PlayStation Now debuts subscription pricing


Recommended Posts

I'm not understanding the game selection point, it has over 100 games on PS Now how is that selection weak?

 

I know all these games are old PS games, but that's the whole purpose of PS Now isn't it? (Maybe you guys are expecting new PS4 games to come to PS Now?)

I'm not understanding the game selection point, it has over 100 games on PS Now how is that selection weak?

 

I know all these games are old PS games, but that's the whole purpose of PS Now isn't it? (Maybe you guys are expecting new PS4 games to come to PS Now?)

Maybe you feel the games currently on the service are enough to warrant the price, others like myself do not. A stronger ps3 selection would be a good start for me personally. Heck, I like the idea of getting access to a strong library of ps2 games as well.

Getting ps4 games would be nice and certainly would add value, but I own a ps4, why would I want to use PS Now for ps4 games at reduced quality based on my internet connection? Maybe as a way to demo games, but overall, getting ps4 games is not a big deal for me.

This is a huge fail. Not only in price....but no way in hell are we going to play games at their convenience. 

 

Its a subscription all-you-can-eat service, you can play the games whenever you want while you maintain a subscription so I don't understand what you mean by playing games at their convenience, mind explaining? 

 

Maybe you feel the games currently on the service are enough to warrant the price, others like myself do not. A stronger ps3 selection would be a good start for me personally. Heck, I like the idea of getting access to a strong library of ps2 games as well.

Getting ps4 games would be nice and certainly would add value, but I own a ps4, why would I want to use PS Now for ps4 games at reduced quality based on my internet connection? Maybe as a way to demo games, but overall, getting ps4 games is not a big deal for me.

 

I don't think the games warrant the price for me personally because I have no interest in playing older PS games but this service is specifically tailored to those that do.

 

Here is a list of some of the games available on PS Now which you consider a weak selection; it has 100+ games and many first party and AAA titles.

 

  • Alpha Protocol
  • Anomaly Warzone Earth
  • Batman Arkham City
  • Ben 10 Omniverse
  • Ben 10 Omniverse 2
  • BioShock Infinite
  • BIT.TRIP Presents

This is debate around whether the price is fair is going down the same route as EA Access. 

 

It'll come down to each individual. For me, I don't think that it's a bad price to pay, but I'd probably pay for 3 months at a time and never more than once a year. There's always a time when less games are released and paying $45 to play all those games  (albeit you're renting) is not bad at all. 

 

Its a subscription all-you-can-eat service, you can play the games whenever you want while you maintain a subscription so I don't understand what you mean by playing games at their convenience, mind explaining? 

 

 

 

Yup, while you maintain. That means we need to finish a game before the sub lapses. That is forcing us to play within a time constraint instead of at our leisure. We are also at the mercy of the frequency as to which PSN goes down, requiring us to play when it's back up and running.

 

You may not understand, but others feel differently than you do. Not to mention, it is grossly over priced in our opinion.

Which would include:

 

PS+

PSNow

PS Vue

Music unlimited 

Movie Unlimited

 

$65-$75 a yr....

 

That's nuts.  $65-$75 year wouldn't even begin to cover that.

Ferrari should offer a supercar for $30k too then. Feel entitled much?

 

These streaming services have huge bandwidth and server requirements on Sony's part.  They aren't pay once and be done with it.  $15-$20 on top of the $50/year PS+ charge would not begin to cover the resources they'd need to stream games (PSNow), TV (PS Vue), Music (Music Unlimited), and Movies (Movie Unlimited).  Every time you watch or play something you are using bandwidth and server resources.  Unlike PS+ where you consume Sony resources to download the free games initially but then you can play them as much as you like after that with minimal ongoing resources required by Sony.

  • Like 1

That's nuts.  $65-$75 year wouldn't even begin to cover that.

Ferrari should offer a supercar for $30k too then. Feel entitled much?

 

These streaming services have huge bandwidth and server requirements on Sony's part.  They aren't pay once and be done with it.  $15-$20 on top of the $50/year PS+ charge would not begin to cover the resources they'd need to stream games (PSNow), TV (PS Vue), Music (Music Unlimited), and Movies (Movie Unlimited).  Every time you watch or play something you are using bandwidth and server resources.  Unlike PS+ where you consume Sony resources to download the free games initially but then you can play them as much as you like after that with minimal ongoing resources required by Sony.

