Recommended Posts

I forget how it is in the older versions (not something I ever really look at), but in 37 beta it does.

proxy.png

 

Proxy settings have been in Firefox for many years..  Some people don't look deeply to find that part or look online to get the instructions on how to setup or where it is located.

  • Like 2
The people who like Firefox are the one's who still like to live in Past. You know Windows 7 with start menu, Cool looking XP etc.

Why is it that some people are simply incapable of making their point without putting other people down? I think it really shows a lack of maturity. Oh and by the way, sometimes the past was better than what we have in the present. Ever heard of a '57 Chevy? ;)

 

As for me, not that it should matter to anyone else, I use Iceweasel on Debian. Seems to work fine. Honestly, I don't spend a lot of time fretting about a browser. I often times run in full screen, so I don't see the browser interface all that frequently.

I've never had either of these problems with firefox.

 

the connection untrusted thing usually means either something wrong with the site's ssl cert...

Well, what can I say.  I do on two separate computers.  As for something wrong with the ssl certificate, I don't get the error on Chrome or IE.  Also, the error is not consistent.  The first site I noticed it on was hotmail.com.

 

Firefox does not use system proxy settings on Windows whereas Chrome / IE does.

I just checked and mine is set to "use system proxy settings."

Well, what can I say.  I do on two separate computers.  As for something wrong with the ssl certificate, I don't get the error on Chrome or IE.  Also, the error is not consistent.  The first site I noticed it on was hotmail.com.

 

I just checked and mine is set to "use system proxy settings."

That's definitely not normal behavior... I use hotmail/outlook.com all the time in firefox and have never had any ssl issue. sounds to me like some kind of addon, plugin, or malware causing an odd issue with your firefox install...

It's the add-ons that have always made me stick with Firefox. Also, I like the fact that Firefox allows me to choose if I want to install an add-on not from the Firefox Add-ons library as opposed to just blocking them in Chrome. I've not used Chrome much lately, but I always found the smoothness of scrolling terrible compared to IE and Firefox, although I'm not sure if that has been addressed lately.

 

Been using Firefox since version 2 and haven't looked back ever since. The speed of the browsers is negligible for me. Maybe Firefox takes 1 second longer to open than Chrome, but that's only because I have loads of add-ons installed and to tell the truth, the delay of 1 second doesn't bother me in the slightest!

 

I also use Firefox on my MacBook Pro, whereas Chrome seems to be a terrible experience on OS X. Oh, and Sky don't like Chrome, so I can't use it to watch Sky Sports! :p

That's definitely not normal behavior... I use hotmail/outlook.com all the time in firefox and have never had any ssl issue. sounds to me like some kind of addon, plugin, or malware causing an odd issue with your firefox install...

It started happening before I had any addons installed.  The first thing I did (after it had imported all my Chrome bookmarks) was open up all my bookmarks so it could populate the favicons.  That's when I noticed various sites with the error.

 

Also, I just fired it up again and sure enough I was logged out of Neowin.

well webkit browsers have a serious flaw right now... none of them allow you to save anything from an IP address...

 

https://forums.opera.com/discussion/1863348/critical-can039t-save-anything-on-local-or-remote-ip-addresses

 

chrome and opera both have that issue.

 

Opera also when it hibernates tabs it flashes parts of my taskbar and so does chrome.

 

both have the issues with hardware accelleration turned on or off. I even reinstalled both and they have the same problems with no addons or anything.

 

 

 

so I stick to firefox till that's fixed.

Proxy settings have been in Firefox for many years..  Some people don't look deeply to find that part or look online to get the instructions on how to setup or where it is located.

I am certain that does not reflect the Windows proxy settings and can surely bypass it.

Firefox is the fastest browser when using NoScript + ABP without question. Not only that but Chrome's ABP doesn't really block ads, it just hides them, and often not very well. So the two main pluses are customisation and extensions I'd say.

I am certain that does not reflect the Windows proxy settings and can surely bypass it.

