Recommended Posts

For those who have not played TF, trust when I tell you this.  It is the smoothest MP game to date.

 

Rather someone jumps in or drops out of a game,no lag cheat or anything.

 

There is no MP game out that tops TF to date.

 

This is not a biased statement.

 

Whilst this is true, it did take them a long time to get there. Again fingers crossed that there will be lessons learned from the first one. 

It's simple, if you expect to sell a high number of copies, yet limit it to a system, it's has to hit a home run with the first hit, or your going to be disappointed. 

The timing was poor also, it had to do well before quickly before CoD, Destiny came out as well.  

Last one wasn't XBox exclusive either.  I seem to remember a PC version.

 

What other platform was it on besides a Microsoft platform?

 

Secondly we all know the PS4 is the more powerful console

 

While true, it's not by much, and not enough to make a big difference.

 

Not surprised by the possible move to more platforms than the 3 it was already released to. Though I distinctly remember those that didn't have those platforms to play the game on thought the game didn't look good. I don't imagine they will get the game anyway then.

<snip>

 

 

While true, it's not by much, and not enough to make a big difference.

 

Not surprised by the possible move to more platforms than the 3 it was already released to. Though I distinctly remember those that didn't have those platforms to play the game on thought the game didn't look good. I don't imagine they will get the game anyway then.

 

Ok, more powerful may be a a wrong choice of words (depending on your opinion) but more its the platform that is achieving more with what its got. Whether that is hardware related, ease of SDK or whatever other reason you can think of. I don't think anyone can disagree that it's hitting or close to hitting 1080/60 than the XB1 is.

For those who have not played TF, trust when I tell you this.  It is the smoothest MP game to date.

 

Rather someone jumps in or drops out of a game,no lag cheat or anything.

 

There is no MP game out that tops TF to date.

 

This is not a biased statement.

:rofl:  You are too funny man. Such jokes, mucho funny. Not but really,

I don't think anyone can disagree that it's hitting or close to hitting 1080/60 than the XB1 is.

 

Indeed. Early on it was a struggle for the X1 due to the SDK and some of the Kinect reserve. Luckily both have been improved, and DX12 coming out, the parity has been and will continue to be more consistent. In the end, both consoles are struggling, and probably always will, to hit 1080p 60fps locked games (unless there isn't a lot going on). We will pretty much have 1080p 30fps consistently locked consoles by the end of the gen. If we ever do see any barebones 4K games (and if Sony decides to make/allow 4K games), the memory and GPU of the PS4 will likely fare much better in this regard. But for the most part, they will be on equal footing for the 1080p environment.

Indeed. Early on it was a struggle for the X1 due to the SDK and some of the Kinect reserve. Luckily both have been improved, and DX12 coming out, the parity has been and will continue to be more consistent. In the end, both consoles are struggling, and probably always will, to hit 1080p 60fps locked games (unless there isn't a lot going on). We will pretty much have 1080p 30fps consistently locked consoles by the end of the gen. If we ever do see any barebones 4K games (and if Sony decides to make/allow 4K games), the memory and GPU of the PS4 will likely fare much better in this regard. But for the most part, they will be on equal footing for the 1080p environment.

 

It can't do 4K games. I don't think it's something that could be patched or changed either. The hardware is just too underpowered to do 4K.

It can't do 4K games. I don't think it's something that could be patched or changed either. The hardware is just too underpowered to do 4K.

 

They can, and they were quoted that they can do them (the PS4 could do better), but I imagine them to be just some over the top type of game, 2D, such as a game similar to Risk. Not that it matters to me, as I currently do not own a 4K TV. Once Sony and MS release 4K video support on the consoles, I will upgrade my TV.

They can, and they were quoted that they can do them (the PS4 could do better), but I image them to be just some over the top type of game, 2D, such as a game similar to Risk. Not that it matters to me, as I currently do not own a 4K TV. Once Sony and MS release 4K video support on the consoles, I will upgrade my TV.

 

No, it can't do games. Only 4K video or images.

 

Support for high-resolution 4K output for still images and movie content is in consideration, but there are no further details to share at this time. PS4 does not currently support 4K output for games.

 

http://blog.us.playstation.com/2013/10/30/ps4-the-ultimate-faq-north-america/

 

But you know, coming directly from Sony that might not be trustworthy... I'll await your quote.

PS4 does not currently support 4K output for games.

 

http://blog.us.playstation.com/2013/10/30/ps4-the-ultimate-faq-north-america/

 

But you know, coming directly from Sony that might not be trustworthy... I'll await your quote.

 

I will just leave that there.

All three versions used the cloud network

 

 

TF on PC did not use Azure...  It used EA's servers...

:rofl:  You are too funny man. Such jokes, mucho funny. Not but really,

 

This is a true statement...

 

People may or may not like TF, but when it comes to MP experience, TF tops KZ:SF, CoD, Halo:MCC, BF4, and whatever else MP shooter out on the market as we speak...

