Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I found that it's not possible to cover my house with a single router/ap.  I therefore decided to buy a second linksys e4200v1 and deploy it at the other end (I ran some long Cat5e from the main router).  

 

I have DD-WRT installed on both. I did try to set them both up with the same SSID and security options etc but that resulted in spotty performance when in the middle of the house. 

 

I therefore chose to use a different SSID for either.  Trouble with this is that I could be sat right next to the primary router and an iphone/laptop etc will STILL try to connect to the one at the other end of the house until I tell it otherwise.

 

I know big buildings must have a decent solution to this problem with multiple AP's.

 

Any ideas?

 

Cheers,

 

Alex

No, You need Wireless Domain Services http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/wireless-mobility/wireless-lan-wlan/65346-wds-faq.html otherwise you just have dumb access points and you could connect to an access point that's almost out of range instead of the one you are just standing beside.

 

The only thing you can do is have a dead zone in the middle of the house so theres no chance of this happening

  On 21/11/2014 at 10:28, T3X4S said:

4200v1 ?!?!  Why would you buy a 2nd router that was so bad they had to completely redo it and call it e4200v2 ??

 

Who told you V1 was bad? V1 is the better one actually as it supports third party (DD-WRT). V2 was some marvel crap that has no support and was dead out the door. The replaced it almost right away. People buying that router today and still trying to find V1 version instead.

 

Also DD-WRT supports WDS so should be easy to setup with some tutuorials out there.

 Wireless distribution system is not Wireless Domain Services though that's just multiple dumb aps. Its entirely possible that you could connect to the access point in the attic instead of the one you are right next to hence the trouble in the middle of the house.

Turn up your roaming aggressiveness. This will help your wifi adapter to choose the one with the better signal

 

http://www.intel.com/support/wireless/wlan/sb/CS-030101.htm

https://kb.meraki.com/knowledge_base/client-roaming-and-connectivity-decisions-explained

 

Big installs will use a combination of blocking access after a certain amount of clients that have connected to the AP and they will not allow if the signal strength isn't there.  Also they will up their roaming agressiveness so that the client tries to pick the AP with the better signal. 

With sc302 here, changing this can help it move between AP. You really should have them set for the same SSID, or you going to get blips when you change, etc.

You could check with dd-wrt and see if it has options for setting a min RSSI, this way it won't let clients connect if signal is not good. This would force client to go to the other AP. You would have to be careful that you don't have a dead spot where you don't meet either AP rssi, etc.

Not sure if dd-wrt support this, any enterprise class AP would, or unifi for example supports doing this. This is how you make sure you don't get long range clients connecting to you with bad connection bringing everyone else on the AP down in performance.

If your AP don't support such features to kick bad clients, then you need to do it on the client like sc302 links talk about.

  On 21/11/2014 at 13:34, sc302 said:

Turn up your roaming aggressiveness. This will help your wifi adapter to choose the one with the better signal

 

http://www.intel.com/support/wireless/wlan/sb/CS-030101.htm

https://kb.meraki.com/knowledge_base/client-roaming-and-connectivity-decisions-explained

 

Big installs will use a combination of blocking access after a certain amount of clients that have connected to the AP and they will not allow if the signal strength isn't there.  Also they will up their roaming agressiveness so that the client tries to pick the AP with the better signal. 

 

Problem is 90% of the roaming devices are tablets or phones which don't have any way to adjust it.

  On 21/11/2014 at 14:26, BudMan said:

With sc302 here, changing this can help it move between AP. You really should have them set for the same SSID, or you going to get blips when you change, etc.

You could check with dd-wrt and see if it has options for setting a min RSSI, this way it won't let clients connect if signal is not good. This would force client to go to the other AP. You would have to be careful that you don't have a dead spot where you don't meet either AP rssi, etc.

Not sure if dd-wrt support this, any enterprise class AP would, or unifi for example supports doing this. This is how you make sure you don't get long range clients connecting to you with bad connection bringing everyone else on the AP down in performance.

If your AP don't support such features to kick bad clients, then you need to do it on the client like sc302 links talk about.

 

Yeah i've tested them extensively using different SSID and the same and it does seem to be affected by the hardware connecting but it is almost always better to have them the same name.  But unfortunately some older phones tend to stick on the crappy signal it can barely pick up even when you try to switch it.  So there doesn't seem to be best scenario.  Honestly the access points and routers need much better integration.  It's unfortunate we have such crappy choices for network equipment unless its enterprise grade.

Not really, Ubiquiti is very affordable unless you want the latest and greatest. 

 

You can pickup a UAP for 69.  A UAP-LR for 89.  A UAP-Pro for 229.  A UAP-AC for 299. 

