PlayStation Now debuts subscription pricing

By soniqstylz
in PlayStation

 Share

Recommended Posts

Veteran

GotBored

Posted
Posted

I'm not understanding the game selection point, it has over 100 games on PS Now how is that selection weak?

 

I know all these games are old PS games, but that's the whole purpose of PS Now isn't it? (Maybe you guys are expecting new PS4 games to come to PS Now?)

Grand Master

trooper11

Posted
Posted

I'm not understanding the game selection point, it has over 100 games on PS Now how is that selection weak?

 

I know all these games are old PS games, but that's the whole purpose of PS Now isn't it? (Maybe you guys are expecting new PS4 games to come to PS Now?)

Maybe you feel the games currently on the service are enough to warrant the price, others like myself do not. A stronger ps3 selection would be a good start for me personally. Heck, I like the idea of getting access to a strong library of ps2 games as well.

Getting ps4 games would be nice and certainly would add value, but I own a ps4, why would I want to use PS Now for ps4 games at reduced quality based on my internet connection? Maybe as a way to demo games, but overall, getting ps4 games is not a big deal for me.

Veteran

GotBored

Posted
Posted

This is a huge fail. Not only in price....but no way in hell are we going to play games at their convenience. 

 

Its a subscription all-you-can-eat service, you can play the games whenever you want while you maintain a subscription so I don't understand what you mean by playing games at their convenience, mind explaining? 

 

Maybe you feel the games currently on the service are enough to warrant the price, others like myself do not. A stronger ps3 selection would be a good start for me personally. Heck, I like the idea of getting access to a strong library of ps2 games as well.

Getting ps4 games would be nice and certainly would add value, but I own a ps4, why would I want to use PS Now for ps4 games at reduced quality based on my internet connection? Maybe as a way to demo games, but overall, getting ps4 games is not a big deal for me.

 

I don't think the games warrant the price for me personally because I have no interest in playing older PS games but this service is specifically tailored to those that do.

 

Here is a list of some of the games available on PS Now which you consider a weak selection; it has 100+ games and many first party and AAA titles.

 

  • Alpha Protocol
  • Anomaly Warzone Earth
  • Batman Arkham City
  • Ben 10 Omniverse
  • Ben 10 Omniverse 2
  • BioShock Infinite
  • BIT.TRIP Presents
Grand Master

dipsylalapo Supervisor

Posted
  • Supervisor
Posted

This is debate around whether the price is fair is going down the same route as EA Access. 

 

It'll come down to each individual. For me, I don't think that it's a bad price to pay, but I'd probably pay for 3 months at a time and never more than once a year. There's always a time when less games are released and paying $45 to play all those games  (albeit you're renting) is not bad at all. 

Grand Master

Hedon

Posted
Posted

 

Its a subscription all-you-can-eat service, you can play the games whenever you want while you maintain a subscription so I don't understand what you mean by playing games at their convenience, mind explaining? 

 

 

 

Yup, while you maintain. That means we need to finish a game before the sub lapses. That is forcing us to play within a time constraint instead of at our leisure. We are also at the mercy of the frequency as to which PSN goes down, requiring us to play when it's back up and running.

 

You may not understand, but others feel differently than you do. Not to mention, it is grossly over priced in our opinion.

Veteran

+Asmodai MVC

Posted
  • MVC
Posted

Which would include:

 

PS+

PSNow

PS Vue

Music unlimited 

Movie Unlimited

 

$65-$75 a yr....

 

That's nuts.  $65-$75 year wouldn't even begin to cover that.

Ferrari should offer a supercar for $30k too then. Feel entitled much?

 

These streaming services have huge bandwidth and server requirements on Sony's part.  They aren't pay once and be done with it.  $15-$20 on top of the $50/year PS+ charge would not begin to cover the resources they'd need to stream games (PSNow), TV (PS Vue), Music (Music Unlimited), and Movies (Movie Unlimited).  Every time you watch or play something you are using bandwidth and server resources.  Unlike PS+ where you consume Sony resources to download the free games initially but then you can play them as much as you like after that with minimal ongoing resources required by Sony.

  • DrunknMunky
  • Like 1
Grand Master

Showan

Posted
Posted

That's nuts.  $65-$75 year wouldn't even begin to cover that.

Ferrari should offer a supercar for $30k too then. Feel entitled much?

 

These streaming services have huge bandwidth and server requirements on Sony's part.  They aren't pay once and be done with it.  $15-$20 on top of the $50/year PS+ charge would not begin to cover the resources they'd need to stream games (PSNow), TV (PS Vue), Music (Music Unlimited), and Movies (Movie Unlimited).  Every time you watch or play something you are using bandwidth and server resources.  Unlike PS+ where you consume Sony resources to download the free games initially but then you can play them as much as you like after that with minimal ongoing resources required by Sony.

