Recommended Posts

Less than a year old isn't the same as less than a month old.

 

That's not how you quantified it originally so it's a moot point. The service launched with Titanfall and other new games have been part of the service since.

That's not how you quantified it originally so it's a moot point. The service launched with Titanfall and other new games have been part of the service since.

Here's what I said, verbatim:

 

This is a brand new game that you could potentially beat in the time frame they're giving. Steam almost always does this for old games, as does EA. Not really comparable. I don't see anyone else offering something like this.

Titanfall was not brand new, it was old. That's how I quantified it. Why shouldn't people be happy that a game that's less than a month old is getting a free 24-hour trial (again, for the entire game)? Who else is doing that with a major release? Anyone?

Here's what I said, verbatim:

 

Titanfall was not brand new, it was old. That's how I quantified it. Why shouldn't people be happy that a game that's less than a month old is getting a free 24-hour trial (again, for the entire game)? Who else is doing that with a major release? Anyone?

 

Only you understood that "brand new game" is less than one month old. I didn't consider Titanfall old when it launched on Game Time and I still don't consider it an old game today for any platform.

 

And I don't even think age has anything to do with it either, unless every game going forward from MS will be part of the scheme within one month. I'm sure they'll do it when sales drop off for any title, which is why I brought Steam/Game Time into the discussion in the first place.

 

Further, I didn't say anyone should be sad / angry or whatever at the news. I just think the availability should be longer.

 

Jeez louise...

Definitely won't take half an hour for the average household in the UK either, can tell you that for a fact :laugh:

 

Define "average". My lil lady's secondary connection is 40mbit, and so far Sunset Overdrive has taken over two hours. Our primary connection is an 120mbit FTTP, but I'm not allowed to use it for games, it's her mini datacentre connection for our home server room link to her full size datacentre in the North West UK.

 

Average, to me here in the UK is probably 4 to 10mbit.

Define "average". My lil lady's secondary connection is 40mbit, and so far Sunset Overdrive has taken over two hours. Our primary connection is an 120mbit FTTP, but I'm not allowed to use it for games, it's her mini datacentre connection for our home server room link to her full size datacentre in the North West UK.

 

Average, to me here in the UK is probably 4 to 10mbit.

 

If you go by statistics and reports, average for urban areas is <20. Rural is hovering around 10.

 

 

 

 

AB is on dialup :P

Only you understood that "brand new game" is less than one month old. I didn't consider Titanfall old when it launched on Game Time and I still don't consider it an old game today for any platform.

 

And I don't even think age has anything to do with it either, unless every game going forward from MS will be part of the scheme within one month. I'm sure they'll do it when sales drop off for any title, which is why I brought Steam/Game Time into the discussion in the first place.

 

Further, I didn't say anyone should be sad / angry or whatever at the news. I just think the availability should be longer.

 

Jeez louise...

It's not possible for me to make all my posts tailored to someone else's views. When I say "brand new," I'm clearly giving my view of what constitutes "brand new." While I can understand the subjectivity on what quantifies newness, there's no debate that there was a clear difference in time when the deals were offered. "Sunset Overdrive" is less than a month old; "Titanfall" was about three and a half months old when it was playable for 48 hours on Origin.

 

Regardless, I go back to my original comment: "Steam almost always does this for old games, as does EA. Not really comparable." In terms of what both Valve and EA do, "Titanfall" is the exception, not the rule. The first time it was offered, it was easily the newest game available on Origin or Steam's free play services. Microsoft just did that for a game that released less than a month ago.

 

Your original comment was entirely negative, calling the offer "pretty damn stingy" and comparing it to dissimilar offers from two PC services. Those offers are an attempt by companies to get potential customers to use their services to begin buying games; the same situation doesn't apply here, as no one is going to buy an Xbox One ($350) and Xbox Live subscription (at least $5 a month) just to play a free trial of a $60 game. It's hard to view your original comment as anything but angry, hence why my response pointed out the differences in the offers.

It's not possible for me to make all my posts tailored to someone else's views. When I say "brand new," I'm clearly giving my view of what constitutes "brand new." While I can understand the subjectivity on what quantifies newness, there's no debate that there was a clear difference in time when the deals were offered. "Sunset Overdrive" is less than a month old; "Titanfall" was about three and a half months old when it was playable for 48 hours on Origin.