 

 

It could very well retail for $75 - $100... Which would still be reasonable

If a consumer even remotely feels like they are being ripped off from the jump, it's a no go...

 

Ok... here is my personal opinion

 

PS+ = $50

PS Now = $10 (my price not Sony)

PS-Vue = $12 (my price not Sony) and don't know what content is provided

Movie Unlimited/Music Unlimited= $20 (my price not Sony)

 

That's $92 in USD. Sony can mark this up to $100...I wouldn't think people would be offended by this price point (but I've been wrong a billion times before)...

 

And name the service "Playstation World" or whatever...

It could very well retail for $75 - $100... Which would still be reasonable

If a consumer even remotely feels like they are being ripped off from the jump, it's a no go...

 

Ok... here is my personal opinion

 

PS+ = $50

PS Now = $10 (my price not Sony)

PS-Vue = $12 (my price not Sony) and don't know what content is provided

Movie Unlimited/Music Unlimited= $20 (my price not Sony)

 

That's $92 in USD. Sony can mark this up to $100...I wouldn't think people would be offended by this price point (but I've been wrong a billion times before)...

 

And name the service "Playstation World" or whatever...

 

What are these opinions based off? You just pull some numbers out of a hat?  I assume those are your theory for YEARLY prices.

 

PS+ = $50 (this is true and generally considered a good value by the gaming community)

 

PS Now is NOT going to cost less than PS+.  Streaming PS3 games requires dedicated PS3 hardware based server farms by Sony and TONS more bandwidth and PS+ does.

Right now Sony is offering it for $20/month or $45 for three months.  This is competitive with services like Gamefly but sure it's open for debate that it's a little high. I personally think it's about right but even if it is high it's not ridiculously high.  $10/year for this service is insane.  Extend the current pricing out to a year and it's $180/year.  There is no way Sony can cut the price to below $100/year and make a profit on it due to the resources required, let alone $10.

 

PS Vue and Movie Unlimited are roughly equal to Hulu Plus and Netflix.  Both of those cost $8 a month I believe so even giving a discount due to bundling with everything else and/or a more limited selection we'll say each is worth roughly $5/month.  So that's $10/month together or $120/year for both.  These also require more server bandwidth and resources than PS+ on the part of Sony.

 

Music Unlimited is roughly equal to Pandora which costs $5/month I believe.  Again dropping the price for Music unlimited due to the bundle and/or because of a smaller selection and I could see it going for $50 or so just like PS+.  This still requires a fair amount of constant bandwidth to stream music but nowhere near as much as movies and games.  If you have tons of users though it adds up fine.

 

So a yearly bundle with everything might be like:

 

$50 for PS+

$120 for PS Now

$60 for PS Vue

$60 for Movies Unlimited

$50 for Music Unlimited

 

There is no way they could offer a bundle of all that for under $300/year and make a profit and yet you think you should get it all for $75-$100!?!

Again, I'd like a $30k Ferrari super car then as well.  Both are equally ridiculous expectations.

  • Like 1

I'm surprised by the reaction by most people, I didn't see many games I would play myself but I didn't think it was too bad. Especially when EA is charging $5 per month or whatever it is for the small list of games they have.

 

I don't think I'd subscribe if I had a PS4 as its a little pricey for me for the choice of games but I'm very picky with my games.

For me the biggest difference here is ea is charging 5 for games you actually download on your xbox and play and sure im sure it has to "check in" at some point  but they play just like disc games where as sony is offering 19.99 for a STREAMING service with not that many of the good ps3 games available on it and you have to have really good internet and or be close to them to be able to play with out to much latency.  I tried renting a game on there in december and my 50mb down and 5mb up  was i gues playable but i was feeling a little annoyed the whole time cause i could tell there was almost a second delay of things happening when i hit buttons.