 

 

It could very well retail for $75 - $100... Which would still be reasonable

If a consumer even remotely feels like they are being ripped off from the jump, it's a no go...

 

Ok... here is my personal opinion

 

PS+ = $50

PS Now = $10 (my price not Sony)

PS-Vue = $12 (my price not Sony) and don't know what content is provided

Movie Unlimited/Music Unlimited= $20 (my price not Sony)

 

That's $92 in USD. Sony can mark this up to $100...I wouldn't think people would be offended by this price point (but I've been wrong a billion times before)...

 

And name the service "Playstation World" or whatever...

Veteran

+Asmodai MVC

Posted
  • MVC
Posted

It could very well retail for $75 - $100... Which would still be reasonable

If a consumer even remotely feels like they are being ripped off from the jump, it's a no go...

 

Ok... here is my personal opinion

 

PS+ = $50

PS Now = $10 (my price not Sony)

PS-Vue = $12 (my price not Sony) and don't know what content is provided

Movie Unlimited/Music Unlimited= $20 (my price not Sony)

 

That's $92 in USD. Sony can mark this up to $100...I wouldn't think people would be offended by this price point (but I've been wrong a billion times before)...

 

And name the service "Playstation World" or whatever...

 

What are these opinions based off? You just pull some numbers out of a hat?  I assume those are your theory for YEARLY prices.

 

PS+ = $50 (this is true and generally considered a good value by the gaming community)

 

PS Now is NOT going to cost less than PS+.  Streaming PS3 games requires dedicated PS3 hardware based server farms by Sony and TONS more bandwidth and PS+ does.

Right now Sony is offering it for $20/month or $45 for three months.  This is competitive with services like Gamefly but sure it's open for debate that it's a little high. I personally think it's about right but even if it is high it's not ridiculously high.  $10/year for this service is insane.  Extend the current pricing out to a year and it's $180/year.  There is no way Sony can cut the price to below $100/year and make a profit on it due to the resources required, let alone $10.

 

PS Vue and Movie Unlimited are roughly equal to Hulu Plus and Netflix.  Both of those cost $8 a month I believe so even giving a discount due to bundling with everything else and/or a more limited selection we'll say each is worth roughly $5/month.  So that's $10/month together or $120/year for both.  These also require more server bandwidth and resources than PS+ on the part of Sony.

 

Music Unlimited is roughly equal to Pandora which costs $5/month I believe.  Again dropping the price for Music unlimited due to the bundle and/or because of a smaller selection and I could see it going for $50 or so just like PS+.  This still requires a fair amount of constant bandwidth to stream music but nowhere near as much as movies and games.  If you have tons of users though it adds up fine.

 

So a yearly bundle with everything might be like:

 

$50 for PS+

$120 for PS Now

$60 for PS Vue

$60 for Movies Unlimited

$50 for Music Unlimited

 

There is no way they could offer a bundle of all that for under $300/year and make a profit and yet you think you should get it all for $75-$100!?!

Again, I'd like a $30k Ferrari super car then as well.  Both are equally ridiculous expectations.

  • DrunknMunky
  • Like 1
Rising Star

Houtei

Posted
Posted

I'm surprised by the reaction by most people, I didn't see many games I would play myself but I didn't think it was too bad. Especially when EA is charging $5 per month or whatever it is for the small list of games they have.

 

I don't think I'd subscribe if I had a PS4 as its a little pricey for me for the choice of games but I'm very picky with my games.

For me the biggest difference here is ea is charging 5 for games you actually download on your xbox and play and sure im sure it has to "check in" at some point  but they play just like disc games where as sony is offering 19.99 for a STREAMING service with not that many of the good ps3 games available on it and you have to have really good internet and or be close to them to be able to play with out to much latency.  I tried renting a game on there in december and my 50mb down and 5mb up  was i gues playable but i was feeling a little annoyed the whole time cause i could tell there was almost a second delay of things happening when i hit buttons.

Grand Master

+Audioboxer Subscriber²

Posted
  • Subscriber²
Posted

For me the biggest difference here is ea is charging 5 for games you actually download on your xbox and play and sure im sure it has to "check in" at some point but they play just like disc games where as sony is offering 19.99 for a STREAMING service with not that many of the good ps3 games available on it and you have to have really good internet and or be close to them to be able to play with out to much latency. I tried renting a game on there in december and my 50mb down and 5mb up was i gues playable but i was feeling a little annoyed the whole time cause i could tell there was almost a second delay of things happening when i hit buttons.

It's made for people / locations with fast Internet.

Those with slow Internet like me are not the target audience for such a service. Hence why as the poster above you lays out to make a profit on this service from a smaller minority (broadband speeds are poor for many PS owners) realistic pricing has to be put in place. Video and music services can stream okay on poorer connections, games can't.

