Recommended Posts

Hi,

So I've got a HP DL160 G6 running with an HP SmartArray p410i 1GB super-capacitor RAM-based cache, and am using 3*15K RPM 73GB SAS drives in a RAID5 configuration and I have a single 500GB WD enterprise SATA drive connected too...

Now I know in comparison to the Dell PERC6 that the HP SA is a steaming pile of trash, it's much slower for reasons I've never been able to work out despite having a much better spec.

But this always gets me, I back up my VMs using the SSH server in ESXi and I have downtime of 50 minutes to transfer a 22GB VM, which is absolutely bloody rediculous (it's still not finished copying) and I'm just at a loss as to why. The 500GB drive isn't anything amazing, just a standard 7200 RPM drive but to transfer a VM at less than 7MBps is just... I'm speechless. I can transfer files faster on a 32 bit SCSI card faster than this.

 

Does anyone have a similar setup or any tips for this? (It's ESXi 5.1 and both file-systems are VMFS-5) I've got 4 more VMs to backup after this then apply some system updates and it's looking like it's going to take the whole day. I don't think it's a hardware speed problem, I'm thinking it's down to ###### poor drivers from HP for the p410i (hpaucli is [in comparison to dell's PERC utilities] a complete joke) or something up with ESXi but don't really know how I can go about test either or speeding it up.

Is the vmkern network on the same or a different physical port from the interface on your primary vSwitch?

 

I read that performance is awful unless this is separated (although I have never tried).

  On 24/01/2015 at 12:18, Fahim S. said:

Is the vmkern network on the same or a different physical port from the interface on your primary vSwitch?

 

I read that performance is awful unless this is separated (although I have never tried).

Ah, I don't mean I'm coping the data over SSH, I just mean I'm connected via SSH to do the file copying. It's going direct disk-to-disk on the same host.

At 11:58 I started copying a 10GB VM, 25 minutes later it's still not finished, so this copy speed is definitely slower than 7MBps.

How exactly are you doing this copy.. Are you going to the datastore and downloading the vm disk?

 

How is your vmkern - is it shared with another nic.. I noticed a huge increase in performance when broke out vmkern to its own port group on its own nic..

 

post-14624-0-74552400-1422101386.png

 

So here I started a download of vm - clicked go at 6:07:30..  Its downloading now, This is off a HP N40L with cheap nics added, the vmkern is using the built in nic I do believe.. If I look at my network performance for my pc I downloading the file too - getting pretty decent network util

 

post-14624-0-94754700-1422101722.png

 

Ok done...  looks like 20min

 

post-14624-0-40134400-1422102622.png

 

See the time created, and then last modified time..  So lets call it 34GB / 20 min = 1.7GB a min = 28MBps, which clearly is not full speed of my network..  I normally see double or triple that from the nas on the same esxi..  But it is inline with with how the vmkern works, etc..

 

edit:  So your dong disk to disk copy on your esxi host?  via cli command..  Let me test that with this same 34GB file..  I have a SSD datastore and the 250GB disk it came with as datastore as well..  BRB

 

Ok so started at 6:38:30 and so far its copied 3.8GB in 3 minutes.. 

so at 10 min mark bit over 12GB

 

/vmfs/volumes/54c39196-0f3ec6fc-3df2-001f29541714/test # ls -la
total 12049416
drwxr-xr-x    1 root     root           420 Jan 24 12:38 .
drwxr-xr-t    1 root     root          1400 Jan 24 12:37 ..
-rw-------    1 root     root     12343582720 Jan 24 12:48 w7x64-clean-flat.vmdk
/vmfs/volumes/54c39196-0f3ec6fc-3df2-001f29541714/test #

 

So I would have to say, seems like a bit slower than the download copy..  But that 250GB disk is pretty old crappy disk ;)

 

So at 20min, 24GB roughly looks like about 20MBps which yeah is like 3x what your seeing and this is just the controller that that comes with the N40L..