For me the biggest difference here is ea is charging 5 for games you actually download on your xbox and play and sure im sure it has to "check in" at some point but they play just like disc games where as sony is offering 19.99 for a STREAMING service with not that many of the good ps3 games available on it and you have to have really good internet and or be close to them to be able to play with out to much latency. I tried renting a game on there in december and my 50mb down and 5mb up was i gues playable but i was feeling a little annoyed the whole time cause i could tell there was almost a second delay of things happening when i hit buttons.

It's made for people / locations with fast Internet.

Those with slow Internet like me are not the target audience for such a service. Hence why as the poster above you lays out to make a profit on this service from a smaller minority (broadband speeds are poor for many PS owners) realistic pricing has to be put in place. Video and music services can stream okay on poorer connections, games can't.

PS Now is not meant to replace PS+ or EA access or anything else of that nature, so the people it's not aimed at have to stop wanting it to be for them when it's not. Not currently anyway till global Internet connections improve, and then pricing may change.

  • Like 1

What are these opinions based off? You just pull some numbers out of a hat?  I assume those are your theory for YEARLY prices.

 

PS+ = $50 (this is true and generally considered a good value by the gaming community)

 

PS Now is NOT going to cost less than PS+.  Streaming PS3 games requires dedicated PS3 hardware based server farms by Sony and TONS more bandwidth and PS+ does.

Right now Sony is offering it for $20/month or $45 for three months.  This is competitive with services like Gamefly but sure it's open for debate that it's a little high. I personally think it's about right but even if it is high it's not ridiculously high.  $10/year for this service is insane.  Extend the current pricing out to a year and it's $180/year.  There is no way Sony can cut the price to below $100/year and make a profit on it due to the resources required, let alone $10.

 

PS Vue and Movie Unlimited are roughly equal to Hulu Plus and Netflix.  Both of those cost $8 a month I believe so even giving a discount due to bundling with everything else and/or a more limited selection we'll say each is worth roughly $5/month.  So that's $10/month together or $120/year for both.  These also require more server bandwidth and resources than PS+ on the part of Sony.

 

Music Unlimited is roughly equal to Pandora which costs $5/month I believe.  Again dropping the price for Music unlimited due to the bundle and/or because of a smaller selection and I could see it going for $50 or so just like PS+.  This still requires a fair amount of constant bandwidth to stream music but nowhere near as much as movies and games.  If you have tons of users though it adds up fine.

 

So a yearly bundle with everything might be like:

 

$50 for PS+

$120 for PS Now

$60 for PS Vue

$60 for Movies Unlimited

$50 for Music Unlimited

 

There is no way they could offer a bundle of all that for under $300/year and make a profit and yet you think you should get it all for $75-$100!?!

Again, I'd like a $30k Ferrari super car then as well.  Both are equally ridiculous expectations.

 

 

I based it off of this...

 

PS+ we all see the value there...

 

PS-Now = as of now selection vs price... Not good

 

PS-Vue = It's new... I don't know if content is worth price point.

 

Movies= Netflix $96 a year I give you that...

 

Music = Pandora is free...

 

And here is the other thing... Most will look at $300 and not bother... They would buy a secondary console instead of buy a $300 service that only last 12months...

 

$300 is a Will U purchase that comes with a game,and $$$ left over...

I based it off of this...

 

PS+ we all see the value there...

So we agree there and can just set that aside. It serves as a good baseline though in that you agree that this is worth over $4/month and has very small resource requirements for Sony when compared to streaming services. Expecting a streaming service to cost less then this is already unreasonable.

PS-Now = as of now selection vs price... Not good

Compared to what? You're saying something Sony is charging $20/month or $45 for three months (which works out to $180/year) should be $10/year. How do you even begin to get there? Now maybe you could argue it should be $10/month like I believe OnLive is but that's still $120/year (as I listed) not $10. There is NO WAY Sony could maintain there required server farm and bandwidth to operate streaming games on $10/year all you can eat subscriptions.

PS-Vue = It's new... I don't know if content is worth price point.

I don't know if it's content is worth the price to me either but things can be reasonbly priced and I may still not be interested in them. So I'm not saying people should get PS Vue I'm just saying that it's unreasonable to expect this to be priced below $5/month or so.

Movies= Netflix $96 a year I give you that...

Yet you think Sony should offer both it and Music for $20? As it turns out Movies Unlimited isn't a subscription service anyway so you CAN drop it from the list. There is NO all you can eat version of it, it's just what Sony calls where you go to buy/rent movies from them.