PS Now is not meant to replace PS+ or EA access or anything else of that nature, so the people it's not aimed at have to stop wanting it to be for them when it's not. Not currently anyway till global Internet connections improve, and then pricing may change.

  • DrunknMunky
  • Like 1
Grand Master

Showan

Posted
Posted

What are these opinions based off? You just pull some numbers out of a hat?  I assume those are your theory for YEARLY prices.

 

PS+ = $50 (this is true and generally considered a good value by the gaming community)

 

PS Now is NOT going to cost less than PS+.  Streaming PS3 games requires dedicated PS3 hardware based server farms by Sony and TONS more bandwidth and PS+ does.

Right now Sony is offering it for $20/month or $45 for three months.  This is competitive with services like Gamefly but sure it's open for debate that it's a little high. I personally think it's about right but even if it is high it's not ridiculously high.  $10/year for this service is insane.  Extend the current pricing out to a year and it's $180/year.  There is no way Sony can cut the price to below $100/year and make a profit on it due to the resources required, let alone $10.

 

PS Vue and Movie Unlimited are roughly equal to Hulu Plus and Netflix.  Both of those cost $8 a month I believe so even giving a discount due to bundling with everything else and/or a more limited selection we'll say each is worth roughly $5/month.  So that's $10/month together or $120/year for both.  These also require more server bandwidth and resources than PS+ on the part of Sony.

 

Music Unlimited is roughly equal to Pandora which costs $5/month I believe.  Again dropping the price for Music unlimited due to the bundle and/or because of a smaller selection and I could see it going for $50 or so just like PS+.  This still requires a fair amount of constant bandwidth to stream music but nowhere near as much as movies and games.  If you have tons of users though it adds up fine.

 

So a yearly bundle with everything might be like:

 

$50 for PS+

$120 for PS Now

$60 for PS Vue

$60 for Movies Unlimited

$50 for Music Unlimited

 

There is no way they could offer a bundle of all that for under $300/year and make a profit and yet you think you should get it all for $75-$100!?!

Again, I'd like a $30k Ferrari super car then as well.  Both are equally ridiculous expectations.

 

 

I based it off of this...

 

PS+ we all see the value there...

 

PS-Now = as of now selection vs price... Not good

 

PS-Vue = It's new... I don't know if content is worth price point.

 

Movies= Netflix $96 a year I give you that...

 

Music = Pandora is free...

 

And here is the other thing... Most will look at $300 and not bother... They would buy a secondary console instead of buy a $300 service that only last 12months...

 

$300 is a Will U purchase that comes with a game,and $$$ left over...

Veteran

+Asmodai MVC

Posted
  • MVC
Posted

I based it off of this...

 

PS+ we all see the value there...

So we agree there and can just set that aside. It serves as a good baseline though in that you agree that this is worth over $4/month and has very small resource requirements for Sony when compared to streaming services. Expecting a streaming service to cost less then this is already unreasonable.

PS-Now = as of now selection vs price... Not good

Compared to what? You're saying something Sony is charging $20/month or $45 for three months (which works out to $180/year) should be $10/year. How do you even begin to get there? Now maybe you could argue it should be $10/month like I believe OnLive is but that's still $120/year (as I listed) not $10. There is NO WAY Sony could maintain there required server farm and bandwidth to operate streaming games on $10/year all you can eat subscriptions.

PS-Vue = It's new... I don't know if content is worth price point.

I don't know if it's content is worth the price to me either but things can be reasonbly priced and I may still not be interested in them. So I'm not saying people should get PS Vue I'm just saying that it's unreasonable to expect this to be priced below $5/month or so.

Movies= Netflix $96 a year I give you that...

Yet you think Sony should offer both it and Music for $20? As it turns out Movies Unlimited isn't a subscription service anyway so you CAN drop it from the list. There is NO all you can eat version of it, it's just what Sony calls where you go to buy/rent movies from them.

Music = Pandora is free...

With ads it is and limits that I don't believe Music Unlimited has. So the equivalent to Music Unlimited is Pandora One which I believe costs $5/month. I believe Sony's cheapest tier is also $5/month so $60/year but if they gave a discount for bundling it then $50/year would seem like a reasonable price... as I stated.

And here is the other thing... Most will look at $300 and not bother... They would buy a secondary console instead of buy a $300 service that only last 12months...

 

$300 is a Will U purchase that comes with a game,and $$$ left over...

Of course most people would look at $300 and not bother. Bundling them all together like that would be a really bad idea and that's exactly why Sony didn't do it. You're the one who suggested they bundle them all together and then sell them for some ridiculously low price that would likely bankrupt Sony. Heck Sony knows $90 for 6 months or $180/year is more than people would be willing to part with no matter how good of a deal it may be and that's why they only offer 1 and 3 month subscriptions to PlayStation Now.
Rising Star

Houtei

Posted
Posted

Yeah  thats what i was saying. This service is seems pointless because the only people that benefit are the people next door to the datacenter hosting these games and the game selection for alot of people sucks anyways. I have reasonably fast internet to most standards a specially here in the US and i cant play comfortably. Yet services like Grid I can play without any noticeable lag at all.  Was playing batman arkam asylum last night on grid and ran flawlessly.  