 

The pro and the ac may be out of your price range but the standard UAP and LR may be well within your budget.

https://store.ubnt.com/unifi.html

http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss_1?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=ubiquiti&rh=i%3Aaps%2Ck%3Aubiquiti

 

Also to be able to drop based on signal strength with the ubiquiti APs it is done through the CLI. 

https://community.ubnt.com/t5/UniFi-Configuration-Examples/UniFi-Set-minimum-RSSI-for-clients/ta-p/522637

 

 

The issue is that it is the client that decides what AP to connect to, the AP basically sits there waiting on the client to connect to it with the right credentials.  This needs to be fixed at the client level not the AP, you can only tell the ap to kick it.  If the client is dumb enough to select the same AP it will get kicked again after a few minutes.

LR really a waste of money.. People get hung up on tx power of the AP, and forget about the tx power of the client.. Which is normally going to be the problem. Does not matter if the client can see the signal from the AP with full bars, if its little tx power can not get back to the AP, etc.

While the LR might have place in specific applications, in a home setup or office building, etc. not so much.

I picked up the AC model a while back, and love it.. Some people seem to have issues - but it has performed for me exactly how I would of hoped. Some might say $300 is a bit much, but you can drop that on a wifi router without too much effort as well. Having enterprise sort of features are great to play with, and the info you get from the controller software is very useful if needed to troubleshoot wireless issues or just keep an eye on your clients and their use, etc.

I wish I had a bigger house to have an excuse to deploy more of them ;) I am toying with getting the outdoor model for my patio - I only get about 30+ mbps out there ;) Maybe in the spring ;)

I justified the cost because this is what I do for a living, and being able to play/test with AC was icing on the cake or prob would of went with just the pro model.

Ive seen this tried in so many places and people add more and more access points to fill in the dead zones which creates more problems with the client selecting the wrong access point.

 

Tbhonest its a case of you either put up with the crap speeds where access points overlap and the client selects the wrong ap instead of the closest or you give in and eliminate the possibility of this happening by ensuring there is no overlap between access points (creating dead zones).

 

Or you could get the gear that can do this correctly which is cisco aironet with Wireless Domain Services (in short intelligent access points that don't simply connect a device to an ap randomly based on who responds first but based on which will provide the best signal to the client) .

There really is no other way of doing this right, Either you have dumb access points that will connect a device to whichever one responds first or you have intelligent ones that connect you to whichever access point is closest to you with the added benefit of not having to re-authenticate every time you change access points (Fast secure roaming).

 

  Quote

Q. What is the radio management (RM) feature of WDS?

 

A. A WDS-enabled AP also acts as an aggregator for radio frequency (RF) statistics from the other APs. The WDS-enabled AP passes along these statistics to the Wireless LAN Solution Engine (WLSE) in order to highlight rogue APs. The monitor of RF allows the WLSE to create a map of wireless coverage. The WLSE also uses current APs in order to carry out site surveys and identify areas with no coverage. You can import floor plans onto the software to make areas where you need extra APs easy to spot.

 

 The only thing you need to worry about when you have Wireless Domain Services is that the channels don't overlap.They'reap enough on ebay too

 

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Cisco-AIR-LAP1252AG-A-K9-1252-WAP-AUTONOMOUS-firmware-w-Bracket-antennae-/201192856962?pt=US_Wireless_Access_Points&hash=item2ed8075d82

  On 21/11/2014 at 11:23, Roger H. said:

Who told you V1 was bad? V1 is the better one actually as it supports third party (DD-WRT). V2 was some marvel crap that has no support and was dead out the door. The replaced it almost right away. People buying that router today and still trying to find V1 version instead.

 

Also DD-WRT supports WDS so should be easy to setup with some tutuorials out there.

Then I am completely confused.

A couple of years ago, I built a gaming computer for the son of one of my parents' neighbors.  The dad was the Sr Exec VP of operations for Linksys North America - he gave me a 4200 as a gift.  After I told him about the issues of constantly rebooting, and dropped signals, he "had the guys whip up a custom FW update" which he gave me.  He was using same router at his house.  Eventually, I sold it because I would see so many other people with the same exact problems, I knew it wouldn't get better (even after going to regular release FW)   So I switched to the netgear WNDR3700 and used that for a while.

Then I heard they came out with a V2, so - my thinking was "OK they saw the first version was crap, and they ushered this one out " -- but what you're saying is opposite.

