Bloatware removal tools to recommend to friends?


Recommended Posts

Hi fellow Neowinians,

 

I've had a lot of friends who bought PCs latent with tons of bloatware that makes the laptop runs poorly.

 

I've recommended that they remove software that they don't use to speed up their laptops, but all too often, they end up removing crucial drivers and I ended up having to reinstall them.

 

What are some software that I should recommend to them that would remove bloatware, but leave the drivers alone?

If you're willing to spend some time and do them a real favor (maybe they'll repay you in some way) I'd recommend reinstalling from a clean copy of Windows, with just the latest hardware drivers installed. Most OEM utilities are pretty useless and can be safely dispensed with.

Reinstalling is the best option for decraping a system, but assuming its Windows 8+ then they could try a system Refresh / Reset (though OEM's are created bloated recovery images so that might not always work). Otherwise  PC Decrapifier I've used and it does a pretty good job.

 

Additionally a quick search pulled up a PC World article "Beat it, bloatware: How to clean Superfish and other crap off your PC" that also talks of a " Should I Remove It? utility", It seems useful, but I havent tested it out yet.

 

But as said before PC Decrapifier has been around for a while and works quite nicely.

Sometime I think that people expect too much from their computer.

 

A friend of mine has a Dell I3135-3751SLV and she's not too happy with the performance.

 

She did run PC Decrapifier, but there's still a lot bloat left over (she's too cautious about what she is removing) so she's going to drop her laptop off this week.

 

Anyway, the laptop isn't exactly a speed demon esp. because it has an AMD A6-1450 processor and I have to keep her expectations in line.

 

That said, I also plan to disable a lot of the Visual Effects to increase performance.

LOL gotta love the people who buy the $200 POS and complain that its slow.

You know what's funnier (and I've actually seen this happen), some will then happily pay for those scam RAM/system speed booster utilities. Yeah, don't spend on the hardware but on stupid sh*t and then complain about how everything's still so slow. How intelligent. :rolleyes: And of course more often than not these people will end up loading their already POS system with every toolbar and other crap imaginable. :pinch: I swear, next time some relative or acquaintaince asks me to clean their system I'm gonna start charging real $$$ for my time. :crazy:

  • Like 3

PC Cecrapifier works well, http://www.pcdecrapifier.com/

 

I used that before I discovered Windows 7 isos on digitalife. Now Microsoft offers them freely and legally if you have the serial key.

 

After the Lenovo incident I always recommend a fresh copy. Too much openCandy and SSL busting malware. It is downright criminal what these OEMs get away with these days.

On the plus side the new Lenovos wont come with any but many still come with Superfish from old inventory

You know what's funnier (and I've actually seen this happen), some will then happily pay for those scam RAM/system speed booster utilities. Yeah, don't spend on the hardware but on stupid sh*t and then complain about how everything's still so slow. How intelligent. :rolleyes: And of course more often than not these people will end up loading their already POS system with every toolbar and other crap imaginable. :pinch: I swear, next time some relative or acquaintaince asks me to clean their system I'm gonna start charging real $$$ for my time. :crazy:

EXACTLY !

Another thing that was always frustrating for me is - they would call me to fix their computer, then completely ignore my recommendations/advice  & listen to "the guy down the street who's son is a computer genius"   (of course kid down the street is nothing more than a web developer or some IT job that requires zero knowledge of computers).

  • Like 3

Well, she originally had a Dell Inspiron 1564 with Intel Core i3-330M and 4GB RAM, but one of her drunk friends broke it.

 

Anyway, after I removed all the bloatware from that computer, she was generally happy with it.

 

The Intel Core i3-330M is faster then the AMD A6-1450, but not by an outrageous amount.

http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Core+i3+M+330+%40+2.13GHz

http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=AMD+A6-1450+APU

 

She said that her Dell Inspiron I3135-3751SLV has a lot of lagging and freezing issues.

 

 

LOL gotta love the people who buy the $200 POS and complain that its slow.

 

She bought it for $350.

She said that her Dell Inspiron I3135-3751SLV has a lot of lagging and freezing issues.

