MacBook Pro 13" Retina any alternatives?


Recommended Posts

I've always thought that Apple makes overpriced hardware but I just noticed that I can't seem to find any Windows laptops in this price range with similar specs.

 

MacBook Pro 13" Retina has really nice display, 2,6 GHz i5, 8GB memory and 9 hours battery. It's really thin and made of aluminum if I remember correctly. It's about 1300 euros where I live.

 

I would prefer buying Windows laptop, so far I've looked HP, Asus and Samsung laptops but can't seem to find anything good at the same price. Is there anything i've missed?

 

It should have pretty much the same performance, not plastic, good battery and thin. 1080p IPS or better.

Dell XPS 13 maybe?

 

It has good battery life, is a beefy machine comes with a 1080 display. It does come at a price though - not much cheaper (if at all) than the rMBP. 

To answer your question, no. If you want the best, you have to go with Apple. There is no comparison. On top of that, you can still install and run Windows through the included Boot Camp option.

Tim

To answer your question, no. If you want the best, you have to go with Apple. There is no comparison. On top of that, you can still install and run Windows through the included Boot Camp option.

Tim

Good point. Expensive as Apple hardware may seem, it does give you a much better bang for the buck than most high-end Wintel laptops.

I absolutely agree; if you want the best laptop hardware, it has to be Apple. Their trackpads alone are lightyears ahead of any Windows-based laptop I've come across. I've tried so many different brands over the years, and ultimately always come back to (and now stay with) Apple laptops; even if it means dual booting Windows.

you won't find too many others with that type of screen resolution...and im going to second steropixels opinion on the apple trackpad, its sooooooo good you won't be able to use tiny windows trackpads by synaptics or the like ever again 

The levono Yoga 3 Pro is a great replacement.  I currently own the Yoga 2 pro and it is just awesome.  The only difference is i run linux on mine, but for the specs you are looking for i think the Yoga 3 pro meets all your needs.  Oh yeah I forgot, it'll be out later this month

 

http://www.engadget.com/2014/10/09/lenovo-yoga-3-pro-thinkpad-yoga-14/

  • Like 2

Acer makes good laptops, and this idea that only Apple makes "good" hardware is nonsense, you are paying extra for the name, essentially ANY top end laptop by most of the better manufacturers will give you equal and possibly better performance, don't look at price, look at features and what you need 

Isn't a good built-in keyboard (and trackpad) sort of important for a laptop?  :huh:

Microsoft touts the Surface as a tablet, but also claim it can be a laptop, if you have the additional expensive keyboard. The type cover keyboard has limited key travel compared to a traditional laptop, and don't even get me started on the miserable excuse of a "touchpad." 

 

The MBP is a great laptop - high end build quality. I equate Thinkpads of equivalent to MBP's. Yoga Pro 3 is also a great alternative. There are some (very high-end) Asus laptops that are similar to MBP's build quality, but cost way more than the MBP.

Acer makes good laptops, and this idea that only Apple makes "good" hardware is nonsense, you are paying extra for the name, essentially ANY top end laptop by most of the better manufacturers will give you equal and possibly better performance, don't look at price, look at features and what you need 

You lost all credibility with that opening statement...They have made one good laptop ever - the S7.

Apple is usually unbeatable for the base models so if those specs are fine with you there's hardly going to be something comparable from other manufacturers. Consumers buy garbage (e.g. i7s with mechanical hard drives, 2GB low-end videocards slower than IGPs, etc.) so the manufacturers mostly sell garbage. Also don't believe the hype that Windows runs perfectly on Macbooks, the battery life is usually much shorter and the Windows touchpad drivers are teh horribleness (plus other random problems) but the experience is usually still better compared to some other OEMs. If Microsoft had any shame with the current sorry state of the notebook market they should go and beg Samsung to not discontinue their notebook market, once Samsung is gone there's only Lenovo and a few Asus models between Windows and a sea of garbage.

Apple is usually unbeatable for the base models so if those specs are fine with you there's hardly going to be something comparable from other manufacturers. Consumers buy garbage (e.g. i7s with mechanical hard drives, 2GB low-end videocards slower than IGPs, etc.) so the manufacturers mostly sell garbage. Also don't believe the hype that Windows runs perfectly on Macbooks, the battery life is usually much shorter and the Windows touchpad drivers are teh horribleness (plus other random problems) but the experience is usually still better compared to some other OEMs. If Microsoft had any shame with the current sorry state of the notebook market they should go and beg Samsung to not discontinue their notebook market, once Samsung is gone there's only Lenovo and a few Asus models between Windows and a sea of garbage.

 

+1 i agree with all you have said.

 

I got a MacBook Air (Mid 2012) and ended up loving OSX on a laptop. Windows 8 works fine but as you mentioned I probably get 2-3 hours less battery life on Windows compared to OSX. The gestures and virtual desktops made me enjoy OSX far better than Windows 8 on a laptop anyway.