TF on PC did not use Azure...  It used EA's servers...

 

Are you sure? I was under the same impression and then found this.

 

" Titanfall uses the Xbox Live Cloud to run dedicated servers for PC, Xbox One, and Xbox 360."

 

Source

 when it comes to MP experience, TF tops KZ:SF, CoD, Halo:MCC, BF4, and whatever else MP shooter out on the market as we speak...

 

This is true, at least based on my experience. I have played every next gen shooter online, and TF can't be touched.

  • Like 1

This is a true statement...

 

People may or may not like TF, but when it comes to MP experience, TF tops KZ:SF, CoD, Halo:MCC, BF4, and whatever else MP shooter out on the market as we speak...

 

 

This is true, at least based on my experience. I have played every next gen shooter online, and TF can't be touched.

 

If you're talking about gameplay that's your opinion :) If you're talking about matchmaking, lobbies modes etc that would be up for debate.

Seems like there's scope for so much more in this franchise. I bought TF when it was cheap on Origin a few months back and did get some good fun out of it but have found myself drifting back to Battlefield now.

 

Would like to see a bigger variety of Titans, perhaps some other vehicles? 

They can, and they were quoted that they can do them (the PS4 could do better), but I imagine them to be just some over the top type of game, 2D, such as a game similar to Risk. Not that it matters to me, as I currently do not own a 4K TV. Once Sony and MS release 4K video support on the consoles, I will upgrade my TV.

4K on current "next gen" consoles: Not gonna happen, atleast not natively, maybe 4K video services, but definately never gaming. Wait another 6 years or so and the new consoles might do 1080P consistenly and maybe 1440P. So ja, we'll have to wait for next next "Gen" consoles.

If you're talking about gameplay that's your opinion :) If you're talking about matchmaking, lobbies modes etc that would be up for debate.

 

I'm talking matchmaking, lobbies, drop ins/outs etc...

 

Like I said, people may or may not like the style of play when it comes to TF...  But the things mentioned above are top notch.

 

These things are helped by being on a stable dedicated server infrastructure. Rather it be Azure, or anyone else who can offer the service, the service has to be consistent and world wide

Mechanically, it's a very cool game. But without any meaningful single player campaign or story it's just a series of death matches.

 

Now if they made a Halo-esque campaign for this with story, characters, pacing, and vast explorable areas I think you'd see a lot more success.

 

-Forjo

Mechanically, it's a very cool game. But without any meaningful single player campaign or story it's just a series of death matches.

 

Now if they made a Halo-esque campaign for this with story, characters, pacing, and vast explorable areas I think you'd see a lot more success.

 

-Forjo

 

Look at the two of the largest (on console) MP games. With both CoD and BF most people don't even bother with the single player campaign, I would guess that the same would apply with Titanfall. 

 

More modes would be cool, but they do have more than just death matches. 

Look at the two of the largest (on console) MP games. With both CoD and BF most people don't even bother with the single player campaign, I would guess that the same would apply with Titanfall. 

 

More modes would be cool, but they do have more than just death matches. 

 

My post is definitely my opinion. But you assert that "most people don't bother with single player". What is your source for that? I know multiplayer is very popular, but I don't think it's enough to carry a AAA game -- which is why I think Titanfall failed to live up to expectations.

 

-Forjo

4K on current "next gen" consoles: Not gonna happen, atleast not natively, maybe 4K video services, but definately never gaming. Wait another 6 years or so and the new consoles might do 1080P consistenly and maybe 1440P. So ja, we'll have to wait for next next "Gen" consoles.

 

I am just going by what MS has officially stated. That 4K gaming is coming to the Xbox One (which they reinstated last year), and is supported. If they plan on it (according to them officially), then there is no reason the PS4 can't (as on paper, the hardware is more powerful on the PS4 and would do a better job). Not that I can imagine anything good can come out of those most likely simple games.

 

But I am only going by official word. Whether or not we will ever see it, I have no idea.

I quite liked the mechanics, design, etc.... but playing the same 6 (or whatever) maps ad nauseam with cobbled together teams (and poor matchmaking on top of that) just utterly destroyed the game. I would love to play more of it... if there were more of it to play.

I quite liked the mechanics, design, etc.... but playing the same 6 (or whatever) maps ad nauseam with cobbled together teams (and poor matchmaking on top of that) just utterly destroyed the game. I would love to play more of it... if there were more of it to play.