 

I just wish someone would come out with a way to digitally rent games for 2-3$ a night or something that starts on first launch or something instead of this streaming stuff. I mean clearly they can make a game not run without internet connections to see if you are allowed to be playing.

Veteran

+Asmodai MVC

Posted
  • MVC
Posted

Yeah  thats what i was saying. This service is seems pointless because the only people that benefit are the people next door to the datacenter hosting these games and the game selection for alot of people sucks anyways. I have reasonably fast internet to most standards a specially here in the US and i cant play comfortably. Yet services like Grid I can play without any noticeable lag at all.  Was playing batman arkam asylum last night on grid and ran flawlessly.

It's not pointless just because you're not the target market. As a PS3 owner I'm not the target market either but there are many people who are and I do see value in the service even if it isn't for me personally. The service is designed to allow its users to play games they don't otherwise own a system capable of playing. If you DO have a system capable of playing the game then you should look elsewhere to buy or rent the game, you are NOT the intended market. If you have a < 5 Mbps or high latency connection then this service is not intended for you.

As for the game selection it's not that bad for a service that's just starting up. It's going to continue to grow we're at the very beginnings of this thing. I have no idea how it compares to Grid but nVidia is giving away Grid temporarily as a trial balloon and so we don't know what they plan on charging once that trial expires (June 30 2015). Sony has been having a bunch of network issues lately though so I'm not surprised Grid runs better for you. Sony is absolutely going to need to shore up their networking for their streaming services to have a chance.

I just wish someone would come out with a way to digitally rent games for 2-3$ a night or something that starts on first launch or something instead of this streaming stuff. I mean clearly they can make a game not run without internet connections to see if you are allowed to be playing.

This is TOTALLY different from PS Now. PS Now is for games that even if you rented them and downloaded them they wouldn't run because your system isn't compatible with them. As for renting games though I don't think that's going to happen because while it might seem like a good idea to you I seriously doubt a ton of people are going to want to pay $2-$3 to download a 30+GB game only to have it stop working the next day unless they pay again. If the games were left on the drive so you didn't have to keep paying for them then renting games would very quickly fill up your drive with as big as games are today. Plus it would take forever to download them on slow connections and in theory if you have a fast connection (assuming Sony eventually works out the kinks in their network) you're probably still better off streaming them.
Grand Master

compl3x

Posted
Posted

Yup, while you maintain. That means we need to finish a game before the sub lapses. That is forcing us to play within a time constraint instead of at our leisure. We are also at the mercy of the frequency as to which PSN goes down, requiring us to play when it's back up and running.

 

You may not understand, but others feel differently than you do. Not to mention, it is grossly over priced in our opinion.

 

 

I don't really know of any subscription that allows you to keep using something after the sub ends, so that doesn't seem like a fair criticism. I'd be inclined to think Sony would extend subscriptions to compensate for any extended downtime.

  • DrunknMunky
  • Like 1
Grand Master

Hedon

Posted
Posted

I don't really know of any subscription that allows you to keep using something after the sub ends, so that doesn't seem like a fair criticism. I'd be inclined to think Sony would extend subscriptions to compensate for any extended downtime.

It's just an opinion. Take it or leave it.

Grand Master

compl3x

Posted
Posted

I didn't take issue with whether or not it is an opinion, I was simply pointing out that no subscription system I know of allows people to continue using a service after the sub ends. Criticising Sony's planned system because they use the same sub model everyone else doesn isn't a reasonable criticism.

 

Do you know of any subscriptions that allow you to keep using a service after the sub ends?

  • GotBored and DrunknMunky
  • Like 2
Grand Master

Hedon

Posted
Posted

I didn't take issue with whether or not it is an opinion, I was simply pointing out that no subscription system I know of allows people to continue using a service after the sub ends. Criticising Sony's planned system because they use the same sub model everyone else doesn isn't a reasonable criticism.

 

Do you know of any subscriptions that allow you to keep using a service after the sub ends?

I will say it again....it forces us to finish games at their time frame. I will criticize (well WE) that system, especially at that horrid price model. It's not only reasonable to criticize that, but its worthy of mentioning.

Grand Master

+Audioboxer Subscriber²

Posted
  • Subscriber²
Posted

What other system do you propose then? A one off fee of 5.99 to play all the games forever? -_- No subscription based service exists that carries on serving you after you unsubscribe.

And why do you keep saying we in your posts. Your opinion is your own, unless there's a small collection of minions following you that just reiterate your opinion. I don't even see one single person criticizing the subscription model on Neowin, just the price. So unless you have minions or an imaginary friend, or those "official PS forums" are full of complaints who is we?

