Recommended Posts

My post is definitely my opinion. But you assert that "most people don't bother with single player". What is your source for that? I know multiplayer is very popular, but I don't think it's enough to carry a AAA game -- which is why I think Titanfall failed to live up to expectations.

 

-Forjo

 

An easy source. Steam does a great job of tracking achievements earned. Out of all of the copies of Black Ops, only 45% completed the SP campaign, and it was 56% from MW3 and MW2.

 

And even if people do play the SP campaign, again it mostly be the once and then that's it. A lot more time is spent playing the MP, look at the source and for CoD the mean time spent playing MP vs SP was rougly 1/5 Source

 

May be if Titanfall 2 comes to a wider audience it'll warrant a more focussed SP campaign, but again I'd prefer a MP that hits the nail on the head and having SP and MP with both being mediocre. 

I quite liked the mechanics, design, etc.... but playing the same 6 (or whatever) maps ad nauseam with cobbled together teams (and poor matchmaking on top of that) just utterly destroyed the game. I would love to play more of it... if there were more of it to play.

 

You should definitely look at trying the game again, there are more modes and the matchmaking is a lot better than when it was first released. 

I just don't think the time spent playing through the campaign warrants the time and effort spent creating them. SP campaigns in BF and CoD can usually be completed around the 6-8 hour mark on regular difficulty. 

Normally I won't buy a game without one.

 

I mean, if they want to sell me a game without a campaign, it'd better be half price or something (if not free to play.)

 

Titanfall was a special case, since it was a new developer (and I still loved the campaign!)

An easy source. Steam does a great job of tracking achievements earned. Out of all of the copies of Black Ops, only 45% completed the SP campaign, and it was 56% from MW3 and MW2.

 

And even if people do play the SP campaign, again it mostly be the once and then that's it. A lot more time is spent playing the MP, look at the source and for CoD the mean time spent playing MP vs SP was rougly 1/5 Source

 

May be if Titanfall 2 comes to a wider audience it'll warrant a more focussed SP campaign, but again I'd prefer a MP that hits the nail on the head and having SP and MP with both being mediocre. 

 

You should definitely look at trying the game again, there are more modes and the matchmaking is a lot better than when it was first released. 

I don't think that 45% of people completing the SP campaign supports the conclusion that "most people don't bother" with SP. If 45% actually finished it then greater than 45% actually played some of it.

 

Your 1:5 source for CoD is interesting, but doesn't really support the conclusion. Sure, when people play CoD multiplayer, they play 5 times as many mean hours as single-player. But I think that says more about the CoD campaign than single-player as a game mode. If you look at the rest of the chart, you'll see that more people overall play single-player than multiplayer (if not for as many hours). The rest of the article seems to indicate that single-player games (or games with a single-player mode) are very important to a great many people.

 

I think even after reading your cited data, I think Titanfall would have been FAR more successful had it included, as I said, a "Halo-esque campaign for this with story, characters, pacing, and vast explorable areas".

 

In other words, a single-player campaigns deserving of it's concept and mechanics.

 

-Forjo

  • Like 1

Normally I won't buy a game without one.

 

I mean, if they want to sell me a game without a campaign, it'd better be half price or something (if not free to play.)

 

Titanfall was a special case, since it was a new developer (and I still loved the campaign!)

 

Since it was devs formerly of the CoD: MW team, maybe it's best they didn't have a campaign mode, no?

I am just going by what MS has officially stated. That 4K gaming is coming to the Xbox One 

 

Oh great, just what we need, games @ 4K running at 5fps.

 

Xbox one can't come close to running games @ 1080p, for god sakes they'll never run at 4K.

  • Like 3

Oh great, just what we need, games @ 4K running at 5fps.

Xbox one can't come close to running games @ 1080p, for god sakes they'll never run at 4K.

We are not sure what you are talking about. Most games on the Xbox One are 1080p. I don't understand why some insist on spreading fud.

I love how everyone who either never played the game or only played it for a couple of hours but insisted or implied it was terrible is now excited for its sequel :p

 

That said, I'm glad more people will finally give the soon-to-be franchise a chance. I've dropped 431 hours into the game on Xbox One -- by far the most I've put into a game in years -- and play it constantly.

  • Like 3

I love how everyone who either never played the game or only played it for a couple of hours but insisted or implied it was terrible is now excited for its sequel :p

 

That said, I'm glad more people will finally give the soon-to-be franchise a chance. I've dropped 431 hours into the game on Xbox One -- by far the most I've put into a game in years -- and play it constantly.

People kill me with that.. All you heard last year is "TitanFall sucks", Titanfall has no true single player campaign, EPIC FAIL"

Now that EA has come out and said TF will most likely be multi-plat, folks. Singing different tune. "Oh now we get to see one of the best shooters, on the best console" and crap like that.

Doesn't bother me if TF goes multi-platform. As long as the game still runs on Azure on Xbox, it's all good with me...

  • Like 2

Now that EA has come out and said TF will most likely be multi-plat, folks. Singing different tune. "Oh now we get to see one of the best shooters, on the best console" and crap like that.

 

Who exactly? :wacko: I've not seen a single post like that in this topic. If you're bad mouthing another forum for those types of posts, please put an end to it here.

  • Like 3
  • 3 weeks later...

This was a given from the start, I mean it's EA, 3rd party publishers are all going multiplatform unless Sony or MS pay to publish it or some other deal.

 

Anyway, since we're talking next year for this, probably, if MS does things like they say, then they should be asking EA to bring this to the Windows Store with XBL support and cross-play. Sure EA has origin on the PC but it wouldn't hurt them in the least to do it.