My copy came with 15 maps.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • BrowserOS 0.46.0 by Razvan Serea BrowserOS is a free, open-source Chromium-based browser that runs AI agents natively, offering a smarter, more productive browsing experience. It supports Chrome extensions and integrates AI agents to automate tasks, fill forms, and streamline workflows. Your data stays on your computer: you can use your own API keys or run local models via Ollama, making it a privacy-first alternative to tools like Perplexity, Comet, or Dia. With built-in productivity tools and app integrations, BrowserOS boosts efficiency while keeping control firmly in your hands. Being Chromium-based, BrowserOS lets you effortlessly import your bookmarks, passwords, and Chrome extensions in just a few clicks. BrowserOS works with OpenAI GPT models, Anthropic Claude, Google Gemini, and local AI models via Ollama or LMStudio. You can use your own API keys and effortlessly switch between providers. BrowserOS Agent Your AI productivity assistant that organizes and manages your browsing effortlessly Quickly list, group, or close tabs Save and resume browsing sessions Search your history and organize bookmarks Switch instantly to the tab you need BrowserOS Navigator – Automate web tasks with ease Navigate websites and search automatically Interact with pages without manual effort Handle repetitive tasks in seconds What makes BrowserOS special Feels like home - same familiar interface as Google Chrome, works with all your extensions AI agents that run on YOUR browser, not in the cloud Privacy first - bring your own keys or use local models with Ollama. Your browsing history stays on your computer Open source and community driven - see exactly what's happening under the hood MCP store to one-click install popular MCPs and use them directly in the browser bar (coming soon) Built-in AI ad blocker that works across more scenarios! BrowserOS 0.46.0 changelog: Run Claude Code & Codex right in your browser — We've extended the agent harness to bring full coding agents into BrowserOS. Claude Code and Codex now come bundled and plug straight into the assistant, so you can drive your browser with the agent — and the subscription — you already use. A brand new experience — A redesigned new tab, a calmer composer, and a rebuilt command center for switching between agents. The whole assistant is cleaner, faster to reach, and easier to live in. New MCP tools — We rebuilt the browser tool surface from the ground up — a tighter, more reliable set of tools for agents to drive the browser. Plus one-click install of BrowserOS as an MCP server into the agents you already run, with automatic URL sync. Chromium 148 — Updated to the latest Chromium base with all recent upstream fixes and security patches. Streamlined — We've pulled back a few features that weren't getting much use — Skills, Soul, and Memory — so we can focus and ship better versions of them soon. Download: BrowserOS 0.46.0 | 181.0 MB (Open Source) Download: BrowserOS for macOS | 485.0 MB Links: BrowserOS Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft finally admits its default Windows 11 25H2, 24H2 action broke key legacy component by Sayan Sen Microsoft last week released Windows 11 KB5094126 and KB5093998 as the latest Patch Tuesday updates. Following that the company also published the accompanying dynamic updates under KB5094149, KB5095971, and KB5094156. So far the company has acknowledged two known issues that have popped up after the release which include bugged-out Office apps as well as the Recycle Bin; though there could be more at play too. Speaking of bugs and issues, Microsoft seems to have finally acknowledged a problem that probably has been around for close to a year. That's because back in July of 2025 the company made a default change to the latest Windows 11 versions, wherein it switched to JScript9Legacy on Windows 11 24H2 and later releases. Hence following the release of version 25H2 in October 2025, JScript9Legacy also remained default-enabled. As a result there has been a compatibility issue ever since then. For those wondering, by switching to JScript9Legacy Microsoft intended to improve the security of modern Windows PCs by reducing vulnerabilities tied to legacy scripting like cross-site scripting (XSS), among others. XSS exploits can allow cyber-attackers to attach malicious code onto legitimate websites and use them to execute the code when a potential victim loads such a website. Hence the new JScript9Legacy engine enforced stricter execution policies and improved object handling, which should help mitigate such attacks. Microsoft today has published a new support article detailing the problem. Neowin spotted it while browsing. The company says that JScript global definitions and execution context may fail to persist across scripts, potentially breaking older dependent apps and web-based components that relied on this legacy behavior. In the article Microsoft has confirmed that the issue stems from its move away from the older jscript9.dll engine in favor of jscript9legacy.dll. As mentioned above, while the newer engine was designed to address vulnerabilities and strengthen security it also changes how JScript handles execution context. As a result functions and definitions loaded by one script could no longer remain available to subsequent scripts once execution ended. The company notes that some applications worked correctly on earlier Windows versions because the older JScript engine automatically retained global definitions and execution state between scripts. Under the newer model though that behavior is disabled by default causing certain legacy workloads and polyfill-dependent scripts to fail. Microsoft says it addressed the problem via the KB5077241 update though the fix had not been enabled automatically in the following updates. As such admins must explicitly turn on persistent JScript execution context using a Registry setting that the tech giant shared today. The configuration can be applied to individual processes or system-wide through the FEATURE_ENABLE_PERSISTENCE registry key. The steps have been outlined below: Run the following command to create the feature control registry key: reg add "HKLM\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main\FeatureControl\FEATURE_ENABLE_PERSISTENCE" Under this key, create a new DWORD (32-bit) value. Configure the value as follows: To enable persistence for specific processes only: Set the value to 1 for each target process name. To enable persistence for all processes: Add * as the key name and set its value to 1. You can find the official support article here on Microsoft's website.
    • The possibility that milk gathers back into a glass implies that gravity can be 'reversed'.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      590
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      186
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      76
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!