Windows update problem?


Recommended Posts

Is anyone having trouble with Windows update not working or taking an extremely long time? I'm talking about hours from download to install. I installed the Windows 10 updates yesterday and it completely hosed my system so I erased and installed Windows 8.1 till 10 goes to RTM. I am running all the updates and they are taking so incredibly long. I've installed Windows plenty of times and I've never seen it go so slow like this.

 

EDIT: I've also begun getting "another installation is running" message or error 1500 when trying to re-install my stuff. This is on a clean installation of Windows 8.1. I've never seen this issue before of not being able to install something. I tried updating my nVidia driver and it told me it couldn't because another installation was running. I am not running anything else at all other than Windows Update in the background.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1246574-windows-update-problem/
Share on other sites

Yup, having exactly the same problem - left the pc on overnight with 20 updates left to go and it just stayed there.  Tried to update Nvidia drivers and it says it can't as another update is taking place.  All a bit annoying really!

You might need too delete the boot partition created by the install for 8. Should be 350mb or so and reside on the primary drive for windows. Getting upgraded to 10 it might be messed up as well. When you install a fresh 8 it ill create it again.

Well, I've reinstalled Windows 8.1 four times. It keeps having these really strange problems where it won't update and I get errors trying to install programs. I commonly get error 1500 that another installation is in progress. Other times, like now, I am trying to reinstall Lightroom and the installer is just sitting there frozen at 0%. I've never seen issues like this. Could it actually be something hardware related? When I ran Windows update, I had to leave the computer overnight after reboot just for it to install the updates.

No I haven't tried that. I don't want to install some program that s going yo scan for problems then chage me for a fix.

I just tried downloading an updated version of a program I use and the browser kept telling me the download was interrupted. Then when it finally did download, it told me the setup files were corrupted when I tried to run it. I'm really wondering if something went to g with my Samsung SSD.

No I haven't tried that. I don't want to install some program that s going yo scan for problems then chage me for a fix.

I just tried downloading an updated version of a program I use and the browser kept telling me the download was interrupted. Then when it finally did download, it told me the setup files were corrupted when I tried to run it. I'm really wondering if something went to g with my Samsung SSD.

 

It's possible that the drive is an issue, or it could be a network problem that's causing downloaded files to become corrupted. Maybe try downloading files with known hashes to see.

 

Edit: a selection of test files, with provided hashes at the bottom of the page. I'd recommend the larger files.

http://www.thinkbroadband.com/download.html

No I haven't tried that. I don't want to install some program that s going yo scan for problems then chage me for a fix.

I just tried downloading an updated version of a program I use and the browser kept telling me the download was interrupted. Then when it finally did download, it told me the setup files were corrupted when I tried to run it. I'm really wondering if something went to g with my Samsung SSD.

 

It's just an application that applies the commands listed on that page under the manual repair steps. You won't get charged for support from Microsoft unless you call them specifically and give them a credit card number.

 

If you suspect the drive I'd try either the manufacturer's tools or HDTune and see if it's reported any SMART errors. Your issue sounds like it could either be that or a NIC driver problem.

It's just an application that applies the commands listed on that page under the manual repair steps. You won't get charged for support from Microsoft unless you call them specifically and give them a credit card number.

 

If you suspect the drive I'd try either the manufacturer's tools or HDTune and see if it's reported any SMART errors. Your issue sounds like it could either be that or a NIC driver problem.

Sorry. I Googled a solution that masqueraded as a fox but I stalled a program then wanted $40 to fix the problem. I've ibstalled Windows on this PC many times so I dant imagine how it could be the network interface but I guess it's possible. The thing is that I was trying to install stuff that I already had downloaded and installed months ago and had problems. Adobe Lightroom still won't install. I'm running a chkdsk on the drive now but I'm not sure if it will find anything.

I'm trying to use some diagnostic tools but they won't even install. This is getting very frustrating. I'm not even sure it would be the ethernet adapter if I am trying to install programs I had already.

You didn't mention if you did anything at all with your hardware before this happened, but I just remembered I had the same issue a few years back with corruption and it turned out to be a bad SATA cable. It's worth a try if you have an extra lying around.

 

(It DID suddenly go *poof* and stop working, it wasn't a gradual degradation.)

 

@xendrome: He said it was a fresh reinstall.

To rule out one of the updates causing the problem, install them one by one.  You should be able to select what updates to install and what not to.  May take a while, but at least you will know its not one of the updates.

