Recommended Posts

My post is definitely my opinion. But you assert that "most people don't bother with single player". What is your source for that? I know multiplayer is very popular, but I don't think it's enough to carry a AAA game -- which is why I think Titanfall failed to live up to expectations.

 

-Forjo

 

An easy source. Steam does a great job of tracking achievements earned. Out of all of the copies of Black Ops, only 45% completed the SP campaign, and it was 56% from MW3 and MW2.

 

And even if people do play the SP campaign, again it mostly be the once and then that's it. A lot more time is spent playing the MP, look at the source and for CoD the mean time spent playing MP vs SP was rougly 1/5 Source

 

May be if Titanfall 2 comes to a wider audience it'll warrant a more focussed SP campaign, but again I'd prefer a MP that hits the nail on the head and having SP and MP with both being mediocre. 

I quite liked the mechanics, design, etc.... but playing the same 6 (or whatever) maps ad nauseam with cobbled together teams (and poor matchmaking on top of that) just utterly destroyed the game. I would love to play more of it... if there were more of it to play.

 

You should definitely look at trying the game again, there are more modes and the matchmaking is a lot better than when it was first released. 

I just don't think the time spent playing through the campaign warrants the time and effort spent creating them. SP campaigns in BF and CoD can usually be completed around the 6-8 hour mark on regular difficulty. 

Normally I won't buy a game without one.

 

I mean, if they want to sell me a game without a campaign, it'd better be half price or something (if not free to play.)

 

Titanfall was a special case, since it was a new developer (and I still loved the campaign!)

An easy source. Steam does a great job of tracking achievements earned. Out of all of the copies of Black Ops, only 45% completed the SP campaign, and it was 56% from MW3 and MW2.

 

And even if people do play the SP campaign, again it mostly be the once and then that's it. A lot more time is spent playing the MP, look at the source and for CoD the mean time spent playing MP vs SP was rougly 1/5 Source

 

May be if Titanfall 2 comes to a wider audience it'll warrant a more focussed SP campaign, but again I'd prefer a MP that hits the nail on the head and having SP and MP with both being mediocre. 

 

You should definitely look at trying the game again, there are more modes and the matchmaking is a lot better than when it was first released. 

I don't think that 45% of people completing the SP campaign supports the conclusion that "most people don't bother" with SP. If 45% actually finished it then greater than 45% actually played some of it.

 

Your 1:5 source for CoD is interesting, but doesn't really support the conclusion. Sure, when people play CoD multiplayer, they play 5 times as many mean hours as single-player. But I think that says more about the CoD campaign than single-player as a game mode. If you look at the rest of the chart, you'll see that more people overall play single-player than multiplayer (if not for as many hours). The rest of the article seems to indicate that single-player games (or games with a single-player mode) are very important to a great many people.

 

I think even after reading your cited data, I think Titanfall would have been FAR more successful had it included, as I said, a "Halo-esque campaign for this with story, characters, pacing, and vast explorable areas".

 

In other words, a single-player campaigns deserving of it's concept and mechanics.

 

-Forjo

  • Like 1

Normally I won't buy a game without one.

 

I mean, if they want to sell me a game without a campaign, it'd better be half price or something (if not free to play.)

 

Titanfall was a special case, since it was a new developer (and I still loved the campaign!)

 

Since it was devs formerly of the CoD: MW team, maybe it's best they didn't have a campaign mode, no?

I am just going by what MS has officially stated. That 4K gaming is coming to the Xbox One 

 

Oh great, just what we need, games @ 4K running at 5fps.

 

Xbox one can't come close to running games @ 1080p, for god sakes they'll never run at 4K.

  • Like 3

Oh great, just what we need, games @ 4K running at 5fps.

Xbox one can't come close to running games @ 1080p, for god sakes they'll never run at 4K.

We are not sure what you are talking about. Most games on the Xbox One are 1080p. I don't understand why some insist on spreading fud.

I love how everyone who either never played the game or only played it for a couple of hours but insisted or implied it was terrible is now excited for its sequel :p

 

That said, I'm glad more people will finally give the soon-to-be franchise a chance. I've dropped 431 hours into the game on Xbox One -- by far the most I've put into a game in years -- and play it constantly.