 

Regardless, I go back to my original comment: "Steam almost always does this for old games, as does EA. Not really comparable." In terms of what both Valve and EA do, "Titanfall" is the exception, not the rule. The first time it was offered, it was easily the newest game available on Origin or Steam's free play services. Microsoft just did that for a game that released less than a month ago.

 

Your original comment was entirely negative, calling the offer "pretty damn stingy" and comparing it to dissimilar offers from two PC services. Those offers are an attempt by companies to get potential customers to use their services to begin buying games; the same situation doesn't apply here, as no one is going to buy an Xbox One ($350) and Xbox Live subscription (at least $5 a month) just to play a free trial of a $60 game. It's hard to view your original comment as anything but angry, hence why my response pointed out the differences in the offers.

 

Clearly there is. What's the reasoning behind 1 month? Why not 1 day? Or 1 week? It's completely arbitary.

 

Titanfall is not the exception. Again, if you use the arbitrary rule of "1 month" in your mind then sure. However, they've offered more than 1 new game via Game Time. Heck, they gave a whole week for BF4 which is the current in a series. Even if it goes over your "1 month" rule, it's about as new as BF gets.

 

I wasn't angry? Not sure what gave that impression. I think the 24hrs is stingy and the countdown to only play within one day, not even from when you boot it the first time, worse still. I'm not bothered if you think they're dissimilar or not. I'm not trying to change opinions. In my opinion, they are very similar. Steam free weekends have nothing to do with getting people to use the service. Even if it were, what's the difference between it and what MS' plans are? Nobody is going to buy a gaming PC at least three times the cost of an X1 + XBL sub just to play trials for 72+ hours to turn your argument on it's head :s Not sure what that has to do with anything, but hey ho..

Clearly there is. What's the reasoning behind 1 month? Why not 1 day? Or 1 week? It's completely arbitary.

 

Titanfall is not the exception. Again, if you use the arbitrary rule of "1 month" in your mind then sure. However, they've offered more than 1 new game via Game Time. Heck, they gave a whole week for BF4 which is the current in a series. Even if it goes over your "1 month" rule, it's about as new as BF gets.

 

I wasn't angry? Not sure what gave that impression. I think the 24hrs is stingy and the countdown to only play within one day, not even from when you boot it the first time, worse still. I'm not bothered if you think they're dissimilar or not. I'm not trying to change opinions. In my opinion, they are very similar. Steam free weekends have nothing to do with getting people to use the service. Even if it were, what's the difference between it and what MS' plans are? Nobody is going to buy a gaming PC at least three times the cost of an X1 + XBL sub just to play trials for 72+ hours to turn your argument on it's head :s Not sure what that has to do with anything, but hey ho..

You misread what I wrote. I wrote that "there's no debate that there was a clear difference in time when the deals were offered." As in one month is different than three and a half months. That isn't debatable. As for the debate to what quantifies newness: I gave what I considered to be "brand new." As I stated in the first sentences of my post which you just quoted, I'm not going to try and fit your view over what constitutes "brand new." I gave my opinion. You have yours. Clearly they differ. What point are you even trying to make here?

 

As the context of my post clearly states, "Titanfall" is the exception in terms of when it was offered. It was the newest game offered on EA's Game Time service. They haven't yet offered another game that's been more new for a Game Time session.

I spent a couple of hours playing SO last night and it was really fun.  Went to buy it today and Microsoft have added a 20% discount today (?44 down to ?38).  The free day plus the discount is a good way to encourage sales.

  • Like 2

Clearly there is. What's the reasoning behind 1 month? Why not 1 day? Or 1 week? It's completely arbitary.

 

Why does it have to have a reasoning? Microsoft have been pushing this game hard, it sold well and after a month they wanted to puch more sales on it so they put it up as a demo for people to play.

 

Far from stingy and a pretty legit way to boost sales. Here's to this happening more.

I spent a couple of hours playing SO last night and it was really fun.  Went to buy it today and Microsoft have added a 20% discount today (?44 down to ?38).  The free day plus the discount is a good way to encourage sales.

