Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

 

I'm trying to setup a quick Citrix Lab to do some product testing with Xen Desktop/App and rather than use Xen Server I was planning on using Hyper V/SCVMM as the management machine. I got SCVMM installed and from the server itself if I select to login using the windows identity it works fine (currently the Domain Admin). From any other machine neither the Windows Identity nor specifying that Domain Admin account will work.

 

Additionally, if I try to specify credentials (same domain admin I am logged in as) from the VMM Server itself it fails with the same error;

 

You cannot access VMM management server UK-CITRIX-VMM.

Contact the Virtual Machine Manager administrator to verify that your account is a member of a valid user role and then try the operation again.

ID: 1604

 

 

Obviously the user is part of a role otherwise it would never have logged in at all but to Confirm, at the moment I only have one Role group which is the Administrators group. Windows Firewall is currently off for Domain, Prive and Guest networks on all the machines involved. I can ping to all machines via host name and if I put in a random server name I get a completely different error so I don't think this is a connectivity issue.

 

Any Idea's?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1231453-scvmm-2012-r2-console-login-issue/
Share on other sites

we need a little more info on this (like is the SCVMM fully patched? what is the OS of the host?) also:

1) did you try running it with a "run as a administrator"?

2) what does the event viewer records when this error pop up?

3) is the server hosting the VMM in a different domain then the SCVMM?

4) did you the domain\account|password or did you type account|password? because the last one works, i just tested.

we need a little more info on this (like is the SCVMM fully patched? what is the OS of the host?) also:

1) did you try running it with a "run as a administrator"?

2) what does the event viewer records when this error pop up?

3) is the server hosting the VMM in a different domain then the SCVMM?

4) did you the domain\account|password or did you type account|password? because the last one works, i just tested.

 

I'll answer the questions but I did manage to fix this yesterday;

 

OS: 2012 R2 - All Microsoft updates were ran to be 100%

1) Yes, no change

2) I couldn't find anything between App/System and the SCVMM logs

3)nope, all machines involved were on the same domain

4) I tried both, however I found if I tried account | password it looked like it may have been trying local accounts - this could be because I was using the administrator account so the username did match a local account.

 

As for the "fix", I did come across a few posts that were aimed at 2008 R2 SCVMM but around the lines of having issues like mine if you changed the run as service account (which I did). On install I selected to just use the local account but then later switched it to be a domain account and I think this caused the issue. That's the only thing I believe I did differently and it worked instantly so I'm fairly sure this is the case.

 

Thanks for the help anyway :)

I'll answer the questions but I did manage to fix this yesterday;

 

OS: 2012 R2 - All Microsoft updates were ran to be 100%

1) Yes, no change

2) I couldn't find anything between App/System and the SCVMM logs

3)nope, all machines involved were on the same domain

4) I tried both, however I found if I tried account | password it looked like it may have been trying local accounts - this could be because I was using the administrator account so the username did match a local account.

 

As for the "fix", I did come across a few posts that were aimed at 2008 R2 SCVMM but around the lines of having issues like mine if you changed the run as service account (which I did). On install I selected to just use the local account but then later switched it to be a domain account and I think this caused the issue. That's the only thing I believe I did differently and it worked instantly so I'm fairly sure this is the case.

 

Thanks for the help anyway :)

 

oh that bug...it exists since the beginning and still isn't fixed; the only fix is to reinstall :/

 

