What's your preferred track rating system: hearts, stars or halve stars?


What's your preferred track rating system: heart/broken heart, stars or halve stars?  

18 members have voted

  1. 1. What's your preferred track rating system: heart/broken heart, stars or halve stars?

    • Heart/Broken heart rating
      1
    • 5 star rating (only full stars allowed)
      8
    • 5 star rating (halve stars allowed)
      7
    • Other (please explain in the topic)
      1


Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

What's your preferred rating system in audio players?

 

I'm asking this question because I will start implementing a rating system in my audio player Dopamine (see this thread).

You're allowed to motivate your choice. I'm especially interested in knowing why one uses the halve star rating: how do you organize your collection with halve stars?

 

Thank you!

well i don't do it much, but if i did (or when i did)  i would prefer rating system out of 10...   so if you are using 5 stars, then halves should be allowed.

actually, now that i think about it more, 5 stars is fine,   i would mostly only rank the songs i most like, and the out of ten system would be more suitable for movies.

 

 

 

anything but the hearts :p

  • Like 1

Don't personally use ratings myself (if I didn't like it I'd just delete it :D)  but if I were to use it, I'd probably go 1-5 with halves allowed, just to save space in the interface versus a row of 10 of them.   And yea, no hearts please... Dopamine's got a pretty slick interface, don't go cutesifying it up now with a kiddy look.

  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...

I like the thumbs up and thumbs down of Play Music, it's simple and it works well. Stars are too precise for me, sometimes I feel like a song is 5 stars, and a few days later in another mood it could be 3 stars. With thumbs, it'd just be a thumbs up. When I'm given the option of using stars, I always just give four or five stars anyway, and find it hard to differentiate between them.

  • Like 1

I like the thumbs up and thumbs down of Play Music, it's simple and it works well. Stars are too precise for me, sometimes I feel like a song is 5 stars, and a few days later in another mood it could be 3 stars. With thumbs, it'd just be a thumbs up. When I'm given the option of using stars, I always just give four or five stars anyway, and find it hard to differentiate between them.

 

Thanks for your feedback. I'll probably just give you an option to switch between both rating systems. I'm also more of a like/don't like guy. But I understand other people need more precision.

The one I've grown the most used to is a star rating system, usually out of 5. No halves.

 

What would be neat is a negative rating system and a song flagged with a negative rating would never be played again until its status is changed. I've never seen a player do that before.

The one I've grown the most used to is a star rating system, usually out of 5. No halves.

 

What would be neat is a negative rating system and a song flagged with a negative rating would never be played again until its status is changed. I've never seen a player do that before.

 

I was thinking about something along the lines of this. Not with a negative rating, but more giving a weight to a song in a shuffled playlist, depending on its rating. Meaning: a song with a lower rating would have less chances of being played than a song with a high rating.

Not too fussed between hearts and stars. Maybe some other graphical representation more in line with the overall look of the app. Bars or something? Dunno.

Also not sure how useful half ratings would be, but that may be because over the years, I have never retained the ratings I have given songs. Every time I've reinstalled my OS, I've always lost that info :(

Half ratings would basically turn marks out of five into marks out of 10, right? So I suppose that could be good. And obviously, you can still just use full marks if that is more your thing.

Thumbs up/down or full/broken hearts seem a bit too restrictive. I mean, if it's so bad that it gets a thumbs down or a broken heart, you should probably get rid of it :p

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • App, useful & Teams shouldn't be used in the same sentence.
    • New Outlook for Windows and Web is getting a simple but very useful email feature by Sayan Sen Recently Microsoft put up a blog post highlighting not one, not two, but 15 total reasons why it feels you should switch to New Outlook already. If that was not enough, the company is bringing another new feature soon that could finally compel you to switch over to the new app. According to a recent update on the Microsoft 365 roadmap, the tech giant is making changes to how message sorting works when users choose criteria besides the traditional options of From, Subject, or Date Received. The idea is to provide better options for the attribute being used for sorting and make it easier to understand why messages appear in a particular order. For those unfamiliar Outlook already allows users to sort emails using a variety of fields including sender, category, importance, subject, and message size. Users can access these options through the Filter menu in Outlook for Windows and Outlook on the web. With the upcoming change, whenever users sort by a field other than From, Subject, or Date Received, Outlook will automatically display an additional column showing the value being used for the sort. For example, if messages are sorted by Size, a Size column will appear in the message list, allowing users to immediately see the data that determines the ordering of emails. Microsoft believes this should make sorting behavior simpler and reduce the need to manually adjust views or inspect individual messages. Support for sorting by Flag Due Date is also coming and should be especially be helpful for users who rely on email flags to manage follow-up tasks and deadlines. The feature is listed under Microsoft 365 Roadmap ID 564803 and is expected to reach general availability beginning later this month itself (June 2026). You can find the entry here. As always though, users should keep in mind that roadmap timelines can change and rollout schedules may occasionally be adjusted by Microsoft. Outlook for Web is also set to receive this feature.
    • That is true. but the liability side of my balance sheet is clean and has been for decades.  Nobody comes a knocking,  calling or writing harassing me for the money i owe them.😎👍  Haven't dealt with "a money changer" in decades and like Jesus it was in Jerusalem.  Don't have much money, but have even less stress in my life.👍👍     P.S.  Sorry, can't walk on water or change it to wine,  
    • Maybe ? DLSS Swapper (can swap the DLSS/FSR/XeSS versions) as long as the game (typically online/competitive) doesn't checks for file tampering. You can try different version(s) or update if not the current version of the FSR. https://github.com/beeradmoore/dlss-swapper
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      492
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      248
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!