Music = Pandora is free...

With ads it is and limits that I don't believe Music Unlimited has. So the equivalent to Music Unlimited is Pandora One which I believe costs $5/month. I believe Sony's cheapest tier is also $5/month so $60/year but if they gave a discount for bundling it then $50/year would seem like a reasonable price... as I stated.

And here is the other thing... Most will look at $300 and not bother... They would buy a secondary console instead of buy a $300 service that only last 12months...

 

$300 is a Will U purchase that comes with a game,and $$$ left over...

Of course most people would look at $300 and not bother. Bundling them all together like that would be a really bad idea and that's exactly why Sony didn't do it. You're the one who suggested they bundle them all together and then sell them for some ridiculously low price that would likely bankrupt Sony. Heck Sony knows $90 for 6 months or $180/year is more than people would be willing to part with no matter how good of a deal it may be and that's why they only offer 1 and 3 month subscriptions to PlayStation Now.

Yeah  thats what i was saying. This service is seems pointless because the only people that benefit are the people next door to the datacenter hosting these games and the game selection for alot of people sucks anyways. I have reasonably fast internet to most standards a specially here in the US and i cant play comfortably. Yet services like Grid I can play without any noticeable lag at all.  Was playing batman arkam asylum last night on grid and ran flawlessly.  

 

I just wish someone would come out with a way to digitally rent games for 2-3$ a night or something that starts on first launch or something instead of this streaming stuff. I mean clearly they can make a game not run without internet connections to see if you are allowed to be playing.

Yeah  thats what i was saying. This service is seems pointless because the only people that benefit are the people next door to the datacenter hosting these games and the game selection for alot of people sucks anyways. I have reasonably fast internet to most standards a specially here in the US and i cant play comfortably. Yet services like Grid I can play without any noticeable lag at all.  Was playing batman arkam asylum last night on grid and ran flawlessly.

It's not pointless just because you're not the target market. As a PS3 owner I'm not the target market either but there are many people who are and I do see value in the service even if it isn't for me personally. The service is designed to allow its users to play games they don't otherwise own a system capable of playing. If you DO have a system capable of playing the game then you should look elsewhere to buy or rent the game, you are NOT the intended market. If you have a < 5 Mbps or high latency connection then this service is not intended for you.

As for the game selection it's not that bad for a service that's just starting up. It's going to continue to grow we're at the very beginnings of this thing. I have no idea how it compares to Grid but nVidia is giving away Grid temporarily as a trial balloon and so we don't know what they plan on charging once that trial expires (June 30 2015). Sony has been having a bunch of network issues lately though so I'm not surprised Grid runs better for you. Sony is absolutely going to need to shore up their networking for their streaming services to have a chance.

I just wish someone would come out with a way to digitally rent games for 2-3$ a night or something that starts on first launch or something instead of this streaming stuff. I mean clearly they can make a game not run without internet connections to see if you are allowed to be playing.

This is TOTALLY different from PS Now. PS Now is for games that even if you rented them and downloaded them they wouldn't run because your system isn't compatible with them. As for renting games though I don't think that's going to happen because while it might seem like a good idea to you I seriously doubt a ton of people are going to want to pay $2-$3 to download a 30+GB game only to have it stop working the next day unless they pay again. If the games were left on the drive so you didn't have to keep paying for them then renting games would very quickly fill up your drive with as big as games are today. Plus it would take forever to download them on slow connections and in theory if you have a fast connection (assuming Sony eventually works out the kinks in their network) you're probably still better off streaming them.

Yup, while you maintain. That means we need to finish a game before the sub lapses. That is forcing us to play within a time constraint instead of at our leisure. We are also at the mercy of the frequency as to which PSN goes down, requiring us to play when it's back up and running.

 

You may not understand, but others feel differently than you do. Not to mention, it is grossly over priced in our opinion.

 

 

I don't really know of any subscription that allows you to keep using something after the sub ends, so that doesn't seem like a fair criticism. I'd be inclined to think Sony would extend subscriptions to compensate for any extended downtime.