 

I think it was a really smart thing to do with a new game like Sunset Overshoot. Put up a new Halo game and people already know what to expect, but SO looked so wacky I wasn't really sure if it would be my kind of game. I tried the demo and liked it so I bought it. If I didn't have the demo opportunity I might have passed on the game.

I spent a couple of hours playing SO last night and it was really fun.  Went to buy it today and Microsoft have added a 20% discount today (?44 down to ?38).  The free day plus the discount is a good way to encourage sales.

We can also currently get a digital code for it via CDkeys.com for ?37.90 - 5% for liking via FB.

Why does it have to have a reasoning? Microsoft have been pushing this game hard, it sold well and after a month they wanted to puch more sales on it so they put it up as a demo for people to play.

 

Far from stingy and a pretty legit way to boost sales. Here's to this happening more.

 

It wasn't a demo, it was the first foray into their new incentive 'Play Time'. I don't have an issue with the service itself, just the stingy time frame and restrictions it has/had.

 

Steam and Origin have a good mix of hitting the sweet spot. I don't begrudge any dev trying to boost sales :)

it was the first foray into their new incentive 'Play Time'. I don't have an issue with the service itself, just the stingy time frame and restrictions it has/had.

 

I totally agree. I just got into it, earning cheevos, loving the colours flying by as I grind on poles and stuff, then bam it stopped working and I had to delete it. They should do a two or three day trial, or even just 48hrs, 24h is just too short if you factor in life, eating, working, sleeping. I know some people game 24h, but I don't, I have something called life going on!

  • Like 1

I didn't have a chance to pre-load it so only managed to squeeze in a few hours, but I loved it. I'll definitely be buying it before the end of the year. Hopefully in a sale of some sort :P

 

I think that 24 hours is a good amount of time to make in available, but what they really need to is make it available to pre-download a week in advance so you don't spend much time trying to download it. 

 

They want to give enough time to give everyone a taste and then encourage people to buy.

It wasn't a demo, it was the first foray into their new incentive 'Play Time'. I don't have an issue with the service itself, just the stingy time frame and restrictions it has/had.

 

Steam and Origin have a good mix of hitting the sweet spot. I don't begrudge any dev trying to boost sales :)

 

"Here play this for 24 hours without paying" Sounds like a demo to me. No matter what branding it is all painted with it's all just demo's evolved.

"Here play this for 24 hours without paying" Sounds like a demo to me. No matter what branding it is all painted with it's all just demo's evolved.

 

I can see why but I'd argue that a demo would only allow you to see/play/experience a small portion of an overall product, this was access to the full product. If you had absolutely nothing to do that day, you could have put a lot of time in and got a massive chunk of the game done.

 

I'm glad they did this because I've been on the fence about this title, but leaning more towards not buying it. This pretty much gave me enough of the game to know I won't enjoy this so can cross this off a list of maybes :)

  • Like 1

"Here play this for 24 hours without paying" Sounds like a demo to me. No matter what branding it is all painted with it's all just demo's evolved.

 

I'm in the same boat at Skiver on this. I've seen in a few places that many folk managed to finish the game in the time it was free. For the completionist there will always be things to do so it won't be enough, but for most the one play through will be enough. 

 

