Do You Sign Your Bank Card?


Bank Card Signature  

75 members have voted

  1. 1. Do You Sign Your Bank Cards?

    • UK - Yes
      18
    • UK - No
      9
    • USA / Canada - Yes
      16
    • USA / Canada - No
      16
    • Other Europe - Yes
      4
    • Other Europe - No
      2
    • Australia - Yes
      1
    • Australia - No
      1
    • Rest of World - Yes
      2
    • Rest of World - No
      1


Recommended Posts

AFAIK - in the UK, a retailed can reject your card if you haven't signed it so yes, I always do it.

 

Again, the US its required because they don't use chip and pin like we do. I don't recall if they have even implemented the chip side. I know when I was out there a fair old time ago, I had to sign for everything as they didn't have chip and pin machines.

I've gotten called out for cards (US) that I've forgotten to sign, but then they ID me.  That said, at least 3/4 of the time they don't even notice when I use my wife's card.  But still, yea I sign 'em just to save time.

I cant honestly see why it matters here in the UK, i've never been asked to sign anything to compare to the signature on any of my cards.

 

I've been told in one random shop a few years ago it should be signed as they can refuse the card, however despite telling me that they accepted the card anyway.

I cant honestly see why it matters here in the UK, i've never been asked to sign anything to compare to the signature on any of my cards.

 

I've been told in one random shop a few years ago it should be signed as they can refuse the card, however despite telling me that they accepted the card anyway.

It's useful if someone steals your card and then uses it to buy things and get cash back instead of having the money put back on your card.

1) scammer steals card

2) scammer buys something

3) scammer goes to another store on another day and returns items with any excuse

4) scammer asks for money back as cash instead of on card, some retailer will refuse, others will allow it

5) if accepted, retailer will ask for a signature and check with the card (details must match). If the signature doesn't match, they won't give the refund.

  • Like 2

It's useful if someone steals your card and then uses it to buy things and get cash back instead of having the money put back on your card.

1) scammer steals card

2) scammer buys something

3) scammer goes to another store on another day and returns items with any excuse

4) scammer asks for money back as cash instead of on card, some retailer will refuse, others will allow it

5) if accepted, retailer will ask for a signature and check with the card (details must match). If the signature doesn't match, they won't give the refund.

I saw this a lot when I worked retail. Our policy was though, if it was bought on a card, it went back to the card, anything else required manager over ride.

I've gotten called out for cards (US) that I've forgotten to sign, but then they ID me.  That said, at least 3/4 of the time they don't even notice when I use my wife's card.  But still, yea I sign 'em just to save time.

You do realize the entire point of signing the back of the card is so that it is ALWAYS compared against a signed photo ID, where they match up the signatures and the photo to the person before them.  If you go into any store (US) and hand them your card and they don't ask for a photo ID, whether you signed the card or not, should always raise a red flag and you should say something.  Either the clerk is slacking or the business willingly accepts any card, including stolen.

 

Signing a card should not save you any time.  You should always be asked for a photo ID - taking the same amount of time to verify.

You do realize the entire point of signing the back of the card is so that it is ALWAYS compared against a signed photo ID, where they match up the signatures and the photo to the person before them.  If you go into any store (US) and hand them your card and they don't ask for a photo ID, whether you signed the card or not, should always raise a red flag and you should say something.  Either the clerk is slacking or the business willingly accepts any card, including stolen.

Yea I do realize that. Maybe you should let them know that though.. as I said more often than not it's not even looked at.  I'm there to buy something, not to educate people on how to do their jobs.

You do realize the entire point of signing the back of the card is so that it is ALWAYS compared against a signed photo ID, where they match up the signatures and the photo to the person before them.  If you go into any store (US) and hand them your card and they don't ask for a photo ID, whether you signed the card or not, should always raise a red flag and you should say something.  Either the clerk is slacking or the business willingly accepts any card, including stolen.

 

Signing a card should not save you any time.  You should always be asked for a photo ID - taking the same amount of time to verify.

Never seen that in the UK, before chip and pin they'd ask you to sign something and see if it matched up with the signature on the back of the card.

I sign the back of my card... but I honestly cannot remember the last time anyone asked for an ID to verify my signature.

 

Most stores have the self-swiping card readers... so the cashier never even touches my card. I just swipe the card and move on.  I thought that was the point of the customer card readers.

 

Credit-Card-Reader1.png

 

It would seem kinda weird to hand your card to the cashier... and then they hand it BACK for me to swipe. And that's probably why they rarely do that.

 

Note... I only have a debit card... so maybe it's different for credit cards (?)

 

 

 

 

Nope..   They never ask for my card or ID...  I use the card reader which it sits in front of you. You swipe your card then go.

 

Signature on the back was for in the past when they had no computerized POS systems. They don't need to check since we have today's technologies.

 

They ask you for your ID if you write them a check. I never use the check/checkbook since 90's.

Do you sign the back of your bank cards?

 

Nope, always completely forget.

 

AFAIK - in the UK, a retailed can reject your card if you haven't signed it so yes, I always do it.

 

True. I used to be an area manager for a fleet of urban sports shops in the late 90's early 2000's and if customers cards weren't signed, then we had the right to refuse sale.

This was at a time when you ran customers cards through the streamline machine and had them sign the slip so it was kind of necessary to have the card also signed. What i can tell you though is a large majority of folks didn't remember to sign their cards, so what we used to do is have them sign the card as well (but shhhh).

 

Now days, at least in the UK, it does seem kind of pointless.

You do realize the entire point of signing the back of the card is so that it is ALWAYS compared against a signed photo ID, where they match up the signatures and the photo to the person before them. 

 

Maybe where you're from, but not in the UK.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
    • it dosnt support onprem exchange. it dosnt support mapi-calls. the views are all worse/limited. its slower. it cant see public folder calendars. we already have webmail. the list of other missing features is pretty huge but i only see it when customers call to say their email isnt working, and 9/10 times its cause they accidentality changed to outlooknew(new). Hold the line everyone!
    • yeah, this looks beautiful. Damn this winter's going to be great.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!