  • Like 1

I don't really know of any subscription that allows you to keep using something after the sub ends, so that doesn't seem like a fair criticism. I'd be inclined to think Sony would extend subscriptions to compensate for any extended downtime.

It's just an opinion. Take it or leave it.

I didn't take issue with whether or not it is an opinion, I was simply pointing out that no subscription system I know of allows people to continue using a service after the sub ends. Criticising Sony's planned system because they use the same sub model everyone else doesn isn't a reasonable criticism.

 

Do you know of any subscriptions that allow you to keep using a service after the sub ends?

  • Like 2

I didn't take issue with whether or not it is an opinion, I was simply pointing out that no subscription system I know of allows people to continue using a service after the sub ends. Criticising Sony's planned system because they use the same sub model everyone else doesn isn't a reasonable criticism.

 

Do you know of any subscriptions that allow you to keep using a service after the sub ends?

I will say it again....it forces us to finish games at their time frame. I will criticize (well WE) that system, especially at that horrid price model. It's not only reasonable to criticize that, but its worthy of mentioning.

What other system do you propose then? A one off fee of 5.99 to play all the games forever? -_- No subscription based service exists that carries on serving you after you unsubscribe.

And why do you keep saying we in your posts. Your opinion is your own, unless there's a small collection of minions following you that just reiterate your opinion. I don't even see one single person criticizing the subscription model on Neowin, just the price. So unless you have minions or an imaginary friend, or those "official PS forums" are full of complaints who is we?

I will say it again....it forces us to finish games at their time frame. I will criticize (well WE) that system, especially at that horrid price model. It's not only reasonable to criticize that, but its worthy of mentioning.

 

 

That's what a subscription is: you pay a price to use a service for a specific amount of time. If you don't like the pricing that is a reasonable criticism, but arguing you don't like subscriptions because they impose a time limit is... odd?

That's what a subscription is: you pay a price to use a service for a specific amount of time. If you don't like the pricing that is a reasonable criticism, but arguing you don't like subscriptions because they impose a time limit is... odd?

Odd to you, yes. All good. We are not getting anywhere with this, so it is just time to move forward.

It's just an opinion. Take it or leave it.

Definitely leave it. I don't ask someone who hates metal what they think of Shadows Fall or Machine Head...

 

That would just be silly. It should just be noted that your post definitely has less weight than others so we shouldn't read much into it, instead of trying to change the way you feel about it.

 

Anyway! I personally think the idea has good foundation, but nothing just magically works unless you plant the seed and start to grow it. PS Now has to start somewhere. While many of us might be jaded by the fact that we may have played a lot of this content already, there are still plenty of people getting into the scene and it would be a great answer for someone who really wants to jump in and play.  Remember that the gaming industry is growing, and imagining more people being able to enjoy what we do already only opens up more conversations. :)

  • Like 2

Definitely leave it. I don't ask someone who hates metal what they think of Shadows Fall or Machine Head...

That would just be silly. It should just be noted that your post definitely has less weight than others so we shouldn't read much into it, instead of trying to change the way you feel about it.

Anyway! I personally think the idea has good foundation, but nothing just magically works unless you plant the seed and start to grow it. PS Now has to start somewhere. While many of us might be jaded by the fact that we may have played a lot of this content already, there are still plenty of people getting into the scene and it would be a great answer for someone who really wants to jump in and play. Remember that the gaming industry is growing, and imagining more people being able to enjoy what we do already only opens up more conversations. :)

For someone who buys a PSNow able TV entry point could be picking up or borrowing a Dualshock controller. Travelling a distance to your family/friends who only own a smart TV with PS Now support? Take an easy to carry controller and rent a game one off for the night. That kind of impulse in the future. Especially if a lot TVs get future support.