Can we call it an extended demo? :P

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • If Valve refused to let them make the case, I wonder if they've already partnered with someone else to do it? The fact that they didn't seek permission/licence before diving straight in is incredible though
    • OpenClaw now has native mobile apps on iOS and Android by Karthik Mudaliar OpenClaw, the viral open-source personal AI agent, now has its own mobile app, available on both Android and iOS. Users can pair the app with an existing OpenClaw gateway and can start using new mobile-native features that are now available on the app. The app supports all the existing features you'd already have seen on OpenClaw's TUI, as well as some more, such as real-time and background Talk mode, action approvals, sharing from iOS, and optional access to device capabilities such as camera, screen, location, photos, contacts, calendar, and reminders. These features are available on both the Android and iOS versions of the app. What's important with these apps is that they don't run OpenClaw on your phone, but are actually just companion apps that require a running OpenClaw Gateway on an existing device, on macOS, Linux, or Windows via WSL2. To pair the app with your existing OpenClaw gateway, users need to run the command "/pair qr" on the TUI or existing chat interface, which brings up a QR code. Users can then scan this QR code to pair it up with the mobile app. There's also an option to manually pair the app by entering the host and a port. Previously, OpenClaw had been available on phones via WhatsApp, Telegram, Slack, Discord, Microsoft Teams, Matrix, and others. Now, with a native mobile app, the interface is much cleaner and more focused on just the OpenClaw, of course, with the added support for camera, screen, location, and more. It's important to note that OpenClaw comes with its own security warnings. There's always a chance of prompt injection with these tools, so users are recommended to double-check authentication, tool policy, sandboxing, and execution approvals rather than prompts alone. For users well-versed with the AI harness, a native mobile app makes it easier to approve an automation, share a link, use voice, or let an agent react to phone-side context.
    • Google pitches Spanner as one database for all AI agents with these new featues by Karthik Mudaliar Google Cloud is introducing new features within Spanner, its distributed database, as a place where enterprises should keep their data, using which AI agents could make smarter and better decisions. In a detailed blog post, Google highlighted quite a few features coming to Spanner, including relational data, graph relationships, vector search, key-value access, full-text search, and operational analytics together in one database architecture. Google says that today's systems aren't well-made for AI agents. There could be data that is present in one system, search indexes in another, embeddings in a vector database, and relationship data in a graph database. This fragmentation isn't great for AI agents to do their jobs because they don't have access to all of this data in one place. This is where Google is positioning Spanner as a solution. Spanner is already a globally distributed relational database with strong consistency, and Google wants its customers to see it as a broader data layer for AI applications. The company introduced something called Spanner Graph, along with integrated vector search, full-text search, a Cassandra-compatible key-value endpoint, and a columnar engine for analytical queries on operational data. Google also added that its ScaNN-powered vector search can support indexes with more than 10 billion vectors, while the columnar engine can make some analytical scans up to 200 times faster. All of this isn't just exclusive to the Google Cloud Platform, and there's support for multi-cloud as well. This comes via Spanner Omni, which Google says is a downloadable, containerized version of Spanner that can run on Kubernetes and in environments outside Google Cloud, including Microsoft Azure and AWS, and even on-premises infrastructure as well as edge deployments. Google says that customers who are interested in the full-featured edition should contact the company, and there's no word on commercial availability or separate pricing. Those interested can read the full blog by Google Cloud, which details these features individually.
    • Kalmuri 4.2.5 by Razvan Serea Kalmuri is your all-in-one, portable screen capture and recording solution designed for speed, simplicity, and flexibility. Whether you need a full-screen snapshot, a custom area, a scrolling webpage, or smooth video recording, Kalmuri delivers with ease. Capture text instantly from images with built-in OCR, keep floating images on top for quick reference, and use the precise color picker for perfect design matching. Customize hotkeys to work your way and share results instantly with built-in upload options. Kalmuri runs without installation, making it ideal for USB use, and offers an intuitive interface that’s easy to learn. Kalmuri key features: Video recording support (designation of whole screen and area) Whole screen, active program, window control, area application Extract text from images using optical character recognition (OCR). Support for PNG, JPG, WEBP, BMP, GIF file formats MP4 video recording powered by FFmpeg for high-quality results Full web page capture Share the captured image on the web Color extraction function Printer output Hotkey settings Adjustable via keyboard for area capture (Arrow key, Ctrl+Arrow key, Shift+Arrow key) File name format (sequential, datetime) Free to use it at work, at home, in government offices, at school, etc. Using Kalmuri portable for video recording Kalmuri’s portable version doesn’t include FFmpeg, which is required for video recording. Without it, you’ll get an “error FFmpeg.exe not found” message. To fix this, download FFmpeg from the provided link, extract it, and place FFmpeg.exe in Kalmuri’s folder. Kalmuri will then recognize it automatically, allowing you to start recording in high quality instantly. Kalmuri 4.2.5 changelog: Fixed an intermittent crash when using Area Capture Improved stability for Area Capture and screen recording Resolved a capture issue that could occur right after startup Download: Kalmuri 4.2.5 | 24.2 MB (Freeware) Download: Kalmuri Portable 4.2.5 | 2.1 MB View: Kalmuri Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      Juan Dela earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Collagen Project earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      Wakeen1966 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      516
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      273
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      143
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      54
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!