Google Chrome GUI + Content "too small"


Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

I picked up a Dell Inspiron 15 recently. It has a 1080p so the resolution is big. I noticed that with Google Chrome the GUI and the web page content are way too small to read. I understand there is a zoom feature but shouldn't it "fit" correctly in my screen like Firefox? In the screenshot provided I have Firefox and Chrome side by side to show you the difference. Firefox's view is fine (the gui and content) but Chrome looks way too small. I've tried disabling display scaling on highi DIP setting but it didnt help.

post-410830-0-17039900-1416808814.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1237632-google-chrome-gui-content-too-small/
Share on other sites

The "problem" is that the Windows DPI setting is bigger than 100% (on my laptop, by default it set to bigger because of the smaller 15,5" screen with fullhd resolution) and all other browsers are following Windows dpi setting and makes webpages "zoomed in" a bit just like the UI, but chrome doesn't follow the dpi setting and it just displays it's UI and webpages as on 100% dpi setting.

  • Like 2

The "problem" is that the Windows DPI setting is bigger than 100% (on my laptop, by default it set to bigger because of the smaller 15,5" screen with fullhd resolution) and all other browsers are following Windows dpi setting and makes webpages "zoomed in" a bit just like the UI, but chrome doesn't follow the dpi setting and it just displays it's UI and webpages as on 100% dpi setting.

 

This. My screen is too small for it to look the way it is. I have to constantly squint. I had no problems with it before I recently updated it.

Chrome is fine. Your Firefox browser is distorted. It looks like it's at 125% or 150% zoom. I can tell because the actual size of the reddit logo in the upper left is larger than the actual dimensions the site is designed to show it at. Several other elements are also showing signs of distortion from zoom in the Firefox view.

 

This is like looking at the world through a magnifying glass for too long and then thinking there's something wrong with your eyes when you finally look at the world without it. =)

Chrome is fine. Your Firefox browser is distorted. It looks like it's at 125% or 150% zoom. I can tell because the actual size of the reddit logo in the upper left is larger than the actual dimensions the site is designed to show it at. Several other elements are also showing signs of distortion from zoom in the Firefox view.

 

This is like looking at the world through a magnifying glass for too long and then thinking there's something wrong with your eyes when you finally look at the world without it. =)

Firefox is fine. Most apps I run are zoomed in that much. I know that Firefox isn't zoomed because I just installed it and didn't touch anything. I'll take screenshots of its settings when I get home from work. Once upon a time ago, Chromes GUI and web content was as big as the way Firefox looks now.

Firefox is fine. Most apps I run are zoomed in that much. I know that Firefox isn't zoomed because I just installed it and didn't touch anything. I'll take screenshots of its settings when I get home from work. Once upon a time ago, Chromes GUI and web content was as big as the way Firefox looks now.

I dunno, man. Open the same page again in more browsers. I think you'll see they're more like Chrome's proportions than Firefox's.

 

That Firefox screenshot looks like it has scaling for the vision impaired turned on. I suppose it's possible you have Windows set to scale the UI somewhat, and Chrome and Firefox are affected by the OS settings differently. But Chrome is definitely much closer to 100% scaling than Firefox. Just look up screenshots of the Reddit front page, man. Your Firefox proportions are off. This is objectively verifiable stuff. Just compare to other people's screenshots of the site, or load it up in IE/Safari and break the tie.

That is exactly what he said...

Yeah, people aren't reading the first post :laugh:

I know Chrome enabled scaling support a few releases ago, but I think they might have disabled it due to bugs. I think of all the browsers Firefox has the best support for it due to how it renders the interface, even IE with it's really good support gets a few UI things wrong.

Chrome would automatically adjust to a high dpi mode for me until one of the recent updates.

Happy to see Im not the only one experiencing this problem.

Here's the view settings on the browsers

post-410830-0-43757600-1416971069.jpg

post-410830-0-53308400-1416971075.jpg

Yeah, people aren't reading the first post :laugh:

 

This. Holy. I can't tell if everyone here is jumping at the chance to defend chrome or if they're just not reading the OP.

 

This is clearly a problem with chrome not following the DPI setting in windows. Not exactly surprising coming from Google...

  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...

Yes there is a fix(scale the whole browser using a launch prefix in the shortcut)

 

Gimme a sec to google it.

 

Edit:

/high-dpi-support=1 /force-device-scale-factor=1

Change force-device-scale-factor to increase/decrease chrome dpi size.

I use this on my stream 7 so it's easier to use on the small screen.

Yes there is a fix(scale the whole browser using a launch prefix in the shortcut)

 

Gimme a sec to google it.