Not an answer to your problem but you could use ghettoVCB which is a free backup script for ESXi and works quite well. Bit fiddly to set up but once done it's fine. 

 

I have it scripted so I just log into the host and run a script to do the backup then once done I can copy the backup files without having to take down any of the servers.

I've now shut down all VMs except one (my W7 remote management VM) and I've taken a screenshot of it... Something really is not right here.

aNS6w1g.png

EDIT: Changed around the graph output (bit hard on a small VNC screen) and it's apparently reading at 6MBps from the main drive and writing to the backup drive at 15MBps... I can't understand how it's writing twice the data it's reading!

 

 

  On 24/01/2015 at 12:45, Depicus said:

Not an answer to your problem but you could use ghettoVCB which is a free backup script for ESXi and works quite well. Bit fiddly to set up but once done it's fine. 

 

I have it scripted so I just log into the host and run a script to do the backup then once done I can copy the backup files without having to take down any of the servers.

I can't do that as I've got snapshots disabled and have all changes written to the disk as they're performed.

Edited by n_K

Ok so it finished

 

/vmfs/volumes/54c39196-0f3ec6fc-3df2-001f29541714/test # stat w7x64-clean-flat.vmdk
  File: w7x64-clean-flat.vmdk
  Size: 34359738368     Blocks: 67108864   IO Block: 131072 regular file
Device: 831f0b1fc2871364h/9448282774282113892d  Inode: 4225796     Links: 1
Access: (0600/-rw-------)  Uid: (    0/    root)   Gid: (    0/    root)
Access: 2015-01-24 12:38:34.000000000
Modify: 2015-01-24 13:06:49.000000000
Change: 2015-01-24 13:06:49.000000000
 

 

So we got 28 min for 34GB, roughly 20MBps, which yeah is blowing you away on crappier hardware.... Hmmmmmm??

you could try dd command vs cp, doing a test now looks like 4.9GB in 3 minutes vs the 3.8 with the cp command, let me try uping the bs from 1M

 

edit:  Well using dd seems to get me the speeds I saw with download..  About 28MBps vs the 20 was seeing with cp.

 

edit2:  ok -- seems cp has really be depreciated for a while on esxi.. your suppose to use vmfsktools command..

 

http://www.vmware.com/pdf/esx_3p_scvcons.pdf

For performance and data placement reasons, do not use scp or cp; instead, use vmkfstools, the Virtual Machine Importer tool from VMware, or the SDK APIs to manipulate your virtual disks. You should see very significant performance improvements if you use the recommended tools.

 

So doing a copy of that same vm using

/vmfs/volumes/535605bc-d0c25a0d-7cf0-001f29541714/w7 # vmkfstools -i /vmfs/volumes/datastore0/w7/w7x64-clean.vmdk /vmfs/volumes/datastore1/test/test.vmdk
Destination disk format: VMFS zeroedthick
Cloning disk '/vmfs/volumes/datastore0/w7/w7x64-clean.vmdk'...
Clone: 100% done.
 

was done in 4.25 min or 133MBps

 

/vmfs/volumes/54c39196-0f3ec6fc-3df2-001f29541714/test # stat test.vmdk
  File: test.vmdk
  Size: 514             Blocks: 0          IO Block: 131072 regular file
Device: 831f0b1fc2871364h/9448282774282113892d  Inode: 8420100     Links: 1
Access: (0600/-rw-------)  Uid: (    0/    root)   Gid: (    0/    root)
Access: 2015-01-24 13:38:46.000000000
Modify: 2015-01-24 13:42:57.000000000
Change: 2015-01-24 13:42:57.000000000
 

 

post-14624-0-99362500-1422107393.png

 

Argh the dd is an annoying busybox version, just started running it with all the ibs and out set to 16MB and will see what happens with an 8GB file!

Did not know that about cp on ESXi, thanks budman! I'll see if DD increases the speed and if not will retry with that command, I'm assuming it doesn't bother copying the blank space and speeds up transfer that way, the VM I'm copying now is 90% utilised so it probably wouldn't save much time.