 

Also, before doing a clean install, boot from the install media.  Then press Shift f10.  This should put you in a command prompt.  Run...

 

Diskpart

list disk

Select disk 0 (should be disk 0 as your primary HD. Verify when you run list disk)

clean

exit

exit again to exit out of the command window.

 

I have had issues installing, or windows working right, on machines to Win7 that had XP installed previously without running the diskpart commands first.

I don't know, it's weird. I was still getting install hangs so I booted from my Win 8.1 DVD and installed to another SSD instead. The first thing I did (which I have always done) is install my nVidia drivers. Right now the progress bar has been stuck at around 95% for about 20 minutes. I clicked on the sound card driver and that's been stuck at 0% for 20 minutes. Just now a notification popped up that "Restore could not be completed. We weren't able to copy your settings over from SkyDrive." I have no idea what's going on.

I didn't try a different cable, but I have 2 SSD's on separate cables so yes I am trying another cable since I am now using the 2nd SSD. Still nothing is installing properly and these are drivers I've already had on my HDD for some time. The nVidia install never completed so I had to force quit it.

Tried installing an updated nVidia driver, stuck at 95%. Tried again to install sound card driver, stuck at 0%. Different SSD and different cable. I find it  highly unlikely that I have 2 bad drives and 2 bad cables at the same exact time. What the hell is going on?

I don't know if this has anything to do with it, but last night my a/v caught a Windows update file that was "very new or rare" and by default was going to block the download. If something was partially downloaded or a piece was missing, it could maybe cause the issue? I checked on the file and then allowed it, but if I didn't have mine set to prompt me for everything, it might have just quietly blocked something in the background without me ever knowing what was going on. Long shot, but maybe check logs on yours?

Tried installing an updated nVidia driver, stuck at 95%. Tried again to install sound card driver, stuck at 0%. Different SSD and different cable. I find it  highly unlikely that I have 2 bad drives and 2 bad cables at the same exact time. What the hell is going on?

 

Just the vid/sound updates?  Tried downloading the updated software directly from the NVIDIA or whoever you sound card manufacturer is?

Well, the installation is completely fresh. No AV software installed yet. I am seeing if maybe my 8.1 DVD got corrupted or something and just made a Windows 10 DVD and am going to try clean installing that.

Windows Update message Security Update for Internet Explorer 10 for Windows 8 (KB3034196) Actual, I'm running Windows 7 not Windows 8 or 8.1.

 

Wait a momnent...

 

Update: Windows Update has change log:

 

Security Update for Internet Explorer 11 for Windows 7 for x64-based Systems (KB3034196)
 
Installation date: ?2/?11/?2015 7:12 PM
 
Installation status: Successful
 
Update type: Important
 
A security issue has been identified in a Microsoft software product that could affect your system. You can help protect your system by installing this update from Microsoft. For a complete listing of the issues that are included in this update, see the associated Microsoft Knowledge Base article. After you install this update, you may have to restart your system.
 
More information: 
 
Help and Support: 

I am getting really ###### off. I clean installed Windows 10 this time and didn't run Windows update or anything yet. I just went to install the NVidia driver and it still gets stuck at 95%. This is really baffling. I wonder if I should my drives on the controller card I have. If I move the hard drives, which are software RAID0, to the controller card will the array stay intact?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
    • Usually the bigger ones with many fixes/changes take a few, theyre an exception to the rule most likely
    • If you don’t get lucky with Valve’s Steam Machine reservation system, you can make your own Steam Machine instead. Valve says that “starting with the SteamOS 3.8 release, you can put together your own Steam Machine using whatever PC parts you want.” SteamOS 3.8.10 launched last week with a slew of updates, including “improved compatibility with recent Intel and AMD platforms.” Alongside that improved compatibility, Valve is giving gamers the green light to install SteamOS on their own desktops. In an interview with The Verge, Valve’s Pierre-Loup Griffais said Valve has been “rolling out improvements to [SteamOS] so it’s more compatible with desktop hardware,” including eventual support for Nvidia graphics. Griffais says Valve has “a growing team” working on Nvidia driver support for SteamOS, adding, “We’re collaborating with Nvidia very closely.” While he mentioned that Nvidia support might not come this year, Griffais emphasized that “it’s certainly something that we’re working on in the background.”     Subscription not needed: https://archive.fo/Tssfc Subscription needed: https://www.theverge.com/games/953411/valve-steamos-desktop-nvidia
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      452
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!