 

Like I said, look it up on how to set it up. 

 

That's what Google is for.  That's why people complain about their problem.  Google it for a solution or report a problem to Mozilla..  if not working at all, then use alternative browser or use proxy software.

If you're having trouble with Flash in Firefox, I am not having problems with it,

but that might be because I am using the beta version of Flash:

http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer.html

 

 

I absolutely and vehemently HATE Adobe Crash Player. I see these errors on a frequent basis . . .

 

The-Adobe-Flash-plugin-has-crashed.png

 

Shockwave-flash-mithering-again.png

 

Adobe-Crash-Player-has-stopped-working.p

 

 

It often locks up my entire browser, so I'm forced to do this . . .

 

Adobe-Crash-Player--KILL-IT.png

 

 

This was rather a new one recently . . .

 

Adobe-Crash-Player--software-exception.p

 

 

Adobe Crash Player is like a cancer on the web. It is the buggiest and most unstable POS software for online multimedia content.

And that's for the non-beta version, which acts more like poorly coded pre-alpha software that gets worse with every release.

 

 

In no uncertain terms ... Adobe Crash Player seriously needs to DIE!

After using Chrome for most of the day, i can say that one advantage firefox does have is the font looks smooth and sharp. Chrome seems horrible with fonts. Most look fuzzy for some reason.

This is something thats made me turn away from chrome in the past. 

For me it's as simple as the extension selection. I started with Firefox before Chrome existed, and I put in all of my "necessary" extensions that I needed. When Chrome came out I gave it a go and enjoyed it, but I couldn't get the extensions that I wanted, or the replacements that I could find weren't as extensive.

But really, to each their own. My Microsoft instructor was all about Chrome a couple of weeks ago, and I know some people who still stick with the default options (Internet Explorer or Safari, depending on your O.S.)

Just go for what you prefer, really.

<snip>

 

I still find it impressive that their collective fail is even multi-platform, multi-arch and multi-OS too!

 

Unfortunately, they must also think CVE's stand for Certificate of Valiant Effort.

You want reasons?

 

1. Chrome introduced many abominations that have been reluctantly adopted by every major browser now, with no evidence that they're better :-

- no title bar, just a row of tabs

- insane numbering scheme

 

2. Chrome's extension system is a joke compared to Firefox

 

3. It uses much more memory

 

4. Firefox has tons of great addons, and they are the reason other browsers added extension support

 

There's zero reason to use Chrome other than the fact that Google forces you to use it for things like Hangouts. It does nothing better. Its not faster, lighter and doesn't have more features.

I started on Firefox, moved to Chrome, and I'm now back on Firefox.

 

- Firefox 1.0 - 3.5.7 (late 2004 - 2010)

- Chrome 4.0 - 35.0 (2010 - mid 2014)

- Firefox 30.0 - present

 

I switched to Chrome because Firefox was having too many memory issues and it was painful having a single plugin crash the whole browser; however, I switched back to Firefox because Google has increasingly become more 'evil' and they removed NPAPI support under linux (I still require it for the job).

 

I am happy again with Firefox, but that is not to say I wasn't happy on Chrome. Both are excellent browsers, but as I get older and less trusting, I realize that Firefox will likely not be replaced again except if another product from Mozilla is released under the same spirit.

Firefox is much more customizable than Chrome. Chrome's extension are nothing compared to Firefox's add-ons. Chrome extensions can add a little functionality, but really doesn't change the experience. On the other hand, Firefox add-ons can change the browser completely. I feel like Chrome is becoming the 'new IE' as they're moving away from the idea of an open web to an idea that Google should be in charge of what the web is. 

 

I've been using Cyberfox, a 64-bit variant of Firefox as my secondary browser and it's feels snappier than Chrome.