 

Edit:

/high-dpi-support=1 /force-device-scale-factor=1

Change force-device-scale-factor to increase/decrease chrome dpi size.

I use this on my stream 7 so it's easier to use on the small screen.

I believe that fix is for chrome appearing too big. The issue I am having is that the text appears too small. As with the GUI. Thanks for the help though :)

I believe that fix is for chrome appearing too big. The issue I am having is that the text appears too small. As with the GUI. Thanks for the help though :)

It's for both, force-device-scale-factor bigger then 1 increases size and lower then 1 decreases size.

It changes the size of the UI and the webpages.

I as example set it to 1.5 on my tablet to increase the overall size.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Xbox Insiders get Xbox 360 achievements and Gamertag character upgrades by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Microsoft is continuing its fast-paced update schedule for Xbox Insiders. Today, the company announced a new slate of features it is rolling out to Xbox Insiders in the Alpha Skip-Ahead ring, which includes an expansion to the gamertag system, Xbox 360 achievements, and more. The unique Gamertag that Xbox users can choose for their profile is getting more characters. Instead of the 12-character limit, Insiders will now be able to get a Gamertag that's 15 characters long. The 12-character limit will still apply to Gamertags that are not unique or contain any non-Latin characters. Meanwhile, Microsoft is adding Xbox 360 game support to its Game Hubs. Selecting an installed Xbox 360 game on a modern Xbox console will now show achievement progress, captures, and other information. Achievement pop-ups are back for these classics too, which should be good news for achievement hunters. The next change is for Xbox players who can't wait to jump into their games when an update is required. "If a game requires an update and is available to stream through your Game Pass membership, you can start playing immediately with cloud gaming while the update downloads in the background," explains Microsoft. The final change of this Insider update is once again to the game cards. Insiders will find that all games, both released and upcoming, will now have a simple button to add to their profile's wishlist, making the process much easier from a single place. This Xbox update is rolling out today to Insiders in the Alpha Skip-Ahead ring. As usual, Microsoft aims to bring it to more Insiders over time before they reach all Xbox owners. Head here to find out how to join the Xbox Insider Program to get a chance to test these features and upcoming ones on both consoles and PC.
    • In the boot options in the UEFI is set to legacy or CMS? It needs to be set to UEFI if it's not already.
    • Researchers claim Microsoft's quantum breakthrough is flawed by basic Python errors by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft's aggressive roadmap to deliver a commercial quantum supercomputer by 2029 has now hit a bit of a snag, and it's not because of a complex sub-zero dilution refrigerator, but rather because of a few lines of basic Python code. A new critique published in the scientific journal Nature argues that simple software errors effectively manufactured the breakthrough that Microsoft's foundational research claimed back in 2025 into Majorana-based topological qubits. Topological quantum computing, the path that Microsoft chose for its research, relies on creating and controlling "Majorana zero modes." These are exotic quasiparticles that theoretically offer vastly superior error resistance compared to the highly sensitive superconducting qubits currently being championed by rivals like Google and IBM. However, physically proving you have created these particles requires sifting through massive amounts of complex electrical conductance data to isolate a specific "topological gap." Because of the sheer volume of data, physicists rely heavily on custom software pipelines to process the results. This is where the Python scripts come in. Now, according to the critique, Microsoft’s data processing software contained fundamental programming errors that ultimately skewed the published results. By mishandling data arrays or deploying incorrect logic within the Python script, the software supposedly discarded "noisy" or contradictory data. Which is why it only highlighted the specific electrical measurements that supported the topological-gap claim. The researchers behind the critique argued that this makes the findings invalid, suggesting the heralded "quantum leap" was actually a false positive generated by bad code and not a product of groundbreaking physics. However, Microsoft is pushing back hard against these allegations. The Redmond giant has formally rejected the criticism, saying that it's just a minor anomaly rather than a fatal flaw. According to the company, while there may have been a minor oversight in the data parsing scripts, it does not alter the fundamental reality of their physical experiment. Just weeks ago, Microsoft unveiled the Majorana 2 quantum processor, a milestone so significant that the company boldly accelerated its timeline for a commercial quantum supercomputer from 2035 down to 2029. But the new software allegations reopen an old wound. Microsoft's quantum division faced a remarkably similar crisis when a landmark 2018 paper on Majorana particles was famously retracted in 2021 after independent physicists discovered the data had been inappropriately cropped. That historical baggage makes the current Python-related allegations particularly sensitive. If the foundational math and data processing for the 2025 breakthrough are genuinely flawed, the highly anticipated 2029 commercial timeline could easily be delayed or, worse, cancelled.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      467
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      123
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!