• 0

How can I prevent a page from navigating away if a textbox is not filled?


Question

I have

 

<asp:TextBox ID="info" runat="server" CausesValidation="true" ValidateRequestMode="Enabled" />

 

// A textbox called info

 

<asp:RequiredFieldValidator ID="RequiredFieldValidator1" runat="server"

ControlToValidate="info" ErrorMessage="You must enter something" Display="Dynamic"> </asp:RequiredFieldValidator>

 

//A validator to make sure info is filled.

 

 

 

But, I am still able to navigate away from the page.

What else do I need?

 

 

Do I need to in every other <asp: controls type in some stuff as well? Or just only one more block of code will do it?

 

23 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • 0

I need a code that prevent me from going to another link (within my site) when the textbox isn't entered.

 

That demos is very basic, just shows the simply error message and not on navigating away from the page.

 

I know how to display error messages, but the 'unable navigating away form the page' baffles me.
 

 

 

The validation control does not care about users navigating onto other pages, but I need to know how to do this.

 

  • 0

Let me clarify what I mean,

 

if textbox is empty, or a button that inputs the value from the textbox has not been clicked, you can not visit any other pages that's linked, that includes a masterpage and trees/menus

 

It need to stay on that page until this information is entered into the box.
 

Do you understand what I mean?
 

  • 0

I guess you would have to have an event handler for clicking the links

can't you put some code in there that checks if the length of the field is not 0

if so then just do nothing, otherwise you move on

  • 0

What event-handler do I need? But Where does it go? Since everything is ALL combined with a masterpage, so it should go inside the Master page or just that page where you are required to enter a text?
 

Maybe it should go under Master page, I dunno. I also have ASP menus/trees, that can't function either unless this textbox MUST enter a value.

 

  • 0
  On 15/11/2014 at 21:29, SuperJediMedia said:

Let me clarify what I mean,

 

if textbox is empty, or a button that inputs the value from the textbox has not been clicked, you can not visit any other pages that's linked, that includes a masterpage and trees/menus

 

It need to stay on that page until this information is entered into the box.

 

Do you understand what I mean?

 

 

If you want to tell the users to fill the form and lock them on that page until the form is filled out, then that would be a problem...

 

because it doesn't work that way because the user can close the browser down and pull it up and visit somewhere else.

  • 0
  Quote

because it doesn't work that way because the user can close the browser down and pull it up and visit somewhere else.

 

I think I know what you are saying, but it's not what I mean at all

I am trying to learn how to program/design a website, understanding how THIS aspect work, everything within this site is what I need to worry about.  What you are talking about (The web browsing basics) isn't what I am talking about.

 

  • 0

Correct me if I am wrong, but I believe I should put this event-handler inside the Master Page, not just this one page. Since if I goto  any of the other links, it can't access them unless I input something from this textbox into memory, first.

 

 

Like inside Master Page's

 

protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)

 

{

 

I put in something to check the value of text.

}
 

Any tutorials on this would be great. I can't find them though :(

  • 0

Well I said in the Master Page Page_Load that

 

 if  (this text value == null)

 

{

 

Response.Redirect(" (to this page to input values into the text box)");

 

}

 

But it doesn't do that, it acts like this value isn't null, I am pretty sure that it is null though.

  • 0

Please, I really got to know how to do this. If any of you can even just share with me an online Tutorial that talks about how to prevent a page from navigating away, I would be greatly appreciated!!!

  • 0

Why not write some actual js instead of using asp...

Anyway theres a problem you will run into, you cannot and never will be able to prevent a user from navigating away. Most you can do is showing an alert popup.

What you can do is preventing a user from clicking a link on your page and navigating to the link url.

Following code can be used for that:

$("a").click(function(e) {

if($("#inputelement to check").val() == "") {

e.preventDefault();

}

};

Above code uses jquery but can also be written with pure js.

If you want to learn some proper web development I'd suggest to not depend on asp only but also learn js...

To make writing js simpler you can try learning jquery which is simple js library and easier to learn then pure js, especially when working with the dom.

Keep in mind that this is bypassable for users with disabling js.

What you also can do is the following:

Masterpage has a inputfield and on submit it check the input value, if it's not empty it will save a cookie in the user it's browser.

On all the other pages just check for the cookie and when it does not exist redirect to the masterpage.

This can be made even secure by generating a unique cookie that's stored in a database for each user.

You can also do above with a session variable in asp that's set to true when a value has been submitted. Though this variable is reset when the browser is closed.

The method you choose depends on the website it's use case.

  • 0

Reiterating what others have been saying...

 

You must learn js in order to dynamically control what the user can do on your page like you describe.