Grand Master

compl3x

Posted
Posted

I will say it again....it forces us to finish games at their time frame. I will criticize (well WE) that system, especially at that horrid price model. It's not only reasonable to criticize that, but its worthy of mentioning.

 

 

That's what a subscription is: you pay a price to use a service for a specific amount of time. If you don't like the pricing that is a reasonable criticism, but arguing you don't like subscriptions because they impose a time limit is... odd?

Grand Master

Hedon

Posted
Posted

That's what a subscription is: you pay a price to use a service for a specific amount of time. If you don't like the pricing that is a reasonable criticism, but arguing you don't like subscriptions because they impose a time limit is... odd?

Odd to you, yes. All good. We are not getting anywhere with this, so it is just time to move forward.

Grand Master

dead.cell

Posted
Posted

It's just an opinion. Take it or leave it.

Definitely leave it. I don't ask someone who hates metal what they think of Shadows Fall or Machine Head...

 

That would just be silly. It should just be noted that your post definitely has less weight than others so we shouldn't read much into it, instead of trying to change the way you feel about it.

 

Anyway! I personally think the idea has good foundation, but nothing just magically works unless you plant the seed and start to grow it. PS Now has to start somewhere. While many of us might be jaded by the fact that we may have played a lot of this content already, there are still plenty of people getting into the scene and it would be a great answer for someone who really wants to jump in and play.  Remember that the gaming industry is growing, and imagining more people being able to enjoy what we do already only opens up more conversations. :)

  • GotBored and DrunknMunky
  • Like 2
Grand Master

+Audioboxer Subscriber²

Posted
  • Subscriber²
Posted

Definitely leave it. I don't ask someone who hates metal what they think of Shadows Fall or Machine Head...

That would just be silly. It should just be noted that your post definitely has less weight than others so we shouldn't read much into it, instead of trying to change the way you feel about it.

Anyway! I personally think the idea has good foundation, but nothing just magically works unless you plant the seed and start to grow it. PS Now has to start somewhere. While many of us might be jaded by the fact that we may have played a lot of this content already, there are still plenty of people getting into the scene and it would be a great answer for someone who really wants to jump in and play. Remember that the gaming industry is growing, and imagining more people being able to enjoy what we do already only opens up more conversations. :)

For someone who buys a PSNow able TV entry point could be picking up or borrowing a Dualshock controller. Travelling a distance to your family/friends who only own a smart TV with PS Now support? Take an easy to carry controller and rent a game one off for the night. That kind of impulse in the future. Especially if a lot TVs get future support.

It's why I currently see a possibility a service like this could do well in hotels, airports or places like that. If you can rent a game one off, which you can, people will be okay doing that. Just like they are renting a movies for

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • AI is indeed eliminating jobs, and Oracle just proved it

      By Fezmid · Posted

      You might be right... Look at his name, hiding in plain sight: hAmId.
    • ExplorerPatcher 26100.8457.70.3

