want to win on the specs, the 1030 should win hands down on the pureview camera but going with the better 805 or heck, going for broke with the 808 would also be a boost, then you can leave the screen res at 1080p because you're countering other phones in other key areas.

Because of size maybe? and I don't think the Core-M has all the needed built in 3G/4G/LTE radio stuff and other things the Snapdragon SoCs have.  So MS would have to take those, then use other parts to fill in the gaps, maybe.

Ok. Imagine the possibilities Core-M could bring to a windows phone if it was possible. I think it is a SoC, but idk.

The camera will be faster on any future Lumia 1030 simply because they'll be using the faster and newer quadcore Snapdragon 8xx SoC.  The thing to remember with the 1020 is that it uses the older Snapdragon S4, 1.5Ghz Dual Core.   That SoC also didn't support the higher megapixels the PureView camera uses so, and this is why there's such a big bump, Nokia had to add in a second processor to support it.  This all adds to the camera lag you get but with that the new Snapdragon 805 you have a Quad core CPU up to 2.7Ghz and it supports cameras up to 55 megapixels on it's own, so they wouldn't have to put in a second image processor like with the 1020.

 

All of that will help with making the camera faster on the hardware side, and then all the software and firmware improvements you see with the 830 etc will add to it.  

 

The only devices that use the Snapdragon 805 are from Samsung, the s5 and the new Note 4 etc, I think MS should do something better and go with the 808, why not go for the first Lumia 8 core phone off the bat and make a splash?  Just think, 8 core, 3GB ram, 1440p screen, 41mpix or maybe more, camera?   Between 5" and 5.5" tops as well, and you'd have a monster of a Lumia on your hands, I'd rush out to buy it personally and I hardly take pictures.

The 1020 doesn't use a secondary image processor, the Nokia 808 (their first device with a 41MP sensor) did but the reworked the image stack on the Snapdragon S4 Plus to work with the 41MP sensor. The hump on the 1020 is purely from the size of the sensor.

 

Nokia collaborated with Qualcomm to do a complete rewrite of the chipset's imaging stack in order to make everything work properly

 

Also the Snapdragon 808 isn't 8 cores, its 6 in a 2+4 (big.LITTLE configuration). Either the 2 Cortex-A57 cores are in use for high power applications, or the 4 Cortex-A53 cores are use during low power scenarios. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qualcomm_Snapdragon

 

Regardless the SD805/808/810 should be used for the next irritation of the 1020 as they all officially support sensors up to 55MP.

yea that is in the works in the next updated called denim.  Check out the IFA Event in 3 Parts here : 

I said for Windows Phone not just Lumias

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
    • Apple Watch Series 11 GPS just crashed to 30% off in this fast-moving Prime Day deal by Karthik Mudaliar The Apple Watch Series 11 is available for $279, down from its $399 list price, saving buyers $120, or 30%. Amazon labels the offer as selling fast, so the current price may not remain available for long. This GPS model features a 42mm aluminum case, an Always-On Retina LTPO3 OLED display capable of reaching up to 2,000 nits, and an Ion-X glass surface with improved scratch resistance. Apple rates Series 11 for up to 24 hours of normal use or up to 38 hours in Low Power Mode, with fast charging providing up to eight hours of use from a 15-minute charge. Health and fitness tools include sleep scoring, temperature sensing, ECG support, heart-rate alerts, workout tracking, sleep apnea notifications, and hypertension notifications, where available. The watch also carries IP6X dust resistance and 50-meter water resistance. This configuration is best suited to iPhone owners who want comprehensive health tracking, notifications, contactless payments, and workout data without stepping up to a larger or cellular-equipped model. The smaller case should also appeal to buyers who prefer a lighter watch, while the S/M band fits wrists measuring 130mm to 180mm. With the current generation now significantly below its usual retail price, this is a strong time to replace an aging Apple Watch or buy a first model without compromising on Apple’s newest health and display features. Grab the discounted Apple Watch Series 11 (sold and shipped by Amazon) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      460
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!