 

You have at least the following two ways of implementing this in the page:

  1. Assign an event handler to every link, button and form on the page, which simply cancels the navigation (by simply returning false if I remember correctly). JQuery will help you write some simple code to select all of the necessary HTML elements from your page and assign such an event handler. You would then have an event handler attached to this text box that then removes these event handlers to allow them to work again once your validation condition has been satisfied (textbox is not empty). It may also reapply them if the user deletes the textbox content leaving it empty or otherwise invalid. These event handlers may need to be created and assigned on page load.
  2. Or, if your page structure allows it, while the textbox content is invalid, create a new "overlay" element which, with CSS, covers the entire page, and then with CSS place your text box on top of this. You may need an event handler on this overlay element to stop click events propagating down to things beneath it. This overlay can be added or removed to block or allow respectively user interaction with the rest of the page.

You would also need to add an event handler to block the user leaving the page via the back/forward browser navigation buttons, by closing the tab, by closing their browser, by clicking on a bookmark, by changing the url in the address bar, etc.

 

Understand that protection mechanisms like this are never perfect. A sufficiently knowledgeable/skilled user could remove such blocks with the web developer tools built into the browser for example.

 

You may want to seriously consider whether the design of your application could be improved. Your current requirement of such forced control over the users actions may be a result of a bad design. Why not describe to us in detail the functionality of your application and the problem you're trying to solve by implementing such restrictions. Perhaps we could dissect and discuss your design with you and then maybe come up with a better solution.

  • 0

I must use C# .NET, not JavaScript.

 

As for complexity, +theblazingangel I think you are thinking too complex, but I require nowhere as complex as blocking from going to another website, pressing back button, etc. Only that it can not goto another page linked in my site.

And, I don't even need a popup, just that it can not go to another page unless information has been entered.

 

ALL this should be really really easy to do, but I am just learning.

 

  • 0

I haven't programmed in a long time but this seems like something you really want to handle on the client side

 

Can't you just have a general event handler for the click event?

In that event you can just check if the textbox is empty

If it is you let it go on with the link

if not you just do nothing

  • 0

Just as I said before use asp session variables if you want to do it server side.

 

If you did something else then I'm interested in what exactly you did  :)


  On 16/11/2014 at 07:32, alwaysonacoffebreak said:

Not be an ass or anything but the thing You're doing is the most annoying thing on webpages. It doesn't let You back out.

Hmm he's just using the wrong words to explain what he wants, what he actually wants is just requiring a user to enter a field with something like a username before giving them access to the rest of the site.

  • 0
  On 16/11/2014 at 11:36, Seahorsepip said:

Just as I said before use asp session variables if you want to do it server side.

 

If you did something else then I'm interested in what exactly you did  :)

Hmm he's just using the wrong words to explain what he wants, what he actually wants is just requiring a user to enter a field with something like a username before giving them access to the rest of the site.

 

Oh okay. Then my bad. I just found it weird that he wanted to (by the title) to lock people down before they fill in a box. :D

  • 0
  On 16/11/2014 at 03:38, SuperJediMedia said:

I must use C# .NET, not JavaScript.

 

As for complexity, +theblazingangel I think you are thinking too complex, but I require nowhere as complex as blocking from going to another website, pressing back button, etc. Only that it can not goto another page linked in my site.

And, I don't even need a popup, just that it can not go to another page unless information has been entered.

 

ALL this should be really really easy to do, but I am just learning.

 

 

Why can you not use JavaScript? Is this arbitrary restriction imposed upon you because this is a homework exercise and your tutor has said so, or because you're "trying to learn how to program/design a website" and you don't yet understand how JavaScript fits in and how it may help you achieve what you're after, or because you know enough to recognise that the solution to your problem must be implemented in server side code but you haven't explained things well enough, or because JavaScript is/may-be disabled on the client browser which would cause problems??? Without any disrespect, you are just learning web-dev, whereas myself and others here have quite a lot of experience, so if we're suggesting that you use JavaScript for something and you tell us you can't, please provide an explanation as to why!

 

You've stated several times that you are trying to prevent the user from navigating to other pages on your site, but yet nowhere have you actually been clear enough about exactly what you're trying to achieve. Are you trying to just keep the user within this particular page you've been trying to build, with them having navigated to it somehow, until they have filled in this mysterious textbox (i.e. for some reason prevent them moving away to other pages, but they can load other pages say in a different tab without restriction), or are you trying to block access to all pages on the site until this mysterious textbox has been filled in (textbox displayed by all pages instead of proper content until filled in, or perhaps all pages redirect to the textbox page until it's filled in).

 

What you've described to us in every post so far is entirely ambiguous. It came across to me that you were trying to achieve the former of the two possibilities above, but you may well be trying to achieve the latter.