glad to help.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft releases new Windows 11 Media Creation Tool with the latest updates by Taras Buria Patch Tuesday updates arrive every month, bringing users new features and security updates. To make sure customers have access to the most recent images, Microsoft also releases updates to the Media Creation Tool app, its official utility for Windows 11 installation. Today, the company pushed new ISOs to Media Creation Tool, allowing you to create images with the June 2026 Patch Tuesday updates. With the latest update, the Media Creation Tool now downloads KB5094126. It is Windows 11 version 25H2, build 26200.8655, which is also available via Windows Update. Note that the app itself remains on the previous version, which you can check in Properties > Details. The only change is that it now downloads a more recent Windows 11 build, so the only way to check is to download an ISO. The June 2026 Patch Tuesday update is a special release for Windows 11, as it brings a new performance profile to make the operating system more responsive and snappier when rendering various user interface surfaces, including the Start menu, quick settings, and more. It does so by spiking processor speeds for a brief moment, resulting in higher loads for a second or two. The so-called “Low latency profile” is rolling out gradually, but you can force-enable it with the ViVeTool app. Other changes include webcam improvements, Task Manager updates, shared audio support, and more. You can download the Media Creation Tool app from the official Microsoft website using this link. Besides MCT, Microsoft lets you download Windows 11 ISO as a file directly from the official Windows 11 website. However, you will need a third-party app to write it to your USB drive. Check out this guide if you want to know how to do that.
    • Louis Rossmann suing Samsung over "990 Pro SSD warranty scam" by Sayan Sen Back in 2023, if you recall, Neowin reviewer Robbie Khan had a dispute with Samsung over his 990 Pro SSD, which was rapidly losing its health. After significant back and forth, the tech giant had finally released firmware to "stop" the issue. Interestingly, its previous flagship at the time, the 980 Pro was also facing problems leading to two consecutive sets of firmware fixes. Three years later, it looks like a similar conflict has now broken out between tech repair entrepreneur YouTuber Louis Rossmann and Samsung, as it has escalated into a threatened lawsuit after the company allegedly refused to appropriately replace a failing 990 Pro SSD that remained under warranty. According to Rossmann, a 4TB Samsung 990 Pro NVMe SSD purchased for approximately $330 less than two years ago, began experiencing major hiccups and issues, even though he claims it had been operated under ideal cooling conditions. It was installed in a RAID 1 array and cooled by a heatsink and dual high-speed fans. However the drive reportedly started dropping out of the array, exhibiting controller-level failures that eventually became not useable in any meaningful way. Rossmann said Samsung’s support process was marked by delays and confusion from the very start. After initially contacting the wrong regional support channel, he was redirected to Samsung’s memory support division where he submitted detailed diagnostics, logs, and proof of purchase. Rossmann runs a repair company and owns an ACE Lab PC-3000 machine, which is a professional-grade data recovery equipment. As such, he had been confident in his diagnostics. Samsung even seemingly acknowledged that later. Regardless, Rossmann claims that his initial support ticket was automatically closed before a full 24-hour response window had elapsed, forcing him to reopen the case and resubmit documentation. The controversy however intensified further from here after Samsung accepted the drive for warranty evaluation but later returned it with a repair report stating that the drive had passed its testing and that the SSD had been verified as functional. Rossmann strongly disputed those claims citing that his own independent testing on PC-3000 showed write speeds reducing to as low as 40–60 MB/s before the drive failed entirely. Samsung subsequently informed him that the SSD had been reset and reflashed, passing internal stress tests. However, the company also stated that replacement units were unavailable due to an industry-wide memory shortage and suggested that a refund process could be initiated if further testing confirmed the fault. Thus, to settle, the company offered a refund of $330, the amount that was initially paid by him to make the purchase. Here, Rossmann pointed out the seeming hypocrisy of the tech giant as in how no Samsung drive was apparently allocated for warranty replacements, but they were abundantly available for retail sales especially when using business accounts. As you can see, Rossmann is indeed right, there are Samsung 990 Pro 4TB SSDs on Amazon currently for $950 (shipped and sold by first-party Amazon US itself), and they are also available on Samsung's own store too, albeit for an even higher price of $1100. Thus Rossmann argues that Samsung’s inability or unwillingness to provide a replacement while the same model remains available for purchase at significantly higher market prices reflects a failure to honor its warranty obligations. He has issued a formal 60-day notice and says he intends to file suit in Texas small claims court, asserting that companies should face greater costs for denying legitimate warranty claims than for fulfilling them. You can check out the full video titled "Samsung's 990 Pro SSD warranty policy is a scam; I'm taking them to court," at the link below. Source and image: Louis Rossmann (YouTube) As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases
    • Was it too much to ask to show the icon in this article?
    • Frankly, I blame whoever is writing such articles. "A big improvement/update and/or new feature is now available to everyone! Also, use this unofficial tweak tool to enable it because it actually isn't available to you yet officially and might not in fact even be entirely ready or whatever, hence why it is perhaps not enabled for you*. But it's great and you should enable it!" I mean there's nothing wrong with sharing info about some feature you might need to enable via unofficial means, of course. It's just that these articles tend to essentially end up being two news pieces in one, and one of them tends to be a bit misleading. (*Yes, yes, the "it's a controlled rollout!" thing. Not a fan of that one either. The argument, not the actual rollout.)
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      185
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!