Surface Pro 3 looks like it compares pretty well with MacBook Pro 13". Surface has a little weaker GPU performance it seems and keyboard and touchpad aren't as good, but GPU performance is about the same. Surface also has the Stylus pen and works as tablet which comes in handy.

 

MacBook Pro 13" Retina

256 GB / Intel i5 / 8GB RAM 1549 ?
 
 
Surface Pro 3
256 GB / Intel i5 / 8GB RAM 1339 ?
 
 

How good are the speakers on Surface?

Surface Pro 3 looks like it compares pretty well with MacBook Pro 13". Surface has a little weaker GPU performance it seems and keyboard and touchpad aren't as good, but GPU performance is about the same. Surface also has the Stylus pen and works as tablet which comes in handy.

 

MacBook Pro 13" Retina

256 GB / Intel i5 / 8GB RAM 1549 ?
 
 
Surface Pro 3
256 GB / Intel i5 / 8GB RAM 1339 ?
 
 

How good are the speakers on Surface?

I'd say both are on par. Can you get any discounts - like educational, or possibly wait for holiday sales? 

+1 i agree with all you have said.

 

I got a MacBook Air (Mid 2012) and ended up loving OSX on a laptop. Windows 8 works fine but as you mentioned I probably get 2-3 hours less battery life on Windows compared to OSX. The gestures and virtual desktops made me enjoy OSX far better than Windows 8 on a laptop anyway.

The reason you get less battery with bootcamp is that Apple intentionally setup bootcamp such that it does not turn off the high end graphics card ever. Most Windows laptops have graphics switching to save battery life. If Bootcamp did allow for graphics switching like it does in OSX it would actually get better battery life with Windows than with OSX.

 

To the original poster of the thread aside from the better trackpad and retina display, there are tons of comparable machines spec wise that at least half the cost of the MBPr. You need to search more.

To the original poster of the thread aside from the better trackpad and retina display, there are tons of comparable machines spec wise that at least half the cost of the MBPr. You need to search more.

 

Can you give any examples?

Can you give any examples?

 

 

If he's discounting the Retina display then he's missing the point of the rMBP. That's the main reason why people buy these things.

 

These discussions always come down to differences in what people value, and optimise for, and results in tone-deafness and talking past each other. People are coming from different angles, all of which are valid. No new insight will be gained in this thread.

I'd say both are on par. Can you get any discounts - like educational, or possibly wait for holiday sales? 

 

I could wait for couple of months. Is there new MBP's expected in the next six months?

 

To the original poster of the thread aside from the better trackpad and retina display, there are tons of comparable machines spec wise that at least half the cost of the MBPr. You need to search more.

 

That's what I thought too. I checked HP, Asus and Samsung laptops but those were always made of plastic, battery life wasn't even close to 8-9 hours, had low end i5 or didn't have good quality 1080p IPS panel. Comparable seemed to cost almost 2000 euros.

 

I don't care about trackpad and retina, but if I'm going to buy MBP there is no point buying it without retina display as it's only extra 100 e.

To the original poster of the thread aside from the better trackpad and retina display, there are tons of comparable machines spec wise that at least half the cost of the MBPr. You need to search more.

 

Are you sure of that? There has always been an huge battery life difference even when the macbooks only came with either IGP or dedicated card (not both). Also I thought it was nVidia deciding on things like Optimus, shouldn't they be the ones to blame? Anyway Macbooks are made to run OS X better, the drivers for Windows only leave the users with the crumbs.

The reason you get less battery with bootcamp is that Apple intentionally setup bootcamp such that it does not turn off the high end graphics card ever. Most Windows laptops have graphics switching to save battery life. If Bootcamp did allow for graphics switching like it does in OSX it would actually get better battery life with Windows than with OSX.

This isn't a problem in lower end MBP's/MBA's as they have integrated graphics...Bottom line is using Boot Camp for Windows doesn't result in good battery life. I would look into Parallels if you want to use Windows. You could seamlessly switch between OS X and Windows that way rather than having to reboot.

 

I could wait for couple of months. Is there new MBP's expected in the next six months?

