What's your preferred track rating system: hearts, stars or halve stars?


What's your preferred track rating system: heart/broken heart, stars or halve stars?  

18 members have voted

  1. 1. What's your preferred track rating system: heart/broken heart, stars or halve stars?

    • Heart/Broken heart rating
      1
    • 5 star rating (only full stars allowed)
      8
    • 5 star rating (halve stars allowed)
      7
    • Other (please explain in the topic)
      1


Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

What's your preferred rating system in audio players?

 

I'm asking this question because I will start implementing a rating system in my audio player Dopamine (see this thread).

You're allowed to motivate your choice. I'm especially interested in knowing why one uses the halve star rating: how do you organize your collection with halve stars?

 

Thank you!

well i don't do it much, but if i did (or when i did)  i would prefer rating system out of 10...   so if you are using 5 stars, then halves should be allowed.

actually, now that i think about it more, 5 stars is fine,   i would mostly only rank the songs i most like, and the out of ten system would be more suitable for movies.

 

 

 

anything but the hearts :p

  • Like 1

Don't personally use ratings myself (if I didn't like it I'd just delete it :D)  but if I were to use it, I'd probably go 1-5 with halves allowed, just to save space in the interface versus a row of 10 of them.   And yea, no hearts please... Dopamine's got a pretty slick interface, don't go cutesifying it up now with a kiddy look.

  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...

I like the thumbs up and thumbs down of Play Music, it's simple and it works well. Stars are too precise for me, sometimes I feel like a song is 5 stars, and a few days later in another mood it could be 3 stars. With thumbs, it'd just be a thumbs up. When I'm given the option of using stars, I always just give four or five stars anyway, and find it hard to differentiate between them.

  • Like 1

I like the thumbs up and thumbs down of Play Music, it's simple and it works well. Stars are too precise for me, sometimes I feel like a song is 5 stars, and a few days later in another mood it could be 3 stars. With thumbs, it'd just be a thumbs up. When I'm given the option of using stars, I always just give four or five stars anyway, and find it hard to differentiate between them.

 

Thanks for your feedback. I'll probably just give you an option to switch between both rating systems. I'm also more of a like/don't like guy. But I understand other people need more precision.

The one I've grown the most used to is a star rating system, usually out of 5. No halves.

 

What would be neat is a negative rating system and a song flagged with a negative rating would never be played again until its status is changed. I've never seen a player do that before.

The one I've grown the most used to is a star rating system, usually out of 5. No halves.

 

What would be neat is a negative rating system and a song flagged with a negative rating would never be played again until its status is changed. I've never seen a player do that before.

 

I was thinking about something along the lines of this. Not with a negative rating, but more giving a weight to a song in a shuffled playlist, depending on its rating. Meaning: a song with a lower rating would have less chances of being played than a song with a high rating.

Not too fussed between hearts and stars. Maybe some other graphical representation more in line with the overall look of the app. Bars or something? Dunno.

Also not sure how useful half ratings would be, but that may be because over the years, I have never retained the ratings I have given songs. Every time I've reinstalled my OS, I've always lost that info :(

Half ratings would basically turn marks out of five into marks out of 10, right? So I suppose that could be good. And obviously, you can still just use full marks if that is more your thing.

Thumbs up/down or full/broken hearts seem a bit too restrictive. I mean, if it's so bad that it gets a thumbs down or a broken heart, you should probably get rid of it :p

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This and Crazy Taxi are the two games that interested me the most from this showcase.
    • Good, because the nonstop chattering from the voices in her head made me quit the second game.
    • This new cabinet design lets you run AMD, Intel, and Nvidia PCs inside one case by Sayan Sen At Computex 2026 earlier this month, AMD announced a couple of new X3D processors for both sockets AM4 and AM5 as it confirmed the support extension of the latter till 2029. And although Intel didn't unveil any new desktop chips, the company's Core Ultra 200S Plus series is relatively new too. Let's say though that you want the best of both worlds simultaneously, and instead of running two different systems, you can have both running together side-by-side, or rather on top of one another. That's exactly what Thermaltake's CAPO X dual system is made for doing. While it's not exactly mandatory to run AMD with Intel, or vice versa, you get the idea. As you can see in the render above, it is essentially like a double-decker PC case that is capable of holding two microATX (mATX) motherboards. Even running just one discrete graphics card in a PC can get toasty, so you may be wondering how well the cooling is designed on the CAPO X, Thermaltake has confirmed, as is evident from the marketing promo image above, that the case supports up to two 360 mm AIO liquid coolers. 420mm is not supported. In total there is room for 13 120mm case fans. In terms of I/O (input/output) options for the two systems, there are naturally two places for those ports, one at the top and one at the very bottom of the chassis in the front panel. In terms of use cases, there are many possibilities. Thermaltake itself, for example, highlights how one system can be your main PC while the other could be the AI agent PC. Another example given is how it can be used to stream and game simultaneously with dedicated systems instead of hogging one with the entire load. Nothing regarding pricing or availability was said. Source: Thermaltake (YouTube, X)
    • There might be some passive design improvements (cooling, etc), but I doubt they'd change the core performance spec of the hardware mid-generation when they've already got a new console in development.
    • State of Decay 3 is out in 2027, reveals Plague Nests with new co-op gameplay trailer by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe A few months ago, Undead Labs broke its silence about the third entry in the State of Decay series since its announcement in 2020. Today, the studio had a brand-new trailer to reveal at the Xbox Games Showcase, finally giving players a look at the Unreal Engine 5-powered title. A broad 2027 release window is now attached to State of Decay 3 too. The studio confirmed that every scene seen in the gameplay trailer (except for the studio logo) released today is from the game with no cinematic footage. "The quality bar of the moment-to-moment experience is higher than anything we’ve achieved in Undead Labs’ history," says the studio. "State of Decay 3 is being built in Unreal Engine 5, and we’re creating better quality versions of what makes our game the survival sandbox it is, and the combat experience is really, really important to us, and I think you can see it coming through in this trailer." One new aspect of this upcoming entry is the Plague Nests. These are supposed to be dynamic, dungeon‑like enemy hubs with varied “personas” that change tactics each time one appears on a map. These areas will have the best loot in the game for players brave enough to tackle them. The combat system is being overhauled too, letting players do quick and power attacks depending on the situation. This isn't just on the player's side though, as zombies themselves now have multiple new types of behaviors depending on how fresh or decayed they are. "All of these play very differently, especially as you start getting outnumbered or when you’re making noise and running around and trying to save your rear end or the rear end of your friend next to you," adds the developer. Of course, settlement building and community management are massive parts of this third entry too. These are being further expanded with the cooperative focus, giving players much more freedom for playing together than in State of Decay 2. Players will even be able to split up and build settlements in different areas of the same map with different goals. Undead Labs confirmed that playtests are already ongoing for the title, and interested players can sign up to participate by heading over here once more slots open up ahead of the full release. State of Decay 3 is coming out on PC, Xbox Series X|S, PlayStation 5, and Xbox Game Pass sometime in 2027.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      492
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      68
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!