      By Copernic · Posted

      ExplorerPatcher 26100.8457.70.3 by Razvan Serea ExplorerPatcher is a versatile and free tool that allows you to tweak and enhance the Windows Explorer. It comes with a range of useful features, including the ability to add new context menu items, change file name colors, and enable hidden features. Feature summary Choose between Windows 11 or Windows 10 taskbar (with labels support, small icons and lots of customization). Disable Windows 11 context menu and command bar in File Explorer and more. Open Start to All apps by default, choose number of frequent apps to show, display on active monitor and more. Choose between the Windows 11, Windows 10 and Windows NT Alt-Tab window switcher with customization. Lots of quality of life improvements for the shell, like: Skin tray menus to match Windows style, make them behave like flyouts and center them relative to the icon. Choose action when left and/or right clicking the network icon. Revert to the Windows 7 search box in File Explorer, or disable Windows Search altogether. Disable immersive menus and use mitigations that help you run the real classic theme without glitches. Discover the program's full range of features by reading this wiki article. ExplorerPatcher 26100.8457.70.3 changelog: Tested on OS builds 22621.4317, 22631.7079, 26100.6899, 26100.8037, 26200.8246, 26200.8457, 26300.8493, and 28000.2113. TIP: Windows Defender no longer flags ExplorerPatcher. It is no longer needed to configure Defender exclusions. Enjoy! Important Update for Windows Insider Users If you're running Windows 11 Beta build 26220.8474 or Experimental build 26300.8493, updating ExplorerPatcher is highly recommended. Microsoft has removed parts of the old Windows 10 Start menu from these builds, which caused ExplorerPatcher's Windows 10-style taskbar and Start menu to crash. This update fixes those issues and ensures Explorer starts correctly after future Windows updates. Because the required components are no longer included in Windows, the Windows 10 Start menu option has been disabled on these builds and future builds that lack the necessary files. A temporary workaround is to replace StartTileData.dll with a version from build 26xxx.8457, but this solution may stop working in future releases. The good news: development on the Windows 10 Start menu isn't over yet. More updates are planned. Highlights Fixed crashes affecting the Windows 10 battery flyout on Windows builds 25951 and newer. As part of that fix, network flyout buttons now behave like they did before Windows 11 version 24H2. Changes to the Primary taskbar location on screen setting now apply instantly without requiring a restart. ExplorerPatcher no longer modifies Windows 11 taskbar auto-hide settings when Explorer starts. The Open Start in All apps by default option is now hidden when the new Windows 11 Start menu is enabled. Fixed Windows 10 Start menu crashes on very early Windows 11 builds (21996–22000.51). Fixed a crash in Registry Editor when switching to thumbnail view during registry import/export operations. Improved compatibility with recent Windows builds, especially ARM64 and upcoming 26H1 releases. Improved overall ARM64 performance. Added Greek language translations. Thanks to @KonVetsos! ep_taskbar Improvements ep_taskbar now supports all 43 Windows 11 display languages. Fixed several issues in the system tray and other taskbar components. For mod developers: DLL naming has been simplified and made easier to understand. For mod developers: internal TrayUI changes provide better stability across Windows builds that use different taskbar implementations. Windows 10 Start Menu Improvements To help preserve compatibility, ExplorerPatcher now includes a newly recreated version of the tile layout engine that Microsoft removed in build 26xxx.8474. Current limitations: Tiles may occasionally overlap when pinned in certain ways. Restarting StartMenuExperienceHost.exe or Explorer usually corrects the layout. Further improvements are planned. Additional Fixes Added a blacklist that prevents ExplorerPatcher's shell extension from loading inside specific applications where it may cause problems. Updated Windows 10 Start menu animation support for newer ARM64 Insider builds. Fixed a rare taskbar initialization deadlock that could occur during startup. Start10 Updates Addressed a new compatibility issue caused by Microsoft's ongoing removal of tablet mode code in Windows 11 25H2 Experimental builds. Pinned tiles are no longer reset after repeated crashes. Various wording and interface text improvements throughout the application. Translation and UI Several interface strings have been cleaned up and clarified. Thanks to @sefinek for wording improvements. Please consult the README for more details. Download: ExplorerPatcher 26100.8457.70.3 | ARM64 | ~11.0 MB (Open Source) View: ExplorerPatcher Home Page | Features | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • AI is indeed eliminating jobs, and Oracle just proved it

      By Zeromus2003 · Posted

      This author may be AI..... we just...... don't know.... lol AI is taking over.....run for the hills!
    • Here's how to grab your share of Apple's $4 billion lawsuit payout (if you qualify)

      By David Uzondu · Posted

      Here's how to grab your share of Apple's $4 billion lawsuit payout (if you qualify) by David Uzondu Image via DepositPhotos.com A UK tribunal has approved a collective legal action letting a $4 billion (£3 billion) claim against Apple proceed to trial after consumer rights group Which? formally accused the company of violating competition laws. The tribunal recently set a full trial date for October 2028. Which? filed the lawsuit way back in November 2024, accusing Apple of trapping users in iCloud by restricting rivals from fully accessing iOS. Apple gives users only 5GB of free space, and once that limit vanishes, the system drives upgrades by repeatedly nudging users through notifications. The group claims Apple overcharged millions who bought plans ranging from 99p a month for 50GB to £54.99 a month for 12TB. If Which? wins the now-greenlit lawsuit, the court will force Apple to pay out damages to roughly 40 million UK consumers, with each person receiving around £77 for the pricing abuse. Apple has already put out a statement telling Reuters that the allegations are completely false and that consumers do have choices. "We work hard to make iCloud a great experience, but no customer is required to use it, and customers in the UK have plenty of alternatives to choose from," it told the outlet. The good thing is that if Which? wins, claiming your share requires almost no effort due to the automatic structure of the litigation. You are eligible if you used Apple's iCloud services between November 8, 2018, and June 8, 2026, and paid for upgraded storage during that time. The tribunal automatically enrolls everyone living in the UK on June 8, 2026. The system operates on an "opt-out" basis, meaning you do not have to register right now, and you will just verify your details to collect your cash. However, if you want to leave the claim, you must notify Which? by October 8, 2026. But if you lived outside the UK on June 8, 2026, you must manually register on the official Which? website before October 8, 2026, to opt into the action. If you ignore this deadline, you will lose your chance to grab a share of the settlement. On a related note, Google recently had to resolve a massive data privacy fight by agreeing to a payout of over $170 million to Android users. In that lawsuit, plaintiffs argued that Google programmed the Android system to transmit user data without permission, wasting cellular data. To settle, Google agreed to pay a $135 million nationwide settlement alongside an extra $35 million in California. Eligible Android users must submit online claims to secure their cash, with the final approval hearing literally taking place today (June 23, 2026).
    • Microsoft outs Windows 11 KB5095093 with long list of new features