If the laptop's not heating up a lot (which might require cleaning the insides and possibly reapplying thermal paste) and she's still complaining about performance after a clean install, recommend to her that she (or her father) spend a little money. Easiest thing to do is drop in more RAM and an SSD. If she's not running anything too heavy for the CPU this should definitely help.

Romero, on 11 Mar 2015 - 23:23, said:

If the laptop's not heating up a lot (which might require cleaning the insides and possibly reapplying thermal paste) and she's still complaining about performance after a clean install, recommend to her that she (or her father) spend a little money. Easiest thing to do is drop in more RAM and an SSD. If she's not running anything too heavy for the CPU this should definitely help.

 

She writes her reports and do research online as well as use it for entertainment.

 

The most demanding thing she uses it for is to watch Netflix on her TV via a HDMI port.

 

As for as upgrade is concern, this computer already has 4 GB of DDR3 RAM and I doubt that it needs more than that. I am not so sure about putting SSD in a budget laptop.

 

I want to note that she hasn't actually given me the computer yet, so I still need to wait for that.

She writes her reports and do research online as well as use it for entertainment.

 

The most demanding thing she uses it for is to watch Netflix on her TV via a HDMI port.

 

As for as upgrade is concern, this computer already has 4 GB of DDR3 RAM and I doubt that it needs more than that. I am not so sure about putting SSD in a budget laptop.

 

I want to note that she hasn't actually given me the computer yet, so I still need to wait for that.

I would definately start any system with a check for crapware / unneeded programs / other types of bugs. After that I would look at whats all running and what can be turned off or delayed.  Next a disk cleanup solution.

 

Then as a last resort hardware and while I would always recommend a SSD for best performance I have been impressed lately by how much a good hybrid drive can bring to the table as a cheaper upgrade over standard laptop hard drives.

Hello,

 

I tend to build my own PCs (desktop) and buy business-grade laptops, so I do not have much experience with consumer-grade systems these days.

 

So, question for all the people who are recommending to blow away the preloaded image and load a generic Windows ISO:  Is it really quicker to do this than just removing whatever [bloat|crap|trial]ware was preinstalled?  And is performance that much different?

 

The last time I got a consumer laptop in my hands was a Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro (this is one of the models that didn't get the Superfish adware treatment) and there were probably around ten (or maybe slightly less) programs that I didn't want on it, counting both classic desktop Windows programs and Modern Windows apps).  I doubt I spent more than 10 minutes uninstalling these, including time required to reboot. 

 

Admittedly, I did not check the drive afterwards to see if any files or folders were left on the system, but as part of the process of configuring the system, I did checking of various autoload entries in the registry, scheduled tasks, etc., examining the processes which ran on startup and so forth to make sure no orphaned drivers, services or programs continued to run.  That's something I do separately after I've finished configuring the computer, but I'm guessing that's another 20-30 minutes of time.

 

In any case, total time spent was under an hour.  Call it 45 minutes to be generous.

 

Is it still quicker for you to load an image, even a slipstreamed one with the majority of your third-party programs on it?  Also, did you try benchmarking the system to measure the difference in performance between your own cleaning operation versus a generic Windows install?

 

Regards,

 

Aryeh Goretsky

You really can't beat a clean install of Windows from a blank ISO, though I use Advanced Uninstaller to remove bloatware, it's pretty thorough at getting rid of the junk most uninstallers leave behind.

In any case, total time spent was under an hour.  Call it 45 minutes to be generous.

I can install Windows faster than that from a good USB stick, even on an HDD (not SSD) based system. That should answer your question. And while I can waste time rooting through the registry, Program Files, AppData, Windows and all the other places crapware 'uninstallers' leave residue behind in, why should I bother? Clean install from unmodified ISO = 100% guarantee of no extraneous crap whatsoever. Couldn't be simpler.

  • Like 2

One thing I loved recently - I bought a HP Stream 7 tablet from a microsoft store recently to play with - it was what they call the "signature edition". It had no bloatware at all, other than one tiny little warranty check utility. 

 

It was quite refreshing.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      460
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!