It's why I currently see a possibility a service like this could do well in hotels, airports or places like that. If you can rent a game one off, which you can, people will be okay doing that. Just like they are renting a movies for

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Passkeys: Think of them like a broken heart necklace. Imagine one of those heart necklaces that breaks into two matching pieces. One person keeps one half, and the other person keeps the other half. With passkeys, the website has one half, and you have the other half. If the website gets hacked and someone steals its half, that stolen piece is useless by itself. It cannot unlock your account without your matching half. This particular heart necklace is one of a kind, there is only one in existence. Your half of the necklace has to be stored somewhere. It might be stored on your phone, tablet, computer, security key, or a password manager that can sync it between all your devices. A security key is a small physical device that you keep with you, kind of like a house key, car key, or flash drive. I would not usually recommend a security key as the first option for the average person. For most people, it is easier to use their phone, computer, or a password manager that can sync passkeys between their devices. A security key is more like a spare key you keep in a safe place, just in case you lose access to your other devices or your password manager. Some security keys plug into your computer. Some plug into your phone or tablet. Some get tapped against your device. The idea is simple: a security key can hold another passkey for the same website. Think of it like creating a second one-of-a-kind heart necklace for the same account. One necklace could be paired with your password manager, while another necklace could be paired with your security key. That means the website has more than one matching half on file. One half matches the passkey in your password manager. Another half matches the passkey stored on your security key. So, if you lose access to your phone, computer, or password manager, you would still be able to log in using the passkey stored on your security key. Think of it like keeping an extra special necklace piece on a tiny keychain, stored somewhere safe. The website still has the matching half for that security key, but your half is safely stored inside the little key. A passkey does not automatically exist on every device you own. It lives wherever you save it. If your half is stored on one device, then that device is the one that has the matching piece. For example, if you create the passkey on your Windows computer and it is only saved to that computer, your iPhone does not automatically have that same half. If you create it on your iPhone and it only stays on that iPhone, your Android phone does not automatically have it either. That is where password managers come in. A password manager can act like a protected jewelry box for your passkeys. Instead of your half of the necklace being locked to only one device, the password manager can securely sync that half to your other approved devices. For example, Apple Passwords and iCloud Keychain can sync passkeys between your Apple devices. Google Password Manager can sync passkeys with your Google account. But password managers such as 1Password and Bitwarden can sync passkeys between everything, your phones, tablets and computers. Now, you might ask: “What happens if I lose access to the device that has my passkey?” That depends on where your passkey was saved and what recovery options the website gives you. If your passkey was synced through a password manager, you may be able to sign in from another device that has access to that same password manager. For example, if your passkey is saved in iCloud Keychain, Google Password Manager, 1Password, or Bitwarden, another approved device may still have access to it. If your passkey was saved only on one phone, computer, or security key, and you lose that device, then you may not have your half of the necklace anymore. In that case, you would usually need to use the website’s backup login or account recovery options. A lot of websites that support passkeys still let you fall back to your regular password. So if you lose access to your passkey, the site may still let you log in with your password, a code sent to your email, a text message, a recovery code, or some other account recovery process. That is convenient, but it is also important to understand: if the website still allows password login, then your password still matters. Passkeys are safer than passwords, but if your account still has a password as a backup, you should still use a strong, unique password and turn on two-factor authentication if the website offers it. This is why it is a good idea to have more than one safe way back into important