  • Like 3

I love how everyone who either never played the game or only played it for a couple of hours but insisted or implied it was terrible is now excited for its sequel :p

 

That said, I'm glad more people will finally give the soon-to-be franchise a chance. I've dropped 431 hours into the game on Xbox One -- by far the most I've put into a game in years -- and play it constantly.

People kill me with that.. All you heard last year is "TitanFall sucks", Titanfall has no true single player campaign, EPIC FAIL"

Now that EA has come out and said TF will most likely be multi-plat, folks. Singing different tune. "Oh now we get to see one of the best shooters, on the best console" and crap like that.

Doesn't bother me if TF goes multi-platform. As long as the game still runs on Azure on Xbox, it's all good with me...

  • Like 2

Now that EA has come out and said TF will most likely be multi-plat, folks. Singing different tune. "Oh now we get to see one of the best shooters, on the best console" and crap like that.

 

Who exactly? :wacko: I've not seen a single post like that in this topic. If you're bad mouthing another forum for those types of posts, please put an end to it here.

  • Like 3
  • 3 weeks later...

This was a given from the start, I mean it's EA, 3rd party publishers are all going multiplatform unless Sony or MS pay to publish it or some other deal.

 

Anyway, since we're talking next year for this, probably, if MS does things like they say, then they should be asking EA to bring this to the Windows Store with XBL support and cross-play. Sure EA has origin on the PC but it wouldn't hurt them in the least to do it.

Last one wasn't XBox exclusive either.  I seem to remember a PC version.

microsoft exclusive :rofl:

This was a given from the start, I mean it's EA, 3rd party publishers are all going multiplatform unless Sony or MS pay to publish it or some other deal.

 

Anyway, since we're talking next year for this, probably, if MS does things like they say, then they should be asking EA to bring this to the Windows Store with XBL support and cross-play. Sure EA has origin on the PC but it wouldn't hurt them in the least to do it.

microsoft should be trying to push this with every game that releases on both Xbox and windows.

 

hope they do release a propper PC games store this time with an Xbox type store for AAA titles and not full of tablet/phone games.

This was a given from the start, I mean it's EA, 3rd party publishers are all going multiplatform unless Sony or MS pay to publish it or some other deal.

 

Anyway, since we're talking next year for this, probably, if MS does things like they say, then they should be asking EA to bring this to the Windows Store with XBL support and cross-play. Sure EA has origin on the PC but it wouldn't hurt them in the least to do it.

EA has talked about wanting Cross Buy before so I could definitely see it happen, but they might not want to support two different storefronts and I don't see them giving up Origin.  I guess we'll see.

 

(Though that could be the real reason for EA Access in the first place, who knows?)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 by Razvan Serea Hasleo Disk Clone is a free and all-in-one disk cloning software for Windows 11/10/8/7/Vista and Windows Server that can help you migrate Windows OS to another disk, clone one disk to another disk or clone one partition to another location quickly and efficiently. Completely Free Windows Migration and Disk/Partition Cloning Software Migrate Windows from one disk to another without reinstalling Windows, apps. Clone one disk to another and makes the data on 2 disks are exactly the same. Clone a partition to another location without losing any data. Easily adjust the size and location of the destination partition. Convert MBR to GPT or convert GPT to MBR by cloning. Creation of Windows PE emergency disk. Extremely fast cloning speed and multi-language support. Supported OS: Windows Vista/Server 2008 or later, fully compatible with GPT and UEFI. Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 changelog: Fixed an issue that caused disk enumeration to fail Fixed an issue where WinPE created under Windows ARM64 26H1 did not work properly Download: Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 | 32.3 MB (Freeware) Link: Hasleo Disk Clone Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • This got me thinking, would you rather a self driving car prioritise protecting its passengers or everyone else? I'd choose the one that keeps me and my kids safest. At some point, these cars have to make those choices already, don't they? Wonder if we have a way to find out what way they lean.
    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      557
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      78
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!