 

What I am trying to steer you towards is getting you to actually describe what this mysterious textbox is for, what data does it capture, and from there we could work towards figuring out which of these designs I've described above is the one you were trying to build and more importantly what problem exactly you are trying to solve. With a proper understanding of what problem you are trying to solve, we would then be in a position to not only guide you as to how to implement a solution, but also to assess whether your approach would actually work, and perhaps offer up a better one.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • New Outlook for Windows landing in Microsoft 365 Education accounts next January by Paul Hill Microsoft has announced that from January 2026, Microsoft 365 Education users will be able to switch to a “modern, AI-powered” Outlook for Windows. The Redmond giant said that a new toggle will show up for eligible users that will let them decide whether to run classic Outlook or the new Outlook for Windows. The new version, Microsoft said, brings numerous improvements including more streamlined communication, features to boost your productivity, and more ways to personalize your experience. As this update is coming to Microsoft 365 Education accounts, it means it’ll affect both students and teachers. The refreshed interface more deeply integrates with Microsoft 365 Copilot to deliver: smarter email and calendar management with features such as Pinning and Snoozing; personalized themes that match your style and preferences; and Copilot-powered assistance to help you draft, summarize, and organize your emails and appointments. Microsoft is obviously keen for users to switch over to the new interface when it's available to foist AI on you. However, if you are reticent about using these AI tools, you can always revert back to the classic Outlook for Windows, at least for a while after the new version is released. The new toggle will begin rolling out globally next January. Before then, Microsoft 365 Education users will get in-app notifications ahead of the change to prepare them, and educational organizations will have the power to opt out or manage the experience through administrator settings. While most Microsoft 365 Education users will get the toggle, there are some exceptions. These include: organizations that have opted out of automatic migration; users with perpetual licenses; on-premises account holders; and devices where the toggle is hidden via policy. The upcoming changes will not require any administrative action during the rollout. Microsoft says administrators, if they want to, can notify users about the upcoming change; update their internal documentation; and review the documentation for Admin control over migration. The firm said that after the rollout, policy controls will become available through Group Policy Objects (GPO), Cloud Policy, and Intune. In terms of compatibility with other platforms, the new Outlook for Windows will be compatible, including with Mac. Users will still be able to access their accounts normally through the Outlook app available for macOS or via the Outlook web app.
    • Might be a joke to a shortsighted person, but that's the minimum for ANY EV to be as reliable and hassle-free as my '12 Highlander Hybrid. Sure my Hybrid gets even less at 372mi (in the winter) - 455mi (in the summer) on a tank, but at least I can refill it for another 372mi-455mi in merely 10 minutes or less without ANY of the following worries: Without all of that peace of mind, an EV will require 800mi/charge to give similar peace of mind for me. I ain't buying and worrying about separate vehicles just for city commuting and long road trips. That's a total waste of cash IMO. My Highlander Hybrid perfectly suits both use cases, and for any EV to be worth my consideration, they'll have to suit them too. Maybe for you that solely resides in 1 city and never travel by road it makes no sense, but for anyone with experience of traveling across cities here in Canada, it makes total sense given the long distances. I ain't suddenly adding another 1hr to my road trip just for EVs, mere coffee and snacks suffice for my trips (~800km), and those certainly don't take me 1hr.
    • Microsoft will reportedly hit Xbox division with a massive wave of layoffs soon by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe It was only a few days ago that a report came out regarding a mass layoff wave at Microsoft. While that report only mentioned sales staff that were to be affected, now, another report has landed that mentions the company's Xbox gaming division being another layoff target. According to Bloomberg's Jason Schreier, Microsoft has another major round of layoffs planned for the Xbox division as it reorganizes the company ahead of the new fiscal year. This unfortunate news for many staff will be announced as soon as next week, per the report Bloomberg has gained the information from sources that had asked not to be named, who had said that managers inside Xbox are already expecting the job cuts to take effect soon. While no specific developers, divisions, or numbers were mentioned, "substantial cuts" are reportedly incoming as a part of this change. The gaming division of Microsoft has gone through multiple layoff waves in recent years. Late 2024 saw 650 jobs being cut from Xbox corporate and supporting teams. Earlier in the same year, over 1,900 staff from Activision Blizzard, ZeniMax, and Xbox development teams were let go from Microsoft. Microsoft has released a number of high-profile first games as of late, including Doom: The Dark Ages, Avowed, and Indiana Jones and the Great Circle, and is also pursuing a multi-platform strategy that has Xbox games releasing on PlayStation platforms. It has also confirmed next-gen Xbox hardware is now in development and recently unveiled a first-ever official Xbox handheld initiative. If the latest report turns out to be accurate, we should have an official announcement sometime next week. Microsoft's current fiscal year is slated to end on June 30.
    • LibreOffice is fine for individual use, but its collaboration tools are far behind Office 365.
    • First thing I wondered as well. I miss the old color. I always thought it was nice how each app had its own color. Then they go and take 2 of the most commonly used apps and give them the same color.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Parallax Abstraction earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      956400 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      davidfegan earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      Ainajohn earned a badge
      First Post
    • Conversation Starter
      sophiaisabella32 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      593
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      223
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      170
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      152
    5. 5
      Som
      135
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!