accounts. For example, you might keep your passkey in a syncing password manager, add a second trusted device, save recovery codes somewhere safe, or set up a backup security key. A passkey is very secure, but just like a real key, you need a backup plan in case you lose access to it. Now, you might ask: “What stops a hacker from copying my half of the necklace?” That’s the important part: your half is protected. It is not something you type in, and it is not something the website gets to keep. Think of your half as being locked inside a tiny safe on your phone, computer, security key, or password manager. That safe only opens when you approve it with your fingerprint, face, PIN, or device password. When you log in, the website does not need to see your half. It only needs proof that your half matches its half. Your actual half is not handed over to the website. This is different from a password. With a password, you type the secret into the website. If you type it into a fake website, the hacker now has it. With a passkey, you are not typing your secret into the website. Your device is proving you have the matching half without giving the half away. That also helps protect you from fake websites. If someone makes a fake login page that looks like the real site, your device can tell it is not the real match. It will not use your passkey there. Now, could someone use your passkey if they stole your device, got into your password manager, or somehow unlocked the safe that holds your half? Yes, that is why your device password, PIN, fingerprint, face unlock, and password manager security still matter. But a hacker cannot just steal your passkey from the website or trick you into typing it into a fake page like they can with a password. That is why passkeys are safer than passwords. The two matching pieces have to come together, like two lovebirds who were once separated and are finally reunited.
    • Newegg offers insane combo deal on Amazon Prime Day 2026 that beats Steam Machine by Sayan Sen Building a PC is undoubtedly difficult nowadays but with this epic combo deal, Newegg is trying to make it as easy for you as it is possible. If you are making a new one or even upgrading an old system to a new Windows 11 device, this combo bundle is truly unmissable as you get AMD's Ryzen 9800X3D, a compatible X870 motherboard, a 240mm AIO liquid cooler and finally a Samsung 990 PRO SSD all for under $1000 (purchase link under the specs table down below). This should beat out the newly launched Steam Machine from Valve in terms of performance and performance per dollar especially if you are willing to set Linux up on it. Essentially with this combo you will get the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D 8-core 3D V cache CPU, Samsung's 990 PRO 2TB NVMe SSD, the MSI MAG X870 TOMAHAWK WIFI ATX Motherboard, and finally the Cooler Master Elite Liquid 240. Thanks to that massive vertically stacked L3 cache, the X3D desktop processors, including the 9800X3D, also come with the benefit of not needing fast memory. Even DDR5-5600 should be plenty for it. The technical specifications of the Ryzen 7 9800X3D are given in the table below: Specification Value Architecture Zen 5 Cores / Threads 8 / 16 Base Clock 4.7 GHz Max Boost Clock Up to 5.2 GHz L1 Cache 640 KB L2 Cache 8 MB L3 Cache 96 MB Total Cache 104 MB CPU Core Process TSMC 4nm FinFET I/O Die Process TSMC 6nm FinFET Socket AM5 Default TDP 120W Max Temperature (Tjmax) 95°C Thermal Solution Not included Memory Type DDR5 Max Capacity 256 GB Memory Speeds 2x1R: DDR5-5600 2x2R: DDR5-5600 4x1R: DDR5-3600 4x2R: DDR5-3600 PCIe Version PCIe 5.0 PCIe Lanes (Total/Usable) 28 / 24 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10Gbps) 4 USB 2.0 1 Graphics Cores 2 CU RDNA 2 Frequency 2200 MHz DisplayPort over USB-C Yes Overclocking Unlocked Up next we have the tech specs for the MSI MAG X870 TOMAHAWK WIFI Motherboard: Specification Value Chipset AMD X870 CPU Support AMD Ryzen 9000 / 8000 / 7000 Series Desktop Processors Socket AM5 Memory Slots 4 × DDR5 UDIMM Maximum Memory Capacity 256GB Memory Support DDR5 8400–5600 MT/s (OC), DDR5 5600–4800 MT/s (JEDEC) Integrated Graphics Outputs 1 × HDMI 2.1 FRL (up to 8K 60Hz) 2 × USB4 Type-C with DisplayPort 1.4 HBR3 (up to 4K 60Hz) Expansion Slots PCI_E1: PCIe 5.0 x16 (CPU) PCI_E2: PCIe 3.0 x1 (Chipset) PCI_E3: PCIe 4.0 x4 (Chipset) Audio Realtek ALC4080 Codec 7.1-Channel USB High Performance Audio Supports up to 32-bit/384kHz playback on front panel S/PDIF output M.2 Slots 4 × M.2 M2_1: PCIe 5.0 x4 (CPU, 22110/2280) M2_2: PCIe 5.0 x4 (CPU, 2280/2260) M2_3: PCIe 4.0 x2 (Chipset, 2280/2260) M2_4: PCIe 4.0 x4 (Chipset, 2280/2260) SATA Ports 4 × SATA 6Gb/s RAID Support RAID 0, 1, 5, 10 for M.2 NVMe storage devices Rear USB Ports 4 × USB 2.0 3 × USB 5Gbps Type-A 2 × USB 10Gbps Type-A 1 × USB 10Gbps Type-C 2 × USB4 