• 0

Definitive Best *Free* Antivirus 2015


Poll: Favorite *Free* Antivirus 2015  

360 members have voted

  1. 1. Your Choice?

    • 360 Total Security
    • Ad-Aware
      0
    • Avast! Free
    • AVG AntiVirus Free
    • Avira Free
    • Baidu Antivirus
    • BitDefender (Free Edition)
    • ClamWin/ClamAV
    • Comodo Anti Virus/Internet Security
    • Emsisoft Anti-Malware (free edition)
      0
    • Panda Cloud Antivirus
    • Microsoft Security Essentials
    • Other (please specify below)
    • Malwarebytes (Free Edition)


Question

It's a new year, and a new poll for Definitive Free Best Antivirus. The 2014 thread can be found here.

This is a poll for best Free antivirus, there is a separate thread for paid antiviruses here.

If your choice of Best Free Antivirus is not listed, please choose Other and specify in the comments.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1241712-definitive-best-free-antivirus-2015/
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I go by what the scientific results like AV-Comparatives say, and it gives 360 high marks.

 

ATM I'm torn between 360 Internet and 360 Total Security 6 beta though.

 

Also 360 detected 0day custom malware compiled with the Zeus engine: https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/6d3826b687033269b68c15e2f875bc3863203358c16f6b0018cb52097cd48c32/analysis/1395914178/

 

Note how Kaspersky and Eset didnt detect it...

  • 0

I personally don't have an "Proper AV" installed on my PC

 

Every once in a while I'll do the follow:

 

SuperAntiSpyware (Complete Scan)

CCleaner (look things over)

MalwareBytes (Also Complete Scan

ADW Clearner... (About every 90days or so)

 

Once scans are complete I take them off (don't like a lot of stuff on my pc...

 

You're crazy. 

 

Once you've worked in enterprise IT, you'll realise that it's probably a good idea to have AV installed. 

  • Like 3
  • 0

I go by what the scientific results like AV-Comparatives say, and it gives 360 high marks.

 

ATM I'm torn between 360 Internet and 360 Total Security 6 beta though.

 

Also 360 detected 0day custom malware compiled with the Zeus engine: https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/6d3826b687033269b68c15e2f875bc3863203358c16f6b0018cb52097cd48c32/analysis/1395914178/

 

Note how Kaspersky and Eset didnt detect it...

try 360 total security beta its, not bad

  • 0

I've swtiched many relatives from MSE to 360 Total Security. It works really good and the detection rate with BitDefender and/or Avira engines are great. For someone looking to add a free Firewall to his setup, GlassWire is awesome and also free.

  • 0

ESET is the one. I am a virus writter and they released a definition for my last creation within days of its release. And it was not a binary release so they had to compile it and test it etc, they were really fast. Oh, its a Linux virus to make it better. More info about it: www.virusradar.com/en/Linux_Zariche/detail

  • 0

ESET is the one. I am a virus writter and they released a definition for my last creation within days of its release. And it was not a binary release so they had to compile it and test it etc, they were really fast. Oh, its a Linux virus to make it better. More info about it: www.virusradar.com/en/Linux_Zariche/detail

 

Virus writer huh?  ...What do you do with them?

  • 0

Virus writer huh?  ...What do you do with them?

 

Nothing, I release the source code at VX Heavens. I dont release the virus in binary form, it's just a hobby that I have, I find them fascinating (the way they look like real biological cels, polymorphism, etc)

  • 0

I voted for Panda, but only as a second av choice.

It must be # 2 because all the others say they are number 1. :D

MSE/Windows Defender is my # 1 choice.

 

 

Is there any website that measures the RAM usage and slowdowns of each antivirus? I'm tired of having to set up VMs to test that stuff myself every damn time (last time Avast was the fastest with decent detection and had the lowest RAM usage but I hate its UI and that dumb free subscription).

  • 0

I find it bizare that people aren't voting for Avira considering it always wins in antivirus tests as the best free antivirus. Why bother installing a mediocre antivirus like MSE/360 total security when you can get a much better one that is also free, crazy!

  • 0

I find it bizare that people aren't voting for Avira considering it always wins in antivirus tests as the best free antivirus. Why bother installing a mediocre antivirus like MSE/360 total security when you can get a much better one that is also free, crazy!

Well it wins in protection, but not in performance, and 360 security can use the avira engine and bitdefender engine.

  • 0

MSE and Malwarebytes, all I need. Don't need any extra BS slowing down my system. 

MSE is rated useless so not sure why anyone would use it... This is the FREE AV poll so there would be no extra BS slowing your system down or are you using like a Pentium 4 system?

  • 0

I use Avast Free Antivirus and was thinking of checking out 360 Total Security since it was getting a lot of votes but then see it's a Chinese company. WTF people?

  • 0

360 internet security is a nice program but keep in mind it is made in China and its a communist country so yea you are running government Chinese software on your computer :)

 

No Norton Anti Virus on the vote chart?  I remember when that program was the top dog at the time.

Their non-free program is good but their stripped down free Norton Security Scan is almost malware.

  • 0

My favorite ant-virus is Bitdefender though I don't use it. ( I need a free version.) :(

 

I had a curious thing happen when I did the 30-day trial of Bitdefender. 

 

I had a directory that had a number of '.exe' files (along with source (programming) example files that I had downloaded from Pluralsight.

 

When I did the initial complete scan, every one of the exe files in this particular directory was flagged as having a trojan. I had a second copy of these same exe's in a separate directory, on a separate drive that were not flagged. I ended up deleting all the files in that directory.

 

I'm not asking for assistance in this thread, just saying what happened. 

 

The thing I liked about Bitdefender was that it has a good rating for detecting malware and also it didn't seem to affect system speed to a noticeable degree.  (Y)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Apple Watch Series 11 GPS just crashed to 30% off in this fast-moving Prime Day deal by Karthik Mudaliar The Apple Watch Series 11 is available for $279, down from its $399 list price, saving buyers $120, or 30%. Amazon labels the offer as selling fast, so the current price may not remain available for long. This GPS model features a 42mm aluminum case, an Always-On Retina LTPO3 OLED display capable of reaching up to 2,000 nits, and an Ion-X glass surface with improved scratch resistance. Apple rates Series 11 for up to 24 hours of normal use or up to 38 hours in Low Power Mode, with fast charging providing up to eight hours of use from a 15-minute charge. Health and fitness tools include sleep scoring, temperature sensing, ECG support, heart-rate alerts, workout tracking, sleep apnea notifications, and hypertension notifications, where available. The watch also carries IP6X dust resistance and 50-meter water resistance. This configuration is best suited to iPhone owners who want comprehensive health tracking, notifications, contactless payments, and workout data without stepping up to a larger or cellular-equipped model. The smaller case should also appeal to buyers who prefer a lighter watch, while the S/M band fits wrists measuring 130mm to 180mm. With the current generation now significantly below its usual retail price, this is a strong time to replace an aging Apple Watch or buy a first model without compromising on Apple’s newest health and display features. Grab the discounted Apple Watch Series 11 (sold and shipped by Amazon) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • The laptop in the bedroom is an Acer with i7-10510U CPU. Acer's website states they will not be upgrading it so I had little choice other than disable secure boot. I know next to nothing on these matters so hopefully it will be fine.
    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      460
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!