Windows 7: Officially Dead This Week


Recommended Posts

With no funeral, retrospectives, accolades, or notes of sadness, the Windows 7 era has come to an end.

As noted by Network World, Microsoft will stop selling Windows 7 licenses to PC makers this Friday. So no more new PCs with Windows 7, with the exception of existing inventory. Windows 7 Professional will remain on sale as a standalone product for a very limited time.

What does this mean for the vast number of Windows users? Apparently, not much. New machines are equipped with Windows 8 and Windows 10 is just around the corner. We can now see Windows 7 for what it was: a placeholder designed to assuage the hordes of critics who did not like Vista.

In my office, I have three machines. A Vista machine (which I'm writing on), a Windows 7 machine mostly used for podcasting, and a Windows 8.1 machine being primed to replace the reliable Vista machine. There is also a Windows 8.1 laptop. Of all the machines, the Windows 7 machine, insofar as the OS is concerned, is the least impressive.

 

[more at source]

Goodbye, Windows 7, and good riddance.

 

 

source

Edited by zhangm
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1235021-windows-7-officially-dead-this-week/
Share on other sites

 

 

It was this sort of arrogance that previously brought down Vista. Let's change things for no good reason. The end result was a fix called Windows 7, a worse program. Time to start the process over again.

 

lolwut? Windows 7 is a "worse program"?? this alone just discredits the whole article, because it's so biased that it's disgusting.

 

also this is not the end of Windows 7; OEM can still sell Window 7 Professional until 2015/02, at least.

lolwut? Windows 7 is a "worse program"?? this alone just discredits the whole article, because it's so biased that it's disgusting.

 

also this is not the end of Windows 7; OEM can still sell Window 7 Professional until 2015/02, at least.

Exactly what I thought about that worse problem line also. Quit reading a few lines after that!

 

Windows 7 will be around for as long, if not longer, than XP was even!

 

Windows 10 is nothing more than an OS to "save" MS again after the Windows 8/8.1 flop.

  • Like 3

^^ Seriously... who writes this crap?

 

And I believe Windows 7 licenses will still be available on the refurbishment programs so purchasing computers with 7 should still be theoretically possible.

  • Like 1

I'm not a Microsoft Fanboy or care much about Windows, It's just an OS that happens to be the best option available to meet my needs and agree with Praetor about that statement in the article. Windows 7 has been nothing short of fast, stable for me providing options to meet my needs productivity wise. I was fine with XP, I was fine with Vista, I was fine with W7 but my disdain actually is directed towards Windows 8 that I tried using and finding a reason to love but couldn't. I have my own Windows 7 Ultimate x64 OEM license so I'm hoping they don't pull the plug on updates for a while. By the time I have enough cash to upgrade my hardware I'll probably upgrade my OS, whether I'll install Windows 8 or Windows 10 (when released) is yet to be decided. 

All this is is a user who is uneducated that is writing an article proving to the rest of the educated world that end users think they know enough to become an expert. He clearly shows in the article that he knows nothing about networking, yet continues to bash something that he has very limited knowledge about.

I'm not a Microsoft Fanboy or care much about Windows, It's just an OS that happens to be the best option available to meet my needs and agree with Praetor about that statement in the article. Windows 7 has been nothing short of fast, stable for me providing options to meet my needs productivity wise. I was fine with XP, I was fine with Vista, I was fine with W7 but my disdain actually is directed towards Windows 8 that I tried using and finding a reason to love but couldn't. I have my own Windows 7 Ultimate x64 OEM license so I'm hoping they don't pull the plug on updates for a while. By the time I have enough cash to upgrade my hardware I'll probably upgrade my OS, whether I'll install Windows 8 or Windows 10 (when released) is yet to be decided. 

 

Don't get sucked in by this alarmist click baiting, the guy that wrote this article obviously hasn't got a clue what he's talking about, they aren't dropping support :) just not selling it any more.

  • Like 1

So, hem, the logic in this? Two or three anecdotes, from his own limited experience, that he doesn't demonstrate are caused by flaws in Windows 7, allow him to infer that Windows 7 was generally inferior to Vista, a "placeholder", and that it could not do "too numerous" things.

 

Yeah. Not much to see here. It's called non sequitur.

  • Like 3

I feel like the last 5-6 years of my life have been a lie. When pretty much every other person on the planet came to the conclusion that Windows 7 was the superior OS we were all deceived. 

 

How foolish we were.

 

Honestly though the article almost feels like it's meant to be a joke.

  • Like 2

Honestly though the article almost feels like it's meant to be a joke.

 

 

It clearly is a joke, if the author meant it or not!

 

seriously,  vista might have gotten better with updates... but in no world you can claim it to be a better OS at this moment in time.

 

 

 

What a horrible title too.  :rofl:         pcmag....    seriously :rolleyes:

I've yet to see an intelligent article from said author.

 

Same author:

 

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/apple-should-pull-the-plug-on-the-iphone

 

 

Apparently he hasn't learned over the years.

  • Like 1

Windows 7 will refuse point blank to die, I know too many people who would rather switch to Linux and set the language to ancient Chinese in order to avoid installing Windows 8 or 8.1

:laugh:  :rofl:

  • Like 2

Exactly what I thought about that worse problem line also. Quit reading a few lines after that!

 

Windows 7 will be around for as long, if not longer, than XP was even!

 

Windows 10 is nothing more than an OS to "save" MS again after the Windows 8/8.1 flop.

QFT

Windows 7 market share will flat line or begin to decline next year when it goes on extended support. To think "it'll be around longer than XP" is silly.

 

actually, don't be so sure.      the corporations have upgraded to windows 7 and they are not likely to upgrade very often, to save cost.

 

i bet you anything they will likely skip 8 and 10.    so i am certain windows 7 will stick around for AGES.    for the same reasons XP is still here.

actually, don't be so sure.      the corporations have upgraded to windows 7 and they are not likely to upgrade very often, to save cost.

 

i bet you anything they will likely skip 8 and 10.    so i am certain windows 7 will stick around for AGES.    for the same reasons XP is still here.

 

Yeah, I just left a corporation that only updated to Windows 7 and IE9 (lol) this year.

 

But I'm also of the opinion that Windows 7 won't be around as long as Windows XP, especially if the rumour of a free upgrade to Windows 10 holds true (which actually makes a lot of sense).

Windows 7 will refuse point blank to die, I know too many people who would rather switch to Linux and set the language to ancient Chinese in order to avoid installing Windows 8 or 8.1

 

haha awesome.

actually, don't be so sure. the corporations have upgraded to windows 7 and they are not likely to upgrade very often, to save cost.

i bet you anything they will likely skip 8 and 10. so i am certain windows 7 will stick around for AGES. for the same reasons XP is still here.

Microsoft also gave XP reprise after reprise. Something they are not doing with Windows 7.

I can also guess that Windows 10 won't be a free upgrade. There is no "free" in tech. Microsoft still has to have a way of making money.

  • Like 2

Windows XP got security updates for 12 and a half years, Windows 7 will get security updates for 10 and a half years... that's still a long time.

With over 5 years of support left I cant see enterprises rushing to leave Windows 7. The average computer user will likely run Windows 7 until their computer fails and a new one is purchased with a newer version of Windows on.

 

With that in mind I cant really see Windows 7 going anywhere for a long time yet personally.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!