      By hellowalkman · Posted

      Microsoft outs Windows 11 KB5095093 with long list of new features by Sayan Sen Microsoft today has released its newest preview update (C-release) for the month of June 2026 under KB5095093, builds 26200.8737 (for Windows 11 25H2) and 26100.8737 (on Windows 11 24H2). The update brings new features across various elements of the OS including the Windows update, the Recovery, Widgets, File Explorer, and more. The full changelog is given below: First up we have the features rolling out gradually: [Point-in-time restore for Windows] New! This flexible recovery feature helps you quickly roll back your PC, including apps, settings, and personal files, to a recent automatic restore point. It helps reduce downtime and simplifies troubleshooting when issues occur. To learn more, see Point-in-time restore for Windows. [Windows Update] New! A calendar experience in Windows Update Settings (Settings > Windows Update) lets you pause updates by choosing an end date, for up to 35 days. You can extend the pause by selecting a different end date and re‑pause updates as needed. For more information, see Pause updates in Windows. [Widgets] New! A quieter, more focused Widgets experience helps reduce interruptions and improves default settings and notification controls: Reduce distractions: Widgets no longer open on hover. Notifications and taskbar badges are minimized by default. Simpler: Open to the Widgets dashboard by default on first use. Customize: Configure Widgets how you want by selecting Settings in the navigation bar, then changing any of the default settings. Stay informed: Dashboard icons show the number of alerts, and badges clear automatically when you leave a dashboard. Adjusted defaults: Some default settings are preserved based on usage, while others adjust to reduce interruptions. Performance improvements: This update provides improved reliability, responsiveness, and visual quality across the Widget experience. [Accessibility] New! This update makes your screen easier to see and customizes your zoom experience: Screen tint: Apply a full-screen color overlay to help reduce eye strain and improve readability. Choose from preset tint options, adjust the intensity, or turn it on automatically. Find this feature in Settings > Accessibility. Magnifier: Enter a zoom percentage directly and change it in increments in the Magnifier window for more precise, flexible control. Magnifier settings menu: You can now also modify zoom increments directly from the magnifier bar instead of navigating to Windows Settings each time. [File Explorer] New! When you hover over a file in File Explorer Home, commands such as Open file location and Ask Copilot appear as quick actions. This experience is now supported for work and school accounts (Entra ID).1 Improves the speed and performance of File Explorer launch.2 Fixes an issue where the OneDrive shortcut in File Explorer stops working when File Explorer is run with administrative mode. The address bar now supports paths containing double backslashes and quotation marks (for example, C:\\Users\\user or "C:\Users\user"), improving compatibility with a wider range of inputs. The address bar suggestion dropdown is more reliable and now consistently closes after an item is selected. This update addresses an issue on File Explorer Home where OneDrive files could appear duplicated in the Favorites section. This update includes several refinements to the Rename experience: Addresses an issue where text was repeatedly selected when renaming items in folder views. Addresses an issue where case-only name changes were not immediately reflected in folder views for items stored locally or in the cloud. [Bluetooth] This update improves reliability and performance when connecting to and using Bluetooth devices: New! Windows now keeps the microphone mute state in sync between the audio mixer and the Hands-Free Profile (HFP) for a more consistent experience with Bluetooth headphones with mute buttons or indicators. Accessory compatibility workarounds: Improves compatibility with specific Bluetooth audio devices, helping AirPods appear faster in pairing mode and improving microphone reliability on Beats Studio Pro headphones. Bluetooth audio stability: Improves overall Windows stability with certain PC manufacturer drivers (error code 0x9F). Improves Bluetooth reliability for voice calls when using Classic Audio devices with the Hands-Free Profile (HFP). Reduces time for LE Audio accessories to start playing audio while using the microphone. Device management: Windows will no longer show a “Remove failed” message when attempting to remove Bluetooth devices if the Bluetooth radio is unavailable or has changed since pairing. Settings experience: Improves stability when using the Bluetooth & devices settings page for a smoother, more consistent experience. Connection reliability and responsiveness: Reduces the time it takes for classic Bluetooth audio devices to reconnect after Windows resumes from hibernation. Improves reliability when LE Audio accessories disconnect, such as when another device (for example, a phone) connects. Improves reliability of LE Audio streaming after a connection is lost and restored. [Bluetooth and Phone Link] This update improves audio routing for calls made through a connected phone: When an outgoing call is dialed from a paired phone, audio remains on the phone while ringing and transfers to the PC only when the call is answered from the PC. When Do Not Disturb is enabled on Windows, incoming call audio from a paired phone no longer rings on the PC. [Voice access and voice typing] New! You can now use voice access and voice typing in French, German, and Spanish. As you speak, your PC improves your text in real time. It corrects grammar, punctuation, and recognition errors, and helps improve clarity—even in the presence of background noise. This makes dictation smoother and reduces the need for manual edits.3 [Audio] This update improves the reliability of the inbox HD Audio driver. [Taskbar] This update improves the reliability