No, most likely not. They did a slight "refresh" a few months ago. They'll probably update it next when the new Intel CPU's are ready. 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google begins rolling out its post-Epic Play Store billing model next week by Karthik Mudaliar Google has confirmed that its redesigned Play Store billing and fee structure will take effect on June 30, 2026, in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Economic Area. The changes will let eligible developers offer their own payment systems or send users to an external website for purchases, while separating Google’s platform service fee from the cost of using Google Play Billing. The rollout puts concrete dates and detailed rate cards behind the broader Android policy overhaul Google announced in March. That announcement followed a proposed settlement with Epic Games intended to resolve their long-running disputes over app distribution and payments, although the U.S. portion of the agreement still requires court approval. Under the new billing choice program, developers selling digital content or services can display an alternative payment option alongside Google Play Billing. They may also direct users to their own websites to complete a purchase. Developers can use Google’s standard payment-choice screen or design one that complies with the company’s user-interface rules. Choosing another payment processor does not eliminate Google’s cut altogether. The company will continue charging a service fee for transactions associated with apps distributed through Google Play, regardless of whether payment is handled by Google, an alternative provider, or a developer’s website. Google argues that this fee covers the value and infrastructure provided by Android and the Play Store. For developers earning up to $1 million annually, the service fee will generally be 10 percent. That rate also applies to auto-renewing subscriptions. When Google Play Billing is used in the U.S., U.K., or EEA, Google will add a separate 5 percent billing fee, and developers processing payments elsewhere will not pay that additional charge. This means Google’s familiar flat 30 percent commission is disappearing, but developers will not necessarily see a dramatic reduction on every transaction. An in-app purchase from an existing user processed through Google Play Billing can still reach a combined 30 percent. The biggest savings are likely to come from subscriptions, smaller developers covered by the $1 million tier, and companies able to move customers to their own payment infrastructure. Google is also offering lower rates through its Apps Experience and revamped Games Level Up programs. Apps and games that satisfy the company’s requirements can qualify for 15 percent service fees on new-install transactions and 20 percent on existing-install transactions. The criteria include performance and reliability standards, support for additional Android device categories, and selected platform features. Those program rates are scheduled to become available in the initial markets and Australia on September 30. For consumers, the immediate effect will depend on whether developers adopt alternative payments and pass any savings on through lower prices. For developers, however, June 30 begins a more flexible but considerably more complicated Play Store economy in which distribution, billing, install dates, revenue thresholds, and program participation can each affect Google’s final cut. Google is also separately developing a Registered App Stores program designed to simplify the installation of qualifying third-party stores. That initiative is expected to arrive with a major Android release later in 2026 and will launch outside the U.S. first. Google says the rest of the world will receive the changes by September 30, 2027, although billing rates for markets outside the US, UK, and EEA have not yet been announced.
    • 38% off a super insane price is still an INSANE price.
    • 1TB Samsung T9 and Samsung 9100 PRO SSDs are now selling at great prices by Fiza Ali Amazon is now offering the 1TB variant of Samsung T9 and Samsung 9100 PRO SSD at great prices with limited-time 38% and 39% discounts, respectively, so you may want to check them out if you have been looking to upgrade your storage solution. The Samsung T9 connects via a USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 (20Gbps) interface and delivers sequential read speeds of up to 2,000MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 1,950MB/s, making it suitable for transferring large files, backing up data, and handling high-resolution media content. When it comes to the security features, the SSD includes AES 256-bit hardware encryption to help protect sensitive data. Designed for portability, the drive is reportedly resistant to drops from heights of up to 3 metres. Furthermore, it operates within a temperature range of 0°C to 60°C and can be stored at temperatures between -40°C and 85°C. Samsung Magician Software is included for drive management, firmware updates, performance optimisation, and health monitoring. Finally, the T9 is certified to multiple international standards, including CE, FCC, UL, UKCA, and RoHS 2 compliance, and is backed by a five-year limited warranty as well. 1TB Samsung T9 SSD: $179.99 (Amazon US) - 38% off The Samsung 9100 PRO uses the M.2 2280 form factor and connects through a PCIe 5.0 x4 interface with NVMe 2.0 support. Built with Samsung V-NAND TLC flash memory, an in-house controller, and 1GB of low-power DDR4X cache memory, the 9100 PRO is engineered for high-performance computing and gaming workloads. Furthermore, the SSD delivers sequential read speeds of up to 14,700MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 13,300MB/s. Random performance is rated at up to 1,850,000 IOPS for reads and up to 2,600,000 IOPS for writes, depending on system hardware and configuration. The drive supports TRIM, S.M.A.R.T monitoring, automatic garbage collection, and device sleep mode to help maintain performance and efficiency over time. In terms of security features, it includes AES 256-bit encryption, TCG Opal support, and IEEE 1667 compliance. The 9100 PRO operates within a temperature range of 0°C to 70°C, is rated for 1.5 million hours MTBF, and can reportedly withstand shocks of up to 1,500G for 0.5 milliseconds. Finally, Samsung Magician Software is also included for firmware updates, performance monitoring, drive management, and optimisation. 1TB Samsung 9100 PRO SSD: $206.99 (Amazon US) - 39% off Alternatively, you can also check out other SSD deals here. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • This is about the already discredited 2025 announcement. Not the current one, which I've heard nothing negative about in the academic literature.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!