I check Cyberfox sourceforge page and shows it has dark (black) theme... That looks nice if it's like that for all sites lol

 

Waterfox is very fast for me.  clicked on it and it starts up instantly.  Rendering page fast or slow does not rely totally on the browser alone.  ISP speed / Spamware / Spyware / bots / many many other stuff that slows down your browser.  Firefox/Waterfox has a plethora of Add-ons or Extensions.  Chrome is made by Google so I think they don't want the AdBlocking extension to work correctly.  They did bought AdBlock right?  So non obtrusive ads will show.  Firefox is safe from Google's greedy hands for now I think.  So the choice is clear for me to use the fox.  Someone mention that they will release Firefox x64 bit.  That would be a great news for sure.  I'll just use Firefox instead of Waterfox if they release 64bit browser.

 

For me I use Mozilla Firefox and I have done done since it was Phoenix 0.6.

By pretty much all performance metrics Chrome is a better browser. It's great to use, it's user friendly, it's fast, it's innovate and it's pretty much everything I would want in a browser; except it's made by a company that has the potential to run the internet and I don't like that.

Google is my default search engine. GMail is my email address. Google provide me with DNS and I own an android phone, but for me I have to support a browser that is not based on self-interest and money. Checks and balances and all that.

Firefox is open-source and maintained by a foundation that isn't driven by money and is never going to dominate the internet like Google. It may be second best in most people's eyes but I think the ability to have an open internet that anyone can write a browser for is an important thing to the world and so I support Mozilla and Firefox. It's not what the browser does, but what it stands for.

Having a web page open 20ms quicker doesn't give me a raging boner. Neither does having a larger version number. And even though Google have the money to attract all the very best talent, for me it hasn't translated into a web browser that is so much better than the competition.

The internet should be bigger than one company, so I choose Mozilla Firefox for my browser.

Firefox :

- is modular, got addons for every one of my needs

- doesn't sell me out like all google products do

- doesn't ###### the bed by removing features/support left and right without warning like google does

- does the job pretty fast and well

Adobe Crash Player is like a cancer on the web. It is the buggiest and most unstable POS software for online multimedia content.

And that's for the non-beta version, which acts more like poorly coded pre-alpha software that gets worse with every release.

 

 

In no uncertain terms ... Adobe Crash Player seriously needs to DIE!

Um...if your flash player is crashing that much then the problem is elsewhere. I can't remember the last time I saw it crash on both of my laptops.

Granted I still wish it would die.

Um...if your flash player is crashing that much then the problem is elsewhere. I can't remember the last time I saw it crash on both of my laptops.

Granted I still wish it would die.

I can't see how the problem would be elsewhere, since it happens on all my Windows systems ... main PC, laptop, media centre. The only system I haven't

seen it crash on is in Linux, That has an older version (11.2.x) installed that only get security patch updates since Adobe stopped supporting it on Linux.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
    • 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD drops to its lowest price in over three months by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the 2TB WD_Black SN7100 internal solid-state drive at its lowest price in over three months, so you may want to check it out, if you have been considering a storage upgrade, before the deal dries up (purchase link is toward the end of the article). Featuring a PCIe Gen 4.0 interface and M.2 2280 form factor, the SN7100 promises to deliver sequential read speeds of up to 7,250MB/s and sequential write speeds reaching 6,900MB/s, offering as much as a 35% improvement in performance compared with the previous generation. It also achieves random read speeds of 1,000,000 IOPS and random write speeds of 1,400,000 IOPS. The drive uses Western Digital’s TLC 3D NAND technology for reliable performance and is further supported by a five-year limited warranty. It also offers strong endurance, rated at up to 1,200TBW, making it suitable for demanding workloads such as gaming, content creation, and high-speed recording. Moreover, its DRAM-less architecture claims to improve power efficiency (the SSD relies on system memory for caching via HMB), while the WD_Black Dashboard software enables users to monitor drive health, install firmware updates, and activate Game Mode for potentially better performance. Finally, it operates within an operating temperature range of 0°C to 85°C, and can withstand storage temperatures from -40°C to 85°C. 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD: $242.96 (Amazon US) Check this deal out if you want a 4TB option. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!