of opening the Start menu when selecting the left edge of the taskbar when the icons in the taskbar are left-aligned. [Networking] This update includes networking improvements for virtualized environments. Confidential Virtual Machines (CVMs) now use SR-IOV hardware acceleration by default for improved network throughput, and a configuration issue in nested Hyper-V virtualization network setup has been corrected to ensure reliable VM network provisioning. This update improves the reliability of the Windows networking stack. It reduces bug checks (blue screen errors) related to Wi-Fi power and improves cellular (WWAN) connectivity, including support for IPv6 VPNs. Compatibility with third-party VPN software and SR-IOV configurations on server hardware is also improved. Network adapter settings and bindings are now preserved across OS upgrades. [Printing] New! New printer installations use Internet Printing Protocol (IPP) by default when supported, simplifying setup and improving reliability. For details about third-party driver deprecation, see End of Servicing Plan for Third-Party Printer Drivers on Windows. To control this behavior, use the toggle in Settings > Bluetooth & devices > Printers & scanners > Default install printers using Windows Ready Print. For more information, see Introducing Windows Ready Print and modernized driver selection. For more information, see Introducing Windows Ready Print and Modernized Driver Selection. [Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL)] The update improves usage of WSL in mirrored networking mode with VPNs. [Display and graphics] Improves the reliability of rendering content while scrolling for certain apps spanning across multiple monitors. Improves the reliability and persistence of applying color profiles. [Location services] This update changes how some location settings are displayed in Settings > Privacy & Security > Location to help with clarity. When location services are turned off, settings like Default location and Allow location override don't immediately apply, since location information is not given to apps or services. These settings will now be greyed out when location services are off to reduce confusion over when they take effect. [Search] This update improves the reliability of setting Search related group policies. [Input] New! You can now customize the size of the right-click zone in Settings > Bluetooth & devices > Touchpad. Choose from default, small, medium, or large to control how much of the bottom-right corner responds to a single-finger right-click. This setting is only available on touchpads with a pressable surface. If your device manufacturer provides customization through their own app, a Custom option will appear to reflect those settings. This update improves recognition of English characters when using Japanese handwriting. [General performance] Improves the time to shut down Background Intelligent Transfer Service (BITS) when you turn off your PC. [General Reliability] ​​​​This update improves the reliability of explorer.exe. It addresses issues on the login and lock screens related to third-party credential providers, reduces the probability of taskbar icons appearing as blank gray placeholders, and improves navigation to Home in File Explorer during OneDrive sync. It also improves explorer.exe reliability when switching between desktops, enhances app launch with shell extensions, and using acrylic blur effects in the Start menu, Settings, and the lock screen. [Apps] Resolves an issue where some installers and applications could show unexpected elevation (UAC) prompts after installing KB5089549. [Remote Desktop] This update refreshes the dialog design when you enable Remote Desktop in Settings > System > Remote Desktop. [Graphics Kernel] Improves memory-management policy that allows PCs with more than 32GB of installed memory to run larger local AI models. Up next we have the features under normal rollout: [Secure Boot] With this update, Windows quality updates include additional high confidence device targeting data, increasing coverage of devices eligible to automatically receive new Secure Boot certificates. Devices receive the new certificates only after demonstrating sufficient successful update signals, maintaining a controlled and phased rollout. [Authentication] This update improves Netlogon secure channel connections between domain controllers, enabling successful connections from member servers to domain controllers set up before 2025. [Emoji Panel Update] The emoji panel (Windows key + period (.)) now uses GIPHY for GIF content following the deprecation of Google’s Tenor API. Starting June 30, 2026, install the latest Windows update to continue using GIFs in the Emoji panel. If you don’t update, you will see a "GIF service is not available" error in the panel. Installing the latest Windows update will restore access to GIFs. [Networking] This update improves how your device connects to shared network resources. Connections used by apps and system features, such as the NetUseAdd function, now work more reliably, including unauthenticated (null session) connections. [Recycle Bin (known issue)] Fixed: This update addresses an issue where the confirmation dialog might display an internal Recycle Bin file name instead of the original file name when permanently deleting a file. This issue might occur after installing the June 2026 security update (KB5094126). [Taskbar] This update improves notification badge display across your apps. Notification counts and badge visuals now update correctly, helping you stay up to date with new activity. You can choose to manually download the update from Microsoft's update catalog website at this link.

  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      468
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      165
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      106
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      87
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      69
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!