Do You Sign Your Bank Card?


Bank Card Signature  

75 members have voted

  1. 1. Do You Sign Your Bank Cards?

    • UK - Yes
      18
    • UK - No
      9
    • USA / Canada - Yes
      16
    • USA / Canada - No
      16
    • Other Europe - Yes
      4
    • Other Europe - No
      2
    • Australia - Yes
      1
    • Australia - No
      1
    • Rest of World - Yes
      2
    • Rest of World - No
      1


Recommended Posts

I've never signed my cards, in fact my signature strip just says VOIDVOIDVOID because I don't use a wallet and it wears out quick. :rofl:

Cashiers never need to touch my card with Chip and Pin / Contactless and that's how it should be. :)

  • Like 1

I usually put "see id" on mine.  Doesnt matter tho.  They rarely even look at the back of CCs these days.


You do realize the entire point of signing the back of the card is so that it is ALWAYS compared against a signed photo ID, where they match up the signatures and the photo to the person before them.  If you go into any store (US) and hand them your card and they don't ask for a photo ID, whether you signed the card or not, should always raise a red flag and you should say something.  Either the clerk is slacking or the business willingly accepts any card, including stolen.

 

Signing a card should not save you any time.  You should always be asked for a photo ID - taking the same amount of time to verify.

 

When I use my card, more often than not, I am not asked to see my ID or they do not compare the sigs.  Retailers are lazy these days.

The one thing that annoys me about my Debit card is if I select "Debit" on the machine I have to enter my 4 digit pin for it to be used... which is great. But if someone swipes my card they can just select the "Credit" option which bypasses the need for a pin all together. How dumb is that!?

The one thing that annoys me about my Debit card is if I select "Debit" on the machine I have to enter my 4 digit pin for it to be used... which is great. But if someone swipes my card they can just select the "Credit" option which bypasses the need for a pin all together. How dumb is that!?

 

That's because of security risk.... you want people behind you hear your PIN number when cashier asks you?

 

That's the reason cashier use credit for your protection... If you want to use debit, then use the card reader in front of you.

The one thing that annoys me about my Debit card is if I select "Debit" on the machine I have to enter my 4 digit pin for it to be used... which is great. But if someone swipes my card they can just select the "Credit" option which bypasses the need for a pin all together. How dumb is that!?

 

Pretty dumb.  Why I have an alert on my account.  Any transaction more that $1, I get an email.

That's because of security risk.... you want people behind you hear your PIN number when cashier asks you?

 

That's the reason cashier use credit for your protection... If you want to use debit, then use the card reader in front of you.

 

We never vocally tell them our pin, We punch it on a keypad.

You should have told the cashier that you want to use debit before she/he press the credit button.

 

I'm not talking about that. I'm talking about someone getting my debit card and running it as credit, bypassing the 4 digit security pin.

I'm not talking about that. I'm talking about someone getting my debit card and running it as credit, bypassing the 4 digit security pin.

 

some stores here that cashiers ask "debit or credit"... 

 

some stores here that you choose on your own and swipe the card.

some stores here that cashiers ask "debit or credit"... 

 

some stores here that you choose on your own and swipe the card.

 

Ya I know. It's just the principle of the thing.

 

Its like wearing a bullet proof vest, but person shooting you can decide whether or not you are wearing one.

I'm not talking about that. I'm talking about someone getting my debit card and running it as credit, bypassing the 4 digit security pin.

 

and it actually charges your account?   that is retarded, i would complain to the bank and get that fixed.

and it actually charges your account?   that is retarded, i would complain to the bank and get that fixed.

 

I don't think they can fix it. I think its the nature of debit cards.

In reality, one of the only differences between running a card as debit or credit is the time in which it takes the transaction to flow through to your account. When a PIN is entered, the money is immediately deducted -- or debited -- from the account, whereas if credit is selected, the payment goes through the credit card network and the payment is withdrawn within a few days.

 

I recently spoke with Jason Oxman, CEO of the Electronic Transactions Association. He said that selecting credit or debit simply affects "how the transaction is submitted to the network." In essence, the distinction between credit and debit at the point of sale has no bearing on what rights a consumer does or doesn't have. Instead it only changes the "rails" on which the money transfers from the consumer's account to the merchant's.

 

 

http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2014/01/22/what-selecting-credit-when-you-run-your-debit-card.aspx

 

I guess that makes a bit more sense, but still...

I'm not talking about that. I'm talking about someone getting my debit card and running it as credit, bypassing the 4 digit security pin.

 

I do that if I dont want to punch in my key.  I just let them run it as credit.  I dont even have to sign anything.  And they never ask to see my ID.

so it is not. credit part should have its own pin on it.  unless your bank messed something up.

 

A lot of banks provide their debit cards through credit card companies. For example, mine is through Visa. If I run it like a debit card it requires a pin and immediately debits my bank account. However, running it like a credit card does not immediately charge my account and gives me the same fraud prevention as any ordinary credit card.

I do, but it is more out of habit than necessity. My card is chipped so I never have to sign anything.

 

The signature is pointless anyway. How is some 16 year old cashier going to be able to determine if the signature is forged or not? It's pseudo-security.

  • Like 1

I do, but it is more out of habit than necessity. My card is chipped so I never have to sign anything.

 

The signature is pointless anyway. How is some 16 year old cashier going to be able to determine if the signature is forged or not? It's pseudo-security.

 

 

i also have had a friend, who would go on a week holiday to carrebians, and then use his wife card (who was here WITH HIM) and go out every night. he would sign the bills instead of his wife.

 

after the trip he managed to get $3000 returned to him to the cards, since his wife made a claim.   even though she was there!

 

 

there is no way for them to check.    

 

 

 

 

however, if there is no claim, if does not matter what it says.   i always sign my name as Mickey Mouse, in case they don't have the right machine and i am made to sign.   

NOT ONCE ANYONE GAVE ME ANY ISSUES. and with my writing it is pretty obvious it says Mickey, and my card has my real signature!  not once anyone cared to check.

 

i probably spend over $1000 and had 20-30 purchases, where i signed my name as mickey mouse without problem.

The one thing that annoys me about my Debit card is if I select "Debit" on the machine I have to enter my 4 digit pin for it to be used... which is great. But if someone swipes my card they can just select the "Credit" option which bypasses the need for a pin all together. How dumb is that!?

 

I'm just glad you can't do that over here, you always have to enter the pin in the card reader. On some rare instances, they also check your signature (which is why I sign it), but this is getting more and more rare.

Canada: No

Australia: No

 

I've never signed a card in my life and no one has ever pointed it out. I also use my Wife's card very frequently, which is also not signed and no one has ever cared that my name is obviously not Jessica.

 

I'm aware they say it's for "my safety", but when no one ever checks it, it doesn't matter. Besides, I'd rather that the person who steals my Bank card doesn't also know my signature. Seems like a stupid place to put it.

 my name is obviously not Jessica.

 

 

 

Not by day, but by night, at the local drag club, you take on the identity of "Jessica"  :shifty:

 

:rofl:  :laugh:

 

 

Card security does seem to be going backwards to some degree. Tap and Go seems like it could be rife with abuse. Banks install the technology on most new cards & you can't request a card without the functionality.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!