So, I dont know.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dead By Daylight and three more games join Xbox Free Play Days this weekend by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe As the weekend approaches, Microsoft has brought along another Free Play Days promotion for Game Pass subscribers to jump into. This time, Dead by Daylight, Headbangers: Rhythm Royale, Trailmakers, and Synduality Echo of Ada are all available for Xbox Game Pass Ultimate, Standard, and Core members for no extra cost. As always, any progress made during the weekend also carries over automatically if you decide to purchase a game afterward. From the four games available, Dead by Daylight should be the most familiar to most gamers. The multiplayer four-versus-one asymmetric survival horror game has you assuming the roles of survivors or the killer to see who can come out on top. Next, Headbangers: Rhythm Royale lands as a light-hearted, rhythm-based battle royale game. Up to 30 players can be in a single round, all represented as pigeons, before various mini-games involving increasingly difficult rhythm challenges get thrown at the group. The last remaining pigeon becomes the "Master Headbanger." Meanwhile, Trailmakers is a popular sandbox experience where you and your friends construct physics-based vehicles. A wide range of modular parts are offered for making these vehicles, with an exploration element also adding more options to search for. Adventure, sandbox, and racing modes arrive as options for playing either solo or in multiplayer. Lastly, the Synduality Echo of Ada is a sci-fi extraction shooter experience where you control mechs as you search for loot while fighting AI and other players. Here are the store links for the announced titles and their supported platforms: Dead by Daylight - $11.99 (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One) Headbangers: Rhythm Royale - $3.99 (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) Trailmakers - $14.99 (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) SYNDUALITY Echo of Ada - $29.99 (Xbox Series X|S) This Free Play Days promotion will end on Sunday, June 22, at 11:59 pm PT. Following this, expect another round of games to enter the program next Thursday, June 26.
    • I'm not simping, I'm telling it how it is. This is the norm and has been forever. Profits need to keep growing, it doesn't matter if you are valued at a trillion or a million. As long as you are part of public trading that's the name of the game. If it's cheaper for the company to outsource, they will, and you'll get laid off. Welcome to capitalism 101. Like I said, the problem is the system itself.
    • Samsung may offer Galaxy AI free for life on the Galaxy Z Fold7, Z Flip7, and Z Flip7 FE by Sagar Naresh Bhavsar Samsung is all set to unveil its latest foldables: the Galaxy Z Fold7, Z Flip7, the affordable Z Flip7 FE, along with the Galaxy Watch8 series at the Unpacked event, possibly in New York City. The Galaxy Z Fold7 is expected to be the thinnest book-style foldable from the company, while the Galaxy Z Flip7 is tipped to come with a full-screen cover display. These devices are almost confirmed to launch with Android 16-based One UI 8 out of the box, the beta of which is already live for the Galaxy S25 series. Samsung is also expected to give a glimpse of its first XR headset, the Galaxy XR, dubbed "Project Moohan," at the event. However, there may be something more exciting coming for upcoming foldable fans. A reliable leaker, PandaFlashPro on X, has tipped that you might get all Galaxy AI features for free for life with the upcoming Galaxy Z Flip7 and Galaxy Z Fold7. Notably, Galaxy AI will also reportedly be permanently free on the affordable Galaxy Z Flip7 FE. The leaker also claimed that the Galaxy Z Fold7, Z Flip7, and Z Flip7 FE will also come with Gemini Advanced plus 2TB of cloud storage, free for six months. This is similar to theoffer that Samsung offered the Galaxy S25 series earlier this year. However, the company cleared the air that the Galaxy AI features on the Galaxy S25 series will be free till the end of 2025, after which a subscription-based model will be introduced. If true, then you will be able to enjoy Galaxy AI features such as Sketch to Image, Generative Image, Note Assist, Live Translate, Interpreter, Chat Assist, etc., free for a lifetime on the upcoming foldables, setting it apart from its competitors.
    • Summary for all: Some WD SSDs need firmware updates for 24H2.
    • Next-gen AMD GPUs reported to support HDMI 2.2 with up to 80Gbit/s bandwidth by Aditya Tiwari Some beans have spilled around AMD's rumored upgrades for its next-generation graphics architecture. The American silicon giant is expected to support up to 80 Gbps mode on HDMI 2.2 for its upcoming graphics architecture, internally codenamed GFX13, and expected to launch as RDNA 5 or UDNA. The latest information comes from the leaker @Kepler_L2, who took to their social media account on X (via VideoCardz). It strengthens the hopes of the latest HDMI standard and support for faster bandwidth making their way to the next generation of AMD GPUs. The HDMI 2.2 standard was announced earlier this year and released to manufacturers in the first half of 2025. It pushes the maximum allowed bit rate to 96 Gbps and supports Latency Indication Protocol (LIP) to improve audio and video synchronization. However, according to Kepler's post, RDNA 5 GPUs are expected to support only 64 Gbps and 80 Gbps modes. This suggests that the 96 Gbps mode may not be supported on the new architecture, while it remains unclear whether this is due to some hardware limitation or will be added later. Although the new piece of information pertains to GFX13, it doesn't clarify whether it's related to the PRO or Radeon RX series. The company has previously used UHBR 13.5 (54 Gbps) for its consumer-focused GPUs to reduce costs while supporting UHBR 20 (80 Gbps) on PRO cards, according to the leaker. It remains to be seen whether AMD treats the two product lines the same or differently. Another standard announced earlier this year was DisplayPort 2.1b, which keeps the same maximum bandwidth of 80 Gbps but supports three times the cable length for UHBR20 GPU-to-display connections compared to existing VESA-certified DP80 passive cables. The new standard is supported on NVIDIA's RTX 50 and RTX PRO Blackwell series GPUs. For now, there is no update on whether AMD will bring DisplayPort 2.1b support to the GFX13 architecture.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      MikeK13 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      OHI Accounting earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      OHI Accounting earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      Thornskade earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Higante88 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      708
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      269
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      202
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      178
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      128
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!