Recommended Posts

On Wednesday, March 09, 2016 at 2:10 AM, trag3dy said:

 

 

Still looks bad and they continue to ###### on the originals even more. The whole bit with the logo..

 

Gotta love the feminist agenda being pushed, too. They couldn't make it any more blatant. The women are the heroes and the big strong man (who they are portraying as an idiot, too, looks like) is the helpless secretary.

On previous trailer that criticized by ghostbuster fans as "idiot-writers-who-did-not-properly-research-what-ghostbuster-really-was",
it said: 30 YEARS AGO FOUR SCIENTISTS SAVED NEW YORK
 
The fans quickly pointed out opening intro text are incorrect, among the original four of Ghostbuster team, only three of them were scientists,
and fans use that fact to said that the writer of the New Ghostbuster (2016) indeed someone who did not watch the original properly.
 
So they changed the Intro text (0:07) on the 'new' trailer, now it said: 30 YEARS AGO FOUR FRIENDS SAVED THE WORLD
Edited by Torolol
  • Like 2
7 minutes ago, Torolol said:
On previous trailer that criticized by ghostbuster fans as "idiot-writers-who-did-not-properly-research-what-ghostbuster-really-was",
it said: 30 YEARS AGO FOUR SCIENTISTS SAVED NEW YORK
 
The fans quickly pointed out opening intro text are incorrect, among the original four of them only three of them were scientists,
and fans use that fact to said that the writer of the New Ghostbuster (2016) indeed someone who did not watch the original properly.
 
So to they changed the Intro text (0:07) on the 'new' trailer, now it said: 30 YEARS AGO FOUR FRIENDS SAVED THE WORLD

ACK Comic Sans :pinch:

 

Good point though, if you're going to destroy a movie franchise at least do some research on it! 

21 hours ago, HawkMan said:

which one ? ;)

the latest one lol, i actually mostly enjoyed it, but suddenly it looks a bit better now. compared to the horrors in the gb trailer.

 

would've been better if they just left out the whole 30 years bit...as it makes it sound like a sequel. yet the original actors in this play completely different characters right?

 

or maybe it secretly is a sequel and they changed their identities? but then what happened to ghosts? hauntings took a break?

 

massive fail on the trailer opening scene..

 

if i'm correct, Dan and *mr not funny anymore cameos haven't been revealed yet right?

 

 

*bill murray, made the mistake of watching lost in translation several years back and didn't find it funny. i miss the old murray.

think the only kinda amsuing bit he's done since  was the tree scene in get smart.

Edited by Slarlac249
11 minutes ago, HawkMan said:

For what it was, it was a decent movie. I mean it's a super hero movie...

just took a while to get to the good stuff, it started off way too slow. also i think you could compare this doom to the guy in the force awakens, as in not that threatening, i found doom in the other f4 movie to be more menacing.

 

younger actors don't always been better characters.

 

back on topic...

 

does anyone know dan and murray's roles yet in this? or did miss that info..

On 03/03/2016 at 9:06 PM, HawkMan said:

The trailer gives me me very mixed feelings.

 

one one hand, the ghosts look great, BUT that's also the problem.  They look too good, in a very uncharacteristic statement from me, There's too much CGI and the CGI is too good. it doesn't look like ghostbusters. 

 

The old classic animatronic and film trick ghosts had a feel to them that made them seem "realistic" in their way. these just look like really awesome CGI. and not the nice gritty real ghosts of ghostbusters. 

 

on top of that. the trailer gives the whole story away, and the whole story is basically a line by line retelling of the original movie. down to the token black "guy" and "his" role. 

 

They simply replaced the characters with women and placed it 30 years in the future and apparently everyone forgot that ghosts even existed in those 30 years... smh.... why... 

 

I'll watch, it. but it's definitely not going to be a classic. 

It's a bit like an explosion in a neon factory.

  • 2 months later...
5 hours ago, trag3dy said:

 

Still looks like ######. I also think they couldn't make it any less funny if the tried, which is quite an achievement after how bad the first trailer was.

Best part is at 2:13.  Already at 38K dislikes ... 8K likes.

 

This might be a fun movie to watch really drunk...and I mean blackout drunk...so you don't remember it.

  • Like 2

Only time will tell how it turns out at the box office, but one thing's for sure, if it does bomb, hard, no studio is going to bother doing this again, for any reboot/respin w/e.   Maybe that'd put an end to Paul Feigs crazy ideas of reboots.

2 minutes ago, John. said:

Such cheap, predictable jokes. That was actually painful to watch. That's the best they could find to put in a trailer?

I find the whole reboot of this with 4 females to be a joke. Such an iconic movie being destroyed by Hollywood. :cry:

It's the effects of the ghosts that get me. It's like an explosion in a neon factory!

I'll reserve judgement till it is actually released but it doesn't look like something i'm going to rush out to see.

1 hour ago, John. said:

Such cheap, predictable jokes. That was actually painful to watch. That's the best they could find to put in a trailer?

The sad part. if it's like every other trailer in the universe. this IS the best parts of the movie, maybe even the only "funny" parts...

I'll be shocked if the critics give this high scores of any kind.  I expect RT to be in the 40s and lower, if it's up over 50% then I don't know what they're smoking.

  • 3 weeks later...

I don't know what it is but Bill never seems to care or want to be a part of any Ghostbusters projects, events, w/e.  I'm actually shocked they even got him to voice act for the game, or even show up at all in this movie.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Pretty nice tool, thanks
    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      455
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!