Last one wasn't XBox exclusive either.  I seem to remember a PC version.

microsoft exclusive :rofl:

This was a given from the start, I mean it's EA, 3rd party publishers are all going multiplatform unless Sony or MS pay to publish it or some other deal.

 

Anyway, since we're talking next year for this, probably, if MS does things like they say, then they should be asking EA to bring this to the Windows Store with XBL support and cross-play. Sure EA has origin on the PC but it wouldn't hurt them in the least to do it.

microsoft should be trying to push this with every game that releases on both Xbox and windows.

 

hope they do release a propper PC games store this time with an Xbox type store for AAA titles and not full of tablet/phone games.

This was a given from the start, I mean it's EA, 3rd party publishers are all going multiplatform unless Sony or MS pay to publish it or some other deal.

 

Anyway, since we're talking next year for this, probably, if MS does things like they say, then they should be asking EA to bring this to the Windows Store with XBL support and cross-play. Sure EA has origin on the PC but it wouldn't hurt them in the least to do it.

EA has talked about wanting Cross Buy before so I could definitely see it happen, but they might not want to support two different storefronts and I don't see them giving up Origin.  I guess we'll see.

 

(Though that could be the real reason for EA Access in the first place, who knows?)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • You're absolutely right! No reason in hell these should be on the road!
    • They aren't going to want to. Most would just go with the 17 Pro and save money. Why would they want to spend $300 for basically the same thing? It's not worth it if there are hardly any changes from year to year.
    • 24H2 rolled out to the Release Preview Channel in early June 2024, so this coming a bit later in the Experimental Channel (formerly Dev) doesn't really say much more than earlier H2 releases that came out in October. I am not sure what the thinking is here by putting it in Experimental, one would think that the 26H2 stamp means features are locked down and it's now bug tested until October? I don't even pretend to understand Microsoft's strategy for Windows Insider Program though
    • Nothing Ear (a) and CMF Buds Pro 2 with active noise cancellation drop to lowest price ever by Fiza Ali With Prime Day 2026 scheduled to run from Tuesday 23 to Friday 26 June, Amazon has already begun rolling out early access offers ahead of the main event. Particularly, Nothing Ear (a) and CMF Buds Pro 2 wireless earbuds have dropped to their lowest price ever with limited Prime deal offering 33% and 24% discounts, respectively. Nothing Ear (a) are equipped with 11mm dynamic drivers featuring a PM1 + TPU diaphragm. For noise control, the earbuds offer active noise cancellation (ANC) of up to 45dB across frequencies reaching 5,000Hz. The smart ANC algorithm adapts to surrounding noise levels, while a Transparency Mode allows users to remain aware of their environment when needed. Connectivity is handled via Bluetooth 5.3, with support for AAC, SBC, and LDAC audio codecs. Additional features include IP54-rated earbuds for dust and splash resistance, paired with an IPX2-rated charging case. Furthermore, users also benefit from pinch controls, in-ear detection, Google Fast Pair, Microsoft Swift Pair, dual-device connectivity, and a low-latency mode designed for gaming and video playback. The Nothing X app unlocks a range of customisation options, including a personalised equaliser, bass enhancement, control remapping, ear tip fit testing, firmware updates, dual-device management, a Find My Earbuds feature, and low-latency mode settings. When it comes to the battery, the earbuds house a 46mAh lithium-ion battery, while the charging case contains a 500mAh cell. With ANC disabled, users can expect up to 9.5 hours of playback from the earbuds and up to 42.5 hours in total with the charging case. With ANC enabled, battery life is rated at up to 5.5 hours per charge and up to 24.5 hours combined with the case. Finally, fast charging is also supported that should provide up to 10 hours of playback from a 10-minute charge with ANC turned off. Nothing Ear (a) Wireless Earbuds (Black): $53.20 (Amazon US) - 33% The CMF Buds Pro 2 feature a dual-driver audio system consisting of an 11mm bass driver and a 6mm micro-planar tweeter. The earbuds use PU (polyurethane) and PET (polyethylene terephthalate) titanium-coated diaphragms and are tuned by Nothing to deliver balanced audio performance. They further support active noise cancellation of up to 50dB across a frequency range of up to 5,000Hz, and noise control features include a Smart ANC algorithm, Adaptive ANC, Transparency Mode, and Clear Voice Technology 2.0. For calls, the CMF Buds Pro 2 use a total of six microphones and feature an environmental noise-cancelling algorithm, Clear Voice Technology 3.0, and Wind Noise Reduction 3.0 that should improve voice clarity during conversations. Furthermore, when it comes to the connectivity, it is provided through Bluetooth 5.4. Additional features include an IP55 rating for dust and water resistance, Google Fast Pair, Microsoft Swift Pair, in-ear detection, a low-latency mode, and a Find My Earbuds function. Moreover, through the Nothing X app for Android and iOS, users can access custom EQ settings, a bass enhancement algorithm, customisable controls, Find My Earbuds, low-latency mode, dual-device connectivity, an ear tip fit test, and firmware updates. The earbuds contain a 60mAh rechargeable lithium-ion battery, while the charging case houses a 460mAh battery. A full charge of the earbuds and case via USB-C should take approximately 85 minutes, while the earbuds alone should be fully recharged in the case in around 60 minutes. Battery life is rated at up to 11 hours of playback on a single charge and up to 43 hours with the charging case when ANC is turned off. With ANC enabled, playback time is reduced to up to 6.5 hours on the earbuds and up to 26 hours with the charging case. Talk time is rated at up to 6 hours on the earbuds and 25 hours with the case with ANC disabled, or up to 4.8 hours and 18.6 hours, respectively, with ANC enabled. CMF Buds Pro 2 Wireless Earbuds (Dark Grey): $37.05 (Amazon US) - 24% Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      542
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      186
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      77
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      76
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!