 

EDIT: OK no there is definitely something not right, 3Gbps link speeds between the SATA/SAS disks and the controller, 0.2GB copied in 30 seconds.

Edited by n_K

Dude see my edit.. Use vmkfstools -i src dst

 

My test shows a SCREAMING difference..   What you got to loose..  It sure can not be any slower than your dd or cp commands ;)

  On 24/01/2015 at 12:52, n_K said:

I can't do that as I've got snapshots disabled and have all changes written to the disk as they're performed.

 

Curios as to why you disabled snapshots.

Just tried on a 23GB disk after the 8GB DD finished budman;

/vmfs/volumes/508aa94d-fbcf15ba-0faf-68b599b49d30/Jan 24 2015/W7 # vmkfstools -i /vmfs/volumes/Main/Windows\ 7\ Pro
fessional-N\ x64/Windows\ 7\ Professional-N\ x64.vmdk /vmfs/volumes/Backup\ Disk/Jan\ 24\ 2015/W7/
Destination disk format: VMFS zeroedthick
Cloning disk '/vmfs/volumes/Main/Windows 7 Professional-N x64/Windows 7 Professional-N x64.vmdk'...
Failed to clone disk: The file already exists (39).
Ignore, I'm being dense and not putting in the filename!

 

  On 24/01/2015 at 14:11, Depicus said:

Curios as to why you disabled snapshots.

Uses space which I don't have that much of.

Yeah that is much better ;)  Should be a helpful thread for other people I think.. I don't normally move files between datastores

 

Now not sure on what your original was..  Was it thick, or thin?  Notice it defaults to thickzero'd -- so if was thin before, your backup isn't.  if you want to maintain thin you can do -d thin on the end.  But that took about double the time to copy..  But I would think even 10 minutes for you would be much better than what you were seeing.

Not so sure its really a performance booster doing that any more.. If on SSD datastore makes no difference for sure.. So your storage is local, is it VAAI ??  Do you see hardware acceleration when you look at your datastores?

 