40Gbps Type-C Front USB Headers 4 × USB 2.0 4 × USB 5Gbps Type-A 1 × USB 20Gbps Type-C LAN Realtek 8126-CG 5G LAN Wireless Wi-Fi 7 (M.2 Key-E module pre-installed) Supports 2.4GHz / 5GHz / 6GHz bands Up to 5.8Gbps Supports 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be Bluetooth Bluetooth 5.4, MLO, 4KQAM Internal Power Connectors 1 × 24-pin ATX Power 2 × CPU Power Connectors 1 × PCIe 8-pin Power Connector Fan Headers 1 × CPU Fan 1 × Combo Fan (Pump/System) 6 × System Fan RGB Headers 3 × Addressable V2 RGB (JARGB_V2) 1 × RGB LED (JRGB) Other Internal Headers 1 × EZ Conn-header 2 × Front Panel Headers 1 × Chassis Intrusion 1 × Front Audio 1 × TPM 2.0 Header Debug Features 4 × EZ Debug LEDs 1 × EZ Digit Debug LED Rear I/O Ports Clear CMOS Button Flash BIOS Button HDMI 2 × USB 40Gbps Type-C 1 × USB 10Gbps Type-C 4 × USB 10Gbps Type-A 3 × USB 5Gbps Type-A 4 × USB 2.0 5G LAN Port Wi-Fi/Bluetooth Antenna Connectors Audio Connectors Form Factor ATX The Samsung 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $500. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The tech specs are given below: Specification Value Interface PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 Form Factor M.2 2280 Controller Samsung In-house Controller NAND Flash 3D TLC DRAM Cache 2GB LPDDR4 Sequential Read (Max) 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write (Max) 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4K) Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4K) Up to 1,550,000 IOPS TBW (Endurance) 1,200 TBW MTBF 1,500,000 hours Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C to 85°C Shock Resistance 1,500G / 0.5ms Heatsink No Get the combo deal at this link: AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D, Samsung 990 PRO 2TB, MSI MAG X870 TOMAHAWK WIFI motherboard, Cooler Master Elite Liquid 240: $784.99 + $25 off with promo code FTTF77: $759.99 (Sold and Shipped by Newegg US) Good to know This Newegg deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I heard from a lot of people that driver support for the latest games when RDNA first came out (Radeon 5000 series) was pretty bad, but if you didn't buy the card on day one, or were not trying to play the latest titles, then you were isolated from that issue. Other than that, it's been good and only getting better.
    • Meta launches new AI glasses in 26 styles and Muse Spark multimodal capabilties by Pradeep Viswanathan Meta today announced a new line of Meta Glasses in partnership with EssilorLuxottica. The new AI glasses build on the company’s existing smart glasses portfolio, which is sold under the Ray-Ban Meta and Oakley Meta brands. The new Meta Glasses start at just $299, are compatible with prescription lenses, and will be available in 26 styles across different colors, lenses, and frames. At launch, Meta Glasses will be available in three frame styles. The Meta Adventurer features a clean rectangular design and comes in Standard and Large sizes. The Meta Fury is a bolder frame for users who want a stronger look. Meta Glasses by Kylie is a slim oval frame designed in collaboration with Kylie Jenner. Similar to existing Meta AI Glasses, the new Meta Glasses include a dedicated action button that can be used to quickly access Meta AI or launch a favorite feature. They also feature open-ear speakers for calls, music, and more. Meta has also included a multi-mic array with wind noise reduction for calls and messaging. Users can capture photos and videos hands-free using voice commands. Meta claims more than eight hours of battery life, while the portable charging case can provide up to 40 additional hours. As expected, Meta Glasses come pre-loaded with Meta AI powered by Muse Spark from day one. Muse Spark is the first model from Meta Superintelligence Labs with improved multimodal capabilities. The same Meta AI upgrade is also now available on existing Ray-Ban Meta and Oakley Meta Glasses in the US and Canada via an update. With the Muse Spark-powered AI assistant, Meta AI in the new glasses can provide smarter answers, understand what the user is seeing, and help with daily tasks such as calendar management and navigation. Meta also announced an upcoming feature called the dynamic photo feature, which captures multiple frames and recommends the best one. Pedestrian navigation is also coming soon to these glasses. Meta is also adding support for 14 new live translation languages, including Japanese, Mandarin Chinese, Hindi, and Korean. The new Meta Glasses are available starting today through Meta.com, Best Buy, Amazon, LensCrafters, Sunglass Hut, and select retailers.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      468
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      166
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      87
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!