There are lots of variables at play when it comes to performance - a we see in this example using a deprecated common way that many people would do can have huge performance implications.. Comes down to your requirements.  I for sure have my storage over provisioned for sure.. Small datastore..  And play with lots of vms, I don't see any reason to suck up all the space with zeros ;)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • It’s encouraging that Intel is still competing, the best they can, in the gpu space.
    • Windows 11 KB5062233/ KB5060843/ KB5062197/ KB5061090 setup, recovery updates released by Sayan Sen This week Microsoft released non-security preview updates for Windows 11 22H2 and 23H2 under KB5060826 as well as for 24H2 under KB5060829. The company also published dynamic updates alongside them. Dynamic updates bring improvements to the Windows Recovery in the form of Windows Recovery Environment (WinRE) updates, also called Safe OS updates, as well as to the Setup binaries in the form of Setup updates. These Dynamic Update packages are meant to be applied to existing Windows images prior to their deployment. These packages include fixes to Setup.exe binaries, SafeOS updates for Windows Recovery Environment, and more. Dynamic Updates also help preserve Language Pack (LP) and Features on Demand (FODs) content during the upgrade process. VBScript, for example, is currently an FOD on Windows 11 24H2. Both setup and recovery updates were released. The changelogs are given below. First up we have the Setup updates: Up next, we have the recovery updates: Microsoft notes that the Recovery updates will be downloaded and installed automatically via the Windows Update channel. The Setup updates, however, need to be downloaded and installed manually. You can avail them on Microsoft's Update Catalog website: KB5062233, KB5060843, KB5062197, and KB5061090.
    • Gaming mouse review: Keychron Lemokey G2 8K Wireless, high performance, light in weight by Robbie Khan Available in the UK and USA, the G2 is a wireless gaming mouse by Lemokey, the customised gaming peripheral arm of Keychron, a brand many readers will know well. I've checked out Keychron keyboards recently, models such as the top-tier Q6 Max, and the bargain priced B6 Pro. I never got the chance to check out the G1, but the G2 seems to put itself firmly in-between competing 8K gaming mice out there whilst coming in at a decent sum under £100/$100. The other benefit is that it uses Keychron Launcher, the web-based software that has been a staple part of Keychron keyboards for a long time now. I rate the launcher highly and have rarely had a problem with it, so it is great to see a robust piece of software being used on an affordable gaming mouse that's not only built well, but performs well, too. As it's a high performance gaming mouse with a flagship PixArt sensor, I will be comparing the G2 directly against my personal mouse, the similarly sized Pulsar Feinmann F01. Both mice are priced wildly differently, so it was interesting to compared several factors between them to see if one bests the other where it matters most, or if it just comes down to individual preferences. Let's check out the specs... Keychron Lemokey G2 SKU G2-A1 Sensor PixArt 3950 IPS 750 MCU Realtek 8762G Connectivity Bluetooth 5.1 / 2.4 GHz / Wired (type-C cable) Polling Rate Up to 8000 Hz (2.4 GHz / wired mode), 125 Hz (Bluetooth mode) Motion Sync Yes Angle Snapping Yes Acceleration 50g Cable Detachable Type-C to C Cable + Type-A to Type-C adapter Dongle Micro USB-A dongle Main switches Huano Micro Switch Switch lifespan 80 Million Clicks Battery 300 mAh Battery life 60 Hours (Under 1000Hz) 35 Hours (1000-4000Hz) 20 Hours (4000-8000Hz) Skates Teflon / PTFE Lift Off Distance 0.7 / 1.0 / 2.0 mm Material (Body and Grip) ABS Dimensions 118mm / 62.6mm / 38.2mm Tracks on glass (min. 4 mm thickness) Yes (max 1000Hz report rate) Weight 52 ± 3 g Colours Black / White Price £73.99 / $69.99 Fit and finish Made of all ABS, it certainly doesn't feel anywhere near as nice as the F01, but then again it's priced much lower, so no complaints there. To me it feels more like a previous generation Endgame/Zowie mouse, before they started to use the more grippy textured finish. It's a fine finish but how long that lasts only time will tell. With the Endgame mice I always found that the side buttons would go shiny first, and I suspect the exact same to apply here with the G2, since the size and shape of them is similar, as is the material quality. Speaking of side buttons, my personal preference is flat and large buttons, the long and pointed ones like those on the G2 shown above and GAMIAC PX71 at the bottom always felt a bit awkward to me for naturally resting a thumb on, whereas the large surface area of the ones found on the Feinmann and others like it feel more ergonomic and comfortable for long usage sessions. Pulsar Feinmann F01 (ergo shape) Lemokey G2 (ambidextrous shape) Under my 19cm hand, the G2 feels comfortable and stable for both claw and palm grip styles, though my usual style is a hybrid approach. I like to pinch a mouse with a thumb and ring finger, then articulate forward or backward movement with them to adapt to different play-styles. Both mice have a sloping back hump that works brilliantly for this and i had no problem getting comfortable with the G2 here. The underside of the G2 hides a cool feature I wish more more mice makers adopted, can you spot what it is in the photo below? That little flap at the bottom to store the USB dongle, it's convenient, especially for gamers who travel with their mice or laptop gamers. The skates applied are PTFE and cover three zones on the underside, sadly I forgot to take a photo of them before swapping them out to my preferred skates, the Wallhack Pro UWMP yellow dots. I found no problem with glide resistance on the stock skates, though find dots glide nicer overall and these yellow dots slide around like butter. Lemokey states 52g for the weight, give or take 3g, so my scales measure up perfectly here. It's not as lightweight as the Feinmann which currently is 45g, but it's still considered super-light and honestly, under the hand, this weight difference on dot skates is hard to tell apart. Gripping the G2 hard on both sides shows no obvious issues with flexing, so the internal construction is also up to scratch and exactly what i would expect in this price range. The differences start to be noticed when you are using the G2 as a combination mouse, both in gaming and desktop use. The wheel is thinner than the one on the Feinmann and other gaming mice with fat wheels. I much prefer a nice wide wheel, the diameter is also much larger as can be seen with the overhead photo above. The button tops also have a distinct difference in feel when actuating the switches. there is more of a hollow feel to the G2's tops, as well as slightly more travel post-click. the Huano switches feel and sound excellent, though, but I think the ABS contact surface on the outside could have been slightly more distinct in feel. Here is a demo of how the main switches sound, you can also hear the switch tops clap if you pay attention: Likewise the side buttons have extra play after the switches actuate, something the Feinmann and others in the higher price category don't tend to have. Features & software Aside from the usual features that all gaming mice support these days, such as Motion Sync, lift off distance and Macro, the big feature with the G2 is that is uses Keychron Launcher, the web-browser based software. All changes are stored directly onto the on-board memory, here is what the sections within it look like: I found no bugs with the implementation here, and unlike other Keychron wireless devices I have used with Launcher in the past, the G2 connects and can be customised in it over both wired and wireless. Just be aware that the firmware update option when connected via wireless will only check the dongle's firmware. To check the G2's firmware, a USB cable will need to be connected. Performance Whether on the desktop in Windows or in games, the cursor and motion performance is excellent, though this is to be expected from all modern gaming mice, regardless of price. The higher priced mice tend to have better use of high quality materials, and implementation of software and physical features. I'm currently pacing through nine games, all mixed genre, and in each of them I had no troubles quickly getting comfortable with the G2. If you're used to an Endgame XM2we sized mouse, then this will be just as familiar to you. The convenience of the DPI button at the top of the mouse instead of underside makes instant switching simpler, although the button can be remapped to do something else for those who don't care about DPI toggling. Here is a demo of the G2 playing Doom: The Dark Ages: The sensor tracking performance at 8K was perfect, aside from the few moments my physical movement on the mousepad slowed down causing some drops in the Razer mouse tracking measurement graph below: A consistent 7900-8000Hz polling was observed, though keep in mind that using such high polling rates will impact CPU performance whilst gaming. How much this affects framerates will boil down to the CPU you have. On my i7 12700KF there was no change whilst gaming, but during the measurement above I did observe 13% CPU package utilisation. In practice, though, I saw no performance difference playing at 8K versus 2K or even 1K. Battery life will drastically be impacted at 8K polling rates for obvious reasons, and whilst many prefer 4K, there is a growing trend to just stick to 2K which feels the safe middle ground of great battery performance, whilst still being suitably responsive on paper for even the most fast-paced of gaming sessions. Conclusion The Lemokey G2 has proven to be a rather excellent mouse, not just for gaming, but general use, too. Though being excellent doesn't give it any special status, as there are equally excellent mice out there that cost the same, less and even more. A buying decision will come down to individual needs, do you value the use of a browser-based software tool like Keychron Launcher? If so, then this is right up your street. Do you want something lightweight but also supports the gaming features and feel in the hand as more expensive mice? Maybe the G2 will satisfy. It's not totally perfect, nothing ever is, the thumb buttons could have been a bit wider, and the switch caps have more travel after clicking than what I am comfortable with, but otherwise this is a great mouse with features that rival the competition. The sensors on gaming mice these days isn't a key selling factor any more either, since even entry level gaming mice are capable of precision tracking and speed that was only possible on the top-tier models of the past, like many things in tech now, the point of diminishing returns has been reached, and brands have to work harder at giving us consumers a unique selling point to attract interest. I believe the G2 has at least one USP (Keychron Launcher), it also helps that it's a very comfortable mouse to use for all-day sessions.
    • Delays can happen any time and names changed, but the joke was still there to be made.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Alexander 001 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      icecreamconesleeves earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      PAC0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      PAC0 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Shahmir Shoaib earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      564
    2. 2
      +FloatingFatMan
      187
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      185
    4. 4
      Skyfrog
      113
    5. 5
      Xenon
      110
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!